Next Article in Journal
Non-Markovian Persistent Random Walk Model for Intracellular Transport
Next Article in Special Issue
New Generalized Jacobi Galerkin Operational Matrices of Derivatives: An Algorithm for Solving Multi-Term Variable-Order Time-Fractional Diffusion-Wave Equations
Previous Article in Journal
A Fractional-Order Fidelity-Based Total Generalized Variation Model for Image Deblurring
Previous Article in Special Issue
Approximate Analytical Solution of Fuzzy Linear Volterra Integral Equation via Elzaki ADM
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An H1-Galerkin Space-Time Mixed Finite Element Method for Semilinear Convection–Diffusion–Reaction Equations

Fractal Fract. 2023, 7(10), 757; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7100757
by Xuehui Ren 1, Siriguleng He 2 and Hong Li 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Fractal Fract. 2023, 7(10), 757; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7100757
Submission received: 25 September 2023 / Revised: 8 October 2023 / Accepted: 11 October 2023 / Published: 13 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers for Numerical and Computational Methods Section)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The report is in the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is well-written and presented, results are promising.

Comments to be fixed:

Fix the title Eequations--Equations

The author should mention the Ladyzhenskaya–Babuška–Brezzi condition and then use the abbreviation LBB.

Fix equation (1) t \in J,

In line (39), after method [9], the author should add "space–time ultra-weak discontinuous Galerkin method [Bac2021]". Reference Bac2021 is as follows: M. Baccouch, H. Temimi, A high-order space-time ultra-weak discontinuous Galerkin method for the second-order wave equation in one space dimension, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 389, pp. 113331, 2021.

Why did you introduce an auxiliary variable q? Do the error analysis steps change and make it more complicated without q?

How did you treat the nonlinearity in your algorithm?

in Tables 1,2,3,4, why you didn't choose more refined meshes h and k (1/20, 1/30, ... 1/50).

What if you choose the same mesh size in space and time and the same order, quadratic for example, would you have the same rate of convergence 3.

Mention in Figure1 that these graphs are plotted for t=T (I believe)

would you have the optimal rate of convergence if you choose epsilon=0.0001?

In all your simulations, you chose linear or quadratic basis functions, could you go to cubic and above?

A general polish of the English language should be done.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop