Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Biofuels Addition on Shock-Induced Ignition and Combustion of Methane–Hydrogen Mixtures
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing Wildfire Prevention through the Integration of Prescribed Burning into ‘Fire-Smart’ Land-Use Policies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Estimation Inventories of Persistent Organic Pollutants from Rice Straw Combustion as an Agricultural Waste

1
Department of Environmental Sciences, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan
2
National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research (CNR-IIA), Via Salaria km 29.300, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy
3
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Center of Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fire 2023, 6(12), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6120459
Submission received: 27 October 2023 / Revised: 28 November 2023 / Accepted: 1 December 2023 / Published: 3 December 2023

Abstract

:
Rice cultivation stands as the primary agricultural activity in Asia, generating a substantial amount of agricultural waste. Unfortunately, this waste is often disposed of through burning, contributing to severe environmental, health and climate issues. This study presents the characterization of PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs. The emissions were quantified using a fixed-grid-system biomass plant and measuring the macro-pollutants online and sampling the organic micro-pollutants and metals in isokinetic mode, followed by ISO and CEN standards methods. Additionally, the role of agrochemicals was monitored in terms of metal catalysis resulting in POP emissions. This study provides the comprehensive characterization of the most relevant groups of pollutants (metals, PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs) resulting from agricultural waste combustion. Prominent catalytic metals quantified were Cu (22–48 µg/Nm3) and Fe (78–113 µg/Nm3). Rice straw samples from AJK exhibited higher values of organochlorine micro-pollutants compared to those from Punjab and Sindh, i.e., ∑PCDD/F (2594 > 1493 > 856 pg/Nm3) and ∑PCB (41 > 38 > 30 pg/Nm3), respectively, whereas the organic micro-pollutants ∑c-PAH, indicators of incomplete combustion (PICs), were recorded high in the samples from Sindh followed by Punjab and AJK. The average EF is 100 pg/kg, 2.2 pg/kg and 1053.6 µg/kg for ∑PCDD/F, ∑PCB and ∑c-PAH. This study supports the idea that the phenomena leading to the formation of dioxin and dioxin-like compounds are influenced not only by poor combustion but also by the presence of metal catalysts in the burned fuel.

1. Introduction

The agricultural system of paddy fields is linked to the production of massive quantities of crop waste after each harvest, including roots, stubble and straw [1]. The world annual rice crop production is 700 million tons, globally producing 80% of crop residue (2.8 billion tons) with 158 million tons of rice harvested in Asia alone [2] (632 million tons of crop residue). It is calculated that the grain-to-straw ratio varies between 0.5 and 0.7 for rice crops [3]. The common disposal method of rice straw is through open-field burnings and, in Asian countries, where this crop represents the economic pillar, this practice represents significant source of pollution [4]. Pakistan contributes 1.7% to the total rice production of Asia, ranking as the tenth producer and fourth exporter [5]. Rice is usually planted in Pakistan during the summer season, around May/June, and harvested around October/November, followed immediately by the cultivation of wheat. The short time between rice harvesting and wheat cultivation leads farmers to dispose of agricultural residues through open burnings [6]. Currently, persistent organic pollutant (POP) emissions from biomass combustion represent significant environmental and health problems for the population of Pakistan. The main territories of Pakistan where rice is grown include the provinces of Sindh and Punjab, and the neighbouring regions of the State of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) [7].
In addition to the internal sources, we must also add the contributions from the main neighbouring rice producers (such as China and India) through the transboundary movement of aerosol [8,9]. Both the local combustion and transboundary movement of aerosols contribute to local and regional air pollution. Prior to this study, the environmental conditions in Pakistan had not been subject to systematic monitoring and evaluation. Therefore, the data obtained from this investigation provide novel insights into the current situation regarding emissions of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Furthermore, the examination of metal emissions aimed to assess the potential impact of agricultural additives on the catalytic activity of chlorinated compounds. Consequently, these findings represent a significant step forward in understanding and addressing the environmental challenges faced in Pakistan.
From 2015 to 2022, the production of rice in Pakistan increased by 4.6%, equal to 7.5 Mt of rice produced, and with it the combustion of its residues (consequently the emission of pollutants) [5]. During the combustion of rice straw, brown clouds are formed, consisting of particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and black carbon (BC) [10]. Due to the poor combustion conditions in the absence of oxygen (oxidizer) caused by the piles, the combustion of rice straw generally produces a large amount of BC. This phenomenon is amplified by the high amount of silica present in this type of straw, which produces sintered forms of ash/fuel/silica that prevent the homogeneous-phase oxidation reactions and reduce the oxygen/fuel contact [11]. Given the high adsorbing power of PM and BC, they could represent a vehicle for POPs that can be generated by bad combustion including PAHs, PCDD/Fs and PCBs [12,13,14].
The formation of halogenated POPs comes from the catalytic action of some metals such as the oxides of copper (Cu) and iron (Fe) [15,16]. These metals are constituent parts of the additives (pesticides, fungicides, herbicides and fertilizers) used on agricultural crops [17] (Supplementary Material Table S1) and they have been detected in biomass combustion emissions [18,19,20]. It must be taken into account that the agricultural additives absorbed by rice plants and accumulated in the straw cannot be linked only to this crop. Part of these additives are absorbed by the soil and therefore also derive from the cultivation of wheat for which the same land area was used (© 2021 Syngenta PAKISTAN–Wheat, 2021 Supplementary Material Table S2 [21]).
Studies conducted by Palma et al. [22] and Carnevale et al. [23] showed that the prominent metals emitted by combustion of agricultural residue waste include Fe, Cu, zinc (Zn), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K) and calcium (Ca). Experimentation led by Mubeen et al. [24] concluded that when metals were combined with chlorine (Cl) and exposed to combustion conditions, it resulted in dioxin emissions, among which copper chloride (CuCl2) is the major contributor in toxicity equivalent (TEQ) values. Dioxin emissions are intensifying compared to previous cultures precisely due to the application of pesticides, for example, in Hokkaido (Japan), atmospheric values have risen from 0.0058 to the existing 0.53 pg-TEQ/m3 [25]. Human exposure to atmospheric chemistry culprits is currently a major problem and is rising with every passing year. Respiratory illnesses have increased threefold in biomass combustion zones [26]. Yao et al. [27] and Zhang et al. [28] reviewed studies on PAH emissions as a result of biomass combustion and concluded that the moisture content, cellulose and lignin characterization of straw type and the emerging volatile compounds accelerated PAH emissions.
The data here reported are part of a larger project in collaboration between the Department of Environmental Sciences of the Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, the Italian National Research Council’s Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research (CNR-IIA) and the Council for Agricultural Research and Economics Centre of Engineering and Agro-Food Processing (CREA-IT). Agricultural waste from the three main regions involved in rice cultivation in Pakistan (Punjab, Sindh and AJK) were compared by burning through a boiler. The project included the characteristics of rice straw residues in combustion and the emissions characterization considering the elemental analysis, the metals content and the quantification of PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs for each type of straw. Furthermore, the influence that the metal content had on the formation of the organochlorines detected was evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rice Straw Samples

The experimentation was carried out on rice straw (Oryza sativa L.) imported from three different localities in Pakistan: Punjab, AJK and Sindh. Composite samples weighing 200 kg each were collected from randomly selected localities of each chosen area. Firstly, the samples were brought to Chakwal Koont agricultural farm of Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi for a period of one week. Later, the samples were transported to the port of Milan in Italy from the port of Karachi in Pakistan via ship cargo, where all facilities were provided for secure storage of sample. In Italy, after reaching the CNR-IIA storage facility, characteristics tests for rice straw were performed as described in Table 1.

