Nanofibrous Scaffolds in Biomedicine
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. General Features of Nanofibrous Scaffolds
3. Nanofibrous Scaffolds in Targeted Tissue Regeneration
3.1. Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds
3.2. Polycaprolactone (PCL) and Derivatives
3.3. Graphene-Based Composite Mats
3.4. Peptide-Based Materials
3.5. Natural and Hybrid Biomaterials
3.6. Miscellaneous Materials
3.7. Nanofiber Scaffolds and Models
4. Bone Regeneration
4.1. Electrospun Nanofibers in Bone Tissue Engineering
4.2. Silk-Based Materials
4.3. Polycaprolactone (PCL) and Derivatives
4.4. Hydroxyapatite and Nanoparticles
4.5. Peptide-Based Materials
4.6. Chitosan and Alginate Blends
4.7. Poly(lactic acid) and Derivatives
4.8. Poly[(R)3-hydroxybutyrate] (PHB) and Poly[3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate] (PHBV)
4.9. Calcium Phosphate and Mineralized Scaffolds
4.10. Fiber-Guiding Scaffolds
4.11. Use of Adult Stem Cells
4.12. Graphene-Based Scaffolds
5. Cardiac and Vascular Regeneration
5.1. Cardiac Tissue Engineering
5.2. Vascular Tissue Engineering
6. Soft Tissue Regeneration
6.1. General Applications
6.2. Ligament and Tendon Tissue Engineering
6.3. Specific Soft Tissue Applications
6.4. Soft Tissue Engineering with Drug Release Potential
7. Neural Regeneration
7.1. Poly(Epsilon-Caprolactone) (PCL)-Based Fibers
7.2. Composite and Encapsulated Fibers
7.3. Irradiated Fibers
8. Wound Healing and Skin Regeneration
8.1. General Applications
8.2. Silk Fibroin-Based Scaffolds
8.3. Collagen and Composite Scaffolds
9. Advanced Drug Delivery
9.1. Electrospun Fibers in Drug Delivery
9.2. Core–Shell Nanofibers
9.3. Nanocylinder and Nanoparticle Systems
9.4. Blends and Infusion Techniques
10. Testing and Evaluation of Nanofibrous Scaffolds
10.1. In Vitro Tests
10.2. In Vivo Tests
10.3. Ex Vivo Tests
10.4. In Silico Tests
11. Outcomes in Using Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Biomedicine
12. Limitations
Future Directions
13. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bacáková, L.; Parízek, M.; Stanková, L.; Novotná, K.; Douglas, T.E.L.; Brady, M.A.; Kromka, A.; Potocky, S.; Stránská, D.; Tanger. Polymeric Nanofibrous Scaffolds Reinforced with Diamond and Ceramic Nanoparticles for Bone Tissue Engineering. In Proceedings of the 6th NANOCON International Conference, Brno, Czech Republic, 5–7 November 2014; pp. 502–507.
- Kasoju, N.; Bhonde, R.R.; Bora, U. Fabrication of a novel micro-nano fibrous nonwoven scaffold with Antheraea assama silk fibroin for use in tissue engineering. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 2466–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakhoda, H.M.; Dahman, Y. Novel Biodegradable Polyurethanes Reinforced with Green Nanofibers for Applications in Tissue Engineering. Synthesis and Characterization. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 92, 1895–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauer, B.; Emonts, C.; Bonten, L.; Annan, R.; Merkord, F.; Vad, T.; Idrissi, A.; Gries, T.; Blaeser, A. Melt-Spun, Cross-Section Modified Polycaprolactone Fibers for Use in Tendon and Ligament Tissue Engineering. Fibers 2022, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharifi, F.; Atyabi, S.M.; Norouzian, D.; Zandi, M.; Irani, S. Osteoblast cell behavior on chitosan/poly caprolactone nanifiber for hard tissue engineering application. Minerva Biotecnol. 2018, 30, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Ji, Y.J.; Zheng, W.P.; Yan, M.Z.; Wang, D.Y.; Li, M.; Chen, J.B.; Yan, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, X.; et al. Electrospun Nanofibers Containing Strontium for Bone Tissue Engineering. J. Nanomater. 2020, 2020, 1257646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, M.D.; Chen, Y.F.; Xu, Y.; Wang, K.F.; Bian, S.Q.; Jiang, Q.; Fan, Y.J.; Zhang, X.D. Bioinspired supramolecular nanofiber hydrogel through self-assembly of biphenyl-tripeptide for tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 8, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, P.G.; Pal, P.; Dhara, S. Hierarchical Decoration of Eggshell Membrane with Polycaprolactone Nanofibers to fabricate a Bilayered Scaffold for Skin Tissue Engineering. MRS Adv. 2019, 4, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashok, N.; Sankar, D.; Jayakumar, R. Surface Modified Polymeric Nanofibers in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. In Electrospun Polymeric Nanofibers: Insight into Fabrication Techniques and Biomedical Applications; Jayakumar, R., Ed.; Advances in Polymer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 291, pp. 177–189. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, Q.X.; Liao, J.F.; Yang, Y.; Qu, Y.; Peng, J.R.; Fan, M.; Luo, F.; Qian, Z.Y. Preparation and Characterization of Epoxidized Methyl Oleate-Graphite Oxide/Poly(L-lactide) Electrospun Hybrid Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2014, 6, 1769–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, T.; Byun, H.; Lee, J.; Perikamana, S.K.M.; Shin, Y.M.; Kim, E.M.; Shin, H. Stem cell spheroids incorporating fibers coated with adenosine and polydopamine as a modular building blocks for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2020, 230, 119652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purushothaman, A.E.; Abhinandan, R.; Adithya, S.P.; Sidharthan, D.S.; Balagangadharan, K.; Selvamurugan, N. Bioactive Molecule-incorporated Polymeric Electrospun Fibers for Bone Tissue Engineering. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2023, 18, 470–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Zhou, Y.F.; Shi, D.; Chang, R.; Zhang, J.Y.; Keidar, M.; Webster, T.J. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP)-modified and bioactive protein-loaded core-shell nanofibers for bone tissue engineering applications. Biomater. Sci. 2019, 7, 2430–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ikeuchi, M.; Tane, R.; Ikuta, K. Electrospray deposition and direct patterning of polylactic acid nanofibrous microcapsules for tissue engineering. Biomed. Microdevices 2012, 14, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.J.; Dong, X.T.; Shafiq, M.; Myles, G.; Radacsi, N.; Mo, X.M. Recent Advancements on Three-Dimensional Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2022, 4, 959–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rachmiel, D.; Anconina, I.; Rudnick-Glick, S.; Halperin-Sternfeld, M.; Adler-Abramovich, L.; Sitt, A. Hyaluronic Acid and a Short Peptide Improve the Performance of a PCL Electrospun Fibrous Scaffold Designed for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bertram, U.; Steiner, D.; Poppitz, B.; Dippold, D.; Köhn, K.; Beier, J.P.; Detsch, R.