Conservation and Enhancement of the Pietrabbondante Archaeological Site between History, Geology and Emerging Crowd-Based Digital Technologies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Toward an Integrated System for Implementing Digital Plans for the Maintenance and Management of the Archaeological Heritage
2.1. The SUNDAE Catalogue v.1.0
3. Crowd Based Data Collection in the Inner Areas, an Explanatory Test Case
3.1. The Site of Pietrabbondante
- the Sacello of the Eastern Sanctuary, characterized by three areas standing in line [46]. It was used until the late Republican era, and then desacralized and abandoned due to the suppression of pagan cults and the demolition of their temples in 406 AD;
- the aerarium and small stoà, built in the eastern area of the site in the last years of the 3rd century BC and characterized by three rooms that opening onto a portico used to store worshippers’ offerings;
- the tabernae, located on two parallel terraces between temples B and A. It was first destroyed by lightning during the 2nd century BC and then by a fire in the 4th century AD.
3.2. An Overview of the Geological Characteristics of the Archaeological Site
- Layer A: Chaotic colluvial deposits, composed of havana brown clayey silts containing plant residues and occasional calcarenitic fragments. Thickness: 0.5–1.6 m;
- Layer B: Weathered and reworked deposits due to creep and solifluction processes. These consist of havana brown and grey silty clays characterized by a weak scaly/schistose structure. These deposits contain organic matter as well as occasional marly and calcarenitic fragments and are often iron-oxidated and decalcified. Thickness: 1.7–4.6 m;
- Layer C: Grey scaly silty clays interbedded with centimetric to decametric marly and calcarenite levels. The top of the layer is at a depth of 2.5–5.8 m below the ground surface.
3.3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Legislative Decree 42. Cultural and Landscape Heritage Code; G.U. n. 45 February 24, 2004; Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato S.p.A.: Rome, Italy, 2004. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
- D’Agostino, S.; Giuliani, C.F.; Conforto, M.L.; Guidoboni, E. Recommendations for Drawing Up Projects and Carrying Out Interventions for the Conservation of Archaeological Built Heritage; Cuzzolin: Napoli, Italy, 2009. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
- Palumbo, G. Threats and Challenges to the Archaeological Heritage in the Mediterranean. In Management Planning for Archaeological Sites. An International Workshop Organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and Loyola Marymount University 19–22 May 2000 Corinth Greece; Teutonico, J.M., Palumbo, G., Eds.; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 3–10. [Google Scholar]
- Pavlova, I.; Makarigakis, A.; Depret, T.; Jomelli, V. Global overview of the geological hazard exposure and disaster risk awareness at world heritage sites. J. Cult. Herit. 2017, 28, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gizzi, F.T. Identifying geological and geotechnical influences that threaten historical sites: A method to evaluate the usefulness of data already available. J. Cult. Herit. 2008, 9, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iadanza, C.; Cacace, C.; Del Conte, S.; Spizzichino, D.; Cespa, S.; Triglia, A. Cultural heritage, landslide risk and remote sensing in Italy. In Landslide Science and Practice: Risk Assessment, Management and Mitigation; Margottini, C., Canuti, P., Sassa, K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 6, pp. 491–499. [Google Scholar]
- Parisi, F.; Augenti, N. Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2013, 34, 735–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spizzichino, D.; Cacace, C.; Iadanza, C.; Trigilia, A. Beni culturali e rischio idrogeologico in Italia. Boll. Ist. Super. Conserv. Ed. Restauro 2013, 27, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
- Quattrone, G. Risk Analysis and Vulnerability Assessment of Archaeological Areas for the Preventive Conservation. In Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. EuroMed 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Ioannides, M., Fink, E., Moropoulou, A., Hagedorn-Saupe, M., Fresa, A., Liestøl, G., Rajcic, V., Grussenmeyer, P., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 157–168. [Google Scholar]
- Del Giudice, V.; De Paola, P.; Forte, F. Evaluation methodologies of earthquake damages to cultural heritage. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2018, 13, 1647–1653. [Google Scholar]
- ICOMOS. The Venice Charter. International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of monuments and Sites. 1964. Available online: https://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf (accessed on 26 October 2020).
- ICOMOS. Charter for the Protection and Management of Archaeological Heritage. 1990. Available online: https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/arch_e.pdf (accessed on 26 October 2020).