2.2. Boiler and Sampling

A fixed-grid-system biomass boiler in the combustion phase, GSA 40–80 kW (D’Alessandro Termomeccanica, La Spezia, Italy), was used as the combustion plant. Under the grid on which the rice straw sample was stored, a fan distributed the air. A double auger mechanism was operated that transported the biomass to the combustion chamber from storage powered by a mechanical system. Sampling for PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs was performed according to an internal method based on EN 1948 reference methods (UNI EN 1948-1:2006, 2006; UNI EN 1948-4:2014, 2014) [29]. Sampling was conducted using an ST5 Isokinetic auto-sampler pump (DadoLab, Cinisello Balsamo, Italy) connected to a titanium probe (Isokinetic Heated Probe HP5 DadoLab, Cinisello Balsamo, Italy), which was separately used to collect both organic micro-pollutants and metals (Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively) [30]. Briefly, PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs analyses were performed using a quartz thimble containing quartz wool (Munktell, Ahlstrom-Munksjö, Helsinki, Finland) heated up to 120 ± 5 °C. The condensed vapors (6 ± 2 °C) and the gaseous fraction of samples were adsorbed on AmberliteTM XAD®-2, (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). At the end of each sampling point, the probe was washed with 200 mL methanol (MeOH), acetone (Ace) and dichloromethane (DCM). Prior to sampling, a sampling standard solution containing isotopically labelled (13C) congeners of PCDD/Fs and PCBs was added to the quartz wool present in the sampling thimble.
As for the analysis of the metals, a quartz fibre filter (QFF) (MK-360, Munktell, Värnamo, Sweden) was used and 3 bubblers were inserted downstream containing a solution of HNO3/H2O2 (3.3%w/w/1.5%w/w), according to [31] for the collection of the volatile fraction. After sampling, the entire probe was washed with the 200 mL HNO3 25%w/w solution. The sampling was carried out between 22 November 2017 and 6 December 2017 (Supplementary Material Table S4). Each sampling point involved laboratory blanks and field blanks that underwent the same treatment as the samples. To ensure control and quality assurance of the entire procedure, blanks were subtracted from real samples.

2.3. Standards and Solvents

All 13C and perdeuterated standard solutions of PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs were purchased from a local distributor of Wellington Laboratories (Guelph, ON, Canada. The sampling standard (SS) solutions contained 13C-PCBs (P48-SS, 10 pg/µL) and 13C-PCDD/Fs (EN-1948SS, 10–20 pg/µL). The extraction standard (ES) solution contained 13C-labelled PCBs and PCDD/Fs (WP-LCS, 10 pg/µL and EN-1948ES, 10–20 pg/µL, respectively). As for PAHs, the ES solution contained perdeuterated compounds (L-429IS, (10 ng/µL). Finally, EN1948-IS (10–20 pg/µL), WP-ISS (10 pg/µL) and L-429RS (10 ng/µL) were used as the injection standard (IS) solutions for PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs, respectively. The GC/MS calibration was performed by the isotopic dilution method, using commercially available calibration curves: EN1948-CVS for PCDD/Fs, P48-W-CVS for PCBs and PAH-CVS-B for PAHs (Wellington Labs, Guelph, Canada). The mixed standard solution used for ICP-MS calibration was obtained from Merck. Ace; the MeOH, toluene (Tol), DCM and n-Hexane (Hex) used in the chemical analysis were purchased from Romil (UK); the MilliQ water was from Millipore (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany); and Suprapur® HNO3 65% was obtained from Merck (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.4. Cleanup and Analysis

2.4.1. PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs

The samples collected were taken to the laboratory for processing. Each sample for micro-pollutants analysis consisted of a thimble, an XAD-2 cartridge, the probe condensation water and the probe wash solution. The condensed water was extracted by liquid/liquid (L/L) extraction with DCM (10% of the total volume) by adding an amount of NaCl (25g) to increase the ionic strength. The extraction was performed 3 times, collecting all the extracts in the same flask. The XAD-2 was placed in the thimble with 4 g of Na2SO4 and the probe wash solution. The whole thimble was extracted in Soxhlet for 36 h with Tol after adding the ES solutions of PCDD/Fs and PCBs (500 pg).
The Soxhlet and the L/L extracts were combined in the same round-bottom flask to be concentrated in a rotary evaporator up to a volume of 10 mL. The extract was divided into two aliquots: PAHs analysis was carried out on 1/10 of the concentrated extract, and the remaining 9/10 of the extract was used for PCDD/Fs and PCBs clean-up and separation, as performed by Guerriero et al. [32]. The two fractions containing PCDD/Fs and PCBs were concentrated and spiked with 13C-labelled injection standards solutions (WP-ISS and EPA1613-IS for PCBs and PCDD/Fs, respectively). PCDD/Fs and PCBs were analysed by triple-quadrupole gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS) (Trace 1310 GC/TSQ 8000 Evo, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); the chromatographic separation was carried out on a DB-XLB column (60 m, 0.25 µm film thickness, 0.25 mm internal diameter, Agilent J&W, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using hydrogen (H2) as the carrier gas [33].
The 1/10th of the extract dedicated to the analysis of PAHs was spiked with the ES (L429-IS) and then cleaned up on a manually packed micro-column (1 g of 3% deactivated basic alumina and 3 g of activated silica) eluted with DCM/Hex 50:50. The eluate was concentrated and then added to labelled IS solution. PAHs analysis was performed on a DSQ II single-quadrupole GC/MS (Trace GC Ultra/DSQ II, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). The separation was performed on an Rxi@-5 ms column (30 m length with 0.25 µm film thickness, and 0.25 mm internal diameter, Restek, Centre County, PA, USA).

2.4.2. Metals

The metal analysis was performed in accordance with ISO 17294-2:2016 using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS 7700 Agilent). The QFF was transferred into a Teflon vessel and subjected to acid attack by a microwave digester (Start D, Milestone, Sorisole, Italy). The acid attack was carried out with a solution of 6 mL of HNO3 (65%) and 3 mL of H2O2 (30%). The probe washes were filtered with a second QFF, which was extracted as above. The extract and the filtrate were unified and added to the more volatile part collected by the solution of the two bubblers. The sample was brought to a final volume of 100 mL after the addition of ultrapure water and subjected to analysis. The calibration of the instrument was performed using multi-element standards (standard mix, 10 ppm metal concentration, Christiansburg, VA, USA), prepared in aqueous solution acidified with 1% of HNO3. Instrumental calibration was performed with 5 standards of increasing concentrations (from 5 to 100 ppb). Yttrium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as an internal standard through the automatic input system provided by the instrument.