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Schubert, D.W.; Horch, R.E.; et al. Vascular Tissue Engineering: Effects of Integrating Collagen into a PCL Based Nanofiber Material. Biomed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9616939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, W.; Chen, L.; Seta, J.; Markel, D.C.; Yu, X.W.; Ren, W.P. Corona Discharge: A Novel Approach To Fabricate Three-Dimensional Electrospun Nanofibers for Bone Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 3, 1146–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lotfi, M.; Bagherzadeh, R.; Naderi-Meshkin, H.; Mahdipour, E.; Mafinezhad, A.; Sadeghnia, H.R.; Esmaily, H.; Maleki, M.; Hasssanzadeh, H.; Ghayaour-Mobarhan, M.; et al. Hybrid Chitosan-β-Glycerol Phosphate-Gelatin Nano-/Micro Fibrous Scaffolds with Suitable Mechanical and Biological Properties for Tissue Engineering. Biopolymers 2016, 105, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amandi, A.F.; Shahrtash, S.A.; Kalavi, S.; Moliani, A.; Mousazadeh, H.; Sara, M.R.S.; Dadashpour, M. Fabrication and characterization of metformin-loaded PLGA/Collagen nanofibers for modulation of macrophage polarization for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. BMC Biotechnol. 2023, 23, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazarnezhad, S.; Baino, F.; Kim, H.W.; Webster, T.J.; Kargozar, S. Electrospun Nanofibers for Improved Angiogenesis: Promises for Tissue Engineering Applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, B.B.; Sharifi, F.; Stroud, D.P.; Montazami, R.; Hashemi, N.N.; Sakaguchi, D.S. 3D Microfibrous Scaffolds Selectively Promotes Proliferation and Glial Differentiation of Adult Neural Stem Cells: A Platform to Tune Cellular Behavior in Neural Tissue Engineering. Macromol. Biosci. 2019, 19, e1800236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sezer, U.A.; Yavuz, K.O.; Ors, G.; Bay, S.; Aru, B.A.; Sogut, O.; Caglar, T.A.; Bozkurt, M.R.; Cagavi, E.C.; Demirel, G.; et al. Zero-valent iron nanoparticles containing nanofiber scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2020, 14, 1815–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanumantharao, S.N.; Rao, S. Multi-Functional Electrospun Nanofibers from Polymer Blends for Scaffold Tissue Engineering. Fibers 2019, 7, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCullen, S.D.; Ramaswamy, S.; Clarke, L.I.; Gorga, R.E. Nanofibrous composites for tissue engineering applications. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2009, 1, 369–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santoro, M.; Shah, S.R.; Walker, J.L.; Mikos, A.G. Poly(lactic acid) nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 107, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Z.H.; Cai, H.W.; Ao, Z.; Xu, J.H.; Heaps, S.; Guo, F. Microfluidic Printing of Tunable Hollow Microfibers for Vascular Tissue Engineering. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021, 6, 2000683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Z.W.; Mahalingam, S.; Basnett, P.; Raimi-Abraham, B.; Roy, I.; Craig, D.; Edirisinghe, M. Making Nonwoven Fibrous Poly(ε-caprolactone) Constructs for Antimicrobial and Tissue Engineering Applications by Pressurized Melt Gyration. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2016, 301, 922–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bölgen, N.; Vaseashta, A. Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Nanotechnologies and Biomedical Engineering (ICNBME), Chisinau, Moldova, 23–26 September 2015; pp. 319–322. [Google Scholar]
- Mozafari, M.; Shabafrooz, V.; Yazdimamaghani, M.; Vashaee, D.; Tayebi, L. Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: State-of-the-Art and Future Trends. In Tissue Regeneration: Where Nano-Structure Meets Biology; Liu, Q., Wang, H., Eds.; Frontiers in Nanobiomedical Research; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2014; Volume 2, pp. 163–203. [Google Scholar]
- Metwally, S.; Karbowniczek, J.E.; Szewczyk, P.K.; Marzec, M.M.; Gruszczynski, A.; Bernasik, A.; Stachewicz, U. Single-Step Approach to Tailor Surface Chemistry and Potential on Electrospun PCL Fibers for Tissue Engineering Application. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1801211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, R.H.; Steele, J.A.M.; Chapman, R.; Gormley, A.J.; Chow, L.W.; Mahat, M.M.; Podhorska, L.; Palgrave, R.G.; Payne, D.J.; Hettiaratchy, S.P.; et al. Modular and Versatile Spatial Functionalization of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds through Fiber-Initiated Controlled Radical Polymerization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 5748–5757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farzamfar, S.; Aleahmad, M.; Kouzehkonan, G.S.; Salehi, M.; Nazeri, N. Polycaprolactone/Gelatin Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 11104–11115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banasiak, A.I.; Racki, A.; Malek, M.; Chlanda, A. Flake Graphene as an Efficient Agent Governing Cellular Fate and Antimicrobial Properties of Fibrous Tissue Engineering Scaffolds—A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 5306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koutsopoulos, S. Self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogels in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Progress, design guidelines, and applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2016, 104, 1002–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mishra, A.; Loo, Y.H.; Deng, R.H.; Chuah, Y.J.; Hee, H.T.; Ying, J.Y.; Hauser, C.A.E. Ultrasmall natural peptides self-assemble to strong temperature-resistant helical fibers in scaffolds suitable for tissue engineering. Nano Today 2011, 6, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steffens, D.; Lersch, M.; Rosa, A.; Scher, C.; Crestani, T.; Morais, M.G.; Costa, J.A.V.; Pranke, P. A New Biomaterial of Nanofibers with the Microalga Spirulina as Scaffolds to Cultivate with Stem Cells for Use in Tissue Engineering. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2013, 9, 710–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Andreica, B.I.; Anisiei, A.; Rosca, I.; Sandu, A.I.; Pasca, A.S.; Tartau, L.M.; Marin, L. Quaternized chitosan/chitosan nanofibrous mats: An approach toward bioactive materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 302, 120431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghosh, P.; Rameshbabu, A.P.; Das, D.; Subramanian, B.; Samanta, S.K.; Roy, S.; Pal, S.; Ghosh, S.K.; Dhara, S. Single-pot biofabrication of living fibers for tissue engineering applications. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 2019–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, G.R.; He, R.Y.; Sha, B.Y.; Li, W.F.; Qing, H.B.; Teng, R.; Xu, F. Electrospun three-dimensional aligned nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. Biol. Appl. 2018, 92, 995–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nain, A.S.; Miller, E.; Sitti, M.; Campbell, P.; Amon, C.; Asme. Fabrication of Single and Multi-Layer Fibrous Biomaterial Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. In Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Boston, MA, USA, 31 October–6 November 2008; pp. 231–238. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, D.; Somers, S.M.; Grayson, W.L.; Spector, A.A. A Poroelastic Model of a Fibrous-Porous Tissue Engineering Scaffold. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McCullen, S.D.; Haslauer, C.M.; Loboa, E.G. Fiber-reinforced scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Use of traditional textile substrates to nanofibrous arrays. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 8776–8788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monteiro, N.; Martins, A.; Pires, R.; Faria, S.; Fonseca, N.A.; Moreira, J.N.; Reisa, R.L.; Neves, N.M. Immobilization of bioactive factor-loaded liposomes on the surface of electrospun nanofibers targeting tissue engineering. Biomater. Sci. 2014, 2, 1195–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sazhnev, N.A.; Kil’deeva, N.R.; Drozdova, M.G.; Markvicheva, E.A. Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Electrospun from Fibroin-Containing Solutions. Fibre Chem. 2022, 53, 370–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, J.J.; Zhu, J.; Wang, L.J.; Kang, J.; Wang, X.; Xiong, J. Co-electrospun nano-/microfibrous composite scaffolds with structural and chemical gradients for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 119, 111622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, S.I.; Krebs, M.D.; Bonino, C.A.; Samorezov, J.E.; Khan, S.A.; Alsberg, E. Electrospun Chitosan-Alginate Nanofibers with In Situ Polyelectrolyte Complexation for Use as Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part A 2011, 17, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bontempi, M.; Marchiori, G.; Petretta, M.; Capozza, R.; Grigolo, B.; Giavaresi, G.; Gambardella, A. Nanomechanical Mapping of Three Dimensionally Printed Poly-ε-Caprolactone Single Microfibers at the Cell Scale for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kankala, R.K.; Xu, X.M.; Liu, C.G.; Chen, A.Z.; Wang, S.B. 3D-Printing of Microfibrous Porous Scaffolds Based on Hybrid Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2018, 10, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshimi, R.; Yamada, Y.; Ito, K.; Nakamura, S.; Abe, A.; Nagasaka, T.; Okabe, K.; Kohgo, T.; Baba, S.; Ueda, M. Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffolds, Platelet-Rich Plasma, and Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Injectable Bone Regeneration with Tissue Engineering. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2009, 20, 1523–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chernozem, R.V.; Surmeneva, M.A.; Shkarina, S.N.; Loza, K.; Epple, M.; Ulbricht, M.; Cecilia, A.; Krause, B.; Baumbach, T.; Abalymov, A.A.; et al. Piezoelectric 3-D Fibrous Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-Based Scaffolds Ultrasound-Mineralized with Calcium Carbonate for Bone Tissue Engineering: Inorganic Phase Formation, Osteoblast Cell Adhesion, and Proliferation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 19522–19533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, G.B.; Lv, Y.G. Immobilization and Application of Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffold-based Growth Factor in Bone Tissue Engineering. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 1967–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anjum, S.; Rahman, F.; Pandey, P.; Arya, D.K.; Alam, M.; Rajinikanth, P.S.; Ao, Q. Electrospun Biomimetic Nanofibrous Scaffolds: A Promising Prospect for Bone Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kai, D.; Prabhakaran, M.P.; Chan, B.Q.Y.; Liow, S.S.; Ramakrishna, S.; Xu, F.J.; Loh, X.J. Elastic poly(ε-caprolactone)-polydimethylsiloxane copolymer fibers with shape memory effect for bone tissue engineering. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 11, 015007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.S.; Jin, Y.; Park, H.J.; Yang, K.; Lee, M.S.; Yang, H.S.; Cho, S.W. In Situ Bone Tissue Engineering with an Endogenous Stem Cell Mobilizer and Osteoinductive Nanofibrous Polymeric Scaffolds. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 12, 1700062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stocco, T.D.; Rodrigues, P.J.G.; de Almeida, M.A.; Lobo, A.O. Nanohydroxyapatite Electrodeposition onto Electrospun Nanofibers: Technique Overview and Tissue Engineering Applications. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parizek, M.; Douglas, T.E.L.; Novotna, K.; Kromka, A.; Brady, M.A.; Renzing, A.; Voss, E.; Jarosova, M.; Palatinus, L.; Tesarek, P.; et al. Nanofibrous poly(lactide-co-glycolide) membranes loaded with diamond nanoparticles as promising substrates for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 1931–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, B.; Yuan, X.; Wu, J.; Bai, Y.; Jiang, D.M. Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2015, 7, 1221–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.Z.; Zhang, G.R.; Wang, L.L.; Jiang, Y.Z.; Ouyang, H.W.; Zou, X.H. Novel biodegradable three-dimensional macroporous scaffold using aligned electrospun nanofibrous yarns for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2012, 100A, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Wang, P.; Weir, M.D.; Reynolds, M.A.; Zhao, L.; Xu, H.H.K. Hydrogel fibers encapsulating human stem cells in an injectable calcium phosphate scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 11, 065008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, Y.Z.; Zuo, G.F.; Yu, F.; Huang, Y.A.; Ren, K.J.; Luo, H.L. Preparation and mineralization of three-dimensional carbon nanofibers from bacterial cellulose as potential scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 205, 2938–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.H.; Rios, H.F.; Jin, Q.M.; Sugai, J.V.; Padial-Molina, M.; Taut, A.D.; Flanagan, C.L.; Hollister, S.J.; Giannobile, W.V. Tissue engineering bone-ligament complexes using fiber-guiding scaffolds. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moradi, S.L.; Golchin, A.; Hajishafieeha, Z.; Khani, M.M.; Ardeshirylajimi, A. Bone tissue engineering: Adult stem cells in combination with electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 6509–6522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Zhang, Y.N.; Xu, J.W.; Wang, J.X.; Gu, X.N.; Li, P.; Fan, Y.B. Three-dimensional magnetic fibrous scaffold with icariin expanded by supercritical CO2 for bone tissue engineering under static magnetic field. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2021, 226, 109304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adadi, N.; Yadid, M.; Gal, I.; Asulin, M.; Feiner, R.; Edri, R.; Dvir, T. Electrospun Fibrous PVDF-TrFe Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering, Differentiation, and Maturation. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020, 5, 1900820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhaarathy, V.; Venugopal, J.; Gandhimathi, C.; Ponpandian, N.; Mangalaraj, D.; Ramakrishna, S. Biologically improved nanofibrous scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. Biol. Appl. 2014, 44, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, P.H.; Cho, J.Y. Myocardial tissue engineering using electrospun nanofiber composites. BMB Rep. 2016, 49, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fathi-Karkan, S.; Banimohamad-Shotorbani, B.; Saghati, S.; Rahbarghazi, R.; Davaran, S. A critical review of fibrous polyurethane-based vascular tissue engineering scaffolds. J. Biol. Eng. 2022, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, N.H.; Meng, S.; Li, Z.; Fang, J.; Qi, C.; Kong, T.T.; Liu, Z. Tailoring the Heterogeneous Structure of Macro-Fibers Assembled by Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibrils for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Small 2024, 20, e2307603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolgin, J.; Hanumantharao, S.N.; Farias, S.; Simon, C.; Rao, S.T. Mechanical Properties and Morphological Alterations in Fiber-Based Scaffolds Affecting Tissue Engineering Outcomes. Fibers 2023, 11, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, B.Q.; Wang, W.; Fan, Y.; Wang, X.M.; Watari, F.; Li, X.M. Fiber-reinforced scaffolds in soft tissue engineering. Regen. Biomater. 