Reprod. Med., Volume 6, Issue 1 (March 2025) – 3 articles

Background: Diagnoses for right lower quadrant pain in women must include both gynecologic and non-gynecologic causes. In this differential, ovarian torsion and appendicitis are both serious etiologies that can require swift surgical intervention. Ovarian torsion is the least common of the two, accounting for 2.7% of emergency surgery cases according to a 10-year review, while the lifetime risk of appendectomy for females is 23.1%. As many as 2–3% of patients undergoing surgery for acute appendicitis are instead found to have ovarian torsion. However, there are currently only rare case reports of these two conditions co-presenting in the same patient simultaneously, with little discussion on how to be better prepared before entering the operating room. Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe this rare co-presentation to better inform providers of this potential complication and to improve future patient care outcomes. Method: A case report of a patient seen at Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, was assessed. Conclusions: This case shows the rare possibility of dual acute etiologies of abdominal pain warranting urgent surgical management. This case also highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach in the pre-procedural evaluation of possible competing etiologies of acute abdominal pain that warrant surgical management. Additionally, this case brings up interesting ethical questions regarding informed consent, autonomy, and the obligation of intraoperatively consulted surgeons to provide definitive and indicated surgical care in the absence of prior discussion of possible pathology. Full article

Background/Objectives: In the postpartum period, approximately 12% of patients seek care in the emergency department (ED), with a higher representation of Black patients. Hypertension is a common reason for ED visits during this period, often leading to dangerously delayed diagnosis and treatment. Objective: This study aims to assess the time to diagnosis and treatment of hypertensive disorders in the postpartum period in the ED, focusing on potential disparities in care, to identify areas for quality improvement. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A multi-centered large medical institution in the metro Detroit area. Methods: Postpartum patients (day 2 through day 28) presenting to the ED from November 2015 to December 2022. Exposures: none. Main Outcome Measures: Primary analysis assessed the time elapsed between severe-range blood pressure readings (greater than/equal to 160 systolic and/or 110 diastolic) and the administration of antihypertensives. Secondary analyses assessed the presence of essential laboratory workups such as complete blood counts, complete metabolic panels, and urine protein and creatinine. Results: Among the 430 women who presented to the ED during the postpartum period with hypertension, 372 (86.5%) exhibited severe-range blood pressure (greater than/equal to 160 systolic and/or 110 diastolic). Patients presented on average on postpartum day 6. Of the patients with severe hypertension, only 72% received a complete blood count, 66% underwent evaluation of creatinine and liver profile, and 4% had a urine protein and creatinine test ordered. The average time from severe-range blood pressure reading to antihypertensive administration was 189 min for Black patients and 370 min for White patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the time of the first blood pressure reading, laboratory evaluation, or treatment of severe-range blood pressure between racial groups. Conclusions: This study identifies the most significant area for improvement in the timely administration of antihypertensive medication following severe-range blood pressure readings. Additional areas for improvement were observed in ordering essential laboratory tests to assess the severity of preeclampsia. The institution demonstrated delayed yet equitable care for White and Black patients, contrary to the existing literature indicating potential racial disparities. A targeted quality improvement plan has been implemented to improve the identified areas of concern to adhere to the ACOG’s treatment recommendations for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. The impact on patient care will be reassessed at the 1-year mark. Full article

Background/Objectives: Previous literature has described that non-white pregnant patients are at increased risk of severe morbidity from obstetric hemorrhage (OBH). Here, we investigate whether such disparities are secondary to delay in the administration of postpartum oxytocin for non-white patients compared to white patients. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all deliveries from 2018 to 2019, comparing (1) Hispanic white or non-white race (HW/NWR) pregnant people and (2) non-Hispanic white (NHW) pregnant people. Our primary outcome was the time from delivery to the first dose of postpartum oxytocin, and our secondary outcome was the frequency of other hemorrhage interventions. Results: Out of 3832 patients with self-identified race and ethnicity recorded in their patient record, 644 patients identified as NHW, and 3188 patients identified as HW/NWR. We found no difference in time to first dose of postpartum oxytocin (p = 0.51), and there was also no difference in the frequency of other hemorrhage-related interventions. Conclusions: Our study found no delay in the administration of postpartum oxytocin for non-white patients. Full article