2.5. Emission Factors

Consider the calculation of the emissivity factor as follows (Equation (1)):
EF = (X⋅flow rate dry)/B
EF: emission factor expressed in 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) TEQ pg/kg for PCDD/Fs and PCBs and in benzo[a]pyrene (B(a)P) TEQ µg/Kg for carcinogenic PAHs (c-PAH).
X: summation of the concentrations of each congener of the class expressed in TCDD TEQ (pg/Nm3) for PCDD/Fs and PCBs and in B(a)P TEQ (µg/Nm3) for c-PAHs.
flow rate dry: average dry flow rate in Nm3/h.
B: Kg/h of biomass burned.

3. Results

3.1. Biomass Characterization

Biomass characterization was observed as mentioned in Table 1. The characterization was carried out before sample combustion. A high average ash content, represented as a percentage, indicates an elevated silica content resulting from combustion. It also enhances the bad combustion conditions in the boiler bed that inhibit the pollutant emissions [23], which is discussed in the coming sections in detail.

3.2. Metals

As a reference, the current legislation for plant emissions was taken into consideration, i.e., the European Directive (EU) 2015/2193, which identifies the limits for the total content of metals in fumes (European Commission, 2015)). The concentrations of metals recorded in the emissions of the three samples of straw are justified by the type of combustion system (Table 2). The study of metals was aimed at evaluating whether the presence of specific species during combustion acted as a catalyst for the formation of organic chlorinated micro-pollutants. Among these metals, it is known that Cu is the one that favours the formation of organochlorine micro-pollutants, while other metals such as Zn and Cd have significantly lower catalytic activity [34]. From Table 2, it can be observed that the Cu in the AJK rice straw sample reaches 48 ± 1 µg/Nm3, which is greater than the sample from Punjab (35 ± 1 µg/Nm3) and more than double compared to the rice straw samples from Sindh (22 ± 1 µg/Nm3). Palma et al. [30] support the same trends in relation to the metal’s catalytic action in the formation of PCDD/Fs and PCBs. The other metals, on the other hand, have very different trends. For example, Fe is lower in AJK rice straw (78 ± 2 µg/Nm3) but acts as a powerful precursor due to its effective catalytic activity, along with Cu (22–48 µg/Nm3), in the formation of PCBs and PCDD/Fs. Mg, Ca, Fe and Zn being the top emerging metals might be a result of the irrigation water and fertilizers used for crop growth [30,35].

3.3. PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs

Rice straw has a high silica content (10–15%), which tends to polymerize in the cell wall of the epidermis at high temperatures [36]. Rice straw also contains cellulose (32% to 47%), hemicellulose (19% to 27%) and lignin (5% to 24%), with the latter known as a lingo-cellulosic biomass [37,38]. Compared to other biomasses, rice straw is considered a low-performance fuel due to its low calorific value [39]. It is apparent from Table 3 that high quantities of micro-pollutants were produced by the combustion tests of the three rice straw samples. The distribution of the PCDD/F, PCB and PAH classes varies significantly depending on the types of rice straw, i.e., a characteristic fingerprint for rice straws is not obtained, even when using similar combustion conditions. As observed from Table 1, the macro-constituents of the fuels appear to be similar. The PCDD/F concentrations in the emissions from AJK rice straw are significantly higher than the others (2594 TEQ pg/Nm3). The Deacon reaction for dioxin formation explains the higher production in AJK as higher Cu concentrations enhance emissions.
In the three rice straw samples, there is a clear dominance of OctaCDD, 2,3,7,8 TetraCDF and 1,2,3,7,8 PentaCDF compared to other congeners. The sum PCDD/Fs TEQ is higher in the AJK rice straw sample followed by the Punjab and Sindh samples. OCDD represents the lead emission, depicting a highly stable and persistent PCDD congener. It is formed as an impurity in products of chlorine chemistry, such as chlorophenols, which are among the main starting products of the chlorinated pesticides used in agriculture [40]. But a significantly higher emission of 2,3,7,8 TetraCDF is observed from the Punjab sample, of 964 pg/Nm3. It is followed by the emissions of 1,2,3,7,8 PentaCDF, recorded as 642 pg/Nm3 (AJK), and 1,2,3,7,8 PentaCDF, noted as 465 pg/Nm3.
All values were correlated with the International Toxicity Equivalency Factor (I-TEFs) NATO 1988 recommendation index for TEF. Based on the results, these three compounds potentially contributed to the total PCDD/F findings. The combustion conditions were supported by the addition of metals as catalysts (Cu or Fe) [23], or were inhibited, as in the case of rice straw, due to the high silica and lignocellulose content [41]. The literature also supports the fact that thermal decomposition of lignocellulose material favours the formation of phenols, resulting in the precursor route of dioxin formations [42].
The data from Table 4 reveal an interesting phenomenon for PCDD/Fs. The significantly higher sum PCB data revealed by AJK rice straw samples (41 dl-TEQ pg/Nm3), followed by Punjab (38 dl-TEQ pg/Nm3) and Sindh (30 dl-TEQ pg/Nm3), likely contribute to the sum PCDD/Fs concentrations. This is based on a consideration of the PCB values detected in the three straw samples in relation to TEFs articulated by World Health Organization (WHO) 2006 guidelines (Table 4). Table 4 is quite revealing in several ways as it can be noticed that the highest TEQ was emitted by 2,3′,4,4′,5-PentaCB, attributed to both its abundance in the intentionally produced industrial mixtures and its high persistence in the environment among all the dl-PCBs. As reported by Kaya et al. [43], 2,3′,4,4′,5-PentaCB is the most abundant dioxin-like congener among the PCB congeners of Aroclor 1254, accounting for, on average, 7% to 13.5% by weight depending on the production lot. According to the sales record of Monsanto U.S., the world’s biggest PCB producer, between 1957 and 1974 Aroclor 1254 was the second most produced/sold Aroclor mixture after Aroclor 1242. Moreover, it is one of the most persistent dioxin-like congeners in the environment, while 3,3′,4,4′,5-PentaCB was present at 38 pg/ Nm3 (AJK), followed by 35 pg/ Nm3 (Punjab) and 26 pg/ Nm3 (Sindh). Interestingly, the highest collective emissions emerged from the Sindh rice straw samples (87,255 pg /Nm3), but TEQs conflict this trend and AJK (41 dl-TEQ pg/Nm3) shows a rise as a result. This might be the reason for the highest results being obtained for 3,3′,4,4′,5-PentaCB and its highest WHO-TEF.
Chlorinated compounds originating from pesticides or fertilizers were believed to be responsible for dioxin emissions resulting from combustion [22,30,44]. These compounds are normally not specifically associated with combustion. In fact, they are found mostly in ambient air samples and especially in urban areas [45]. We observed higher dioxin emissions than those reported in the literature for PCBs [30], which was assumed to be due to poor combustion conditions during the rice straw experiment [46]. Several scientific pieces of evidence demonstrate how chlorine acts as a catalyst during combustion in the Deacon synthesis process for the formation of chlorinated compounds [47,48]. Cu mainly derives from the fungicide treatments to which the rice crop is subjected at various stages of growth. As listed in the Supplementary Materials, more than one fungicide contains the metal Cu, i.e., copper oxychloride and cuprous oxide, and it is also present in a mixture of products such as Bordeaux and Moltovin (see Supplementary Material Table S1).
The concentrations of PAHs compared to those of PCDD/Fs and PCBs are significantly higher (Table 5). Fourteen PAHs were quantified during the current study including carcinogenic compounds (benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(b+j)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene), as notified by USEPA (1998) and the European Council (2004). Sum PAHs were considerably higher in Sindh (18,536 ng/Nm3) followed by Punjab (15,353 ng/Nm3) and AJK (15,207 ng/Nm3) rice straw samples. Benzo(a)pyrene had the highest TEF value [49], which is also a contributing factor to the highest values from straw samples that ranged between 6779 and 10,327 ng/Nm3, dominated by Sindh, having greater toxicity threats. These values are directly expressed as TEQ itself. Therefore, having the highest TEF, it is the compound that represented most of the total concentration of PAHs in the individual experiments of rice straw combustion.
In the Sindh samples, a trend of a rise in fluranthene by 3398 ng/Nm3 followed by dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (1787–2285 ng/Nm3) was observed. Moisture percentage, metal catalysts and high lignin content resulted in higher PAH emissions [42]. According to Zhang et al. [50], atmospheric PAH values show higher trends in the winter season than the summer season due to the increased use of biomass as a fuel.
The TEQs of sum of dioxin (PCDD/Fs), dioxin-like compounds (PCBs) and carcinogenic PAHs are collectively presented in Table 6 to express a complete but precise picture. Rice straw is proven to be a higher lignocellulosic material that produces more dioxin and dioxin-like compounds than lignocellulosic agricultural waste, as it inhibits combustion conditions [51,52]. Another prominent reason is the use of catalyst-based pesticides during cropping stages. It has been estimated that the combustion of chlorinated pesticides increased the concentrations of dioxin and dioxin-like compounds 35- to 270-fold [53,54]. According to Tame et al. [39] and Wilhelm et al. [43], the combustion of PAH in the presence of metal catalysts results in the emission of dioxin and dioxin-like compounds.

