Incentive Mechanisms for Smart Grid: State of the Art, Challenges, Open Issues, Future Directions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Includes a detailed discussion of SG, the various incentive mechanisms’ applications, and categories.
- Presents motivations behind the use of incentive mechanisms in SG
- Discusses several technologies used to design incentive-mechanism-based SG systems.
- Discusses research projects and use cases in incentivized SG systems.
- Presents the lessons learned from these implementations and identification of challenges, as well as open issues directing future scope of research.
2. Background
2.1. Smart Grid
2.2. Big Data Life Cycle in SG Systems
3. Technologies for Designing Incentive Mechanisms in SG
3.1. Game Theory
3.2. Blockchain
3.3. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
4. Research Projects and Use Cases
5. Lessons Learned, Open Issues, Challenges, and Future Directions
5.1. Open Issues and Challenges
5.2. Future Research Directions
6. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Triantafyllou, A.; Jimenez, J.A.P.; Torres, A.D.R.; Lagkas, T.; Rantos, K.; Sarigiannidis, P. The challenges of privacy and access control as key perspectives for the future electric smart grid. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2020, 1, 1934–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghasempour, A. Internet of things in smart grid: Architecture, applications, services, key technologies, and challenges. Inventions 2019, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hossain, E.; Khan, I.; Un-Noor, F.; Sikander, S.S.; Sunny, M.S.H. Application of big data and machine learning in smart grid, and associated security concerns: A review. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 13960–13988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dileep, G. A survey on smart grid technologies and applications. Renew. Energy 2020, 146, 2589–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Choo, K.K.R. Fault-Tolerant Multisubset Aggregation Scheme for Smart Grid. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 17, 4065–4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, Q.V.; Liyanage, M.; Deepa, N.; VVSS, M.; Reddy, S.; Maddikunta, P.K.R.; Khare, N.; Gadekallu, T.R.; Hwang, W.J. Deep Learning for Intelligent Demand Response and Smart Grids: A Comprehensive Survey. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2101.08013. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Y.; Kumar, R.; Tang, S. Incentive-based distributed scheduling of electric vehicle charging under uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2018, 34, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alquthami, T.; Milyani, A.H.; Awais, M.; Rasheed, M.B. An Incentive Based Dynamic Pricing in Smart Grid: A Customer’s Perspective. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, H.; Liu, C.H.; Wang, W.; Zhao, J.; Song, Z.; Su, X.; Crowcroft, J.; Leung, K.K. A survey of incentive mechanisms for participatory sensing. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2015, 17, 918–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Restuccia, F.; Das, S.K.; Payton, J. Incentive mechanisms for participatory sensing: Survey and research challenges. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. (TOSN) 2016, 12, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haddi, F.L.; Benchaïba, M. A survey of incentive mechanisms in static and mobile p2p systems. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2015, 58, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Pan, M.; Song, L.; Dawy, Z.; Han, Z. A survey of contract theory-based incentive mechanism design in wireless networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2017, 24, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaimes, L.G.; Vergara-Laurens, I.J.; Raij, A. A survey of incentive techniques for mobile crowd sensing. IEEE Internet Things J. 2015, 2, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Chen, L.; Shahabi, C. Spatial crowdsourcing: A survey. VLDB J. 2020, 29, 217–250. [Google Scholar]
- Sultan, S. Privacy-preserving metering in smart grid for billing, operational metering, and incentive-based schemes: A survey. Comput. Secur. 2019, 84, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Hoang, D.T.; Hu, P.; Xiong, Z.; Niyato, D.; Wang, P.; Wen, Y.; Kim, D.I. A survey on consensus mechanisms and mining strategy management in blockchain networks. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 22328–22370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micholia, P.; Karaliopoulos, M.; Koutsopoulos, I.; Navarro, L.; Vias, R.B.; Boucas, D.; Michalis, M.; Antoniadis, P. Community networks and sustainability: A survey of perceptions, practices, and proposed solutions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018, 20, 3581–3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ferrag, M.A.; Maglaras, L.A.; Janicke, H.; Jiang, J.; Shu, L. A systematic review of data protection and privacy preservation schemes for smart grid communications. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 806–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asaad, M.; Ahmad, F.; Alam, M.S.; Sarfraz, M. Smart grid and Indian experience: A review. Resour. Policy 2019, 74, 101499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephenson, J.; Ford, R.; Nair, N.K.; Watson, N.; Wood, A.; Miller, A. Smart grid research in New Zealand—A review from the GREEN Grid research programme. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1636–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winfield, M.; Weiler, S. Institutional diversity, policy niches, and smart grids: A review of the evolution of Smart Grid policy and practice in Ontario, Canada. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1931–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tightiz, L.; Yang, H. A comprehensive review on IoT protocols’ features in smart grid communication. Energies 2020, 13, 2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Liu, B.; Wu, H. Smart grid cyber-physical attack and defense: A review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 29641–29659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leszczyna, R. A review of standards with cybersecurity requirements for smart grid. Comput. Secur. 2018, 77, 262–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alladi, T.; Chamola, V.; Rodrigues, J.J.; Kozlov, S.A. Blockchain in smart grids: A review on different use cases. Sensors 2019, 19, 4862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Colmenares-Quintero, R.F.; Quiroga-Parra, D.J.; Rojas, N.; Stansfield, K.E.; Colmenares-Quintero, J.C. Big Data analytics in Smart Grids for renewable energy networks: Systematic review of information and communication technology tools. Cogent Eng. 2021, 8, 1935410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, C.; Bond, C.A.; Narayanan, A. The Adoption of New Smart-Grid Technologies: Incentives, Outcomes, and Opportunities; Rand Corporation: Santa Monica, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Shahzad, F.; Javed, A.R.; Zikria, Y.B.; Rehman, S.U.; Jalil, Z. Future Smart Cities: Requirements, Emerging Technologies, Applications, Challenges, and Future Aspects. TechRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hart, D.G. How advanced metering can contribute to distribution automation. IEEE Smart Grid 2012, 3. Available online: https://resourcecenter.smartgrid.ieee.org/publications/enewsletters/SGNL0077.html (accessed on 6 March 2022).
- Bashir, A.K.; Khan, S.; Prabadevi, B.; Deepa, N.; Alnumay, W.S.; Gadekallu, T.R.; Maddikunta, P.K.R. Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for prediction of smart grid stability. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2021, 31, e12706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nistor, S.; Wu, J.; Sooriyabandara, M.; Ekanayake, J. Capability of smart appliances to provide reserve services. Appl. Energy 2015, 138, 590–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alazab, M.; Khan, S.; Krishnan, S.S.R.; Pham, Q.V.; Reddy, M.P.K.; Gadekallu, T.R. A multidirectional LSTM model for predicting the stability of a smart grid. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 85454–85463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jenkins, N.; Long, C.; Wu, J. An overview of the smart grid in Great Britain. Engineering 2015, 1, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muzumdar, A.; Modi, C.; Madhu, G.; Vyjayanthi, C. A trustworthy and incentivized smart grid energy trading framework using distributed ledger and smart contracts. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2021, 183, 103074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kappagantu, R.; Daniel, S.A. Challenges and issues of smart grid implementation: A case of Indian scenario. J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2018, 5, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, H.; Liu, S. Distributed genetic real-time pricing for multiseller-multibuyer smart grid based on bilevel programming considering random fluctuation of electricity consumption. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 135, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobus, C.B.; Klaassen, E.A.; Mugge, R.; Schoormans, J.P. A real-life assessment on the effect of smart appliances for shifting households’ electricity demand. Appl. Energy 2015, 147, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, X.; Wang, S.; Yan, C.; Cui, B. A fast chiller power demand response control strategy for buildings connected to smart grid. Appl. Energy 2015, 137, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrari, M.L.; Pascenti, M.; Sorce, A.; Traverso, A.; Massardo, A.F. Real-time tool for management of smart polygeneration grids including thermal energy storage. Appl. Energy 2014, 130, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Gennaro, M.; Paffumi, E.; Martini, G. Customer-driven design of the recharge infrastructure and Vehicle-to-Grid in urban areas: A large-scale application for electric vehicles deployment. Energy 2015, 82, 294–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy, G.T.; Reddy, M.P.K.; Lakshmanna, K.; Kaluri, R.; Rajput, D.S.; Srivastava, G.; Baker, T. Analysis of dimensionality reduction techniques on big data. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 54776–54788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deepa, N.; Pham, Q.V.; Nguyen, D.C.; Bhattacharya, S.; Prabadevi, B.; Gadekallu, T.R.; Maddikunta, P.K.R.; Fang, F.; Pathirana, P.N. A survey on blockchain for big data: Approaches, opportunities, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2022, 131, 209–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azeroual, O.; Nikiforova, A. Apache Spark and MLlib-Based Intrusion Detection System or How the Big Data Technologies Can Secure the Data. Information 2022, 13, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Jaroodi, J.; Mohamed, N. Service-oriented architecture for big data analytics in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2018 18th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID), Washington, DC, USA, 1–4 May 2018; pp. 633–640. [Google Scholar]
