A Comprehensive Review of Quality of Aquaculture Services in Integrated Multi-Trophic Systems
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Quality of Aquaculture Services in IMTA
- Land-based IMTA, applied in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments, aligns with sustainable development goals through a holistic aquaculture approach. These systems, typically employing recirculating aquaculture systems (RASs), integrate fish cultivation with extractive species. The primary challenge lies in maintaining water quality within the recirculating systems.
- Freshwater (lakes and ponds) IMTA. IMTA systems in lakes operate in a natural environment, which makes it difficult to control nutrients and wastes, as these can be dispersed and affect the balance of the surrounding ecosystem. In addition, it is essential to monitor water quality to keep it within safe parameters for all species involved.
- Marine or coastal IMTA systems face unique challenges in waste management and nutrient monitoring due to environmental dynamics and scale. These systems must adapt to constant changes, such as temperature and water composition fluctuations, which impact system health and operational sustainability. Typically, coastal IMTA integrates finfish, shellfish, and macroalgae, where finfish waste provides nutrients for shellfish and algae, enhancing productivity and reducing environmental impacts.
- Key areas where QoAS is applied in IMTA (Figure 2):
- IoAT. Real-time monitoring systems are essential to ensure the health and sustainability of aquaculture farms. The use of IoAT sensors and data analysis platforms to monitor key variables such as pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and salinity allows aquaculture operators to detect changes early. However, detection alone is insufficient without the presence of technical devices, called engineering actors. These devices, such as heaters, coolers, pH regulators, and salinity adjustment systems, allow operators to respond effectively by automating corrective actions. Together, IoAT sensors and technical devices form an integrated system that reduces the risk of mass mortality, improves fish health, and ensures optimal conditions for aquatic organisms, playing a vital role in the future of sustainable aquaculture.
- Optimisation of resource use (water, food, energy). The efficiency in the use of resources is paramount in aquaculture, particularly in the context of reducing operational costs and enhancing sustainability. A high-quality aquaculture system must ensure efficient resource allocation while minimising disruptions to the ecosystem and production processes. One of the most promising advancements in this area is the implementation of intelligent systems that automatically adjust feed distribution based on real-time data regarding fish behaviour. This approach not only improves feed conversion ratios but also mitigates waste, thereby contributing to a more sustainable aquaculture practice. Intelligent feeding systems leverage technologies such as sensors, cameras, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to monitor fish behaviour and environmental conditions continuously. By analysing data in real-time, these systems can determine the optimal amount of feed to distribute, ensuring that fish receive the necessary nutrients without overfeeding. Overfeeding not only leads to increased costs but also contributes to water pollution and the degradation of the aquatic environment due to uneaten feed decomposing and releasing harmful substances into the water.
- Automation and control systems. Control and automation systems in aquaculture must be reliable, scalable, and exhibit low latency to effectively manage large volumes of data and facilitate quick decision-making. By automating the management of environmental conditions and feed supply through networks of connected sensors, aquaculture operations can achieve efficient production and enhance sustainability. The continued development and implementation of these systems will be essential for the future of aquaculture.
- Communications and connectivity in Smart Aquaculture Farms. Ensuring reliable connectivity between IoT devices and control systems is essential for the effective monitoring and management of aquaculture environments. The use of low-power wide-area networks (LPWANs) and 5G technology provides robust solutions for connecting devices in remote locations, ensuring efficient and continuous data transmission. As aquaculture continues to evolve, the integration of these advanced networking technologies will be crucial for enhancing the sustainability and productivity of the sector.
- Data storage and processing. The efficient processing and storage of large amounts of data from water quality and fish behaviour sensors are critical for successful aquaculture management. Cloud-based platforms offer a robust solution for storing and analysing massive datasets, providing real-time insights that facilitate informed decision-making on feeding, oxygenation, and other production aspects. As aquaculture continues to evolve, the integration of cloud technology will be essential for enhancing productivity and sustainability.
- QoAS policy. The enhancement of aquaculture service quality within IMTA can be achieved through robust policy frameworks that define clear regulatory standards for water treatment, species health, and environmental sustainability. It is also crucial to implement training and education programs for aquaculture professionals, ensuring they possess the skills needed to deliver high-quality IMTA services. Continuous monitoring and evaluation policies should be introduced to assess the environmental and operational impacts of IMTA systems, thereby refining service quality standards over time to meet sustainability objectives. By adopting these comprehensive policy considerations, aquaculture services within IMTA systems can become increasingly sustainable, efficient, and environmentally responsible.