3.4. Emission Factors

POPs bioaccumulate and biomagnify, so controlling them is important; although the data on chlorinated organic micropollutants are essential, they take a back seat to those of c-PAHs. Table 7 depicts the total emission factor (EF) for PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PAHs from rice straw as an agricultural waste combusted in a fixed-grid biomass burning plant. EF represents the mean POP concentrations released per unit of activity. The total biomass burned during this study is documented in Table S4 of the Supplementary Materials, while the total rice crop production is documented in Table S3 of the Supplementary Materials to understand the extent of the combustion issue.
According to the mentioned data, c-PAH takes the lead with an average of 1053.6 µg TEQ/kg released, followed by PCDD/Fs and PCBs. The details of the major contributing compounds in this emission profile are mentioned in the previous section (see Section 2.3). The extent of TEQ values increased with the increase in the biomass quantity subjected to combustion. This quantification multiplies manyfold in the case of an open-burning scenario, as assumed by Sormo et al. [55]. The data depict that the AJK rice straw samples were in the lead in PCDD/F and PCB emissions, while the Sindh straw samples raised concerns with the rise in c-PAHs.

4. Conclusions

Biomass combustion stands out as the most prominent cause of toxic pollutants in the atmosphere. With an increase in population there is a demand for increased agricultural commodity production, leading to more residue wastage. The results in Section 2 of this research article indicate that the combustion of agricultural residual biomass results in certain emissions, leading to an increased threat with contributing catalytic factors. Bad combustion is a potential cause of c-PAHs, as proven in this study. In case of rice straw, the foremost factor contributing to increased emissions is bad combustion due to the silica, lignin and cellulose content of rice straw. Later, Cu and Fe, interestingly followed by Deacon synthesis, resulted in emerging PCDD/F and PCB emissions. Dioxins are characterized as widespread in the air due to their stability, persistence, bioaccumulative tendencies and lipophilic nature. They can be found globally because of long-range transport mechanisms, and the highly chlorinated PCDD/F variants tend to stay in the atmosphere since they are readily trapped by airborne particles. AJK rice straw samples, followed by Punjab and Sindh samples, with a prevalence of 2,3,7, 8-TetraCDF and 1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF for PCDD/Fs and following the same trend for PCBs (with 118, 105 and 167 as majority congeners), showed the same activity as major dioxin categories. In terms of PAH emissions, the concentrations are quite similar for all three types of straw samples, which are on the order of µg/Nm3, while the Sindh samples take the lead, followed by the Punjab and AJK samples. Between Zn, Fe, Cd and Cr identified in the literature as catalysts for the production of chlorinated POPs, there are no trends that identify a correspondence in the various congeners of the samples. Interestingly, however, dioxin and dl-PCBs have the same trends as those identified in Cu concentrations. The emission factor analysis of total chlorinated pollutant emissions (PCDD/Fs + PCBs) showed that the largest contribution comes precisely from PCDD/Fs compared to PCBs. For this reason, the type of fertilizer/pesticide containing Cu must be chosen based on the fate of agricultural crop residues, especially if subjected to burning. Currently, the average concentrations of c-PAHs found in B(a)P TEQ for each kg of straw burned are in the hundreds of micrograms, and this is important considering the temporal trend of rice cultivation over the years in Pakistan. Based on the findings of the current study regarding the POP emission profile, it can be determined that there is a very high risk to human health and the surrounding environment. An alternative use of rice crop waste should be considered to eliminate the potential risk of combustion.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fire6120459/s1. Table S1: Rice crop spray used in Pakistan (© 2021 Syngenta PAKISTAN—Rice, 2021). Table S2: Wheat crop spray used in Pakistan (© 2021 Syngenta PAKISTAN—Wheat, 2021). Table S3: Statistics of total area of Rice cultivation, Rice crop production and yield from past 5 years in Pakistan (Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (Government of Pakistan). Pakistan Economy Survey 2019–2020, 2020). Table S4: Details of Metals and POPs (PCDD/fs, PCBs and PAHs) samplings. Tav Stack: Average temperature in the stack (°C); Biomass feeding: kg of biomass burned per hour (kg/h).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.M. and A.K. (Asma Khalid); methodology, E.G. and A.K. (Asma Khalid); software, A.K. (Asma Khalid) and E.G.; validation, E.G.; formal analysis, A.K. (Asma Khalid), E.P. and M.C.; investigation, M.C.; resources, T.M., A.K. (Azeem Khalid) and E.G.; data curation, A.K. (Asma Khalid), M.C. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K. (Asma Khalid); writing—review and editing, M.C. and E.G.; visualization, A.K. (Asma Khalid); supervision, T.M., E.G. and F.G.; project administration, E.G.; funding acquisition, T.M. and A.K. (Azeem Khalid). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by both the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan under the IRSIP scholarship program 1-8/HEC/HRD/2016/6283 and the Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies (MiPAAF) under the AGROENER project (D. D. n. 26329, 01/04/2016) and the analyses were carried out at the LASER-B laboratory of CREA-IT and the Organic Micro-pollutants laboratory of CNR-IIA.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

