Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Chiral Organosulfur Compounds on Their Activity against the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence of Mutated Colistin-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Treatments and Predictors of Mortality for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infections in Malaysia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

by
Usman Abubakar
1,*,
Amni Izzati Zulkarnain
2,
Jesús Rodríguez-Baño
3,
Norhidayah Kamarudin
4,
Mahmoud E. Elrggal
5,*,
Mohamed Hassan Elnaem
6,* and
Sabariah Noor Harun
1
1
Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, George Town 11800, Penang, Malaysia
2
Faculty of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25200, Pahang, Malaysia
3
Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Department of Medicine, Biomedicines Institute of Seville, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain
4
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kulliyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25200, Pahang, Malaysia
5
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
6
Quality Use of Medicines Research Group, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25200, Pahang, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7(12), 415; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7120415
Submission received: 6 November 2022 / Revised: 26 November 2022 / Accepted: 29 November 2022 / Published: 2 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
This study evaluated the treatments, mortality rate and patient-related factors associated with mortality. This is a retrospective study involving hospitalised patients with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia from January 2018 to June 2020. A clinical pharmacist reviewed patients’ electronic records and collected the data according to a pre-designed form. Data were analysed using both descriptive and inferential tests. The study included 145 patients with CR-GNB infections including 77, 40 and 28 Acinetobacter baumannii, enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively. The mean age was 57.9 ± 15.8 years. Pneumonia (40.7%) and bacteremia (25.5%) were the most common infections. Meropenem (24.7%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (20.4%) were the most commonly used empiric antibiotics while colistin (63.3%) and amikacin (8.3%) were the most common definitive antibiotics. The mean duration before active antibiotics was 4.6 ± 3.3 days. Overall, the in-hospital mortality rate was 41.4%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that intensive care unit (ICU) admission (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 5.201; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.603–16.872; p = 0.006), sepsis/septic shock (AOR: 3.430; 95% CI: 1.021–11.522; p = 0.049) and elevated serum creatinine (AOR: 2.752; 95% CI: 1.005–7.536; p = 0.049) were independently associated with mortality. The mortality rate among patients with CR-GNB infection is high. A high rate of inappropriate antibiotic use was observed, including combination antibiotic therapy and delays in starting active antibiotics. Mortality was significantly associated with ICU admission, sepsis/septic shock and elevated serum creatinine.

1. Introduction

Carbapenems are one of the last-lines of antibiotics used for the treatment of serious infections caused by multidrug resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase inhibitor positive pathogens [1,2]. An increase in the use of carbapenems has led to the emergence and spread of carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) infections have become common in the last decade and they are rapidly spreading in healthcare settings posing serious threats to public health worldwide [3]. CR-GNB cause a wide range of infections, including bacteremia, urinary tract infections, pneumonia and intra-abdominal infections [4]. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) are ranked at the top of the global antibiotic-resistant bacteria priority list [5]. In addition, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has classified CRE and CRAB along with multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa as urgent and serious threats, respectively [6].
Although, the mechanism of resistance and the risk factors for CRAB, CRPA and CRE infections vary, there are some common risk factors associated with infections caused by these pathogens including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of hospitalisation and previous exposure to carbapenems [7,8,9,10,11,12]. The acquisition of carbapenem-hydrolysing β-lactamases or carbapenemases is the most common and clinically important mechanism underlying carbapenem resistance, which causes resistance to carbapenems as well as other β-lactam antibiotics [13]. The therapeutic options for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections are extremely limited. Carbapenem-resistant infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality [4]. Previous studies have shown that mortality rate ranges from 48% to 57.4% for CRE [14,15], 52.7% for CRAB [7,16] and 8% to 18.4% for CRPA [17]. In addition, carbapenem-resistant infections are associated with longer hospitalisation [18], while the total excess cost of treatment is estimated to be USD 3966 per patient [19].
In Malaysia, inappropriate use of antibiotics among patients has been reported [20,21,22]. About 50% of antibiotic prescriptions among inpatients are non-compliant with guidelines [20]. This contributes to the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. In addition, evidence has shown that carbapenems are commonly used for the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae [23]. The prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobactaeriaceae ranged between 0.3% and 5.7% [24,25]. This highlights an important antimicrobial stewardship opportunity for hospital pharmacists to promote rational use of antibiotics and prevent antimicrobial resistance. Understanding the treatment outcomes and the factors associated with treatment failure and mortality is important to design effective interventions to improve treatment outcomes among hospitalised patients in Malaysia. Therefore, the objective of this study is to describe the treatments, mortality rate and factors associated with mortality among hospitalised patients with CR-GNB infections

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Inclusion Criteria

A retrospective cohort study including all hospitalised patients with infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) from January 2018 to June 2020 was conducted in a 350-bed tertiary hospital providing medical, surgical, intensive care, pharmacy, laboratory, nursing and orthopaedic care, located in the eastern coast of Malaysia. A list of all patients with infections due to CRE, CRAB and CRPA was obtained from the medical microbiology unit of the hospital. Patients with CRE, CRAB and CRPA colonisation and those with positive CRE, CRAB and CRPA culture without hospitalisation were also excluded.