- ICOMOS. Salalah Guidelines for the Management of Public Archaeological Sites. 2017. Available online: https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/GA2017_6-3-3_SalalahGuidelines_EN_adopted-15122017.pdf (accessed on 26 October 2020).
- UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. 2019. Available online: http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/ (accessed on 26 October 2020).
- ISO 13822; Bases for Design of Structures—Assessment of Existing Structures; ISO TC98/SC2. ISO: Geneve, Switzerland, 2010.
- MIBACT—Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali; Generale, S. (Eds.) Guidelines for the Assessment and the Mitigation of Seismic risk of Cultural Heritage with Reference to Italian NTC2008; Gangemi Editore: Roma, Italy, 2011. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
- Canuti, P.; Margottini, C.; Fanti, R.; Bromhead, E.N. Cultural Heritage and Landslides: Research for Risk Prevention and Conservation. In Landslides—Disaster Risk Reduction; Sassa, K., Canuti, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 401–433. [Google Scholar]
- Iriarte, E.; Sanchez, M.A.; Foyo, A.; Tomillo, C. Geological risk assessment for cultural heritage conservation in karstic caves. J. Cult. Herit. 2010, 11, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarragüel, A.A.; Krol, B.; van Westen, C.J. Analysing the possible impact of landslides and avalanches on cultural heritage in Upper Svaneti, Georgia. J. Cult. Herit. 2012, 13, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carroll, P.; Aarrevaara, E. Review of Potential Risk Factors of Cultural Heritage Sites and Initial Modelling for Adaptation to Climate Change. Geosciences 2018, 8, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lollino, G.; Audisio, C. UNESCO World Heritage sites in Italy affected by geological problems, specifically landslide and flood hazard. Landslides 2006, 3, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soeters, R.; van Westen, C.J. Slope Instability Recognition Analysis and Zonation. In Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation, Special Report No. 247, Transportation Research Board National Research Council; Turner, K.T., Schuster, R.L., Eds.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1996; pp. 129–177. [Google Scholar]
- Lombardo, L.; Cama, M.; Conoscenti, C.; Märker, M.; Rotigliano, E. Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: Application to the 2009 storm event in Messina (Sicily, southern Italy). Nat. Hazards 2015, 79, 1621–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicu, I.C. Frequency ratio and GIS-based evaluation of landslide susceptibility applied to cultural heritage assessment. J. Cult. Herit. 2017, 28, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blenkinsop, T.G. Visualizing structural geology: From Excel to Google Earth. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 45, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavani, S.; Corradetti, A.; Vinci, F.; Parente, M.; Mazzoli, S.; Morsalnejad, D.; Iannace, A. Virtual geological mapping in the Lurestan region of the Zagros (NW Iran) with Google Earth. Geol. Field Trips Maps 2020, 12, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerr, J.S. The Conservation Plan; ICOMOS Australia: Sydney, Austrilia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Cecchi, R.; Gasparoli, P. Prevenzione e manutenzione per i beni culturali edificati. In Il Caso Studio Delle Aree Archeologiche di Roma e Ostia Antica; Alinea Editrice: Firenze, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Orbaşli, A. Archaeological Site Management and Local Development. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2013, 15, 237–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benali Aoudia, L.; Chennaoui, Y. The Archaeological Site of Tipasa, Algeria: What Kind of Management Plan? Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2017, 19, 173–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baird-Naysmith, L. Archaeological Heritage Management at the Memphis and its Necropolis World Heritage Site. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2018, 20, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, L.F.; Masciotta, M.G.; Morais, M.J.; Azenha, M.; Ferreira, T.; Pereira, E.B.; Lourenço, P.B. HeritageCARE: Preventive conservation of built cultural heritage in the South-West Europe. In Innovative Built Heritage Models; van Balen, K., Vandesande, A., Eds.; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2018; pp. 135–149. [Google Scholar]
- Monumentenwacht. Available online: https://www.monumenten.nl/ (accessed on 18 November 2021).
- Monumentenwacht Vlaanderen. Available online: https://www.monumentenwacht.be/ (accessed on 18 November 2021).
- Monumentendienst. Available online: https://www.monumentendienst.de (accessed on 18 November 2021).
- Maintain our Heritage. Available online: https://www.maintainourheritage.co.uk/ (accessed on 18 November 2021).