I am highly thankful to my family and all colleagues at CNR-IIA and CREA that helped me through my research work and make me feel at home, far from home.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AbbreviationsExplanation
AceAcetone
AJKAzad Jammu Kashmir
BCBlack carbon
CCarbon
CaCalcium
CENEuropean Committee for Standardization
ClChlorine
CNR-IIANational Research Council of Italy, Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research
c-PAHCarcinogenic Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
CREA-ITCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Center of Engineering and Agro-Food Processing
CuCopper
DCMDichloromethane
EFEmission factors
ESExtraction standard
FeIron
GC/MSGas chromatography/mass spectroscopy
HHydrogen
H2O2Hydrogen peroxide
HexHexane
HNO3Nitric acid
ICP-MSInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
ISInjection standards
ISOInternational Standard Organization
I-TEFInternational Toxicity Equivalent Factor
KPotassium
Kg/hKilogram per hour
MeOHMethanol
MgMagnesium
NNitrogen
NaSodium
Na2SO4Sodium sulphate
NaClSodium chloride
NATONorth Atlantic Treaty Organization
O2Oxygen
PAHPoly aromatic hydrocarbon
PCBPoly chlorinated biphenyls
PCDDsPolychlorinated dibenzodioxins
PCDFsPolychlorinated fibenzofurans
pg/Nm3Pico gram per normal cubic metre
PICsProducts of incomplete combustion
PMParticulate matter
POPsPersistent organic pollutants
ppbParts per billion
QFFQuartz fibre filter
SSulphur
SSSampling standard
TCDD2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
TEQToxicity equivalent quotient
TolToluene
USEPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agency
WHOWorld Health Organization
XAD-2Amberlite styrene-divinylbenzene (macroreticular)
ZnZinc