2.2. Data Collection, Variables and Definitions

The data were collected by a clinical pharmacist who was experienced in antimicrobial stewardship and infectious diseases. The electronic medical records of the patients were reviewed to collect the following information: age, gender, race, ward of admission, type of infection (hospital/community-acquired), dates of admission, onset of symptoms and discharge or death, recent hospitalisations, recent surgery, presence of comorbidities, source/type of infection [26] and presence of sepsis or shock [27]. Other information collected was microbiological data such as the specimen collected, pathogen isolated and its susceptibility pattern; laboratory parameters; treatment-related data such as empiric and definitive antibiotics; and outcome data (microbiological cure, discharge/transfer or death). The main outcome variable was in-hospital all-cause mortality. A patient was considered immunosuppressed by fulfilling any of the following criteria: presence of neutropenia, leukaemia, lymphoma and HIV infection with less than 200 CD4/mL, solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, cytotoxic chemotherapy, steroids (>15 mg of prednisone daily for > 2 weeks) [28]. Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed by automated system (Vitek 2) and interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations during the period under review. The study protocol was approved by the International Islamic University Malaysia Research Ethics Committee (IIUM/504/14/11/2/IREC 2020-099). Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. The data were de-identified before data analysis

2.3. Data Analysis

Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22. Data were de-identified before analysis. Categorical data were presented as frequency and percentage, while continuous data were presented as mean and standard deviation. The association between patients’ demographics, clinical, laboratory and treatment characteristics and in-hospital mortality was determined with univariate analysis using Chi-squared or Fisher test for categorical variables, and Student’s T-test or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables, as appropriate. Variables with a univariate p-value < 0.1 were considered for inclusion in multivariate logistic regression analysis; the variables were selected using a stepwise backward process. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients

A total of 145 patients were included in this analysis with a mean age of 57.9 ± 15.8 years and a male (68.3%) and Malay race (88.3%) preponderance (67.5%). More than 50% of the patients had intensive care unit admission. A history of carbapenem use in the preceding 30 days was noted in 40% of the cases. Pneumonia (40.7%) and bacteremia (25.5%) were the most common CRGNB infections. Sepsis/septic shock was reported in 64.1% of the patients, and 73.8% of the infections were hospital-acquired in nature. Table 1 summarises the characteristics of the patients included in the study.

3.2. Patients’ Laboratory Data and Vital Signs on the Day of Infection

Of the 145 patients, 11.0% were unconscious on the first day of the infection, and 53.8% were intubated. More than two-thirds had elevated total white blood cell count (71.7%) and low haemoglobin count (80.0%). In addition, more than 50% had elevated serum creatinine, urea and liver enzymes. The mean lowest systolic and diastolic blood pressure was 108 ± 22.1 and 58.6 ± 12.6, respectively (Table 1).

3.3. Microbiological Characteristics of the Infections

A. baumannii was the most common CR-GNB infection and represented 53.1% (n = 77), followed by K. pneumoniae (22.8%; n = 33) and P. aeruginosa (19.3%; n = 28). Twenty-one (14.5%) of the cases had concurrent fungal infections, of which 12 (57.1%) were secondary fungal infections (occurred after diagnosis of CR-NGB infection). One in five CR-GNB infections was polymicrobial in nature with Enterobacterales, S. aureus and Candida spp. being the most common pathogens involved. Table S1 in the supplementary material summarises the microbiology characteristics of the infections. Overall, there was more than 85% resistance of CRGNB pathogens to penicillins, penicillin plus beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and second, third and fourth generation cephalosporins. Susceptibility to cotrimoxazole, gentamicin, amikacin and colistin was 17.6%, 23.7%, 26.2% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity to gentamicin was significantly higher among CRPA (42.3%) and CRE (40.0%) isolates compared to CRAB (10.4%) isolates, p < 0.001. In addition, CRE (55.0%) and CRPA (42.9%) isolates were more susceptible to amikacin compared to CRAB (11.3%) isolates, p < 0.001. Conversely, susceptibility to cotrimoxazole was significantly higher among CRAB isolates (32.1%) compared to CRE (7.5%) and CRPA (0.0%) isolates, p = 0.042. Table S2 illustrates the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of CRGNB pathogens.