- Doumas, C.G. Managing the Archaeological Heritage: The Case of Akrotiri, Thera (Santorini). Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2013, 13, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ababneh, A. Heritage Management and Interpretation: Challenges to Heritage Site-Based Values, Reflections from the Heritage Site of Umm Qais, Jordan. Archaeologies 2016, 12, 38–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osanna, M.; Rinaldi, E. Planned conservation in Pompeii: Complexity and methodological choices. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 8, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demas, M. Planning for Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites: A Values-Based Approach. In Management Planning for Archaeological Sites. An International Workshop Organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and Loyola Marymount University 19–22 May 2000 Corinth Greece; Teutonico, J.M., Palumbo, G., Eds.; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 27–50. [Google Scholar]
- Heras, V.C.; Wijffels, A.; Cardoso, F.; Vandesande, A.; Santana, M.; Van Orshoven, J.; Steenberghen, T.; Van Balen, K. A value-based monitoring system to support heritage conservation planning. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 3, 130–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- CoE—Council of Europe. Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. Counc. Eur. Treaty Ser. 2005, 199. Available online: https://rm.coe.int/090000168071aabc (accessed on 26 November 2020).
- Al-Ruzouq, R.; Abu Dabous, S. Archaeological Site Information Modelling and Management Based on Close-Range Photogrammetry and GIS. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2017, 19, 156–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marra, A.; Sabino, A.; Bartolomucci, C.; Trizio, I.; Mannella, A.; Fabbrocino, G. On a Rational and Interdisciplinary Framework for the Safety and Conservation of Historical Centres in Abruzzo Region. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2021, 15, 608–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marra, A.; Trizio, I.; Fabbbrocino, G. Digital Tools for the Knowledge and Safeguard of Historical Heritage. In Civil Structural Health Monitoring. CSHM 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Rainieri, C., Fabbrocino, G., Caterino, N., Ceroni, F., Notarangelo, M.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 645–662. [Google Scholar]
- INASA. The Archaeological Site of Pietrabbondante. Available online: https://www.inasaroma.org/pietrabbondante/ (accessed on 26 November 2021).
- Bartolomucci, C. Lo stato di conservazione dei beni tra dissesti e degrado. In Sisma Abruzzo 2009. In Archeologia e Terremoto; Cialone, G., Copersino, M.R., Eds.; ONE Group Edizioni: L’Aquila, Italy, 2013; pp. 132–143. [Google Scholar]
- Palumbo, G.; Al-Tikriti, W.Y.; Mahdy, H.; Al Nuaimi, A.; Al Kaabi, A.; Altawallbeh, D.E.; Ali Muhammad, S.; Marcus, B. Protecting the Invisible: Site-Management Planning at Small Archaeological Sites in al-Ain, Abu Dhabi. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2014, 16, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masciotta, M.G.; Morais, M.J.; Ramos, L.F.; Oliveira, D.V.; Sánchez-Aparicio, L.J.; González-Aguilera, D. A Digital-based Integrated Methodology for the Preventive Conservation of Cultural Heritage: The Experience of HeritageCare Project. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2021, 15, 844–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, M. La fotomodellazione in ambito archeologico: Potenzialità, limiti e prospettive. In Storia-Restauro. Ricerche a Roma e nel Lazio; Asciutti, M., Ed.; GB Editori: Roma, Italy, 2020; pp. 133–144. [Google Scholar]
- Alsadik, B. Crowdsource Drone Imagery—A Powerful Source for the 3D Documentation of Cultural Heritage at Risk. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2021; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marra, A.; Fabbrocino, G. Open-access web mapping as a virtual survey tool for cultural heritage: An application to the Armenian religious architecture documented by Paolo Cuneo. DisegnareCON 2020, 13, 7.1–7.12. [Google Scholar]
- Marra, A.; Fabbrocino, G. Crowd-based Tools for Indirect Condition Assessment and Conservation of Cultural Heritage. In Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. EuroMed 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Ioannides, M., Fink, E., Cantoni, L., Champion, E., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 38–50. [Google Scholar]
- Oomen, J.; Aroyo, L. Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 29 June–2 July 2011; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 138–149. [Google Scholar]
- Constantinidis, D. Crowdsourcing Culture: Challenges to Change. In Cultural Heritage in a Changing World; Borowiecki, K., Forbes, N., Fresa, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 215–234. [Google Scholar]
- Bonacchi, C.; Bevan, A.; Keinan-Schoonbaert, A.; Pett, D.; Wexler, J. Participation in heritage crowdsourcing. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 2019, 34, 166–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frassine, M.; Naponello, G. RAPTOR: Archeologia e tutela. Verso la pubblica amministrazione digitale. Archeol. E Calc. 2012, 23, 81–99. [Google Scholar]
