Manufacturing of Eco Bricks: A Sustainable Solution for Construction †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials
Raw Materials
- Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS): GGBS is used as a supplementary cementitious material, which is a by-product of the iron and steel manufacturing industry (Figure 1).
- 2.
- Parali: Parali, also known as crop residue or agricultural residue, refers to the leftover plant material after a crop has been harvested (Figure 2). This residue includes materials like straw, husks, stems, and leaves. Parali is often considered a waste product in agriculture and is sometimes disposed of through burning, which can contribute to air pollution and environmental degradation. However, it can also be put to more sustainable and beneficial use, such as in the manufacturing of Eco Bricks [1].
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- Cement: It serves as a binder that, when mixed with aggregates (such as sand and gravel) and water, a hardened and durable substance known as concrete is formed.
- 6.
- Water: Water plays an important role in activating the binding properties of the cement. Water must be neutral in nature. Excess salt in water leads to the white puffing in the sample and hence decreases its strength. Water is required for the mixing and curing process.
- 7.
- Aggregates: Aggregates are one of the important constituents of concrete when we are working on any type of concrete/cement-based products. Its main purpose is to add additional compressive strength to the sample, IS: 2386-1969 defines fine aggregates in four grading zones to ensure high strength and durability.
3. Methodology
3.1. Manufacturing Process
3.1.1. Mixing
- A mix design is developed to optimize the proportions of each ingredient.
- Various mix combinations are tested to determine the ideal mixture for desired strength and durability.
3.1.2. Mix Proportion
3.1.3. Molding and Casting of Bricks
3.1.4. Curing
4. The Unique Product Offered for Waste Reduction, Resource Conservation, and Reduction of Carbon Footprint
- I.
- Discovery—understanding the problem.
- II.
- Definition—defining the problem.
- III.
- Development: developing the possible solution.
- IV.
- Delivery: choosing and developing the solution.
5. Testing and Analysis
6. Environmental Impact Assessment
- Eco Bricks Often Require Lower Energy Inputs for Manufacturing Compared to Traditional Bricks, Which Are Fired at High Temperatures. This Reduction in Energy Consumption Leads to a Significant Reduction in Carbon Emissions [4]
- Waste Reduction Using Recycled or Waste Materials in Eco Brick Production Diverts These Materials from Landfills, Contributing to Waste Reduction and a Cleaner Environment
- Conservation of Resources Eco Bricks Reduce the Demand for Virgin Materials, Such as Clay or Sand, Helping Conserve Natural Resources
7. Results and Discussion
7.1. Size and Shape
7.2. Cost Analysis
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Puri, V.; Kumar, S.; Grover, K.; Sharma, M. Development of Eco-Friendly Bricks for Sustainable Construction. In International Conference on Materials Science and Engineering (ICMSE 2022); IOP Publishing: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Antico, F.C.; Wiener, M.J.; Araya-Letelier, G.; Retamal, R.G. Eco-bricks: A sustainable substitute for construction materials. J. Constr. 2017, 16, 518–526. [Google Scholar]
- Edike, U.E. Production and optimization of eco-bricks Department of Building Technology, Bells University of Technology, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 266, 121640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, D.R.; Mute, P.P.; Dhawale, A.B.; Bhandakkar, K.V.; Kedar, R.S. A Review Paper on Eco-Bricks. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Manag. (IJAEM) 2021, 3, 1369–1378. [Google Scholar]
- Raj, S.M.; Gopal, M.N.; Kumar, T.P.; Prasath, G.G.; ME, S.R. An Experimental Study on the Strength & Characteristics of Eco- Bricks from Garbage Dump. Int. J. Latest Technol. Eng. Manag. Appl. Sci. (IJLTEMAS) 2018, VII, 124–128. [Google Scholar]
- Goyal, P.K.; Tarkar, S.; Rayan, S.S.; Sharma, S. Experimental Study on Eco-Bricks. In Advanced Production and Industrial Engineering; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manisha; Singh, N. Investigating Strength and Properties of Ecoladrilo. Eco Bricks Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. (IJCIET) 2017, 8, 134–142. [Google Scholar]
- Parali or Rice Straw, Packaging Type: Loose. Available online: https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/parali-or-rice-straw-23678790162.html (accessed on 22 November 2023).