4. A Comprehensive Review of QoAS in IMTA
- The Higher Level (Primary Aquaculture: Fish and Crustaceans) contains the following:
- (a)
- IoAT systems can monitor vital parameters such as water quality, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and ammonia levels. This real-time monitoring enables early detection of potential problems and helps maintain optimal conditions for fish production. However, detecting issues is only the first step; implementing corrective actions requires the integration of technical devices, or actuators, which allow operators or automated systems to respond effectively. For instance, maintaining temperature may require heaters or coolers, while pH adjustments depend on acid/base regulators, and salinity control necessitates systems for managing salt solutions and freshwater inputs. The combination of IoAT sensors and these actuators ensures efficient, automated management of environmental conditions.Table 1 summarises the main types of IMTA systems and the specific challenges faced in different environments (terrestrial/land, lake, and marine/coastal). Additionally, it outlines the solutions that IoAT and QoAS technologies provide to address these challenges, offering a more efficient and sustainable approach to managing each type of IMTA system. In open systems, it is challenging to directly alter environmental parameters such as temperature, pH, or salinity due to their exposure to natural dynamics. However, indirect strategies, such as adjusting the density of fed organisms or modifying feeding practices, can help maintain a balanced system. These approaches allow for partial control over nutrient input and waste production, which are critical for sustaining aquaculture operations in open environments.
- (b)
- Blockchain for traceability. The adoption of blockchain technology ensures the traceability of aquaculture products, from their production to the final consumer, thereby guaranteeing transparency and the certification of the sustainability of the entire process. This approach allows for the verification of each stage in the product’s life cycle, promoting responsible practices within aquaculture and building trust among consumers.
- Intermediate Level (Filter feeders: Mussels, Clams) contains the following:
- (a)
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) for filtering optimisation. The application of AI and machine learning (ML) in the optimisation of aquaculture systems extends beyond filtration and water quality. In trophic level 1, AI can be applied to determine the optimal density of fed organisms and improve feeding practices. By analysing environmental and biological data, AI enables precise adjustments that enhance resource efficiency and minimise waste, providing an alternative to traditional economic-based decisions. For trophic level 2, AI supports filtration system optimisation through advanced data analysis and process automation, reducing human error and improving overall system performance. These technologies play a vital role in ensuring sustainable and efficient aquaculture operations [9].
- (b)
- Underwater drones. Underwater drones are being recognised as cutting-edge instruments for assessing the health of aquatic ecosystems, particularly in aquaculture. These unmanned vehicles can perform comprehensive inspections of aquatic infrastructure and identify potential risks, such as diseases or parasites, that may impact farmed species. Their capacity to function in challenging environments, combined with advanced sensors, renders them indispensable allies in the pursuit of sustainable aquaculture management [10,11].
- Lower Tier (Primary Producers: Algae, Aquatic Plants, and Vegetables) contains the following:
- (a)
- Biotechnology, Gene Editing (CRISPR), and Artificial Intelligence (AI): Genetically modified algae (GM algae) represent a significant advancement in biotechnology and aquaculture, offering potential solutions to both environmental and economic challenges by enhancing growth and performance. These algae can be specifically engineered to improve nutrient absorption, accelerate growth under controlled conditions, and produce valuable compounds, such as biofuels and pharmaceutical components. However, while CRISPR technology has shown promise in modifying single organisms, its application in complex, interlinked biological systems remains largely theoretical. Future research must carefully assess the feasibility, ethical implications, and environmental risks of such approaches to ensure responsible and sustainable innovation. In addition to biotechnology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays a pivotal role in optimising the growth of algae and plants, particularly in response to dynamic weather conditions. AI systems can analyse environmental data, predict changes, and automate adjustments to growth conditions, such as light, temperature, and nutrient availability. This integration of AI not only complements human decision-making but also improves the reliability and efficiency of aquaculture systems, ensuring resilience against environmental variability.