References

  1. Porichha, G.K.; Hu, Y.; Rao KT, V.; Xu, C.C. Crop Residue Management in India: Stubble Burning vs. Other Utilizations Including Bioenergy. Energies 2021, 14, 4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohidem, N.A.; Hashim, N.; Shamsudin, R.; Man, H.C. Rice for Food Security: Revisiting Its Production, Diversity, Rice Milling Process and Nutrient Content. Agriculture 2022, 6, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Van Hung, N.; Maguyon-Detras, M.C.; Migo, M.V.; Quilloy, R.; Balingbing, C.; Chivenge, P.; Gummert, M. Rice Straw Overview: Availability, Properties, and Management Practices. In Sustainable Rice Straw Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dutta, A.; Patra, A.; Hazra, K.K.; Nath, C.P.; Kumar, N.; Rakshit, A. A State of the Art Review in Crop Residue Burning in India: Previous Knowledge, Present Circumstances and Future Strategies. Environ. Chall. 2022, 8, 100581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ilyas, I.; Umair, A.; Sangi, A. Exploring Potential of Rice Exports from Pakistan Lead Researchers. 2022; pp. 8–11. Available online: https://tdap.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rice-Report_FINAL-DRAFT_compressed.pdf (accessed on 27 October 2023).
  6. Ahmed, T.; Ahmad, B.; Ahmad, W. Why Do Farmers Burn Rice Residue? Examining Farmers’ Choices in Punjab, Pakistan. Land Use Policy 2015, 47, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ishfaq, M.; Akbar, N.; Batool, Z.; Ibrahim, M.U.; Aslam, A.; Zulfiqar, U.; Anjum, S.A.; Akhtar, M.F.; Ahmad, M. Screening and Adaptability of Rice Varieties for Yield, Milling Recoveries, and Quality Traits under Dry Direct-Seeded Rice. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 58, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abdurrahman, M.I.; Chaki, S.; Saini, G. Stubble Burning: Effects on Health & Environment, Regulations and Management Practices. Environ. Adv. 2020, 2, 100011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martínez-Eixarch, M.; Alcaraz, C.; Viñas, M.; Noguerol, J.; Aranda, X.; Prenafeta-Boldú, F.X.; Català-Forner, M.; Fennessy, M.S.; Ibáñez, C. The Main Drivers of Methane Emissions Differ in the Growing and Flooded Fallow Seasons in Mediterranean Rice Fields. Plant Soil 2021, 460, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Junpen, A.; Pansuk, J.; Kamnoet, O.; Cheewaphongphan, P.; Garivait, S. Emission of Air Pollutants from Rice Residue Open Burning in Thailand, 2018. Atmosphere 2018, 9, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Awasthi, A.; Bhaskar, T. Combustion of Lignocellulosic Biomass. In Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals: Biofuels: Alternative Feedstocks and Conversion Processes for the Production of Liquid and Gaseous Biofuels; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Migo-Sumagang, M.V.P.; Van Hung, N.; Detras, M.C.M.; Alfafara, C.G.; Borines, M.G.; Capunitan, J.A.; Gummert, M. Optimization of a Downdraft Furnace for Rice Straw-Based Heat Generation. Renew. Energy 2020, 148, 953–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nair, M.; Bherwani, H.; Kumar, S.; Gulia, S.; Goyal, S.; Kumar, R. Assessment of Contribution of Agricultural Residue Burning on Air Quality of Delhi Using Remote Sensing and Modelling Tools. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 230, 117504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tipayarom, A.; Kim Oanh, N.T. Influence of Rice Straw Open Burning on Levels and Profiles of Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air. Chemosphere 2020, 243, 125379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Akbari, M.Z.; Khamkaew, C.; Thepnuan, D.; Wiriya, W.A.N.; Chantara, S. Elemental Composition of Pm2. 5 Emitted from Rice Straw Burning in Combustion Chamber. In Proceedings of the 81st IASTEM International Conference, Phuket, Thailand, 9–10 October 2017; pp. 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  16. Alengebawy, A.; Abdelkhalek, S.T.; Qureshi, S.R.; Wang, M.Q. Heavy Metals and Pesticides Toxicity in Agricultural Soil and Plants: Ecological Risks and Human Health Implications. Toxics 2021, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, M.M.; Cheema, M.J.M.; Arshad, M.; Khaliq, T. Evaluation of Climate Change Adaptation Practices in the Agriculture Sector Using Satellite Imagery in Pakistan. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 57, 1317–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ansari, M.K.A.; Oztetik, E.; Ahmad, A.; Umar, S.; Iqbal, M.; Owens, G. Identification of the Phytoremediation Potential of Indian Mustard Genotypes for Copper, Evaluated from a Hydroponic Experiment. Clean-Soil Air Water 2013, 41, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hidayatun, N.; Diaz, Q.; Genaleen, M.; Ismail, A.M. Exploring Aluminum Tolerance at Seedling Stage in Rice (Oryza sativa, Linn) by Using Modified Magnavaca Nutrient Solution. Bul. Plasma Nutfah 2017, 23, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Javaid, S. Heavy Metals Stress, Mechanism and Remediation Techniques in Rice (Oryza sativa L.): A Review. Pure Appl. Biol. 2020, 9, 403–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, M.I.; Shoukat, M.A.; Cheema, S.A.; Arif, H.N.; Niazi, N.K.; Azam, M.; Bashir, S.; Ashraf, I.; Qadri, R. Use, Contamination and Exposure of Pesticides in Pakistan: A Review. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 57, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Palma, A.; Gallucci, F.; Papandrea, S.; Carnevale, M.; Paris, E.; Vincenti, B.; Salerno, M.; Di Stefano, V.; Proto, A.R. Experimental Study of the Combustion of and Emissions from Olive and Citrus Pellets in a Small Boiler. Fire 2023, 6, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Carnevale, M.; Paris, E.; Vincenti, B.; Palma, A.; Salerno, M.; Guerriero, E.; Mancini, R.; Calcopietro, M.; Gallucci, F. Combustion and Emission Analysis of Spent Mushroom Compost and Forestry Woodchip for Management and Energy Production. Fire 2023, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mubeen, I.; Lin, X.; Buekens, A.; Cao, X.; Lu, S.; Tang, M.; Yan, J. PCDD/F Formation in Milled Fly Ash: Metal Chloride Catalysis. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2017, 17, 2858–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Anezaki, K.; Kashiwagi, N. Daily Variations and Factors of Atmospheric PCDD/Fs in Post-Harvest Paddy Fields: PCDD/F Source Estimation Using a Bayesian Semi-Factor Model. Chemosphere 2021, 268, 129292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chakrabarti, S.; Khan, M.T.; Kishore, A.; Roy, D.; Scott, S.P. Risk of Acute Respiratory Infection from Crop Burning in India: Estimating Disease Burden and Economic Welfare from Satellite and National Health Survey Data for 250,000 Persons. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 48, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yao, W.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, M.; Song, W.; Yu, D. Emissions of Toxic Substances from Biomass Burning: A Review of Methods and Technical Influencing Factors. Processes 2023, 11, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Bai, P.; Hayakawa, K.; Zhang, L.; Tang, N. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Emitted from Open Burning and Stove Burning of Biomass: A Brief Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 7, 3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Guerriero, E.; Guarnieri, A.; Mosca, S.; Rossetti, G.; Rotatori, M. PCDD/Fs Removal Efficiency by Electrostatic Precipitator and Wetfine Scrubber in an Iron Ore Sintering Plant. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 1498–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Palma, A.; Paris, E.; Carnevale, M.; Vincenti, B.; Perilli, M.; Guerriero, E.; Cerasa, M.; Proto, A.R.; Papandrea, S.F.; Bonofiglio, R.; et al. Biomass Combustion: Evaluation of POPs Emissions (VOC, PAH, PCB, PCDD/F) from Three Different Biomass Prunings (Olive, Citrus and Grapevine). Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Colantoni, A.; Paris, E.; Bianchini, L.; Ferri, S.; Marcantonio, V.; Carnevale, M.; Palma, A.; Civitarese, V.; Gallucci, F. Spent Coffee Ground Characterization, Pelletization Test and Emissions Assessment in the Combustion Process. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Guerriero, E.; Mosca, S.; Torelli, G.N.; Tramontana, G.; Pomponio, S.; Rossetti, G.; Rotatori, M. Evaluation of a Simultaneous Sampling Method of PAHs, PCDD/Fs and Dl-PCBs in Ambient Air. J. Environ. Monit. 2010, 12, 1092–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Benedetti, P.; Guerriero, E.; Mosca, S.; Rotatori, M. Analysis of Polychlorodibenzo-p-Dioxins and Polychlorodibenzofurans in Stationary Source Emissions in GC–MS/MS Using Hydrogen as the Carrier Gas. J. Sep. Sci. 2017, 40, 3469–3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, M.; Buekens, A.; Olie, K.; Li, X. PCDD/F-Isomers Signature—Effect of Metal Chlorides and Oxides. Chemosphere 2017, 184, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rashid, A.; Schutte, B.J.; Ulery, A.; Deyholos, M.K.; Sanogo, S.; Lehnhoff, E.A.; Beck, L. Heavy Metal Contamination in Agricultural Soil: Environmental Pollutants Affecting Crop Health. Agronomy 2023, 6, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Do, N.H.; Pham, H.H.; Le, T.M.; Lauwaert, J.; Diels, L.; Verberckmoes, A.; Do, N.H.N.; Tran, V.T.; Le, P.K. The Novel Method to Reduce the Silica Content in Lignin Recovered from Black Liquor Originating from Rice Straw. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Syazwanee, M.; Shaziera, A.; Izzati, M.; Azwady, A.; Muskhazli, M. Improvement of Delignification, Desilication and Cellulosic Content Availability in Paddy Straw via Physico-Chemical Pretreatments. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2018, 26, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oladosu, Y.; Rafii, M.Y.; Abdullah, N.; Magaji, U.; Hussin, G.; Ramli, A.; Miah, G. Fermentation Quality and Additives: A Case of Rice Straw Silage. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 7985167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Safe, S.; Hutzinger, O. PCDDs and PCDFs: Sources and Environmental Impact. In Environmental Toxin Series; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1990; Volume 3, pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Paris, E.; Carnevale, M.; Guerriero, E.; Palma, A.; Vincenti, B.; Khalid, A.; Rantica, E.; Proto, A.R.; Gallucci, F. Fixed Source Monitoring System for Marker Emission during Biomass Combustion. Renew. Energy 2023, 208, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, C.; Bai, L.; Yao, Q.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Shen, L.; Sippula, O.; Yang, J.; Zhao, J.; Liu, J.; et al. Emission Characteristics of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Dibenzofurans from Industrial Combustion of Biomass Fuels. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kaya, D.; Imamoglu, I.; Sanin, F.D.; Sowers, K.R. A Comparative Evaluation of Anaerobic Dechlorination of PCB-118 and Aroclor 1254 in Sediment Microcosms from Three PCB-Impacted Environments. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 341, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, H.; Liu, W.; Tang, C.; Lei, R.; Zhu, W. Emission Profiles and Formation Pathways of 2,3,7,8-Substituted and Non-2,3,7,8-Substituted Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Dibenzofurans in Secondary Copper Smelters. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zieliński, M.; Kamińska, J.; Czerska, M.; Ligocka, D.; Urbaniak, M. Levels and Sources of PCDDs, PCDFs and Dl-PCBs in the Water Ecosystems of Central Poland—A Mini Review. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2014, 27, 902–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, M.; Buekens, A.; Li, X. Dioxins from Biomass Combustion: An Overview. Waste Biomass Valorization 2017, 8, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huang, H.; Buekens, A. On the Mechanisms of Dioxin Formation in Combustion Processes. Chemosphere 1995, 31, 4099–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kreisz, S.; Hunsinger, H.; Vogg, H. Wet Scrubbers—A Potential PCDD/F Source? Chemosphere 1996, 32, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hester, R.E.; Harrison, R.M. (Eds.) Air Pollution and Health; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 1998; Volume 4, 129p, ISBN 0-85404-245-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Q.; Huang, J.; Yu, G. Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Dibenzofurans Emissions from Open Burning of Crop Residues in China between 1997 and 2004. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 151, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tame, N.W.; Dlugogorski, B.Z.; Kennedy, E.M. Conversion of Wood Pyrolysates to PCDD/F. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2009, 32, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tame, N.W.; Dlugogorski, B.Z.; Kennedy, E.M. PCDD/F Formation from Heterogeneous Oxidation of Wood Pyrolysates. Fire Saf. Sci. 2008, 9, 1189–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, T.; Huang, J.; Deng, S.; Yu, G. Influence of Pesticides Contamination on the Emission of PCDD/PCDF to the Land from Open Burning of Corn Straws. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1744–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vikelsøe, J.; Johansen, E. Estimation of Dioxin Emission from Fires in Chemicals. Chemosphere 2000, 40, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wilhelm, J.; Stieglitz, L.; Dinjus, E.; Will, R. Mechanistic Studies on the Role of PAHs and Related Compounds in PCDD/F Formation on Model Fly Ashes. Chemosphere 2001, 42, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sørmo, E.; Krahn, K.M.; Flatabø, G.Ø.; Hartnik, T.; Arp, H.P.H.; Cornelissen, G. Distribution of PAHs, PCBs, and PCDD/Fs in Products from Full-Scale Relevant Pyrolysis of Diverse Contaminated Organic Waste. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 461, 132546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematics of sampling setup for organic micro-pollutants: Red strips: Chimney (1) gooseneck with interchangeable nozzles, (2) type S pitot tube, (3) heated probe, mod. HP5, (4) inner tube, (5) slide-and-lock device, (6) HUB for Outstack filterholder and 4DL manifold, (7) filterholder, (8) FC5 condenser for PCDDs/PCDFs, PCB and PAH, (9) SC6 Smart Chiller, (10) silica gel protection trap, (11) umbilical cable including 4TC + pitot tube + 2 thermoregulators + suction tube, (12) automatic isokinetic sampler, mod. ST5 Evo).
Figure 1. Schematics of sampling setup for organic micro-pollutants: Red strips: Chimney (1) gooseneck with interchangeable nozzles, (2) type S pitot tube, (3) heated probe, mod. HP5, (4) inner tube, (5) slide-and-lock device, (6) HUB for Outstack filterholder and 4DL manifold, (7) filterholder, (8) FC5 condenser for PCDDs/PCDFs, PCB and PAH, (9) SC6 Smart Chiller, (10) silica gel protection trap, (11) umbilical cable including 4TC + pitot tube + 2 thermoregulators + suction tube, (12) automatic isokinetic sampler, mod. ST5 Evo).
Fire 06 00459 g001
Figure 2. Schematics of sampling setup for metals: Red strips: Chimney (1) gooseneck with interchangeable nozzles, (2) type S pitot tube, (3) heated probe, mod. HP5, (4) inner tube, (5) slide-and-lock device, (6) HUB for Outstack filterholder and 4DL manifold, (7) filterholder and side sampling connector (derivation), (8) impingers train for main line (water content determination), (9) impingers train for side sampling, (10) athermal box with support foam, (11) 100 cc silica gel protection trap for side sampling line, (12) QB1 V1.5 (side sampler), (13) 1 Lt silica gel protection trap for side sampling line, (14) umbilical cable including 4TC + pitot tube + 2 thermoregulators + suction tube, (15) automatic isokinetic sampler, mod. ST5 Evo.
Figure 2. Schematics of sampling setup for metals: Red strips: Chimney (1) gooseneck with interchangeable nozzles, (2) type S pitot tube, (3) heated probe, mod. HP5, (4) inner tube, (5) slide-and-lock device, (6) HUB for Outstack filterholder and 4DL manifold, (7) filterholder and side sampling connector (derivation), (8) impingers train for main line (water content determination), (9) impingers train for side sampling, (10) athermal box with support foam, (11) 100 cc silica gel protection trap for side sampling line, (12) QB1 V1.5 (side sampler), (13) 1 Lt silica gel protection trap for side sampling line, (14) umbilical cable including 4TC + pitot tube + 2 thermoregulators + suction tube, (15) automatic isokinetic sampler, mod. ST5 Evo.
Fire 06 00459 g002
Table 1. Characterization of rice straw biomass (mean values and standard deviations obtained by performing three measurements on three distinct samples of the biomass).
Table 1. Characterization of rice straw biomass (mean values and standard deviations obtained by performing three measurements on three distinct samples of the biomass).
CharacteristicsPunjabAJKSindh
Moisture on a dry basis %9.3 ± 0.39.6 ± 0.310.2 ± 0.4
Ashes average %18.2 ± 0.217.1 ± 0.215.6 ± 0.2
Highest Calorific Power (MJ/Kg)14.7 ± 0.414.5 ± 0.414.9 ± 0.4
Lower Calorific Value (MJ/Kg)13.5 ± 0.413.4 ± 0.413.7 ± 0.4
C (%)36.4 ± 0.238.3 ± 0.237.3 ± 0.2
H (%)6.0 ± 0.15.6 ± 0.16.0 ± 0.1
N (%)0.8 ± 0.20.7 ± 0.20.5 ± 0.2
S (%)0.1 ± 0.20.1 ± 0.20.1 ± 0.2
O (%)38.6 ± 0.438.4 ± 0.440.5 ± 0.4
Table 2. Metal concentrations (µg/Nm3) in the emissions from the three straw samples from the regions of Punjab, AJK and Sindh (mean values and standard deviations obtained by conducting three measurements on the same emission sample).
Table 2. Metal concentrations (µg/Nm3) in the emissions from the three straw samples from the regions of Punjab, AJK and Sindh (mean values and standard deviations obtained by conducting three measurements on the same emission sample).
MetalsPunjab
(µg/Nm3)
AJK
(µg/Nm3)
Sindh
(µg/Nm3)
Mg321 ± 7611 ± 10691 ± 10
Al82 ± 253 ± 298 ± 2
Ca362 ± 7486 ± 9370 ± 7
Cr4.9 ± 0.12.2 ± 0.14.3 ± 0.1
Mn18.3 ± 0.430.4 ± 0.632.9 ± 0.7
Fe113 ± 278 ± 2106 ± 2
Co1.3 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.1
Ni11.1 ± 0.39.9 ± 0.36.2 ± 0.2
Cu35 ± 148 ± 122 ± 1
Zn134 ± 389 ± 293 ± 2
Sr4.9 ± 0.222.2 ± 0.516.6 ± 0.4
Ag0.1 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.1
Cd0.9 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.1
Ba1.9 ± 0.14.4 ± 0.13.8 ± 0.1
Tl0.1 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.1
Pb13.5 ± 0.314.5 ± 0.314.4 ± 0.3
Bi4 ± 0.17.2 ± 0.18.8 ± 0.2
Table 3. PCDD/F concentrations (in pg/Nm3 and pg TEQ/Nm3) and their TEQs for rice straw samples in reference to International Toxicity Equivalency Factors (I-TEFs NATO 1988).
Table 3. PCDD/F concentrations (in pg/Nm3 and pg TEQ/Nm3) and their TEQs for rice straw samples in reference to International Toxicity Equivalency Factors (I-TEFs NATO 1988).
PunjabAJKSindh
CompoundI-TEFpg/Nm3TEQ (pg/Nm3)pg/Nm3TEQ (pg/Nm3)pg/Nm3TEQ (pg/Nm3)
2,3,7,8-TetraCDD1.0007.37.348686.078.07.97
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD0.50012763.48931465.35199.43
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD0.1003.20.32515.114.90.49
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD0.1006.40.6465265.161.60.16
1,2,3,7,8,9 Hexa-CDD0.1003.20.3221.92.191.60.16
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD0.0102232.23124012.405045.04
OctaCDD0.00128,72228.71127,646127.6426,67526.66
2,3,7,8-Tetra CDF0.1009647964.278512851.206472646.89
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF0.0504321215.9512,833641.622485124.21
2,3,4,7,8-Penta CDF0.500225112.28450225.143919.51
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF0.10058158.0563763.70373.74
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF0.10010210.21151.46313.09
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF0.100999.89535.351.60.16
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF0.10012.81.282.40.244.90.49
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF0.010114911.48352535.257977.97
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF0.010640.644384.3816.30.16
OctaCDF0.00157445.7417021.70325.30.33
Sum PCDD/Fs 51,0371492.82158,7952593.9737,424856.44
Table 4. PCB amounts in pg and concentrations in toxicity equivalent (TEQ pg/Nm3) of Punajb, AJK and Sindh rice straw samples.
Table 4. PCB amounts in pg and concentrations in toxicity equivalent (TEQ pg/Nm3) of Punajb, AJK and Sindh rice straw samples.
PunjabAJKSindh
CompoundsWHO TEF 2006pg/Nm3TEQ
(pg/Nm3)
pg/Nm3TEQ
(pg/Nm3)
pg/Nm3TEQ
(pg/Nm3)
3,4,4′,5-TetraCB0.00031530.0463400.10212630.0790
3,3′,4,4′-TetraCB0.000140180.40129660.296617730.1772
2′,3,4,4′,5-PentaCB0.000034050.01228960.08688670.0259
2,3′,4,4′,5-PentaCB0.0000329,2580.87833,9101.017244,9261.3471
2,3,4,4′,5-PentaCB0.000036830.0216520.01958650.0259
2,3,3′,4,4′-PentaCB0.0000310,2920.30887210.261673930.2216
3,3′,4,4′,5-PentaCB0.100035135.088125537.685326326.337
2,3′,4,4′,5,5′-HexaCB0.0000316,0460.48123,6230.708630,0710.9017
2,3,3′,4,4′,5-HexaCB0.000034660.01321520.06455290.0158
2,3,3′,4,4′,5′-HexaCB0.000031240.0032380.00711690.0050
3,3′,4,4′,5,5′-HexaCB0.03000320.956120.3646130.3901
2,3,3′,4,4′,5,5′-HeptaCB0.000031630.0041020.00301220.0036
∑ dl-PCB 61,991 76,867 87,255
∑PCB dioxin-likeTEQ 38 41 30
Table 5. Distribution in ng/Nm3 of PAH congeners in the three types of rice straw: Punjab, AJK and Sindh.
Table 5. Distribution in ng/Nm3 of PAH congeners in the three types of rice straw: Punjab, AJK and Sindh.
CompoundsTEFPunjab
(ng/Nm3)
AJK
(ng/Nm3)
Sindh
(ng/Nm3)
Phenanthrene0.0005112123114
Anthracene0.000593314
Fluoranthene0.05345226873398
Pyrene0.001533656
Benzo(a)anthracene0.005697484
Chrysene0.0312629621222
Benzo(b)fluoranthene0.1731576699
Benzo(k)fluoranthene0.1262188207
Benzo(e)pyrene0.002161321
Benzo(a)pyrene16779730010,327
Perylene-000
Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)pyrene0.1540839518
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene1.1198022851787
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene0.02899188
∑ PAHs 15,35315,20718,536
Table 6. Toxic equivalency of sum of PCDD/Fs (NATO I-TEF 1988), sum of PCBs (WHO TEF 2006) and sum of PCBs and PCDD/Fs in TEQ pg/Nm3. Toxic equivalency of sum of carcinogenic PAHs (c-PAHs) expressed in ng/Nm3 according to Larsen and Larsen 1998, where B(a)P factor is considered as 1.
Table 6. Toxic equivalency of sum of PCDD/Fs (NATO I-TEF 1988), sum of PCBs (WHO TEF 2006) and sum of PCBs and PCDD/Fs in TEQ pg/Nm3. Toxic equivalency of sum of carcinogenic PAHs (c-PAHs) expressed in ng/Nm3 according to Larsen and Larsen 1998, where B(a)P factor is considered as 1.
PunjabAJKSindh
Sum PCDD/PCDF (pg TEQ /Nm3)14932594856
Sum PCB dioxin-like (pg TEQ /Nm3)384130
Sum PCDD/PCDF and PCB(pg TEQ /Nm3) 15312635886
Sum c-PAH (ng TEQ /Nm3)15,35315,20718,536
Table 7. Total emission factor (EF) of PCDD/Fs expressed in TCDD TEQ (pg/kg), of PCBs expressed in TCDD TEQ (pg/kg), of the sum of PCDD/Fs and PCBs expressed in TCDD TEQ (pg/kg) and of carcinogenic PAHs expressed in B(a)P TEQ (µg/kg).
Table 7. Total emission factor (EF) of PCDD/Fs expressed in TCDD TEQ (pg/kg), of PCBs expressed in TCDD TEQ (pg/kg), of the sum of PCDD/Fs and PCBs expressed in TCDD TEQ (pg/kg) and of carcinogenic PAHs expressed in B(a)P TEQ (µg/kg).
EFPunjabAJKSindhAverage
Sum PCDD/PCDF TEQ (pg/kg)71.3160.768.6100.2
Sum PCB dioxin-like TEQ (pg/kg)1.82.52.42.2
Sum PCDD/PCDF and PCB TEQ (pg/kg)73.1163.271102.4
Sum c-PAH TEQ (µg/kg)733.2941.71485.81053.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khalid, A.; Guerriero, E.; Cerasa, M.; Mahmood, T.; Khalid, A.; Paris, E.; Mosca, S.; Gallucci, F. Estimation Inventories of Persistent Organic Pollutants from Rice Straw Combustion as an Agricultural Waste. Fire 2023, 6, 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6120459

AMA Style

Khalid A, Guerriero E, Cerasa M, Mahmood T, Khalid A, Paris E, Mosca S, Gallucci F. Estimation Inventories of Persistent Organic Pollutants from Rice Straw Combustion as an Agricultural Waste. Fire. 2023; 6(12):459. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6120459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khalid, Asma, Ettore Guerriero, Marina Cerasa, Tariq Mahmood, Azeem Khalid, Enrico Paris, Silvia Mosca, and Francesco Gallucci. 2023. "Estimation Inventories of Persistent Organic Pollutants from Rice Straw Combustion as an Agricultural Waste" Fire 6, no. 12: 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6120459

APA Style

Khalid, A., Guerriero, E., Cerasa, M., Mahmood, T., Khalid, A., Paris, E., Mosca, S., & Gallucci, F. (2023). Estimation Inventories of Persistent Organic Pollutants from Rice Straw Combustion as an Agricultural Waste. Fire, 6(12), 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6120459

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop