Transplantology, Volume 6, Issue 1 (March 2025) – 2 articles

Background: mTOR-Is positively influence the occurrence and course of certain tumors after solid organ transplantation. mTOR-inhibitor (mTOR-I) treatment, either alone or in combination with Calcineurininhibitors (CNIs), significantly reduces the incidence of malignancies after organ transplantation. However, there is no information on which mTOR-I, Sirolimus (SIR) or Everolimus (ERL), has a stronger anti-tumoral effect. Methods: The current literature was searched for prospective randomized controlled trials in renal transplantation. There were 1.164 trials screened, of which 20 could be included (7465 patients). We performed a network meta-analysis to analyze the relative risk of different types of mTOR-I compared to CNI treatment on malignancies after transplantation. A minimum follow-up of 24 months was mandatory for inclusion. Results: Four different types of mTOR-I treatment were analyzed in network meta-analyses—SIR mono, ERL mono, SIR with CNI, and ERL with CNI. The average follow-up of all trials was 43.8 months. All four different mTOR-I regimes showed a significant reduced relative risk for malignancies compared to a regular CNI-treatment with the strongest effect under SIR in combination with a CNI (RR 0.23, CI 0.09–0.55, p = 0.001). This effect remained consistent for all tumor entities except non-melanoma skin cancer (RR 0.25, CI 0.07–0.90, p = 0.033). Conclusions: It is well known that an mTOR-I based treatment in transplant patients reduces the risk of tumor manifestation in comparison to CNI treatment. A combination of SIR and CNI seems to be the most potent mTOR-I therapy against malignancies. Full article

Solid organ transplantation entails numerous complex medical and ethical decisions. Shared decision-making (SDM) has been advocated as the optimal model for navigating these decisions, providing a collaborative framework that enhances person-centered care. This approach involves patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals in the decision-making process, ensuring that clinical decisions align with patient preferences, values, and individual circumstances alongside clinical indications. This paper reviews the implementation of SDM throughout the transplantation journey, from diagnosis and transplant referral, pre-transplant assessments, waiting lists, to the organ offer, perioperative period, and long-term follow-up. Barriers to SDM include factors at the patient, provider, and system levels, including inadequate patient–provider communication. Effective SDM requires tailored educational resources, prognostic tools, clinician training, collaborative care models, and supportive policies. Additionally, leveraging technology, such as artificial intelligence and mobile applications, can enhance patient engagement and decision quality. SDM promotes equity by involving all patients—including those from more vulnerable groups—in meaningful conversations about their treatment options, thereby mitigating disparities in access and outcomes. Future research should focus on the long-term impacts of SDM interventions, the development of comprehensive prognostic tools incorporating patient-reported outcomes, and systemic changes to integrate SDM into clinical practice, aiming to improve patient outcomes and person-centered care. Full article