- (b)
- Terrestrial vegetables in RAS integration: Combining RASs with the cultivation of terrestrial vegetables, such as basil, tomato, and lettuce, represents a practical and sustainable approach to removing dissolved inorganic nutrients. These plants not only contribute to nutrient recycling but also offer an additional economic benefit by diversifying production outputs. Their integration into aquaculture systems complements the role of algae and aquatic plants, providing a multi-faceted solution for nutrient management.
- (c)
- Machine learning for growth prediction. By utilising machine learning, historical and environmental data can be examined to enhance the growth conditions of algae, allowing for predictions regarding when algae will attain their ideal harvest size to optimise productivity.
- Recycling Cycle of Waste Recovery contains the following:
- (a)
- Bioreactors for carbon and waste capture: Bioreactors for carbon and waste capture in aquaculture are innovative technologies designed to address environmental challenges. These systems convert organic waste into useful products, such as biofuels or fertilisers, and capture CO₂, thereby contributing to the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
- (b)
- Automated waste handling systems and insect larvae: Automated systems for managing aquaculture waste play a crucial role in improving sustainability and operational efficiency. In closed systems, such as RASs, settling tanks are commonly used to collect and dewater organic waste, enabling easier recycling and disposal. Additionally, innovative approaches, such as the use of insect larvae (e.g., black soldier fly larvae), can transform organic waste into valuable by-products like protein-rich feed or compost.In open systems, waste management presents unique challenges due to the dispersion of sediments. Emerging solutions include robotic technologies capable of cleaning and collecting sediment from the environment, ensuring that waste is managed effectively without harming surrounding ecosystems. These advancements are essential for establishing more efficient and sustainable nutrient recycling cycles in diverse aquaculture systems.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sánchez-Jérez, P.; Babarro, J.M.F.; Padín, X.A.; Portabales, A.L.; Martínez-Llorens, S.; Ballester-Berman, J.D.; Magano, M.C. Cumulative Climatic Stressors Strangle Marine Aquaculture: Ancillary Effects of COVID-19 on Spanish Mariculture. Aquaculture 2022, 549, 737749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexander, K.; Potts, T.; Freeman, S.; Israel, D.; Johansen, J.; Kletou, D.; Angel, D.L. The Implications of Aquaculture Policy and Regulation for the Development of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture in Europe. Aquaculture 2015, 443, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azhar, M.H.; Memiş, D. Utilization of Duckweeds (Lemna minor) as an Extractive Species in Rearing Juvenile Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum, 1792) Using the Open System. Res. Sq. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kambey, C.S.B.; Chung, I.K. A STELLA Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture System (IMTA). Aquac. Indones. 2016, 16, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangano, M.C.; Berlino, M.; Corbari, L.; Milisenda, G.; Lucchese, M.; Terzo, S.; Sarà, G. The Aquaculture Supply Chain in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic: Vulnerability, Resilience, Solutions, and Priorities at the Global Scale. Environ. Sci. Policy 2022, 127, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nederlof, M.; Verdegem, M.; Smaal, A.; Jansen, H. Nutrient Retention Efficiencies in Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture. Rev. Aquacult. 2021, 14, 1194–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chopin, T. Aquaculture, Integrated Multi-trophic (IMTA). In Sustainable Food Production; Christou, P., Savin, R., Costa-Pierce, B.A., Misztal, I., Whitelaw, C.B.A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Moher, D. Updating Guidance for Reporting Systematic Reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 Statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2021, 134, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lebel, L.; Lebel, P. Aquaculture production and its environmental sustainability in Thailand: Challenges and potential solutions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-López, B.; Merkoçi, A. Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection: An updated review. Biosensors 2022, 12, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baena-Navarro, R.; Carriazo-Regino, Y.; Torres-Hoyos, F.; Pinedo-López, J. Intelligent Prediction and Continuous Monitoring of Water Quality in Aquaculture: Integration of Machine Learning and Internet of Things for Sustainable Management. Water 2025, 17, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, J.C.R.; Bega, J.M.M.; Ribeiro, N.U.F.; Ricardi, A.M.; Matsumoto, T. Sistema de Recirculación de Agua con Reactor Aerado en Membrana en la Producción Intensiva de Tilapia. Periódico Eletrônico Fórum Ambient. Da Alta Paul. 2019, 15, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Barraza, C.; Trejo-Martínez, A.B.; Loredo-Osti, J.C.; Gutiérrez-Salazar, G. Evaluación de la Eficiencia Productiva de Tres Líneas de Tilapia con Reversión Sexual en un Sistema de Recirculación (RAS). Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 2016, 44, 869–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez-Montealegre, R.; Zamora-Castro, J.E.; Zúñiga-Calero, G. Determinación del Flujo de Agua para la Biorremediación en Sistemas Recirculados Acuaculturales Utilizando Tapetes Microbianos Construidos. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 2015, 43, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Sayed, A.F.M. Tilapia Culture, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Y.B.; Choi, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Jo, A.H.; Lee, K.M.; Kim, J.H. Biofloc technology in fish aquaculture: A review. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Troell, M.; Joyce, A.; Chopin, T.; Neori, A.; Buschmann, A.H. Ecological engineering in aquaculture—Potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) in marine offshore systems. Aquaculture 2009, 295, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega, M.L.; Castán, L.V.; Olivares, M.S.; Jiménez, M.A.L.; Castro, R.D.L. Presencia de Coliformes Fecales y Totales en el Isognomon alatus en la Laguna de Tampamachoco, Veracruz. Rev. Biol. Agropec. Tuxpan 2014, 2, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González, E.C.G.; Contreras, M.V.S.; Caldera, Y. Flotación por Aire Disuelto con Coagulante Policloruro de Aluminio para Aguas Residuales de Industrias Avícolas. Rev. Boliviana Ing. 2020, 1, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, S.; Chen, Z.; Ghonimy, A.; Li, J.; Zhao, F. Bivalves Improved Water Quality by Changing Bacterial Composition in Sediment and Water in an IMTA System. Aquacult. Res. 2023, 2023, 1930201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shipton, T.A.; Hasan, M.R. An overview of the current status of feed management practices. FAO Fish. Aquac. Tech. Pap. 2013, 583, 3–20. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fishery/docs/CDrom/T583/root/01.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2025).
- Cui, M.; Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Zhao, J.; Li, D.; Wang, W. Fish Tracking, Counting, and Behaviour Analysis in Digital Aquaculture: A Comprehensive Review. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.17800. [Google Scholar]
- Gómez, C.; García, J.; Pérez, J.; Fernández, M. Revolutionizing Aquaculture Practices: IoT and Deep Learning-based Remote Monitoring for Sustainable Fish Farming. IEEE Conf. Ind. Electron. Appl. 2023, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.-H.; Wu, Y.-C.; Zhang, J.-X.; Chen, Y.-H. IoT-Based Fish Farm Water Quality Monitoring System. Sensors 2022, 22, 6700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joyce, G.M.; Priyadarshini, J.S. Analogizing the Role of IoT and Data Analytics for Smart Irrigation and Aquaculture. In Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies (ICTCS 2022); Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amazon. Amazon Web Services. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/iot/ (accessed on 2 September 2024).
- Vernova, G. GE Predix Platform. Available online: https://www.ge.com/digital/iiot-platform/predix-edge (accessed on 2 September 2024).
- Google. Google Cloud Platforms (Google IoT). Available online: https://cloud.google.com/iot-core (accessed on 3 September 2024).
- AgriSync, L. AgricSync. Available online: https://www.agrisyncer.com/ (accessed on 8 September 2024).
- Bushel Inc. Bushel Farm. Available online: https://bushelfarm.com/ (accessed on 9 September 2024).