- Daki, H.; El Hannani, A.; Aqqal, A.; Haidine, A.; Dahbi, A. Big Data management in smart grid: Concepts, requirements and implementation. J. Big Data 2017, 4, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dalceković, N.; Vukmirović, S.; Kovacević, I.; Stankovski, J. Providing flexible software as a service for smart grid by relying on big data platforms. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), Marrakech, Morocco, 16–18 May 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Syed, D.; Zainab, A.; Ghrayeb, A.; Refaat, S.S.; Abu-Rub, H.; Bouhali, O. Smart grid big data analytics: Survey of technologies, techniques, and applications. IEEE Access 2020, 9, 59564–59585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, F.; Liu, S.; Basak, A.; Zhu, Q.; Kiekintveld, C.D.; Kamhoua, C.A. Introduction to game theory. In Game Theory and Machine Learning for Cyber Security; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 21–46. [Google Scholar]
- Saad, W.; Han, Z.; Poor, H.V.; Basar, T. Game-theoretic methods for the smart grid: An overview of microgrid systems, demand-side management, and smart grid communications. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2012, 29, 86–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohsenian-Rad, A.H.; Wong, V.W.; Jatskevich, J.; Schober, R.; Leon-Garcia, A. Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2010, 1, 320–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dimitriou, T.; Karame, G.O. Enabling anonymous authorization and rewarding in the smart grid. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2015, 14, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitriou, T.; Giannetsos, T.; Chen, L. REWARDS: Privacy-preserving rewarding and incentive schemes for the smart electricity grid and other loyalty systems. Comput. Commun. 2019, 137, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Ci, S.; Li, H.; Yang, Y. Designing pricing incentive mechanism for proactive demand response in smart grid. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kansas City, MO, USA, 20–24 May 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Huang, T.; Liao, X.; Abu-Rub, H.; Chen, G. Reinforcement learning in energy trading game among smart microgrids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2016, 63, 5109–5119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Huang, T.; Liao, X.; Abu-Rub, H.; Chen, G. Reinforcement learning for constrained energy trading games with incomplete information. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2016, 47, 3404–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, M.; Hong, S.H. Incentive-based demand response considering hierarchical electricity market: A Stackelberg game approach. Appl. Energy 2017, 203, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, M.; Hong, S.H.; Ding, Y.; Ye, X. An incentive-based demand response (DR) model considering composited DR resources. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2018, 66, 1488–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Hu, S.; Huang, H.; Ranjan, R.; Zomaya, A.Y.; Wang, L. Game-theoretic market-driven smart home scheduling considering energy balancing. IEEE Syst. J. 2015, 11, 910–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pilkington, M. Blockchain technology: Principles and applications. In Research Handbook on Digital Transformations; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Mollah, M.B.; Zhao, J.; Niyato, D.; Lam, K.Y.; Zhang, X.; Ghias, A.M.; Koh, L.H.; Yang, L. Blockchain for future smart grid: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 18–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aderibole, A.; Aljarwan, A.; Rehman, M.H.U.; Zeineldin, H.H.; Mezher, T.; Salah, K.; Damiani, E.; Svetinovic, D. Blockchain technology for smart grids: Decentralized NIST conceptual model. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 43177–43190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Taha, A.F.; Wang, J.; Kvaternik, K.; Hahn, A. Energy crowdsourcing and peer-to-peer energy trading in blockchain-enabled smart grids. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2019, 49, 1612–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, Z.; Wang, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Li, H. A blockchain-enabled secure power trading mechanism for smart grid employing wireless networks. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 177745–177756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumari, A.; Patel, M.M.; Shukla, A.; Tanwar, S.; Kumar, N.; Rodrigues, J.J. ArMor: A Data Analytics Scheme to identify malicious behaviors on Blockchain-based Smart Grid System. In Proceedings of the GLOBECOM 2020-2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 7–11 December 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Hua, W.; Sun, H. A blockchain-based peer-to-peer trading scheme coupling energy and carbon markets. In Proceedings of the 2019 international conference on smart energy systems and technologies (SEST), Porto, Portugal, 9–11 September 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Shao, W.; Xu, W.; Xu, Z.; Liu, B.; Zou, H. A grid connection mechanism of large-scale distributed energy resources based on blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2019 Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Guangzhou, China, 27–30 July 2019; pp. 7500–7505. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.; Paudel, A.; Gooi, H.B.; Nguyen, H.D. A Proof-of-Stake public blockchain based pricing scheme for peer-to-peer energy trading. Appl. Energy 2021, 298, 117154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakhnini, J.; Karimipour, H.; Dehghantanha, A.; Parizi, R.M.; Srivastava, G. Security aspects of Internet of Things aided smart grids: A bibliometric survey. Internet Things 2021, 14, 100111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belhadi, A.; Djenouri, Y.; Srivastava, G.; Jolfaei, A.; Lin, J.C.W. Privacy reinforcement learning for faults detection in the smart grid. Ad Hoc Netw. 2021, 119, 102541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, M.; Adnan, M.; Srivastava, G.; Poor, H.V. Instability detection and prevention in smart grids under asymmetric faults. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2020, 56, 4510–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, Z.; Al-Turjman, F.; Mostarda, L.; Gagliardi, R. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in smart cities. Comput. Commun. 2020, 154, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmani-andebili, M. Modeling nonlinear incentive-based and price-based demand response programs and implementing on real power markets. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2016, 132, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, R.; Hong, S.H. Incentive-based demand response for smart grid with reinforcement learning and deep neural network. Appl. Energy 2019, 236, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.; Mao, Y.; Leng, S.; Maharjan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Vinel, A.; Jonsson, M. Incentive-driven energy trading in the smart grid. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 1243–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raju, L.; Swetha, A.; Shruthi, C.; Shruthi, J. Implementation of Demand Response Management in microgrids using IoT and Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS), Madurai, India, 6–8 May 2021; pp. 455–463. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, T.; Qian, K.; Mutanen, A.; Schuller, B.; Järventausta, P.; Su, W. Classification of electricity customer groups towards individualized price scheme design. In Proceedings of the 2017 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), Morgantown, WV, USA, 17–19 September 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, H.; Kuang, W.; Lu, J.; Hu, Q. A Modified Incentive-based Demand Response Model using Deep Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 12th IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), Nanging, China, 20–23 September 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Su, Z.; Wang, Y.; Luan, T.H.; Zhang, N.; Li, F.; Chen, T.; Cao, H. Secure and Efficient Federated Learning for Smart Grid With Edge-Cloud Collaboration. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021, 18, 1333–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boudko, S.; Abie, H.; Nigussie, E.; Savola, R. Towards Federated Learning-based Collaborative Adaptive Cybersecurity for Multi-microgrids. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Systems, WINSYS 2021, Online, 7–9 July 2021; pp. 83–90. [Google Scholar]
- You, S. A Cyber-secure Framework for Power Grids Based on Federated Learning. engrxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.; Feng, J.; Yin, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, R.; Hu, Y.; Na, C. Fed-DFE: A Decentralized Function Encryption-Based Privacy-Preserving Scheme for Federated Learning. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 71, 1867–1886. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, W.Y.B.; Xiong, Z.; Kang, J.; Niyato, D.; Leung, C.; Miao, C.; Shen, X. When information freshness meets service latency in federated learning: A task-aware incentive scheme for smart industries. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 18, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, B.; Wang, J.; Guo, M.; Lu, J.; Li, G.; Han, L. A hybrid demand response mechanism based on real-time incentive and real-time pricing. Energy 2021, 231, 120940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, J.; Deng, J.; Song, L.; Han, Z. Incentive mechanism for demand side management in smart grid using auction. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2014, 5, 1379–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekhrad, K.; Aslani, A.; Mazzuca-Sobczuk, T. Energy security in Andalusia: The role of renewable energy sources. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2020, 1, 100001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nauwelaers, C.; Seigneur, I.; Gomez Prieto, J. Good Practices for Smart Specialisation in Energy. 2018. Available online: https://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/w/good-practices-for-smart-specialisation-in-energy (accessed on 10 January 2022).
- Marczinkowski, H.M.; ∅stergaard, P.A. Energy Market Recommendations: Smart Island Energy Systems-H2020 Project SMILE Deliverable 8.4. 2021. Available online: https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/energy-market-recommendations-smart-island-energy-systems-h2020-p (accessed on 10 January 2022).