- Pet Plastic Bottle Scrap. Available online: https://dir.indiamart.com/impcat/pet-bottle-scrap.html (accessed on 22 November 2023).
- Ldpe Granules. Available online: https://www.tradeindia.com/manufacturers/ldpe-granules.html (accessed on 22 November 2023).
- Cement Prices. Available online: https://www.reconsgroup.com/prices/mumbai-cement-prices.aspx (accessed on 22 November 2023).
- River Sand in Mumbai. Available online: https://dir.indiamart.com/mumbai/river-sand.html (accessed on 22 November 2023).
- Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Available online: https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/recycled-aggregate-concrete-2850370170755.html (accessed on 22 November 2023).
Material | Percentage |
---|---|
Cement | 10 |
GGBS | 0–5 |
Rice Husk Ash | 0–10 |
Crushed sand | 0–20 |
Aggregate | 15–25 |
Plastic Waste | 0–10 |
water | 20 |
Days | Compressive Load (KN) | Compressive Stress (N/mm2) |
---|---|---|
7 | 157.2 | 2.76 |
14 | 207.1 | 3.64 |
28 | 240.9 | 4.25 |
Material | Water Absorption % |
---|---|
Conventional brick | 0.07–0.10 |
Plastic bottle brick | 20–25 |
Items | Material Cost | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 {Half Sized Brick} | Group 4 | Total Cost of Components, Respectively | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Parali, Cement, Sand, Water) | (PET Bottles, Cement, Sand, Water | (Cement, Demolition Waste, Sand, Plastic Waste, Water) | (Cement, Sand, Aggregate, Liquid Plastic) | ||||||
[1] | [1] | [1] | [1] | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | ||
Parali | Rs.1/kg [8] | 0.038 kg | - | - | Rs 0.038 | - | - | ||
Plastic | Rs. 12/kg (PET) [9] | - | 0.011kg | - | Rs 1.32 | ||||
Rs 45/kg (LD PE) [10] | 46.1 gm | 253.55 gm | Rs 2.07 | Rs 10.59 | |||||
Cement | Rs. 7.3 /kg (PPC) [11] | 0.382 kg | 0.55 kg | 69.15 gm | 46.1 gm | Rs 2.78 | Rs 4.015 | Rs 0.50 | Rs 0.33 |
Sand | Rs 2300/m3 (river) [12] | 1.47 kg | 1.274 kg | 207.45 gm | 115.2 gm | Rs 3.381 | Rs 2.9 | Rs 0.47 | Rs 0.26 |
Recycled Aggregate | Rs 430/m3 [13] | - | - | 46.1 gm | 46.1 gm | - | - | Re 0.09 | Rs 0.09 |
Production cost | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3 | |||||
Total cost of bricks | Rs 7.69 | Rs 9.73 | Rs 4.63 | Rs 14.27 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jha, A.K.; Kewate, S.P. Manufacturing of Eco Bricks: A Sustainable Solution for Construction. Eng. Proc. 2024, 66, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066028
Jha AK, Kewate SP. Manufacturing of Eco Bricks: A Sustainable Solution for Construction. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 66(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066028
Chicago/Turabian StyleJha, Anish Kumar, and Shilpa Pankaj Kewate. 2024. "Manufacturing of Eco Bricks: A Sustainable Solution for Construction" Engineering Proceedings 66, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066028
APA StyleJha, A. K., & Kewate, S. P. (2024). Manufacturing of Eco Bricks: A Sustainable Solution for Construction. Engineering Proceedings, 66(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066028