Effects of Reduced Ambient Pressure and Beam Oscillation on Gap Bridging Ability during Solid-State Laser Beam Welding
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Gap Bridging at Reduced Ambient Pressure
3.2. Gap Bridging Using Beam Oscillation in Combination with Reduced Ambient Pressure
3.2.1. Basic Evaluation of Oscillation Patterns
- While using a beam oscillation, the most frequent weld seam irregularities are notches and lateral spill of the melt pool.
- At atmospheric pressure, the weld seam formation is in most parts independent of the oscillation frequency. Significant differences depending on the oscillation frequency could be observed using a circle pattern. Thereby, high frequencies led to an asymmetrical cross-section of the weld seam.
- At reduced ambient pressure, the formation of weld seam irregularities is largely dependent on the oscillation frequency. However, no universal criteria on the connection between parameter settings and irregularities could be found.
- Based on the results from process monitoring, the weld spatter formation is generally diminished at reduced ambient pressure.
3.2.2. Investigation of Gap Bridging Ability
4. Conclusions
- During single spot laser beam welding without beam oscillation, using the applied optical configuration, gaps exceeding 0.1 mm can lead to significant loss in weld quality.
- A reduction in welding speed has positive impact on the gap bridging ability at the considered range of vs. = 0.5–5.0 m/min.
- While welding at reduced ambient pressure, a reduced gap bridging ability was observed due to a more narrow weld seam geometry. However, the weld spatter formation was significantly improved.
- Beam oscillation can be applied to increase the weld width and enlarge the melt pool volume to ensure a homogeneous filling of the gap. The results at reduced ambient pressure suggest a heighten sensitivity for a change of process parameters (especially oscillation frequency) and therefore a smaller processing window.
- Using beam oscillation, gaps with 0.2 mm could reliably be welded. Gaps with 0.4 mm showed sufficient quality.
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Havrilla, D.; Holzer, M. High power disk lasers: Advances and applications. In Proceedings of the SPIE LASE, Solid State Lasers XX: Technology and Devices, San Francisco, CA, USA, 21–26 January 2011; Volume 7912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannatey-Asibu, E., Jr. Principles of Laser Materials Processing Laser Welding; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svenungsson, J.; Choquet, I.; Kaplan, A. Laser Welding Process—A Review of Keyhole Welding Modelling. Phys. Procedia 2015, 78, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reisgen, U.; Olschok, S.; Jakobs, S. A comparison of electron beam welding with laser beam welding in vacuum. DVS-Berichte. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Electron Beam Welding Conference, Aachen, Germany, 26–30 March 2012; Volume 285, pp. 119–127. [Google Scholar]
- Reisgen, U.; Olschok, S.; Holtum, W.N.; Jakobs, S. Laser beam welding in mobile vacuum. In Proceedings of the Lasers in Manufacturing, Munich, Germany, 26–29 June 2017; Available online: https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/692293 (accessed on 26 February 2019).