- Capetillo-Contreras, O.; Pérez-Reynoso, F.D.; Zamora-Antuñano, M.A.; Álvarez-Alvarado, J.M.; Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J. Artificial Intelligence-Based Aquaculture System for Optimizing the Quality of Water: A Systematic Analysis. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goddard, S. Feed Management in Intensive Aquaculture; Springer: Nueva York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira, M.I.D.; Mendoza, W.V.A.; Caluguillín, V.I.C.; Aguilar, P.J.N.; Villafuerte, C.R.D. Sistemas acuapónicos para el desarrollo sostenible de las zonas rurales de Manabí. Rev. Iberoam. Ambiente Sustentabilidad 2019, 2, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guarnizo Sánchez, N.A.; Contreras Gómez, A.E.Y. Acuaponía urbana: Fomentando la agricultura sostenible en entornos urbanos. Rev. Nodo 2023, 18, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Califano, G.; Kwantes, M.; Abreu, M.H.; Costa, R.; Wichard, T. Cultivating the macroalgal holobiont: Effects of integrated multi-trophic aquaculture on the microbiome of Ulva rigida (Chlorophyta). Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerozi, B.S.; Arlotta, C.G.; Richardson, M.L. Fish Effluent as a Source of Water and Nutrients for Sustainable Urban Agriculture. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León Ganchozo, M.; Navarrete Gómez, R.; Franco Moreira, G.; Risco Chacón, J. Implementación de tecnologías de la industria 4.0 para la seguridad industrial de pymes. Rev. Científica Arbitr. Multidiscip. Pentaciencias 2023, 5, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goda, A.M.A.-S.; Aboseif, A.M.; Taha, M.K.S.; Mohammady, E.Y.; Aboushabana, N.M.; Nazmi, H.M.; Zaher, M.M.; Aly, H.A.; El-Okaby, M.A.S.; Otazua, N.I.; et al. Optimizing nutrient utilization, hydraulic loading rate, and feed conversion ratios through freshwater IMTA-aquaponic and hydroponic systems as an environmentally sustainable aquaculture concept. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 14878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martínez, R.F.; Vela, N.; Aatik, A.E.; Murray, E.; Roche, P.C.; Navarro, J.M. On the use of an IoT integrated system for water quality monitoring and management in wastewater treatment plants. Water 2020, 12, 1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robledo, D.; Navarro-Angulo, L.; Vázquez-Lozano, D.; Freile-Pelegrín, Y. Nutrient removal efficiency of Hydropuntia cornea in an integrated closed recirculation system with pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis. Aquac Res. 2014, 45, 1648–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pucci, G.; Acuña, A.J.; Pucci, O.H. Biodegradación de hidrocarburos en fondos de tanques de la industria petrolera. Rev. Peru. Biol. 2015, 22, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chopin, T.; Cooper, J.A.; Reid, G.; Cross, S.; Moore, C. Open-water integrated multi-trophic aquaculture: Environmental biomitigation and economic diversification of fed aquaculture by extractive aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2012, 4, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chopin, T.; Troell, M.; Reid, G.; Knowler, D.; Robinson, S. Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture. Part I. Current Status and Challenges. Glob. Aquac. Advocate 2010, 13, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Chen, X.; Shih, W.; Lin, C.; Yen, J.; Huang, C.; Yen, Y. Smart water quality monitoring technology for fish farms using cellphone camera sensor. Sens. Mater. 2023, 35, 3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Rehmani, M.H.; Rachedi, A. A Survey on 5G and LPWAN-IoT for Improved Smart Cities and Remote Area Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 6313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malthus, T.J.; Ohsan, R.; Woerd, H.v.D. An evaluation of citizen science smartphone apps for inland water quality assessment. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, E.S.; Alharbi, A.A.; Oshaba, A.S.; El-Emary, A. Enhancing smart irrigation efficiency: A new WSN-based localization method for water conservation. Water 2024, 16, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaezi, M.; Azari, A.; Khosravirad, S.R.; Shirvanimoghaddam, M.; Azari, M.M.; Chasaki, D.; Popovski, P. Cellular, wide-area, and non-terrestrial IoT: A survey on 5G advances and the road towards 6G. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2107.03059. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Gao, Q.; Dong, S.; Zhou, C. Deep Learning for Smart Fish Farming: Applications, Opportunities and Challenges. 2020. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11848 (accessed on 20 November 2024).
- Reichstein, M.; Camps-Valls, G.; Stevens, B.; Jung, M.; Denzler, J.; Carvalhais, N.; Prabhat. Deep Learning and Process Understanding for Data-Driven Earth System Science. Nature 2019, 566, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, B.; Wang, C.; Du, K.-L.; Li, Y.; Li, Y. A Smart Aquaculture System Exploiting IoT, AI and Cloud Computing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Smart Internet of Things (SmartIoT), Xining, China, 25–27 August 2023; pp. 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashid, M.M.; Nayan, A.A.; Rahman, M.O.; Simi, S.A.; Saha, J.; Kibria, M.G. IoT-Based Smart Water Quality Prediction for Biofloc Aquaculture. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2021, 12, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, R.R.; Puccinelli, J.B.; Poersch, L.; Pias, M.R.; Oliveira, V.M.; Janati, A.; Paris, M. Towards Precision Aquaculture: A High Performance, Cost-effective IoT Approach. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2105.11493. [Google Scholar]
- CropX Inc. CropX. Available online: https://cropx.com (accessed on 9 September 2024).
- Bayer Crop Science. Climate FieldView. Available online: https://www.agro.bayer.com.br/climate-fieldview (accessed on 7 September 2024).
- Deere & Company. John Deere Operations Center. Available online: https://www.deere.com/en/technology-products/precision-ag-technology/operations-center/ (accessed on 9 September 2024).
- Trimble Inc. Trimble Ag Software; Trimble Inc.: Westminster, CO, USA, 2018; Available online: https://ptxtrimble.com/en/products/software/trimble-agriculture-software (accessed on 7 January 2025).
Type of IMTA | Specific Problems | IoAT/QoAS Solutions |
---|---|---|
Terrestrial/Land-based IMTA | Managing water quality, ensuring nutrient balance, and maintaining recirculation efficiency to prevent waste accumulation. | IoAT: Real-time sensors for monitoring water quality and nutrient levels. QoAS: Automated systems for optimising recirculation and reducing waste. |
Lake and pond IMTA | Managing nutrients and waste dispersion in natural ecosystems to prevent ecological imbalance. | IoAT: Real-time environmental sensors for continuous water quality monitoring. QoAS: Dynamic adjustments to maintain stable and safe water parameters. |
Marine or coastal IMTA | Managing waste and monitoring nutrients in dynamic environments, requiring adaptation to environmental changes like temperature and water composition. | IoAT: Underwater sensors and aquatic drones for real-time tracking of water conditions and nutrient levels. QoAS: Adaptive systems to adjust parameters dynamically and ensure system sustainability. |
Technology | Summary | Actors/Actions |
---|---|---|
Recirculating Aquaculture Systems | Treats and recycles water using biofiltration, mechanical filtration, UV disinfection, and degassing. Maximises water reuse and reduces environmental impact [12,13,14,15,16]. | Operators monitor and adjust systems to maintain water quality. |
Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) | Integrates species from different trophic levels for nutrient reuse and waste reduction. Includes technologies like filter organisms and Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) [17,18,19,20,21]. | Managers select species; technicians monitor ecosystem health and filtration systems. |
IoAT Sensors | Monitors parameters (temperature, oxygen, pH) in real-time, enabling automated responses and optimised conditions [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. | Technicians respond to alarms; automated systems adjust settings based on sensor data. |
Automated Feeding Systems | Feed dosage adjusts in real-time based on behaviour, reducing waste and improving efficiency [31,32]. | Sensors detect patterns; technicians troubleshoot feeding systems in real-time. |
Advanced Sensors and Biosensors | Detect pathogens, toxins, and nitrogenous compounds in water, enabling early intervention and organism health [33,34,35,36]. | Labs analyse samples; automated systems alert staff to apply preventive treatments. |
Digital Twins and Simulation | Simulate real-time aquaculture systems, optimising operation and reducing errors [37,38,39]. | Analysts configure systems; operators adjust parameters based on simulations. |
Blockchain for Traceability | Ensures transparency and trust in supply chains by recording product provenance [40]. | Quality control staff perform audits; operators record and verify product origins. |
Polyculture and Sustainability in IMTA | Integrates low trophic level species to balance ecosystems and reduce pathogens [41,42,43]. | Managers select species; technicians monitor ecosystem health and species balance. |
Cloud-Based Platforms | Facilitate real-time data storage and analysis for decision-making (e.g., AWS IoT, Google Cloud Platform, Climate FieldView) [44]. | Technicians upload and monitor data; operators adjust systems remotely. |
Connectivity and 5G Networks | Improves IoT connectivity in remote areas, enabling real-time monitoring and management [45,46,47,48]. | Technicians ensure network stability; IoAT sensors relay real-time data. |
Automated Analysis and Big Data | Machine learning predicts events (disease outbreaks, water changes), improving efficiency and decision-making [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. | Data analysts interpret AI alerts; technicians implement operational adjustments. |