- Personal, E.; Guerrero, J.I.; Garcia, A.; Peña, M.; Leon, C. Key performance indicators: A useful tool to assess Smart Grid goals. Energy 2014, 76, 976–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Action Plan of the SET-UP Project: Smart Energy Transition to upgrade Regional Performance. Available online: https://www.regen.co.uk/project/smart-energy-transition-to-upgrade-regional-performance-set-up/ (accessed on 20 September 2021).
- Jha, I.; Sen, S.; Kumar, R. Smart grid development in India—A case study. In Proceedings of the 2014 Eighteenth National Power Systems Conference (NPSC), Guwahati, India, 18–20 December 2014; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Samad, T.; Koch, E.; Stluka, P. Automated demand response for smart buildings and microgrids: The state of the practice and research challenges. Proc. IEEE 2016, 104, 726–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y. China’s Smart Grid Program: One Goal, Two Main Lines, Three Stages and More; IEEE Smart Grid: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, D.K.; Rapaka, G.K.; Pasupulla, A.P.; Jaiswal, S.; Abadar, K.; Kaur, H. A review on smart grid telecommunication system. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 51, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gangale, F.; Vasiljevska, J.; Covrig, C.F.; Mengolini, A.; Fulli, G. Smart Grid Projects Outlook 2017; Joint Research Centre of the European Commission: Petten, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Cocks, M.; Johnson, N. Smart city technologies in the USA: Smart grid and transportation initiatives in Columbus, Ohio. In Smart Cities for Technological and Social Innovation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 217–245. [Google Scholar]
- Cunha, F.B.F.; Carani, C.; Nucci, C.A.; Castro, C.; Silva, M.S.; Torres, E.A. Transitioning to a low carbon society through energy communities: Lessons learned from Brazil and Italy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 75, 101994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batini, C.; Cappiello, C.; Francalanci, C.; Maurino, A. Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2009, 41, 1–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nikiforova, A. Definition and evaluation of data quality: User-oriented data object-driven approach to data quality assessment. Balt. J. Mod. Comput. 2020, 8, 391–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Connor, P.; Axon, C.; Xenias, D.; Balta-Ozkan, N. Sources of risk and uncertainty in UK smart grid deployment: An expert stakeholder analysis. Energy 2018, 161, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaccaro, A.; Pisica, I.; Lai, L.; Zobaa, A. A review of enabling methodologies for information processing in smart grids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 107, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.L.; Li, W.; Chen, H.H. Energy big data security threats in IoT-based smart grid communications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Vasilakos, A.V. Energy big data analytics and security: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2016, 7, 2423–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, C.; He, X.; Shuai, Z.; Jiang, F. Big data issues in smart grid—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 79, 1099–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leszczyna, R. Cybersecurity and privacy in standards for smart grids—A comprehensive survey. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2018, 56, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalipi, F.; Yayilgan, S.Y. Security and privacy considerations for iot application on smart grids: Survey and research challenges. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW), Vienna, Austria, 22–24 August 2016; pp. 63–68. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, H.; Zhang, M.; Shen, J. Efficient privacy-preserving cube-data aggregation scheme for smart grids. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2017, 12, 1369–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahir, M.; Khan, A.; Hameed, A.; Alam, M.; Khan, M.K.; Jabeen, F. Towards a set aggregation-based data integrity scheme for smart grids. Ann. Telecommun. 2017, 72, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, F.; Iqbal, W.; Bokhari, F.S. On the use of CryptDB for securing Electronic Health data in the cloud: A performance study. In Proceedings of the 2015 17th International Conference on E-health Networking, Application Services (HealthCom), Boston, MA, USA, 14–17 October 2015; pp. 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno Escobar, J.J.; Morales Matamoros, O.; Tejeida Padilla, R.; Lina Reyes, I.; Quintana Espinosa, H. A Comprehensive Review on Smart Grids: Challenges and Opportunities. Sensors 2021, 21, 6978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Wen, H.; Wu, J.; Lei, W.; Hou, W.; Liu, W.; Xu, A.; Jiang, Y. Internet of things based smart grids supported by intelligent edge computing. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 74089–74102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chhaya, L.; Sharma, P.; Bhagwatikar, G.; Kumar, A. Wireless sensor network based smart grid communications: Cyber attacks, intrusion detection system and topology control. Electronics 2017, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.W.; Zeeshan, M.; Farid, A.; Usman, M. QoS-aware traffic scheduling framework in cognitive radio based smart grids using multi-objective optimization of latency and throughput. Ad Hoc Netw. 2020, 97, 102020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, H.; Chen, B.; Butler-Purry, K.L.; Singh, C. Security and reliability perspectives in cyber-physical smart grids. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia (ISGT Asia), Singapore, 22–25 May 2018; pp. 42–47. [Google Scholar]
- Yen, S.W.; Morris, S.; Ezra, M.A.; Huat, T.J. Effect of smart meter data collection frequency in an early detection of shorter-duration voltage anomalies in smart grids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 109, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samadi, P.; Mohsenian-Rad, A.H.; Schober, R.; Wong, V.W.; Jatskevich, J. Optimal real-time pricing algorithm based on utility maximization for smart grid. In Proceedings of the 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 4–6 October 2010; pp. 415–420. [Google Scholar]
- Antwi-Afari, P.; Owusu-Manu, D.G.; Simons, B.; Debrah, C.; Ghansah, F.A. Sustainability guidelines to attaining smart sustainable cities in developing countries: A Ghanaian context. Sustain. Future 2021, 3, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otuoze, A.O.; Mustafa, M.W.; Larik, R.M. Smart grids security challenges: Classification by sources of threats. J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2018, 5, 468–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butt, O.M.; Zulqarnain, M.; Butt, T.M. Recent advancement in smart grid technology: Future prospects in the electrical power network. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2021, 12, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howell, S.; Rezgui, Y.; Hippolyte, J.L.; Jayan, B.; Li, H. Towards the next generation of smart grids: Semantic and holonic multi-agent management of distributed energy resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 77, 193–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reka, S.S.; Venugopal, P.; Alhelou, H.H.; Siano, P.; Golshan, M.E.H. Real Time Demand Response Modeling for Residential Consumers in Smart Grid Considering Renewable Energy With Deep Learning Approach. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 56551–56562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zainab, A.; Ghrayeb, A.; Syed, D.; Abu-Rub, H.; Refaat, S.S.; Bouhali, O. Big Data Management in Smart Grids: Technologies and Challenges. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 73046–73059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyanka, E.; Thangavel, S.; Gao, X.Z. Review analysis on cloud computing based smart grid technology in the oil pipeline sensor network system. Pet. Res. 2021, 6, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, T.; Tong, Y. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 2019, 10, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Wang, W.; Gadekallu, T.R.; Cao, J.; Liu, Y. EPPDA: An Efficient Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation Federated Learning Scheme. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adiban, M.; Safari, A.; Salvi, G. STEP-GAN: A One-Class Anomaly Detection Model with Applications to Power System Security. In Proceedings of the ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Toronto, ON, Canada, 6–11 June 2021; pp. 2605–2609. [Google Scholar]
- Soares, A.A.; Lopes, Y.; Passos, D.; Fernandes, N.C.; Muchaluat-Saade, D.C. 3AS: Authentication, Authorization, and Accountability for SDN-Based Smart Grids. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 88621–88640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gadekallu, T.R.; Pham, Q.V.; Huynh-The, T.; Bhattacharya, S.; Maddikunta, P.K.R.; Liyanage, M. Federated Learning for Big Data: A Survey on Opportunities, Applications, and Future Directions. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.04160. [Google Scholar]
Ref. | Year | Paper Aim | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
[9] | 2015 | Presented a survey on incentive strategies for participatory sensing | Did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[10] | 2016 | Presented a review on incentive mechanisms for participatory sensing systems | Did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[11] | 2015 | Presented a survey on incentive mechanisms for static and mobile peer-to-peer systems | Did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[12] | 2017 | Presented a comprehensive survey on the designing of incentive mechanisms through contract theory for applications in wireless networks | Focused on wireless networks Did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[13] | 2015 | A survey on incentive mechanisms to motivate people to volunteer contributions to MCS | Did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[14] | 2020 | Surveyed incentive mechanisms for crowdsensing | Did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[15] | 2019 | Presented a survey on incentive-based schemes for privacy-preserving metering in SG | Limited scope to privacy preserving and did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[16] | 2019 | Provided a survey on game-theory-based incentive mechanisms for incentivizing the participants with consensus mechanisms in the blockchain network | Scope limited to blockchain and did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[17] | 2018 | Presented a survey on the design of incentive mechanisms for motivating the members to participate in community networks | Scope limited to community networks and did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[18] | 2018 | Presented a detailed review on privacy-preserving schemes for SG’ communications | Limited scope to privacy preserving |
[3] | 2019 | Presented a survey on the application of ML and big data analytics in SG One of the significant applications is load forecasting | Focused on application rather than comprehensive survey |
[19] | 2019 | Presented a survey of experiences and initiatives of SG in India | Did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[20] | 2018 | Survey on SG implementation in New Zealand |
|
[21] | 2018 | Presented a survey on SG implementations policies in Ontario, Canada | Limited scope to Ontario, Canada, and did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[22] | 2020 | Surveyed the requirements for communication in SG and also presented a review on IoT protocols for SG communication | Major Focus is on IoT protocol Did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[23] | 2021 | Presented a detailed survey on cyber-physical attack mechanisms on SG and the defense mechanisms for the same | Did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[24] | 2018 | Provided detailed survey on standards for cybersecurity requirements in SG | Focused on security rather than providing incentive mechanism in SG |
[25] | 2019 | Reviewed several use cases of blockchain for SG | Did not consider incentive mechanisms for SG |
[26] | 2021 | Discussed the scope of big data analytics in SG emphasizing renewable energy networks |
|
Acronyms | Description |
---|---|
Renewable energy sources | RES |
Artificial intelligence | AI |
Machine learning | ML |
Smart grid | SG |
Federated learning | FL |
Distributed file systems | DFS |
Internet of things | IoT |
Electric vehicles | EV |
Practice incentives program | PIP |
Mobile crowdsensing | MCS |
Renewable heat incentive | RHI |
Net metering policy | NMP |
Real-time pricing | RTP |
Demand-side management | DSM |
Data concentrator units | DCU |
Meter data management system | MDMS |
Advanced metering infrastructure | AMI |
Solar Energy Industries Association | SEIA |
International Energy Agency | IEA |
Technique | Ref. | Year | Contribution | Limitations and Challenges |
---|---|---|---|---|
Game Theory | [49] | 2012 | A cooperative game strategy is applied for exchanging energy between microgrids without requesting it from the main grid. This paper also provides an overview of the various applications of game theory in SG. | Addressed only three areas: microgrid systems, DSM, and communications |
[50] | 2010 | The energy consumption scheduler provided along with the smart meter enables optimal energy consumption. A distributed incentive mechanism is employed here. | Multiple energy sources, total daily energy consumption, and energy storage can be considered | |
[83] | 2021 | A three-level Stackelberg game is used for modelling a hybrid demand response scheme that combines real-time incentives and pricing. | Different types of service providers in the different consumer/producer environments can be considered | |
[53] | 2018 | A two-level Stackelberg game model is implemented for designing demand response models, where benefits can be provided based on the power consumed. | Can consider time-dependent pricing design | |
[57] | 2018 | A resource-trading framework is presented from the point of view of the grid operator. The Stackelberg model could understand the interaction between different actors. | Renewable energy resources can be considered; ancillary services such as regulation services can be provided | |
[58] | 2015 | A bi-level game model that benefits the customers and aggregators using community-level and market-level games is proposed. | Multiple energy sources, service providers, and customer needs to be considered | |
Blockchain | [62] | 2019 | A framework for crowdsourced energy systems is proposed. A two-phase algorithm is also proposed that manages the distribution network while the crowdsources are being incentivized. | Distributed consensus mechanisms for the SG using blockchain can be considered; different types of threats also need to be dealt with |
[63] | 2020 | An incentive mechanism with smart contracts employing wireless networks is proposed. This enables the producers to be automatically paid with the incentives. | Different types of renewable energy resources can be integrated into the model | |
[64] | 2020 | An ESC-based incentivizing mechanism for rewarding consumers, with the help of -Sutra scheme, is proposed. | Dynamic pricing techniques can be included in the system | |
[65] | 2019 | A decentralized energy and trading scheme with a monetary incentive mechanism is proposed | Long-term investment in low carbon technologies can be considered | |
[67] | 2021 | A PoS public blockchain that reduces energy gaps and thus rewards the consumers and producers is proposed. | Can be used for the distributed control of energy systems | |
AI/ ML | [72] | 2016 | Incentive-based and price-based demand response non-linear models are studied and implemented in different power markets. | Multiple energy sources can be considered |
[73] | 2019 | Considers the profitability of consumers and service providers in designing incentive schemes. Uses reinforcement learning for optimal incentives. | A technique for choosing the optimal weighting factor can be formulated. Multiple service providers and grid operators can be considered in the model | |
[75] | 2021 | Dynamic pricing and incentive mechanisms are used in this demand response model. | Time-dependent pricing schemes can be considered | |
[76] | 2017 | Customers are categorized based on energy usage and pricing during critical peak periods. The “Symbolic aggregate approximation (SAX)” technique was used for the pricing design of various groups. | Producer-based models can also be incorporated | |
[77] | 2020 | A modified incentive-based demand response model that helps in increasing the overall profit of customers and producers is proposed. | Different types of customers, providers, and energy models can be considered | |
[78] | 2021 | Each energy service provider uses DQN to develop the best payment model. An edge-cloud-based FL approach and a DRL-based incentive algorithm are used here. | Blockchain-based models and DP-based gradient perturbation can be considered |
Country | Game Theory | Blockchain | ML | Projects | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain | X | ✓ | X | SMILE | Manages all projects in the line of SG incentives |
Spain | X | X | X | Innovgrid | Smart metering project that helps in collecting data on individual consumption, collective grid demands |
India | X | ✓ | ✓ | POWERGRID | Large-scale integration of renewable capacity of SG |
China | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 5G SG | Automation of power distribution, ensuring load control, ultra-low latency, and security isolation |
China | X | X | X | Honeywell Pilot project | Ensures efficient benefits of demand response |
France | X | ✓ | ✓ | Pilot Linky | Logic controller that aids in the deployment of 300,000 smart meters, ensuring interoperability |
France | X | X | X | ENR Pool | The virtual power plant integrates intermittent solar and wind energy, provides financial incentives for production modulation, solves issues relevant to the integration of grids in the renewable energy sector |
USA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ARRA-funded projects | Focuses on conservation of voltage reduction methods |
USA | X | X | X | SGIG Projects | Reduction of customers’ peak demand, which helps reduce capital investments in peaking power plants |
USA | X | X | X | Smart Study TOGETHER | Evaluation of enabling technologies in SG considering time-based rate programs, impacts on energy consumption, and peak demand |
Brazil | X | ✓ | ✓ | Big Push | Focuses on better promotion of public and private investment of sustainable energies, deploys incentive mechanisms for clean energy innovation |
Challenge | Description | Possible Solutions (Future Directions) |
---|---|---|
Data Quality |
| Record linkage, business rules, and similarity measures |
Data Uncertainty |
| Cooperative game theory |
Data Security |
| Blockchain and FL |
Data Privacy |
| Blockchain and FL |
Data Integrity |
| Homomorphic signature scheme |
Data Authentication |
| Grid recognition authentication |
Latency |
| Integration of FL and edge devices |
Bandwidth and Networking Issues |
| 5G, 6G |
Throughput |
| FL |
Reliability |
| Explainable AI |
Anomaly Issues |
| AI-based solutions |
Type of Energy Sources, Service Providers, and Customers |
| ML-based solutions |
Pricing |
| Time-dependent pricing schemes |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bhattacharya, S.; Chengoden, R.; Srivastava, G.; Alazab, M.; Javed, A.R.; Victor, N.; Maddikunta, P.K.R.; Gadekallu, T.R. Incentive Mechanisms for Smart Grid: State of the Art, Challenges, Open Issues, Future Directions. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2022, 6, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6020047
Bhattacharya S, Chengoden R, Srivastava G, Alazab M, Javed AR, Victor N, Maddikunta PKR, Gadekallu TR. Incentive Mechanisms for Smart Grid: State of the Art, Challenges, Open Issues, Future Directions. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 2022; 6(2):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6020047
Chicago/Turabian StyleBhattacharya, Sweta, Rajeswari Chengoden, Gautam Srivastava, Mamoun Alazab, Abdul Rehman Javed, Nancy Victor, Praveen Kumar Reddy Maddikunta, and Thippa Reddy Gadekallu. 2022. "Incentive Mechanisms for Smart Grid: State of the Art, Challenges, Open Issues, Future Directions" Big Data and Cognitive Computing 6, no. 2: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6020047
APA StyleBhattacharya, S., Chengoden, R., Srivastava, G., Alazab, M., Javed, A. R., Victor, N., Maddikunta, P. K. R., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2022). Incentive Mechanisms for Smart Grid: State of the Art, Challenges, Open Issues, Future Directions. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 6(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6020047