2017, 4, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basu, P.; Repanas, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Glasmacher, B.; NarendraKumar, U.; Manjubala, I. PEO-CMC blend nanofibers fabrication by electrospinning for soft tissue engineering applications. Mater. Lett. 2017, 195, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rockwood, D.N.; Woodhouse, K.A.; Fromstein, J.D.; Chase, D.B.; Rabolt, J.F. Characterization of biodegradable polyurethane microfibers for tissue engineering. J. Biomater. Sci.-Polym. Ed. 2007, 18, 743–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marques, D.R.; dos Santos, L.A.L.; O’Brien, M.A.; Cartmell, S.H.; Gough, J.E. In vitro evaluation of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)/polyisoprene fibers for soft tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2017, 105, 2581–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Y.; Zhai, H.Y.; Sun, Y.N.; Xu, H.X.; Wu, S.H.; Chen, S.J. Electrospun hybrid nanofibrous meshes with adjustable performance for potential use in soft tissue engineering. Text. Res. J. 2022, 92, 1537–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Full, S.M.; Delman, C.; Gluck, J.M.; Abdmaulen, R.; Shemin, R.J.; Heydarkhan-Hagvall, S. Effect of fiber orientation of collagen-based electrospun meshes on human fibroblasts for ligament tissue engineering applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2015, 103, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hojabri, M.; Tayebi, T.; Kasravi, M.; Aghdaee, A.; Ahmadi, A.; Mazloomnejad, R.; Tarasi, R.; Shaabani, A.; Bahrami, S.; Niknejad, H. Wet-spinnability and crosslinked Fiber properties of alginate/hydroxyethyl cellulose with varied proportion for potential use in tendon tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 240, 124492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.M.; Yang, Y.; Fan, Y.B.; Feng, Q.L.; Cui, F.Z.; Watari, F. Biocomposites reinforced by fibers or tubes as scaffolds for tissue engineering or regenerative medicine. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2014, 102, 1580–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schäfer, B.; Emonts, C.; Glimpel, N.; Ruhl, T.; Obrecht, A.S.; Jockenhoevel, S.; Gries, T.; Beier, J.P.; Blaeser, A. Warp-Knitted Spacer Fabrics: A Versatile Platform to Generate Fiber-Reinforced Hydrogels for 3D Tissue Engineering. Materials 2020, 13, 3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.G.; Tan, G.Z.; Asme. Generation of 3D Nanofiber Structure by Divergence Electrospinning for Tissue Engineering Scaffold. In Proceedings of the 13th ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, College Station, TX, USA, 18–22 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, Y.; Ting, Z.; Liverani, L.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Wei, S. Novel biomimetic fiber incorporated scaffolds for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2019, 107, 2694–2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Qi, R.L.; Fang, Y.; Shen, M.W.; Shi, X.Y.; Donghua Univ, C.T. Carbon Nanotube-incorporated Multilayered Polymer Nanofibrous Scaffolding Materials for Tissue Engineering Applications. In Proceedings of the International Forum on Biomedical Textile Materials, Shanghai, China, 7–8 June 2011; pp. 90–95. [Google Scholar]
- Phutane, P.; Telange, D.; Agrawal, S.; Gunde, M.; Kotkar, K.; Pethe, A. Biofunctionalization and Applications of Polymeric Nanofibers in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Polymers 2023, 15, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.Y.; Chooi, W.H.; Liu, S.; Chin, J.S.; Murray, A.; Nizetic, D.; Cheng, D.; Chew, S.Y. Localized delivery of CRISPR/dCas9 via layer-by-layer self-assembling peptide coating on nanofibers for neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2020, 256, 120225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talebi, A.; Nasab, P.M.; Labbaf, S.; Roach, P. Polycaprolactone/Gelatin/Polypyrrole/Graphene Conductive Aligned Fibrous Scaffold with Ferulic Acid Encapsulation for Tissue Engineering Applications. Fiber. Polym. 2023, 24, 2995–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Tian, L.L.; He, L.M.; Chen, N.; Ramakrishna, S.; So, K.F.; Mo, X.M. Lycium barbarum polysaccharide encapsulated Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid Nanofibers: Cost effective herbal medicine for potential application in peripheral nerve tissue engineering. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanaka, T.; Ujiie, R.; Yajima, H.; Mizutani, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Sakuragi, H. Ion-beam irradiation into biodegradable nanofibers for tissue engineering scaffolds. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 206, 889–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keirouz, A.; Chung, M.H.; Kwon, J.; Fortunato, G.; Radacsi, N. 2D and 3D electrospinning technologies for the fabrication of nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering: A review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 12, e01626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, B.N.; Pramanik, K. Fabrication and evaluation of non-mulberry silk fibroin fiber reinforced chitosan based porous composite scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Cell 2018, 55, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freddi, G.; Armato, U. Silk fibroin microfiber and nanofiber scaffolds for tissue engineering and regeneration. In Silk Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine; Kundu, S.C., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2014; Volume 74, pp. 157–190. [Google Scholar]
- Dhand, C.; Balakrishnan, Y.; Ong, S.T.; Dwivedi, N.; Venugopal, J.R.; Harini, S.; Leung, C.M.; Low, K.Z.W.; Loh, X.J.; Beuerman, R.W.; et al. A ntimicrobial quaternary ammonium organosilane cross-linked nanofibrous collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 4473–4492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramanathan, G.; Singaravelu, S.; Raja, M.D.; Nagiah, N.; Padmapriya, P.; Ruban, K.; Kaveri, K.; Natarajan, T.S.; Sivagnanam, U.T.; Perumal, P.T. Fabrication and characterization of a collagen coated electrospun poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid)-gelatin nanofibrous scaffold as a soft bio-mimetic material for skin tissue engineering applications. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 7914–7922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebe, I.; Kállai-Szabó, B.; Zelkó, R.; Szabó, D. Polymers and Formulation Strategies of Nanofibrous Systems for Drug Delivery Application and Tissue Engineering. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 604–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parham, S.; Kharazi, A.Z.