- Messaoudi, T.; Véron, P.; Halin, G.; De Luca, L. An ontological model for the reality-based 3D annotation of heritage building conservation state. J. Cult. Herit. 2018, 29, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Croce, V.; Caroti, G.; De Luca, L.; Piemonte, A.; Véron, P. Semantic Annotation on Heritage models: 2D/3D approaches and future research challenges. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2020, XLIII-B2-2020, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Aparicio, L.J.; Masciotta, M.G.; García-Alvarez, J.; Ramos, L.F.; Oliveira, D.V.; Martín-Jiménez, J.A.; González-Aguilera, D.; Monteiro, P. Web-GIS approach to preventive conservation of heritage buildings. Autom. Constr. 2020, 118, 103304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giuliani, C.F. Provvedimenti antisismici nell’antichità. J. Anc. Topogr. 2011, XXI, 25–52. [Google Scholar]
- Savini, F.; Rainieri, C.; Fabbrocino, F.; Trizio, I. Applications of Stratigraphic Analysis to Enhance the Inspection and Structural Characterization of Historic Bridges. Infrastructures 2021, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marra, A.; Fabbrocino, G. On the SeVAMH survey protocol for safety and safeguard of artistic assets. Overview and validation at the Monumental complex of Santa Chiara in Naples. Restauro Archeol. 2021, 28, 4–17. [Google Scholar]
- Brumana, R.; Oreni, D.; Van Hecke, L.; Barazzetti, L.; Previtali, M.; Roncoroni, F.; Valente, R. Combined geometric and thermal analysis form UAV platforms for archaeological heritage documentation. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, II-5/W1, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bolognesi, M.; Furini, A.; Russo, V.; Pellegrinelli, A.; Russo, P. Testing the Low-Cost RPAS Potential in 3D Cultural Heritage Reconstruction. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015, XL-5/W4, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alsadik, B.; Khalid Jasim, L. Active use of panoramic mobile mapping systems for as built surveying and heritage documentation. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2019, 13, 244–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grün, A.; Remondino, F.; Zhang, L. Photogrammetric reconstruction of the Great Buddha of Bamiyan, Afghanistan. Photogramm. Rec. 2004, 19, 177–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stathopoulou, E.K.; Georgopoulos, A.; Panagiotopoulos, G.; Kaliampakos, D. Crowdsourcing lost cultural heritage. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015, II-5/W3, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Beer, J.; Matthiensen, H.; Christensson, A. Quantification and Visualization of In Situ Degradation at the World Heritage Site Bryggen in Bergen, Norway. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2012, 14, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mezzino, D.; Chan, L.; Santana Quintero, M.; Esponda, M.; Lee, S.; Min, A.; Pwint, M. Built Heritage Documentation and Management: An Integrate Conservation Approach in Bagan. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2017, IV-2/W2, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trizio, I.; Marra, A.; Savini, F.; Fabbrocino, G. Survey Methodologies and 3D Modelling for Conservation of Historical Masonry Bridges. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2021, VIII-M-1-2021, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reina Ortiz, M.; Yang, C.; Weigert, A.; Dhanda, A.; Min, A.; Gyi, M.; Su, S.; Fai, S.; Santana Quintero, M. Integrating Heterogeneous Datasets in HBIM of Decorated Surfaces. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, XLII-2/W15, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nieto-Julián, J.E.; Antón, D.; Moyano, J.J. Implementation and Management of Structural Deformations into Historic Building Information Models. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2020, 14, 1384–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marra, A. Know4CARE. Uno Strumento per la Documentazione e Conservazione del Patrimonio Culturale; PUBLICA: Alghero, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Jouan, P.; Hallot, P. Digital Twin: Research Framework to Support Preventive Conservation Policies. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boje, C.; Guerriero, A.; Kubicki, S.; Rezgui, Y. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mora, R.; Sánchez-Aparicio, L.J.; Maté-González, M.Á.; García-Álvarez, J.; Sanchez-Aparicio, M.; Gonzalez-Aguilera, D. An historical building information modelling approach for the preventive conservation of historical constructions: Application to the Historical Library of Salamanca. Autom. Constr. 2021, 121, 103449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doan, A.; Ramakrishnan, R.; Halevy, A.Y. Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web. Commun. ACM 2011, 54, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berardi, E. (Ed.) Normativa F—Fotografia (v. 4.00). Strutturazione dei Dati e Norme di Compilazione; 2016; Available online: http://www.iccd.beniculturali.it/getFile.php?id=8144 (accessed on 10 June 2022).