3.4. Empirical and Definitive Antibiotic Therapy for Carbapenem-Resistant Infections

A wide range of antibiotics was used for empirical therapy among the patients, with meropenem (24.7%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (20.4%) being the most commonly used. A combination of empirical antibiotics was used in 37.9% of the infection. Effective empirical antibiotics were observed in 11% of the infections. Colistin (63.3%) was the most commonly used definitive antibiotic among the patients, followed by amikacin (8.3%). About 41% received combination definitive antibiotic therapy including colistin-based (75.8%) and non- colistin-based (24.2%) combinations. The mean duration before effective antibiotics (the duration between onset of infection and the use of active antibiotics) was 4.6 days. Table 2 shows the empirical and definitive antibiotics used to treat CRGNB infections.

3.5. Treatment Outcomes and Univariate Regression Analysis for Factors Associated with in-Hospital Mortality

Overall, in-hospital and 14-day mortality rates were 41.4% and 23.4%, respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that ICU admission (odds ratio (OR): 10.766; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.537–25.544; p < 0.001), female gender (OR: 2.842; 95% CI: 1.383–5.842; p = 0.004), sepsis/septic shock (OR: 5.802; 95% CI: 2.539–13.257; p < 0.001), elevated creatinine (OR: 2.881; 95% CI: 1.411–5.881; p = 0.004) and thrombocytopenia (OR: 2.302; 95% CI: 1.025–5.170; p = 0.043) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (Table 3).

3.6. Multivariate Regression Analysis for the Predictors of Mortality

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed ICU admission (AOR: 5.201; 95% CI: 1.603–16.872; p = 0.006), sepsis/septic shock (AOR: 3.430; 95% CI: 1.021–11.522; p = 0.049) and elevated serum creatinine (AOR: 2.752; 95% CI: 1.005–7.536; p = 0.049) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality among the patients. Table 4 describes the multivariate logistic regression analysis for factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