Environmental Monitoring and Control | Real-time platforms monitor parameters (oxygen, temperature, pH) and adjust conditions automatically [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. | Technicians respond to alarms; automated systems make adjustments based on sensor data. |
Durable Aquaculture Infrastructure | Advanced materials (e.g., recycled plastics, biopolymers) reduce costs and improve resilience in harsh environments [47]. | Engineers select materials; staff inspect and maintain structures. |
QoAS Training and Costs | High costs and training requirements challenge QoAS adoption in rural areas [22]. | Trainers train technicians; project managers manage budgets. |
Policies and Funding | Government incentives and funding support small-scale adoption of advanced technologies [22]. | Policymakers design subsidies; financial institutions provide loans to aquaculture producers. |
Proposal | Description |
---|---|
Smart sensors | Development of sensors for real-time monitoring of critical parameters (water quality, temperature, dissolved oxygen) connected to IoT platforms. |
Management systems with machine learning | Use of algorithms to analyse real-time and historical data, predict disease outbreaks, and optimise feeding strategies. |
Drone and remote sensing technologies | Use of drones to monitor crop health and water quality, allowing for periodic assessments and early detection of issues. |
E-learning platforms | Training producers in IoAT technologies and IMTA management through online courses on sustainable practices. |
Collaborative networks | Creation of networks between researchers, producers, and technology companies to share knowledge and resources. |
Mobile applications | Development of apps for managing IMTA systems remotely, integrating sensor data and recommendations into intuitive interfaces. |
Integration with renewable energy | Use of solar panels to reduce operational costs and minimise environmental impact. |
Technology | Potential Impact |
---|---|
Solar panels | Renewable and sustainable energy source to reduce operational costs and carbon footprint. |
Water recycling technologies | Treatment and reuse of water, especially relevant in water-scarce regions. |
Energy storage | Use of lithium-ion batteries or grid storage to manage energy from renewable sources. |
Satellite monitoring | Collection of data on temperature, water quality, and crop health from space. |
Cloud-based analytics platforms | Real-time data collection and analysis to enhance decision-making in IMTA systems. |
Underwater inspection robots | Monitoring of aquaculture infrastructure (e.g., culture nets) to detect damage or debris accumulation. |
Artificial Intelligence | Optimisation of decision-making through advanced data analysis. |
Nanotechnology | Research into disease treatments using nanoparticles to reduce antibiotic resistance and improve crop health. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ruiz-Vanoye, J.A.; Diaz-Parra, O.; Márquez Vera, M.A.; Fuentes-Penna, A.; Barrera-Cámara, R.A.; Ruiz-Jaimes, M.A.; Toledo-Navarro, Y.; Bernábe-Loranca, M.B.; Simancas-Acevedo, E.; Trejo-Macotela, F.R.; et al. A Comprehensive Review of Quality of Aquaculture Services in Integrated Multi-Trophic Systems. Fishes 2025, 10, 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10020054
Ruiz-Vanoye JA, Diaz-Parra O, Márquez Vera MA, Fuentes-Penna A, Barrera-Cámara RA, Ruiz-Jaimes MA, Toledo-Navarro Y, Bernábe-Loranca MB, Simancas-Acevedo E, Trejo-Macotela FR, et al. A Comprehensive Review of Quality of Aquaculture Services in Integrated Multi-Trophic Systems. Fishes. 2025; 10(2):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10020054
Chicago/Turabian StyleRuiz-Vanoye, Jorge A., Ocotlan Diaz-Parra, Marco A. Márquez Vera, Alejandro Fuentes-Penna, Ricardo A. Barrera-Cámara, Miguel A. Ruiz-Jaimes, Yadira Toledo-Navarro, María Beatríz Bernábe-Loranca, Eric Simancas-Acevedo, Francisco R. Trejo-Macotela, and et al. 2025. "A Comprehensive Review of Quality of Aquaculture Services in Integrated Multi-Trophic Systems" Fishes 10, no. 2: 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10020054
APA StyleRuiz-Vanoye, J. A., Diaz-Parra, O., Márquez Vera, M. A., Fuentes-Penna, A., Barrera-Cámara, R. A., Ruiz-Jaimes, M. A., Toledo-Navarro, Y., Bernábe-Loranca, M. B., Simancas-Acevedo, E., Trejo-Macotela, F. R., & Vera-Jiménez, M. A. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Quality of Aquaculture Services in Integrated Multi-Trophic Systems. Fishes, 10(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10020054