- Fabbrocino, G.; Marra, A.; Savini, F.; Trizio, I. Virtual investigation of masonry arch bridges: Digital procedures for inspection, diagnostics, and data management. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Association on Quality Control of Bridges and Structures. EUROSTRUCT 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Pellegrino, C., Faleschini, F., Zanini, M.A., Matos, J.C., Casas, J.R., Strauss, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 979–987. [Google Scholar]
- Calabrò, F. Local Communities and Management of Cultural Heritage of the Inner Areas. An Application of Break-Even Analysis. In Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Borruso, G., Torre, C.M., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Stankova, E., Cuzzocrea, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 516–531. [Google Scholar]
- Barca, F.; Casavola, P.; Lucatelli, S. A strategy for Inner Areas in Italy: Definition, Objectives, Tools and Governance. Mater. UVAL 2014, 31, 1–66. [Google Scholar]
- De Giovanni, G. Problematiche di valorizzazione, fruizione e musealizzazione dei beni culturali. Tecnologie innovative per la città ritrovata. In Il Paesaggio Agrario Italiano Protostorico e Antico. Storia e Didattica; Bonini, G., Brusa, A., Cervi, R., Eds.; Istituto Alcide Cervi: Gattatico, Italy, 2010; pp. 165–177. [Google Scholar]
- Di Pietro, L.; Guglielmetti Mugion, R.; Mattia, G.; Renzi, M.F. Cultural heritage and consumer behaviour: A survey on Italian cultural visitors. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 5, 61–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blasco López, M.F.; Recuero Virto, N.; Aldas Manzano, J.; Garcis-Madriaga, J. Tourism sustainability in archaeological sites. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 8, 276–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Regina, A. ‘Domus publica’. Un esempio di edilizia sacra nel Sannio. In Lectio Brevis—Anno Accademico 2015–2016; Bardi Edizioni: Roma, Italy, 2017; pp. 405–437. [Google Scholar]
- La Regina, A. Le armi nel santuario di Pietrabbondante. In Armi Votive in Magna Grecia; Graells i Fabregat, R., Longo, F., Eds.; Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum: Mainz, Germany, 2018; pp. 241–260. [Google Scholar]
- D’Amico, P. Le armi dell’Aerarium di Pietrabbondante: Strutture e fasi di frequentazione. In Armi Votive in Magna Grecia; Graells i Fabregat, R., Longo, F., Eds.; Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum: Mainz, Germany, 2018; pp. 261–270. [Google Scholar]
- D’Amico, P. Pietrabbondante, FastiOnline. 2018. Available online: http://www.fastionline.org/excavation/micro_view.php?fst_cd=AIAC_2411&curcol=sea_cd-AIAC_10058 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
- La Regina, A. Pietrabbondante. In Culture Adriatiche Antiche di Abruzzo e di Molise; Cianfarani, V., Franchi dell’Orto, L., La Regina, A., Eds.; De Luca Editore: Roma, Italy, 1978; pp. 449–489. [Google Scholar]
- D’Amico, P. Pietrabbondante: L’aerarium del santuario. ArcheoMolise 2018, 32, 18–27. [Google Scholar]
- La Regina, A.; Sanniti, I. Italia, Omnium Terrarum Parens; Pugliese Carratelli, G., Ed.; Libri Scheiwiller: Milano, Italy, 1989; pp. 301–432, 697–700. [Google Scholar]
- La Regina, A. Pietrabbondante Ricerche Archeologiche 2006; INASA: Roma, Italy, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- La Regina, A. Pietrabbondante e il Sannio Antico. In Almanacco del Molise 2014; Astorri, I., Di Rocco, G., Eds.; Arte Contemporanea: Campobasso, Italy, 2014; pp. 161–208. [Google Scholar]
- La Regina, A. La domus publica di Pietrabbondante. ArcheoMolise 2010, 4, 32–43. [Google Scholar]
- Fabbrocino, S.; Lanzano, G.; Forte, G.; Santucci De Magistris, F.; Fabbrocino, G. SPT blow count vs. shear wave velocity relationship in the structurally complex formations of the Molise Region (Italy). Eng. Geol. 2015, 187, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selli, R. Il Paleogene nel quadro della geologia dell’Italia centro-meridionale. Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital. 1962, 3, 737–789. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
- Mostardini, F.; Merlini, S. Appennino centro meridionale. Sezioni geologiche e proposta di modello strutturale. In Proceedings of the Geologia dell’Italia Centrale, Congresso Nazionale 73, Roma, Italy, 30 September–4 October 1986; pp. 1–59. [Google Scholar]
- Patacca, E.; Scandone, P.; Bellatalla, M.; Perilli, N.; Santini, U. La zona di giunzione tra l’Arco appenninico settentrionale e l’arco appenninico meridionale nell’Abruzzo e nel Molise. Studi Geol. Camerti 1992, CROP 11, 417–441. [Google Scholar]
- Patacca, E.; Scandone, P. Geology of Southern Apennines. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 2007, 7, 75–119. [Google Scholar]
- ISPRA. Carta Geologica d’Italia Alla Scala 1:50.000. Foglio 393-Trivento. 2010. Available online: https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/Media/carg/393_TRIVENTO/Foglio.html (accessed on 30 November 2021).