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Ghayour, H.; Ismail, A.F.; Nur, H.; Berto, F. Electrospun Nano-Fibers for Biomedical and Tissue Engineering Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Materials 2020, 13, 2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.B.; Park, H.N.; Ko, W.K.; Bae, M.S.; Heo, D.N.; Yang, D.H.; Kwon, I.K. Poly(L-lactic acid)/Hydroxyapatite Nanocylinders as Nanofibrous Structure for Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2013, 9, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Günday, C.; Anand, S.; Gencer, H.B.; Munafò, S.; Moroni, L.; Fusco, A.; Donnarumma, G.; Ricci, C.; Hatir, P.C.; Türeli, N.G.; et al. Ciprofloxacin-loaded polymeric nanoparticles incorporated electrospun fibers for drug delivery in tissue engineering applications. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2020, 10, 706–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, M.T.; Munj, H.R.; Tomasko, D.L.; Lannutti, J.J. Carbon dioxide infusion of composite electrospun fibers for tissue engineering. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 70, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arkan, E.; Azandaryani, A.H.; Moradipour, P.; Behbood, L. Biomacromolecular Based Fibers in Nanomedicine: A Combination of Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2017, 18, 909–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Xie, L.L.; Lin, W.Z.Y.; Chen, Q.S. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for neural tissue engineering and drug development. Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 1375–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousefi-Ahmadipour, A.; Asadi, F.; Pirsadeghi, A.; Nazeri, N.; Vahidi, R.; Abazari, M.F.; Afgar, A.; Mirzaei-Parsa, M.J. Current Status of Stem Cell Therapy and Nanofibrous Scaffolds in Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering. Regen. Eng. Transl. Med. 2022, 8, 248–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanofibrous Scaffold Structure and Method of Manufacturing | Scaffold Key Properties | Limitations and Critical Factors | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Antheraea assama fibroin-based micro–nano fibrous nonwoven scaffold | Non-toxic, efficient in supporting cell adhesion and growth | Requires validation through in vivo studies, limited to in vitro assessments | [2] |
2 | Supramolecular nanofiber hydrogels through self-assembly of biphenyl-tripeptides, molecular dynamics simulations, rheology, and spectroscopy analysis | Robust hydrogels (0.7 to 13.8 kPa), good biocompatibility, enhanced L929 cell adhesion and proliferation, supports chondrocytes spreading and proliferation | Need for optimization of amino acid sequences for better performance, requires extensive in vivo studies | [7] |
3 | Bilayered scaffold with electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofibers decorated on eggshell membrane (ESM), carbodiimide chemistry | Facilitates extensive cell adhesion, proliferation, and migration, biomimetic architecture and protein-rich composition | Challenges in extraction process of ESM, potential for limited cell adhesion in bare natural tissue, needs further validation | [8] |
4 | Composite structured nano-/microfibrous scaffold made from chitosan–beta-glycerol phosphate–gelatin using electrospinning | High biocompatibility, non-toxic, biodegradable, significant cell attachment and proliferation | Potential rapid degradation and poor mechanical properties of gelatin, requires optimization for mechanical stability and handling | [19] |
5 | Metformin-loaded PLGA/collagen nanofibers (Met-PLGA/Col NFs) fabricated using electrospinning | Modulates macrophage phenotype from pro-inflammatory (M1) to anti-inflammatory (M2), increased cell survival, reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines | Needs further validation for long-term effects and various inflammatory conditions, requires extensive in vivo studies | [20] |
6 | Single-step electrospinning approach with polycaprolactone (PCL), altering voltage polarity to control surface potential | Enhanced cell adhesion and filopodia formation, tunable surface potential, well-engineered scaffolds for bone regeneration | Requires further validation for long-term in vivo effects, potential challenges in maintaining consistent surface chemistry during large-scale production | [31] |
7 | Modular and versatile spatial functionalization of scaffolds through fiber-initiated controlled radical polymerization with poly-e-caprolactone (PCL) and cell-binding peptide motifs | Zonal discrete bilayers with dual functionality (cell-adhesive and antifouling), supports cell adhesion and spatial organization | Complex fabrication process, needs optimization for specific tissue applications, potential scalability issues | [32] |
8 | Ultrasmall natural peptides self-assembled into hydrogels, forming strong temperature-resistant helical fibers | Biocompatible, heat resistant up to 90 °C, tunable high mechanical strength, resembles collagen fibers in the extracellular matrix | Requires further research for long-term stability and functionality in vivo, potential challenges in scaling up for clinical applications | [36] |
9 | Poly-D,L-lactic acid (PDLLA) nanofibers with or without Spirulina biomass, fabricated using electrospinning | High stem cells (SCs) adhesion and viability, atoxic for SCs, mimics natural extracellular matrix (ECM), suitable for tissue engineering | Needs further validation in long-term in vivo studies, potential challenges in consistent fabrication and scaling up for clinical use | [37] |
10 | Quaternized chitosan/chitosan nanofibrous mats, electrospun from ternary solutions followed by selective removal of poly(ethylene oxide) | Good mechanical properties, reversible water vapor adsorption/desorption, strong antimicrobial activity, biocompatible, suitable for wound healing and drug delivery | Requires optimization of quaternized chitosan content for different applications, further validation needed in long-term in vivo studies | [38] |
11 | Single-pot biofabrication of living fibers with amniotic mesenchymal stem cells, extruded in citric acid (CA)/media bath | Instantaneous gelation, tunable mechanical properties, adjustable biodegradability, supports cell attachment and proliferation | Needs further research for long-term stability and functionality in vivo, potential challenges in scaling up for clinical applications | [39] |
12 | Poroelastic model of a fibrous–porous tissue engineering scaffold using mechanical modeling and experimental approach | Provides insights into stiffness moduli and fluid diffusion time, helps in designing 3D scaffolds with specific mechanical properties | Requires extensive validation for different tissue types, potential challenges in accurately predicting in vivo behavior | [42] |
13 | Fiber-reinforced scaffolds using traditional textile substrates and nanofibrous arrays, fabrication and use of scaffold materials to act as a surrogate framework | High mechanical properties, suitable for ex vivo cell expansion and tissue maturation, mimics natural tissue organization | Needs further research to optimize fiber reinforcement strategies for specific tissue applications, potential challenges in scalability and reproducibility | [43] |