- Webb, C.E.; Jones, J.D.C. Handbook of Laser Technology and Applications Volume III: Applications; Institute of Physiks: Bristol, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Aalderink, B.J.; Pathiraj, B.R.G.K.M.; Aarts, R.G.K.M. Seam gap bridging of laser based processes for the welding of aluminium sheets for industrial applications. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 48, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schultz, V.; Seefeld, T.; Vollertsen, F. Gap Bridging Ability in Laser Beam Welding of Thin Aluminum Sheets. Phys. Procedia 2014, 56, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fixemer, P.; Albert, F.; Sievi, P.; Graham, T. Seam Guided Laser Remote Welding with Automated Gap Bridging. Laser Tech. J. 2015, 21, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franciosa, P.; Serino, A.; Al Botros, R.; Ceglarek, D. Closed-loop gap bridging control for remote laser welding of aluminum components based on first principle energy and mass balance. J. Laser Appl. 2019, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rominger, V. High-performance laser welding: A comparison of CO2 lasers and high-brilliance solid-state lasers. Laser Tech. J. 2011, 8, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Börner, C.; Dilger, K.; Rominger, V.; Harrer, T.; Krüssel, T.; Löwer, T. Influence of ambient pressure on spattering and weld seam quality in laser beam welding with the solid-state laser. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-Optics, Orlando, FL, USA, 23–27 October 2011; pp. 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arata, Y.; Abe, N.; Oda, T.; Tsujii, N. Fundamental phenomena during vacuum laser welding. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-Optics, Boston, MA, USA, 12–15 November 1984; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reisgen, U.; Olschok, S.; Jakobs, S.; Turner, C. Sound Welding of Copper: Laser Beam Welding in Vacuum. Phys. Procedia 2016, 83, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reisgen, U.; Olschok, S.; Jakobs, S. Laser beam welding under vacuum of a fine-grained steel. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-Optics, San Diego, CA, USA, 19–23 October 2014; pp. 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reisgen, U.; Olschok, S.; Jakobs, S. Laser beam welding in vacuum of thick plate structural steel. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-Optics, Miami, FL, USA, 6–10 October 2013; pp. 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abe, Y.; Mizutani, M.; Kawahito, Y.; Katayama, S. Deep penetration welding with high power laser under vacuum. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-Optics, Anaheim, CA, USA, 27–30 September 2010; pp. 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Katayama, S.; Abe, Y.; Mizutani, M.; Kawahito, Y. Deep penetration welding with high power disk lasers in low vacuum. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-Optics, Orlando, FL, USA, 23–27 October 2011; pp. 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, M.; Tao, W.; Chen, Y.; Li, F. Comparison of processing window in full penetration laser welding of thick high-strength steel under atmosphere and sub-atmosphere. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 109, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, G.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Xia, H.; Meng, S.; Gong, J. Effect of subatmospheric pressures on weld formation and mechanical properties during disk laser welding of 5A06 aluminium alloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2020, 277, 116457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergmann, J.P.; Patschger, A.; Bastick, A. Enhancing Process Efficiency due to high Focusing with high Brightness Lasers—Applicability and constraints. Phys. Procedia 2011, 12, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Chemical Composition (wt %) 1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fe | C | Si | Mn | P | S | Cr |
Bal. | 0.14–0.19 | <0.40 | 1.00–1.30 | <0.025 | <0.035 | 0.80–1.10 |
Welding Speed [m/min] | Atm. | 10 hPa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Laser Power [W] | Energy per Unit Length [J/mm] | Laser Power [W] | Energy per Unit Length [J/mm] | |
0.5 | 700 | 84.0 | 550 | 66.0 |
1.0 | 950 | 57.0 | 700 | 42.0 |
2.0 | 1375 | 41.3 | 1000 | 30.0 |
5.0 | 2200 | 26.4 | 2150 | 25.8 |
Pattern | Amplitude 1 [mm] | Frequency [Hz] | Laser Power [W] | Energy per Unit Length [J/mm] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Line | 2.0 | 45 | 2000 | 120 |
Circle | 2.0 | 25 | 1400 | 84 |
Eight frame (crosswise) | 1.0 | 235 | 1100 | 66 |
Eight frame (lengthwise) | 1.0 | 45 | 1440 | 84 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Köhler, M.; Tóth, T.; Kreybohm, A.; Hensel, J.; Dilger, K. Effects of Reduced Ambient Pressure and Beam Oscillation on Gap Bridging Ability during Solid-State Laser Beam Welding. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2020, 4, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp4020040
Köhler M, Tóth T, Kreybohm A, Hensel J, Dilger K. Effects of Reduced Ambient Pressure and Beam Oscillation on Gap Bridging Ability during Solid-State Laser Beam Welding. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2020; 4(2):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp4020040
Chicago/Turabian StyleKöhler, Markus, Tamás Tóth, Andreas Kreybohm, Jonas Hensel, and Klaus Dilger. 2020. "Effects of Reduced Ambient Pressure and Beam Oscillation on Gap Bridging Ability during Solid-State Laser Beam Welding" Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 4, no. 2: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp4020040
APA StyleKöhler, M., Tóth, T., Kreybohm, A., Hensel, J., & Dilger, K. (2020). Effects of Reduced Ambient Pressure and Beam Oscillation on Gap Bridging Ability during Solid-State Laser Beam Welding. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 4(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp4020040