- Patacca, E.; Scandone, P.; De Martino, V. Upper Triassic basinal carbonates between the Molise and Sannio Nappes near Frosolone (Duronia, Molise): Geological implications. Rend. Online Soc. Geol. Ital. 2012, 23, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
- ISPRA. IFFI Project. Italian Landslide Inventory. 2005. Available online: http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/en/projects/soil-and-territory/iffi-project/default (accessed on 18 November 2021).
- De Pari, P.; Romano, S. Report on geological-technical studies, Municipality of Pietrabbondante. In Design of the Pietrabbondante Archaeological Complex; Comune di Pietrabbondante (IS): Pietrabbondante, Italy, 2007. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
- Romano, S.; Fostinelli, A.; De Pari, P. Report on geological studies. Municipality of Pietrabbondante. In Preliminary Territorial Regeneration Plan; Comune di Pietrabbondante (IS): Pietrabbondante, Italy, 2009. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
- Volpe, E. Protezione e Conservazione dei Siti Archeologici in Aree Predisposte a Fenomeni di Dissesto Idrogeologico. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy, 2020. Available online: https://iris.unimol.it/handle/11695/97964 (accessed on 30 November 2021).
- MIBACT. Visitatori e Introiti di Musei, Monumenti e Aree Archeologiche Statali. Tavola 7. Dati per Singolo Istituto Museale. 2021. Available online: http://www.statistica.beniculturali.it/Visitatori_e_introiti_musei_19.htm (accessed on 30 November 2021).
- Bertagni, S.; Boarin, P.; Zuppiroli, M. The Dialogue between Structural Interventions and Sustainability Criteria in Rating Systems for Cultural Heritage: The Experience of GBC Historic Building. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2020, 14, 139–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marra, A.; Trizio, I.; Savini, F.; Ruggieri, A.; Fabbrocino, G. Una procedura per l’Historic Digital Twin (HDT) dei ponti ad arco in muratura/A procedure for Heritage Digital Twin (HDT) of masonry arch bridges. In 3D Modelling e BIM 2021—Digital Twin; Empler, T., Caldarone, A., Fusinetti, A., Eds.; DEI srl Tipografia del Genio Civile: Roma, Italy, 2021; pp. 358–373. [Google Scholar]
- Frassine, M.; Naponello, G.; De Francesco, S.; Asta, A. RAPTOR 1.5 Aggiornamenti e sperimentazioni. Archeol. Calc. 2016, 8, 61–71. [Google Scholar]
- Marra, A. Il complesso monumentale di Santa Chiara a Napoli: Un modello innovativo per la conoscenza e la valorizzazione. In Conoscere, Conservare, Valorizzare. Il Patrimonio Religioso Culturale; Niglio, O., Visentin, C., Eds.; Aracne Editrice: Roma, Italy, 2017; Volume III, pp. 141–146. [Google Scholar]
- Savini, F. Comunicare l’archeologia con le immagini: Dal disegno ricostruttivo alla realtà virtuale. In Linguaggi Grafici. Illustrazione; Cicalò, E., Trizio, I., Eds.; PublicaPress: Alghero, Italy, 2020; pp. 722–755. [Google Scholar]
- Trizio, I.; Savini, F.; Giannangeli, A.; Fiore, S.; Marra, A.; Fabbrocino, G.; Ruggieri, A. Versatil Tools: Digital Survey and Virtual Reality for Documentation, Analysis and Fruition of Cultural Heritage in Seismic Areas. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, XLII-2/W17, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Litvak, E.; Kuflik, T. Enhancing cultural heritage outdoor experience with augmented-reality smart glasses. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2020, 24, 873–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CAPWARE. I Sanniti a Pietrabbondante. 2005. Available online: http://www.capware.it/project/sanniti-a-pietrabbondante/ (accessed on 30 November 2021).
- Garcia, A.; Linaza, M.T.; Gutierrez, A.; Garcia, E. Gamified mobile experiences: Smart technologies for tourism destinations. Tour. Rev. 2019, 74, 30–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bugeja, M.; Grech, E.M. Using Technology and Gamification as a Means of Enhancing Users’ Experience at Cultural Heritage Sites. In Rediscovering Heritage Through Technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence; Seychell, D., Dingli, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 859, pp. 69–89. [Google Scholar]
Stratigraphic Log | Sample | Depth [m] | Layer | Particle-Size Distribution | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gravel [%] | Sand [%] | Silt [%] | Clay [%] | ||||
S1 | S1C2 | 12.30–12.80 | C | 0.0 | 7.2 | 55.5 | 37.3 |
S2 | S2C1 | 1.80–2.30 | B | 0.0 | 14.8 | 57.9 | 27.3 |
S2C2 | 5–5.50 | B | 0.0 | 14.6 | 59.2 | 26.2 | |
S3 | S3C1 | 1.5–2 | B | 0.0 | 7.8 | 61.6 | 30.6 |
S3C2 | 4.5–5 | C | 0.0 | 6.4 | 52.9 | 40.7 | |
S5 | S5C1 | 1.5–2 | B | 0.0 | 7.2 | 54.2 | 38.6 |
S5C2 | 12–12.5 | C | 0.0 | 11.4 | 48.5 | 40.1 | |
S5C3 | 20–20.5 | C | 0.0 | 7.8 | 55.5 | 36.7 |
Stratigraphic Log | Sample | Consistency Limits | Water Content w [%] | Degree of Saturation S [%] | Porosity n [%] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liquid Limit LL [%] | Plastic Limit PL [%] | Plasticity Index PI [%] | Consistency Index CI | |||||
S1 | S1C2 | 54.0 | 20.0 | 34.0 | 1.13 | 15.64 | 84.86 | 33.31 |
S2 | S2C1 | 33.0 | 18.0 | 15.0 | 0.82 | 20.71 | 84.84 | 39.64 |
S2C2 | 35.0 | 14.0 | 21.0 | 0.70 | 20.33 | 96.35 | 36.12 | |
S3 | S3C1 | 47.0 | 18.0 | 29.0 | 0.74 | 25.59 | 100.00 | 40.43 |
S3C2 | 47.0 | 11.0 | 32.0 | 0.77 | 18.27 | 79.55 | 38.45 | |
S5 | S5C1 | 48.0 | 14.0 | 34.0 | 0.87 | 18.35 | 84.01 | 37.10 |
S5C2 | 46.0 | 11.0 | 35.0 | 0.74 | 20.10 | 80.97 | 40.31 | |
S5C3 | 46.0 | 17.0 | 29.0 | 1.15 | 12.64 | 76.60 | 31.06 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Marra, A.; Fabbrocino, G.; Fabbrocino, S. Conservation and Enhancement of the Pietrabbondante Archaeological Site between History, Geology and Emerging Crowd-Based Digital Technologies. Heritage 2022, 5, 1504-1528. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030079
Marra A, Fabbrocino G, Fabbrocino S. Conservation and Enhancement of the Pietrabbondante Archaeological Site between History, Geology and Emerging Crowd-Based Digital Technologies. Heritage. 2022; 5(3):1504-1528. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030079
Chicago/Turabian StyleMarra, Adriana, Giovanni Fabbrocino, and Silvia Fabbrocino. 2022. "Conservation and Enhancement of the Pietrabbondante Archaeological Site between History, Geology and Emerging Crowd-Based Digital Technologies" Heritage 5, no. 3: 1504-1528. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030079
APA StyleMarra, A., Fabbrocino, G., & Fabbrocino, S. (2022). Conservation and Enhancement of the Pietrabbondante Archaeological Site between History, Geology and Emerging Crowd-Based Digital Technologies. Heritage, 5(3), 1504-1528. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030079