Nanofibrous Scaffold Structure and Method of Manufacturing | Scaffold Key Properties | Limitations and Critical Factors | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chitosan/polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofiber, electrospinning | Suitable fiber morphology, high biocompatibility, enhanced proliferation rate of MG63 cells on 10% chitosan–PCL scaffold | Requires optimization of chitosan–PCL blending ratios, limited to in vitro assessments | [5] |
2 | Epoxidized methyl oleate–graphite oxide (EMO-GO)/Poly(L-lactide) fibrous scaffolds, electrospinning | Improved hydrophobicity, favors mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) attachment and proliferation, good biocompatibility in vivo | Requires further studies on long-term effects and efficacy, needs to confirm in vivo integration and functionality | [10] |
3 | Poly(lactic acid) (PLLA) nanofiber sheet partially degraded into fragmented fibers, coated with adenosine and polydopamine, assembled into spheroids with human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) | High coating efficiency of adenosine, stimulates osteogenic markers expression, improved mineral deposition, enhanced bone regeneration | Suppressed adipogenic differentiation, needs further validation in more complex in vivo models and long-term studies | [11] |
4 | Three-dimensional (3D) electrospun nanofibers using corona discharge with polycaprolactone (PCL) | Increased pore size, pore volume, and pore interconnectivity, enhanced cell infiltration, proliferation, and differentiation | Needs further validation for clinical applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent pore structures | [18] |
5 | Electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) and hyaluronic acid (HA) composite scaffold incorporating a short self-assembling peptide | Supports cellular attachment, proliferation, and significant osteogenic differentiation and calcium mineralization | Poor processability of HA alone, requires combination with other polymers, needs further in vivo studies | [16] |
6 | Fibrous scaffolds electrospun from fibroin-containing solutions with chitosan, reinforced with silk fiber | Increased stiffness, water-insoluble ultrathin fibers, biocompatible, effective for tissue engineering | Requires further optimization of fibroin–chitosan ratios, potential challenges in scaling up production for clinical applications | [45] |
7 | Co-electrospun nano-/microfibrous composite scaffolds with silk fibroin–poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (SF-PCL) nanofibers and PCL microfibers | Structural, compositional, and chemical gradients, higher osteogenic differentiation, enhanced cell proliferation | Needs further validation in long-term in vivo studies, potential challenges in achieving consistent scaffold properties in large-scale production | [46] |
8 | Electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone)–polydimethylsiloxane (PCL-PDMS) copolymer fibers with shape memory effect | Shape memory properties, biocompatible, promotes osteoblast proliferation and biomineralization, high shape recovery and fixity ratios | Requires optimization of PCLratios for specific applications, potential challenges in maintaining shape memory properties during long-term use | [54] |
9 | 3D-printed poly-epsilon-caprolactone (PCL) single microfibers | Biomimetic surface mechanics, linear increase in modulus with strain rate, potential for rational scaffold design | Needs further research to correlate surface mechanics with biological response, potential challenges in achieving consistent mechanical properties in vivo | [48] |
10 | In situ bone tissue engineering using electrospun nanofibrous polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds functionalized with hydroxyapatite (HA) particles via polydopamine (PDA) coating and systemic injection of substance P (SP) | Mobilizes endogenous stem cells, enhances bone tissue regeneration, highly osteo-inductive and biocompatible scaffolds | Requires further validation for clinical applications, potential challenges in optimizing SP dosage and scaffold functionalization | [55] |
11 | Electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofiber meshes with dexamethasone (Dex)-loaded liposomes immobilized on the surface | Sustained release of Dex over 21 days, promotes osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs), non-cytotoxic | Requires further optimization for in vivo applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent release profiles in clinical settings | [44] |
12 | 3D-printed microfibrous porous scaffolds using composite inks of gelatin (Gel), nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HA), and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), combining 3D printing and freeze-drying | Exceptional biodegradation, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility, promotes osteoblast adhesion, growth, and differentiation | Needs further research to optimize scaffold properties for specific bone tissue applications, potential scalability challenges | [49] |
13 | Electrospun poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) membranes loaded with diamond nanoparticles (ND) | Higher mechanical resistance, supports attachment, spreading, and proliferation of human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells, low inflammatory activity | Needs further research to optimize nanoparticle loading and distribution, potential challenges in scaling up production for clinical use | [57] |
14 | Self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds (PuraMatrix) combined with dog mesenchymal stem cells (dMSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) | Promotes new bone regeneration, supports attachment and proliferation of dMSCs, enhances bone quality and formation | Requires further research for long-term in vivo applications, potential challenges in optimizing scaffold composition and combination with PRP | [50] |
15 | Electrospun chitosan–alginate nanofibers with in situ polyelectrolyte complexation | Biocompatible, promotes cell adhesion and proliferation, uniform nanofiber formation without toxic crosslinking agents | Requires further research to optimize electrospinning conditions and scaffold properties for specific tissue applications, potential scalability issues | [47] |
16 | Biodegradable 3D macroporous scaffold from aligned electrospun nanofibrous yarns using poly(L-lactic acid) and polycaprolactone | Supports cell proliferation and ingrowth, promotes bone formation in vitro and in vivo, provides structural support for stem cells | Needs further validation for clinical applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent scaffold properties during large-scale production | [59] |
17 | Piezoelectric 3D fibrous poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-based scaffolds ultrasound-mineralized with calcium carbonate | Biodegradable, stimulates bone tissue repair, enhances osteoblast cell adhesion and proliferation, superhydrophilic mineralized fibers | Requires optimization of mineralization process, potential challenges in achieving consistent piezoelectric properties and scaffold stability | [51] |
18 | Hydrogel fibers encapsulating human stem cells (hiPSCs, hESCs, hUCMSCs) in an injectable calcium phosphate scaffold | Injectable, supports stem cell viability, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation, high mechanical properties | Needs further research on long-term in vivo effects, potential challenges in optimizing hydrogel fiber encapsulation and maintaining cell viability post-injection | [60] |