4. Discussion

The current study showed that CRAB is the most common CR-GNB infection and that in-hospital mortality among patients with CR-GNB infections was high and associated with ICU admission, sepsis/septic shock and elevated serum creatinine. Colistin-based combination was the most commonly used definitive combination therapy. The study found that the mean age of the patients was about 58 years with a male preponderance. These results are consistent with previous studies for age [29,30] and gender [29,31], respectively. Older adults have a higher risk of CR-GNB infections due to multiple comorbidities, frequent hospitalisation and frequent exposure to antibiotics [15]. A previous study reported that prior use of carbapenem is an independent risk factor for CR-GNB infection [18]. Similarly, the current study found that more than one-thirds of the patients had used carbapenem antibiotics within 30 days prior to the isolation of a CR-GNB pathogen. The mechanism of carbapenem resistance may be intrinsic or mediated by transferable carbapenemase-encoding genes [32]. This finding indicates the need for antibiotic stewardship interventions to improve the appropriate use of carbapenems and reduce the emergence of carbapenem resistance among Gram-negative bacilli. Bacteremia and pneumonia were the most common infections caused by CR-GNB pathogens, and this is in consonance with the results of previous studies conducted in China and the United States [14,29]. This could be attributed to the use of invasive devices such as intubation/mechanical ventilation, enteral and parenteral feeding tubes, hemodialysis and central as well as peripheral catheterisation. Therefore, infection control and prevention strategies should be strengthened in patients exposed to invasive devices to prevent the transmission of resistant pathogens. This can be achieved by developing a flagging system for CRE, CRAB and CRPA colonisation to identify patient at risk earlier and implement appropriate measures such as patient isolation and contact precaution to prevent cross transmission
The current study revealed that meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam were the most commonly used antibiotics for empiric therapy. This is consistent with the result of a study conducted in China [10]. Meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam are frequently used as empiric therapy for patients with suspected extended-spectrum beta-lactamase infection [33,34], and this explains the high rate of usage of these antibiotics in patients with infection caused by CR-GNB. In practice, clinicians prefer to use combination antibiotic therapy for treatment of CR-GNB infections [4,35]. However, there is limited evidence to support the use of combination therapy. More than one-thirds of the patients were treated with combination empiric therapy in the current study. This result, coupled with the delay in initiating effective antibiotic therapy, indicates that most cases received inappropriate empiric antibiotics. A previous study reported that only one-third of infections caused by CR-GNB received appropriate empiric antibiotic treatment [36]. Our study revealed that only 11% of the patients received appropriate empiric antibiotic treatment. Inappropriate empiric antibiotic therapy is associated with increased risk of mortality in CR-GNB infections [36]. Therefore, antimicrobial stewardship interventions are recommended to promote the early administration of effective antibiotics and improve the use of antibiotics particularly in combination with antibiotic therapy. Inappropriate combination therapy may contribute to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and there is limited evidence to support the use of combination therapy in routine clinical practice [37]. This highlights the need for hospital pharmacists to provide antibiotic stewardship services and improve the use of antibiotics in the management of multidrug-resistant infections. The participation of hospital pharmacists in antimicrobial stewardship programs is limited [38] and future pharmacists are not well prepared to participate in stewardship activities [39]. Therefore, training practicing pharmacists and the incorporation of antimicrobial stewardship into undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy curriculum is recommended [40].
Overall, in-hospital and 14-day mortality rate was 41.4% and 23.4%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that sepsis or septic shock is independently associated with mortality and this corroborates the result of previous studies [36,41,42]. Sepsis/septic shock is a prominent predictor of mortality particularly when there is a delay in the administration of effective antibiotics [43]. CR-GNB infections are commonly associated with late diagnosis, high bacterial virulence and inappropriate antibiotic therapy; therefore, most cases will progress to sepsis/septic shock [44]. Therefore, interventions to promote the early administration of effective antibiotics and hemodynamic support within the early hours of recognition of sepsis/septic shock is recommended to reduce the risk of mortality. In addition, ICU admission is significantly associated with mortality because ICU patients are more likely to have severe underlying diseases and several comorbidities. The result also showed that patients who had elevated serum creatinine had 2.7 times higher risk of death compared to those without elevated serum creatinine. Elevated serum creatinine is an indicator of kidney injury. This could be attributed to either complications of infection (acute kidney injury in sepsis) or adverse effects from antibiotics used for the treatment of infection. Colistin and amikacin were the most commonly used definitive therapy in the current study and evidence has demonstrated a higher rate of kidney injury associated with the use of colistin in the management of CR-GNB infections [45,46]. Therefore, renal function should be closely monitored among patients with CR-GNB infections and renal dose adjustment should be administered in those with renal impairment.
Evidence has shown that inappropriate empiric antibiotic therapy increases the risk of mortality in patients with infections due to CR-GNB pathogens [47,48]. The current study revealed that inappropriate empiric antibiotics did not significantly increase mortality risk. This could be attributed to the small sample size in the current study. In addition, the mean duration before active antibiotics was 4.6 days which indicates a delay in the administration of effective treatments. These drug therapy issues are important opportunities for hospital pharmacists to improve the early administration of effective antibiotics among patients with multidrug-resistant infections. This study has several limitations, and the results should be interpreted with caution. Firstly, a retrospective study design was used and this design has some weaknesses in establishing the association between variables. Secondly, the study was conducted in a single hospital and this may limit the generalisability of the findings. Future studies should include a large sample and multiple centres. Thirdly, there are few missing data in the electronic medical records and this leads to an assessment bias in the study. Despite the limitations, this study provides an insight into the pattern of treatment and the factors that predict mortality in patients with infections caused by CR-GNB.