19 | Three-dimensional (3D) carbon nanofibers from bacterial cellulose, combined with hydroxyapatite (HAp), prepared via carbonization and surface treatment with nitric acid | Promotes mineralization, shows 3D fibrous structural features, supports bone tissue regeneration | Requires further optimization for consistent mineralization and structural properties, potential challenges in large-scale production | [61] |
20 | Biomimetic fiber-guiding scaffolds using solid free-form fabrication methods for bone–ligament complex regeneration | Guides ligamentous fiber orientation, enhances tissue integration, withstands biomechanical loading | Needs further research to optimize scaffold design for various clinical scenarios, potential challenges in achieving consistent fiber orientation | [62] |
21 | Three-dimensional magnetic fibrous scaffold with Fe3O4 nanoparticles and icariin (ICA), expanded by supercritical CO2 | Promotes cell proliferation and viability, enhances porosity and angiogenesis, supports bone tissue engineering | Needs further validation for clinical applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent scaffold properties and magnetic field effects in vivo | [64] |
Nanofibrous Scaffold Structure and Method of Manufacturing | Scaffold Key Properties | Limitations and Critical Factors | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Blended polycaprolactone (PCL)/collagen electrospun scaffolds with varying collagen type I concentrations | Beneficial for cell viability and functionality, ideal concentration at 25% collagen I for vascular grafts | High concentrations of collagen may lead to loss of confluent monolayer, needs optimization for different applications | [17] |
2 | Electrospun fibrous poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF-TrFe) scaffolds | Supports cardiomyocyte differentiation and maturation, provides real-time monitoring of tissue contractions via piezoelectric effect | Requires further research to optimize scaffold properties for specific cardiac applications, potential challenges in achieving consistent piezoelectric responses | [65] |
3 | Electrospun biocomposite nanofibers consisting of Poly(L-lactic acid)–co-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PLACL), silk fibroin (SF), and Aloe Vera (AV) | Porous, beadless, uniform nanofibers, interconnected pores, supports cardiac cell proliferation and expression of cardiac proteins | Requires further optimization for specific cardiac tissue applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent scaffold properties in large-scale production | [66] |
4 | Bacterial cellulose/oxidized bacterial cellulose nanofibrils (BC/oxBCNFs) macro-fibers developed via low-speed rotary coagulation spinning and solvent control | Robust mechanical integrity, high biocompatibility, excellent cell adhesion, supports endothelial and smooth muscle cell proliferation | Needs further validation for clinical applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent scaffold properties and achieving large-scale production | [69] |
Nanofibrous Scaffold Structure and Method of Manufacturing | Scaffold Key Properties | Limitations and Critical Factors | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | High-strength and highly oriented polycaprolactone (PCL) fibers, melt spinning technology | High tensile strength (up to 69 cN/tex), excellent strength retention after 24 weeks in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), resistance to high loads | Potential impact of fiber cross-sectional geometry on cell growth, needs further functionalization studies | [4] |
2 | Electrospun polyethylene oxide (PEO) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)/PEO blend nanofibers | Stable, regular, cylindrical fibers, 3D porous interconnected network, non-toxic, supports cell proliferation | Requires further research to optimize scaffold properties for specific soft tissue applications, potential scalability issues | [72] |
3 | Biodegradable polyurethane microfibers electrospun to create scaffolds with small fiber diameter and interconnected porous network | Elastomeric properties, supports soft tissue engineering, biodegradable via hydrolysis and enzyme-mediated chain cleavage | Needs further research to optimize degradation profile and mechanical properties, potential challenges in maintaining consistent scaffold properties in vivo | [73] |
4 | Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and polyisoprene (PI) fibrous scaffolds processed through dripping technique | Suitable mechanical properties for soft tissue applications, promotes skeletal muscle cell proliferation | Requires further research to optimize scaffold properties for different soft tissue types, potential challenges in achieving consistent cell response and integration | [74] |
5 | Electrospun hybrid nanofibrous meshes made from poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(p-dioxanone) (PPDO) blends | Adjustable surface hydrophilicity, degradation profile, and mechanical properties, promotes cell adhesion and proliferation | Needs further validation for clinical applications, potential challenges in optimizing blend ratios and maintaining consistent scaffold properties in large-scale production | [75] |
6 | Electrospun scaffolds made of PLGA, collagen I, and polyurethane, with varied PLGA ratios (50:50 and 85:15) and fiber orientations | Similar tensile properties to knee ligaments, aligned fibers show higher tensile properties, supports fibroblast attachment and proliferation | Requires further optimization for specific ligament tissue applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent scaffold properties and fiber orientation | [76] |
7 | Alginate (Alg) and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) fibers created by wet spinning in varied proportions and crosslinked with CaCl2 and glutaraldehyde | Good degradability, mechanical strength similar to collagenous fibers, supports tenocyte proliferation and migration | Needs further validation for clinical applications, potential challenges in optimizing crosslinking conditions and maintaining consistent scaffold properties | [77] |
8 | Warp-knitted poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) scaffolds infiltrated with hydrogels and cells for fiber-reinforced matrix | Adjustable porosity and elasticity, supports MSC proliferation and differentiation, suitable for various soft tissues | Needs further research for specific tissue applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent scaffold properties and cell response | [79] |
9 | Electrospun PCL short fibers incorporated in freeze-dried gelatin scaffolds | Hierarchical structure with major pores (50–150 µm), improved mechanical properties, enhanced cell adhesion and proliferation | Needs further validation for clinical applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent scaffold properties and fiber distribution | [81] |
10 | Cellulose acetate (CA) nanofibers with multilayers of positively charged chitosan and negatively charged multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CS/CNTs) or CS/ALG via electrospinning and layer-by-layer (LbL) self-assembly | Three-dimensional fibrous structure, improved protein adsorption, enhanced fibroblast attachment, spreading, and proliferation | Requires optimization for homogeneous structure and composition, addressing potential cytotoxicity concerns of CNTs | [82] |
Nanofibrous Scaffold Structure and Method of Manufacturing | Scaffold Key Properties | Limitations and Critical Factors | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Three-dimensional microfibrous scaffolds made from poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) using a novel microfluidics approach | Enhances proliferation and glial differentiation of adult neural stem cells, provides biological and topographic cues | Needs further validation for long-term effects and functionality in vivo, potential challenges in achieving consistent scaffold properties | [22] |
2 | Electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) nanofibers containing zero-valent iron (Fe) nanoparticles | Increased electrical conductivity and mechanical properties, supports nerve regeneration and neurite outgrowth | Cytotoxicity at high concentrations of Fe nanoparticles, requires optimization of Fe content for safe and effective use | [23] |
3 | PCL nanofibers with LbL self-assembling peptide coating for CRISPR/dCas9 delivery | Efficient loading and sustained release of pDNA complexes, enhanced cell adhesion and proliferation, promotes neurite outgrowth | Requires further validation for clinical applications, addressing potential safety concerns with CRISPR/Cas9 systems | [84] |
4 | Conductive aligned fibrous scaffold of PCL/gelatin/polypyrrole/graphene with ferulic acid encapsulation via electrospinning | Highly aligned fibers, improved conductivity, good mechanical properties, limited cytotoxicity, promotes nerve tissue repair | Needs further research for specific tissue applications, potential challenges in optimizing scaffold properties and ensuring consistent cell response | [85] |
5 | Lycium barbarum polysaccharide (LBP) encapsulated in core–shell-structured PLGA nanofibers via coaxial electrospinning | Enhanced proliferation and neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells, promotion of Schwann cells myelination | Needs further validation for clinical applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent release profiles and scaffold properties | [86] |
6 | Ion beam irradiation into biodegradable nanofibers, poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) fibers irradiated with Kr+ ions at varying fluences | Improved cell attachment, surface chemical modification, decreased average fiber diameter | Requires optimization for homogeneous irradiation effects, addressing potential cytotoxicity concerns of ion beam irradiation | [87] |
Nanofibrous Scaffold Structure and Method of Manufacturing | Scaffold Key Properties | Limitations and Critical Factors | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Phase separation-assisted electrospray and electrostatic focusing to create polylactic acid (PLA) nanofibrous microcapsules | Fiber–particle duality, promotes cell attachment, easy to handle for direct 3D patterning, high-aspect-ratio microscaffolds | Control of microcapsule diameter and surface porosity needs optimization, requires validation for diverse tissue engineering applications | [14] |
2 | Non-mulberry silk fibroin fiber-reinforced chitosan composite scaffold | Facilitates human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) attachment and colonization, enhanced sulfated glycosaminoglycan deposition, expression of collagen type II | Requires further validation for clinical applications, potential challenges in maintaining consistent scaffold properties and biological responses | [89] |
3 | QOS-crosslinked collagen nanofibers via electrospinning | Improved flexibility and thermal stability, potent antibacterial activity, and biocompatibility with primary human dermal fibroblasts and human fetal osteoblasts | Higher concentrations of QOS showed cytotoxic effects, optimization required for balance between antimicrobial properties and biocompatibility | [91] |
4 | Quaternary ammonium organosilane (QOS)-crosslinked collagen nanofibers via electrospinning | Enhanced fibroblast adhesion and proliferation, good swelling property, antibacterial properties, suitable mechanical properties, and biocompatibility | Requires further validation for in vivo applications, stability and consistency of collagen coating over time | [92] |
Nanofibrous Scaffold Structure and Method of Manufacturing | Scaffold Key Properties | Limitations and Critical Factors | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP)-modified core–shell nanofibers using coaxial electrospinning, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) core–shell nanofibers | Enhanced hydrophilicity, increased cell attachment and proliferation, higher osteoinductivity, improved drug release profiles | Needs further investigation into long-term effects and stability of CAP treatment, potential challenges in uniform CAP application during large-scale production | [13] |
2 | PLLA/HAp (hydroxyapatite) nanofibrous scaffold with simvastatin loading via electrospinning and aminolysis | Enhanced osteoblast cell proliferation, tunable aspect ratio of microcylinders, potential for bone tissue regeneration, and controlled drug release | Requires further validation for in vivo applications, optimization of drug loading and release profiles | [95] |
3 | Ciprofloxacin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles incorporated into electrospun fibers | Continuous slow release of antibiotics, high local concentration, biodegradability, biocompatibility, and potential for wide range of tissue engineering applications | Needs further characterization and in vivo studies for clinical translation, ensuring consistent drug release and scaffold properties | [96] |
4 | PCL–gelatin electrospun fibers infused with CO2 | Stabilized PCL within blend without overall deformation, increased Rhodamine B loading concentration, potential for enhanced bioactivity | Optimization required for balancing swelling and compression effects, controlled release profiles need further refinement | [97] |
5 | Natural polymer-based electrospun nanofibers for drug delivery and tissue engineering | Biopolymers like chitosan, alginic acid, hyaluronic acid, collagen, gelatin, and albumin are excellent candidates, improved cell interaction and biocompatibility | Difficulties in electrospinning biopolymers, need for specific conditions, solvent, copolymer addition, and crosslinking for successful spinning | [98] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Omidian, H.; Gill, E.J. Nanofibrous Scaffolds in Biomedicine. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8070269
Omidian H, Gill EJ. Nanofibrous Scaffolds in Biomedicine. Journal of Composites Science. 2024; 8(7):269. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8070269
Chicago/Turabian StyleOmidian, Hossein, and Erma J. Gill. 2024. "Nanofibrous Scaffolds in Biomedicine" Journal of Composites Science 8, no. 7: 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8070269
APA StyleOmidian, H., & Gill, E. J. (2024). Nanofibrous Scaffolds in Biomedicine. Journal of Composites Science, 8(7), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8070269