5. Conclusions

There are limited choices of antibiotics for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Inappropriate empiric therapy including the use of combination antibiotic therapy and delays in the initiation of active antibiotics is common in the treatment of infections caused by CR-GNB pathogens. Carbapenems and beta-lactam and beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations are the most commonly used empiric antibiotics. The mortality rate among patients with infections caused by CR-GNB is high and it is independently associated with ICU admission, sepsis/septic shock and elevated serum creatinine. Antibiotic stewardship interventions aimed at promoting early administration and appropriate use of antibiotics are recommended. Future research with a larger patient population and multiple centres is recommended.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/tropicalmed7120415/s1, Table S1: Microbiological characteristics of CRGNB infections; Table S2: Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the CRGNB isolates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.A. and A.I.Z.; methodology, U.A.; A.I.Z.; and J.R.-B.; formal analysis, U.A., M.H.E.; J.R.-B., and A.I.Z.; investigation, U.A., N.K. and A.I.Z.; data curation, U.A. and A.I.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, U.A., A.I.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.R.-B., M.H.E., N.K, M.E.E. and S.N.H.; supervision, U.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the International Islamic University Malaysia Research Ethics Committee (IIUM/504/14/11/2/IREC 2020-099).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the research. The patient records were reviewed several months after the patients were discharged from the hospital. Permission was granted by the hospital management before data collection. The data were de-identified before analysis.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University for their support of this work. Grant Code: 22UQU4320605DSR06.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fritzenwanker, M.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Herold, S.; Wagenlehner, F.M.; Zimmer, K.-P.; Chakraborty, T. Treatment options for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections. Dtsch. Ärzteblatt Int. 2018, 115, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, C.-S.; Doi, Y. Therapy of infections due to carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. Infect. Chemother. 2014, 46, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Logan, L.K.; Weinstein, R.A. The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: The impact and evolution of a global menace. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215 (Suppl. S1), S28–S36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Papst, L.; Beović, B.; Pulcini, C.; Durante-Mangoni, E.; Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Kaye, K.S.; Daikos, G.L.; Raka, L.; Paul, M.; Abbo, L.; et al. Antibiotic treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: An international ESCMID cross-sectional survey among infectious diseases specialists practicing in large hospitals. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, 1070–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Tacconelli, E.; Magrini, N.; Kahlmeter, G.; Singh, N. Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development of New Antibiotics; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 27, pp. 318–327. [Google Scholar]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/Biggest-Threats.html (accessed on 26 November 2022).
  7. Falagas, M.E.; Rafailidis, P.I.; Kofteridis, D.; Virtzili, S.; Chelvatzoglou, F.C.; Papaioannou, V.; Maraki, S.; Samonis, G.; Michalopoulos, A. Risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: A matched case–control study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 60, 1124–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Liu, P.; Li, X.; Luo, M.; Xu, X.; Su, K.; Chen, S.; Qing, Y.; Li, Y.; Qiu, J. Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection: A meta-analysis. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sheng, W.H.; Liao, C.H.; Lauderdale, T.L.; Ko, W.C.; Chen, Y.S.; Liu, J.W.; Lau, Y.J.; Wang, L.S.; Liu, K.S.; Tsai, T.Y.; et al. A multicenter study of risk factors and outcome of hospitalized patients with infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 14, e764–e769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Kim, Y.J.; Kim, S.I.; Kim, Y.R.; Hong, K.W.; Wie, S.H.; Park, Y.J.; Jeong, H.; Kang, M.W. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Diversity of resistant mechanisms and risk factors for infection. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012, 140, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Voor In ‘t Holt, A.F.; Severin, J.A.; Lesaffre, E.M.; Vos, M.C. A systematic review and meta-analyses show that carbapenem use and medical devices are the leading risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 2626–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Tsao, L.H.; Hsin, C.Y.; Liu, H.Y.; Chuang, H.C.; Chen, L.Y.; Lee, Y.J. Risk factors for healthcare-associated infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2018, 51, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Queenan, A.M.; Bush, K. Carbapenemases: The versatile β-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 440–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, X.; Xian, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, R.; Zhao, C.; et al. Risk factors and clinical outcomes for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae nosocomial infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 35, 1679–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ben-David, D.; Kordevani, R.; Keller, N.; Tal, I.; Marzel, A.; Gal-Mor, O.; Maor, Y.; Rahav, G. Outcome of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Du, X.; Xu, X.; Yao, J.; Deng, K.; Chen, S.; Shen, Z.; Yang, L.; Feng, G. Predictors of mortality in patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Infect. Control 2019, 47, 1140–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.L.; Huang, A.W.; Liu, S.L.; Liu, W.J.; Zhang, N.; Lu, X.Z. Mortality attributable to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2016, 5, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Ting, S.W.; Lee, C.H.; Liu, J.W. Risk factors and outcomes for the acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacillus bacteremia: A retrospective propensity-matched case control study. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2018, 51, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vargas-Alzate, C.A.; Higuita-Gutiérrez, L.F.; López-López, L.; Cienfuegos-Gallet, A.V.; Quiceno, J.N. High excess costs of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli in an endemic region. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 51, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jamaluddin, N.A.; Periyasamy, P.; Lau, C.L.; Ponnampalavanar, S.; Lai, P.S.; Ramli, R.; Tan, T.L.; Kori, N.; Yin, M.K.; Azman, N.J.; et al. Point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use in a Malaysian tertiary care university hospital. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tham, D.W.; Abubakar, U.; Tangiisuran, B. Prevalence and predictors of antibiotic use among children visiting the Emergency Department in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia. Eur. J. Pediatrics 2020, 179, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zammari, N.F.; Abubakar, U.; Che Alhadi, S.; Khan, F.U. Use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the prevalence and risk factors associated with surgical site infection in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Drugs Ther. Perspect. 2022, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abubakar, U.; Tangiisuran, B.; Elnaem, M.H.; Sulaiman, S.A.; Khan, F.U. Mortality and its predictors among hospitalized patients with infections due to extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) Enterobacteriaceae in Malaysia: A retrospective observational study. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zaidah, A.R.; Mohammad, N.I.; Suraiya, S.; Harun, A. High burden of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) fecal carriage at a teaching hospital: Cost-effectiveness of screening in low-resource setting. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2017, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Mohamed, N.A.; Said, H.M.; Hussin, H.; Abdul Rahman, N.; Hashim, R. Carbapenem-resistant enterobactericeae: Clinico-epidemiological perspective. Trop. Biomed. 2018, 35, 300–307. [Google Scholar]
  26. Garner, J.S.; Jarvis, W.R.; Emori, T.G.; Horan, T.C.; Hughes, J.M. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am. J. Infect. Control 1988, 16, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, B.; Rodríguez-Baño, J. Current options for the treatment of infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in different groups of patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 932–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cai, B.; Echols, R.; Magee, G.; Arjona Ferreira, J.C.; Morgan, G.; Ariyasu, M.; Sawada, T.; Nagata, T. Prevalence of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in the United States Predominated by Acinetobacter Baumannii and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2017, 25, ofx176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Porwal, R.; Gopalakrishnan, R.; Rajesh, N.J.; Ramasubramanian, V. Carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteremia in an Indian intensive care unit: A review of the clinical profile and treatment outcome of 50 patients. Indian J. Crit. Care Med. Peer-Rev. Off. Publ. Indian Soc. Crit. Care Med. 2014, 18, 750. [Google Scholar]
  31. Asai, N.; Sakanashi, D.; Suematsu, H.; Kato, H.; Hagihara, M.; Nishiyama, N.; Koizumi, Y.; Yamagishi, Y.; Mikamo, H. The epidemiology and risk factor of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae colonization and infections: Case control study in a single institute in Japan. J. Infect. Chemother. 2018, 24, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Codjoe, F.S.; Donkor, E.S. Carbapenem resistance: A review. Med. Sci. 2017, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Delgado-Valverde, M.; Sojo-Dorado, J.; Pascual, Á.; Rodríguez-Baño, J. Clinical management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2013, 1, 49–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Vasoo, S.; Barreto, J.N.; Tosh, P.K. Emerging issues in gram-negative bacterial resistance: An update for the practicing clinician. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 90, pp. 395–403. [Google Scholar]
  35. Carrara, E.; Savoldi, A.; Piddock, L.J.; Franceschi, F.; Ellis, S.; Sharland, M.; Brink, A.J.; Harris, P.N.; Gabriel, L.H.; Rohit, A.; et al. Clinical management of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: A worldwide cross-sectional survey addressing the use of antibiotic combinations. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 28, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Andria, N.; Henig, O.; Kotler, O.; Domchenko, A.; Oren, I.; Zuckerman, T.; Ofran, Y.; Fraser, D.; Paul, M. Mortality burden related to infection with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria among haematological cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 3146–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Abubakar, U. Antibiotic use among hospitalized patients in northern Nigeria: A multicenter point-prevalence survey. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Abubakar, U.; Tangiisuran, B. Nationwide survey of pharmacists’ involvement in antimicrobial stewardship programs in Nigerian tertiary hospitals. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 21, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abubakar, U.; Muhammad, H.T.; Sulaiman, S.A.; Ramatillah, D.L.; Amir, O. Knowledge and self-confidence of antibiotic resistance, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and antibiotic stewardship among pharmacy undergraduate students in three Asian countries. Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn. 2020, 12, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abubakar, U.; Sha’aban, A.; Mohammed, M.; Muhammad, H.T.; Sulaiman, S.A.; Amir, O. Knowledge and self-reported confidence in antimicrobial stewardship programme among final year pharmacy undergraduate students in Malaysia and Nigeria. Pharm. Educ. 2021, 21, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. de Maio Carrilho, C.M.; de Oliveira, L.M.; Gaudereto, J.; Perozin, J.S.; Urbano, M.R.; Camargo, C.H.; Grion, C.M.; Levin, A.S.; Costa, S.F. A prospective study of treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections and risk factors associated with outcome. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Russo, A.; Bassetti, M.; Ceccarelli, G.; Carannante, N.; Losito, A.R.; Bartoletti, M.; Corcione, S.; Granata, G.; Santoro, A.; Giacobbe, D.R.; et al. Bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Clinical features, therapy and outcome from a multicenter study. J. Infect. 2019, 79, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ferrer, R.; Martin-Loeches, I.; Phillips, G.; Osborn, T.M.; Townsend, S.; Dellinger, R.P.; Artigas, A.; Schorr, C.; Levy, M.M. Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: Results from a guideline-based performance improvement program. Crit. Care Med. 2014, 42, 1749–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Sabino, S.; Soares, S.; Ramos, F.; Moretti, M.; Zavascki, A.P.; Rigatto, M.H. A cohort study of the impact of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections on mortality of patients presenting with sepsis. Msphere 2019, 4, e00052-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Almangour, T.A.; Alruwaili, A.; Almutairi, R.; Alrasheed, A.; Alhifany, A.A.; Eljaaly, K.; Alkofide, H.; Alhammad, A.M.; Ghonem, L.; Alsharidi, A. Aerosolized plus intravenous colistin vs intravenous colistin alone for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: A retrospective cohort study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 108, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Almangour, T.A.; Ghonem, L.; Aljabri, A.; Alruwaili, A.; Al Musawa, M.; Damfu, N.; Almalki, M.S.; Alattas, M.; Abed, H.; Naeem, D.; et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin for the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: A multicenter cohort study. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Aydemir, H.; Celebi, G.; Piskin, N.; Oztoprak, N.; Keskin, A.S.; Aktas, E.; Sumbuloglu, V.; Akduman, D. Mortality attributable to carbapenem-resistant nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii infections in a Turkish university hospital. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 65, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, Y.J.; Kim, S.I.; Hong, K.W.; Kim, Y.R.; Park, Y.J.; Kang, M.W. Risk factors for mortality in patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia: Impact of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2012, 27, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.
VariableFrequency (%)
N = 145
Mean age (SD) in years57.9 ± 15.8
Gender
 Male99 (68.3)
 Female46 (31.7)
Race
 Malay128 (88.3)
 Chinese6 (4.1)
 Indian9 (6.2)
 Others2 (1.4)
Intensive care unit admission84 (57.9)
Prior carbapenem use in the last 30 days58 (40.0)
Immunocompromised patient36 (24.8)
Presence of any comorbidity131 (90.3)
Mean (SD) Charlson comorbidity index score3.6 ± 2.2
Type of comorbidity
 Hypertension89 (61.4)
 Diabetes mellitus76 (52.4)
 Malignancy28 (19.3)
 Chronic kidney disease26 (17.9)
 Dyslipidemia20 (13.8)
 Ischemic heart disease16 (11.0)
 Stroke15 (10.3)
Sepsis/septic shock93 (64.1)
Type of infection
 Pneumonia59 (40.7)
 Bacteremia37 (25.5)
 Skin and soft tissue infection20 (13.8)
 Urinary tract infection19 (13.1)
 Intra-abdominal infection5 (3.4)
 Osteomyelitis4 (2.8)
 Ventriculitis1 (0.7)
Acquisition type of infection
 Hospital-acquired107 (73.8)
 Community-acquired38 (26.2)
Recent hospitalisation78 (53.8)
Recent surgery74 (51.0)
Patient’s parameters on the first day of infection
 Intubation78 (53.8)
 Hemodynamic (ionotrope) support60 (41.4)
 Fever48 (33.1)
 Leucocytosis104 (71.7)
 Tachycardia68 (46.9)
 Mean lowest systolic blood pressure108 ± 22.1
 Mean lowest diastolic blood pressure61.2 ± 12.6
 Elevated serum creatinine75 (51.7)
 Elevated serum urea85 (58.6)
 Low haemoglobin level116 (80.0)
 Thrombocytopenia32 (22.1)
 Hypoalbuminemia117 (80.7)
 Hyperbilirubinemia39 (26.9)
 Elevated aspartate transaminase80 (55.2)
 Elevated alanine transaminase55 (37.9)
 Elevated alkaline phosphatase85 (58.6)
SD: standard deviation.
Table 2. Antibiotics used for empirical and definitive therapy among the patients.
Table 2. Antibiotics used for empirical and definitive therapy among the patients.
VariableFrequency (%)
Empirical antibiotics (n = 235)
 Meropenem58 (24.7)
 Piperacillin-tazobactam48 (20.4)
 Vancomycin19 (8.1)
 Colistin13 (5.5)
 Cotrimoxazole11 (4.7)
 Ciprofloxacin11 (4.7)
 Ceftriaxone11 (4.7)
 Cefuroxime10 (4.3)
 Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid8 (3.4)
 Metronidazole8 (3.4)
 Cefepime7 (3.0)
 Ampicillin-sulbactam6 (2.6)
 Ceftazidime5 (2.1)
 Azithromycin5 (2.1)
Cloxacillin4 (1.7)
 Amikacin3 (1.3)
 Clindamycin3 (1.3)
 Imipenem2 (0.9)
 Fusidic acid1 (0.4)
 Ertapenem1 (0.4)
 Cefoperazone1 (0.4)
Combination empirical antibiotic therapy55 (37.9)
Received active empirical antibiotics16 (11.0)
Received active antibiotic treatment87 (60.0)
Received active antibiotic treatment in first 48 h21 (14.5)
Definitive antibiotics (n = 109)
 Colistin69 (63.3)
 Amikacin9 (8.3)
 Meropenem6 (5.5)
 Piperacillin-tazobactam6 (5.5)
 Gentamicin5 (4.6)
 Ceftazidime4 (3.7)
 Cotrimoxazole3 (2.8)
 Ciprofloxacin3 (2.8)
 Cefepime2 (1.8)
 Imipenem2 (1.8)
Combination definitive antibiotic therapy62 (42.8)
Types of combinations
 Colistin-based combinations47 (75.8)
 Non-colistin-based combinations15 (24.2)
Mean days to effective antibiotics4.6 ± 3.3
Table 3. Univariate logistic regression analysis for factors associated with in-hospital mortality.
Table 3. Univariate logistic regression analysis for factors associated with in-hospital mortality.
VariableOdds Ratio95% Confidence Intervalp-Value
Age1.0060.984–1.0270.605
Female gender2.8421.383–5.8420.004
Race
 MalayReference
 Chinese0.7310.129–4.1370.723
 Indian1.8270.468–7.1270.386
 Others1.4620.089–23.8950.790
Intensive care unit admission10.7664.537–25.544<0.001
Receive active empirical antibiotics1.1150.391–3.1810.838
Immunocompromised1.1820.552–2.5290.667
Charlson comorbidity index1.1060.950–1.2870.195
Sepsis/septic shock5.8022.539–13.257<0.001
Type of infection1.7630.806–3.8570.156
Diagnosis
 Bacteremia1.4890.702–3.1570.300
Pneumonia2.1761.104–4.2910.025
Urinary tract infection0.2270.063–0.8180.023
 Skin and soft tissue infection0.4240.145–1.2390.117
 Intra-abdominal infection0.9430.153–5.8200.949
Polymicrobial infections1.0000.438–2.2851.000
Days to effective antibiotics0.9990.878–1.1360.983
Highest temperature0.8910.585–1.3480.585
Fever0.8680.427–1.7650.696
Leucocytosis3.5631.412–8.9900.007
Tachycardia1.3830.701–2.7250.349
Elevated serum creatinine2.8811.411–5.8810.004
Elevated serum urea3.4481.611–7.3770.001
Anemia2.6130.891–7.6620.080
Thrombocytopenia2.3021.025–5.1700.043
Intubation10.0913.580–28.444<0.001
Hyperbilirubinemia2.1781.003–4.7290.049
Pathogen
EnterobacteriaceaeReference
P. aeruginosa0.7520.278–2.0330.574
Acinetobacter baumannii1.0150.469–2.1970.970
Received active antibiotic treatment3.0711.491–6.3270.002
Received active antibiotic treatment in first 48 h1.2610.486–3.2710.633
Bold font indicates statistical significance.
Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for factors associated with in-hospital mortality.
Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for factors associated with in-hospital mortality.
VariableAdjusted Odds Ratio95% Confidence Intervalp-Value
Intensive care unit admission5.2011.603–16.8720.006
Sepsis/septic shock3.4301.021–11.5220.049
Elevated serum creatinine2.7521.005–7.5360.049
Received active antibiotic treatment2.5620.896–7.3290.079
Bold font indicates statistical significance.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abubakar, U.; Zulkarnain, A.I.; Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Kamarudin, N.; Elrggal, M.E.; Elnaem, M.H.; Harun, S.N. Treatments and Predictors of Mortality for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infections in Malaysia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7120415

AMA Style

Abubakar U, Zulkarnain AI, Rodríguez-Baño J, Kamarudin N, Elrggal ME, Elnaem MH, Harun SN. Treatments and Predictors of Mortality for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infections in Malaysia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2022; 7(12):415. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7120415

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abubakar, Usman, Amni Izzati Zulkarnain, Jesús Rodríguez-Baño, Norhidayah Kamarudin, Mahmoud E. Elrggal, Mohamed Hassan Elnaem, and Sabariah Noor Harun. 2022. "Treatments and Predictors of Mortality for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infections in Malaysia: A Retrospective Cohort Study" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 7, no. 12: 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7120415

APA Style

Abubakar, U., Zulkarnain, A. I., Rodríguez-Baño, J., Kamarudin, N., Elrggal, M. E., Elnaem, M. H., & Harun, S. N. (2022). Treatments and Predictors of Mortality for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infections in Malaysia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 7(12), 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7120415

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop