Next Article in Journal
Performance Analysis of Position Estimation and Correction Methods
Previous Article in Journal
A Decision-Making System for Medical Transportation Mode Using Machine Learning Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

An In-Depth Analysis of Peritoneal Dialysate Effluent Composition with a Deep-UV-LED-Based Affordable Optical Chromatographic Sensor †

1
Department of Photonics, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, 197022 Saint Petersburg, Russia
2
AS Ldiamon, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
3
Chair of Veterinary Biomedicine and Food Hygiene, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
4
Jeko Disain OÜ, 51014 Tartu, Estonia
5
Dialysis Unit, Saint Petersburg City Mariinsky Hospital, 191014 Saint Petersburg, Russia
6
Chair of Internal Diseases, Clinical Pharmacology and Nephrology, North-Western State Medical University Named After I.I. Mechnikov, 191015 Saint Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Biosensors, 20–24 May 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IECB2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 73(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024073008
Published: 7 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Biosensors)

Abstract

:
It was shown earlier that the use of fast protein and metabolites liquid chromatography (FPMLC) and low-cost deep UV–LED-based optical chromatographic sensors with PD-10 desalting columns as a separation element can facilitate the monitoring of patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD). Previously, we established that the first peak in the FPMLC chromatograms of effluent dialysate is mainly responsible for proteins and could be used for the assessment of peritoneal protein loss in patients on PD, while the origin and clinical significance of the other two peaks still remain unclear. Optical absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy in the UV and visible regions of 240…720 nm were used for the analysis of PD effluent chromatographic fractions collected from a drainpipe of the sensor with photometric detection at 280 nm; chromatograms of twenty dialysate samples were processed. The absorption and fluorescence spectra of the first fraction demonstrated peaks at 270 nm and 330 nm, respectively, which is typical for proteins. The absorption spectra of the third fraction revealed the characteristic maxima of creatinine and uric acid, while the fluorescence spectra showed the characteristic peak of indoxyl sulfate 375 nm at 270 nm excitation. The second fraction had a single, extremely wide absorption band, strong fluorescence was observed at 440–450 nm while excited at 370 nm. Such spectral characteristics are typical for advanced glycation end products (AGE). Thus, it was demonstrated that deep UV–LED-based affordable chromatographic sensors could provide significantly more information about the composition of PD effluent dialysate than just the total protein concentration, including the contents of clinically significant metabolites, e.g., indoxyl sulfate and AGE. Moreover, the introduction of optical fluorescence detection could significantly improve the capabilities of such devices.

1. Introduction

One of the modalities of renal replacement therapy (RRT) received by patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD). This treatment has several advantages over the more widely used hemodialysis (HD), including the possibility of undergoing the procedure at home without medical assistance, better tolerability of the therapy, and less dependence on sophisticated equipment [1,2]. Like the other more common RRT modalities, chronic PD has specific side effects, e.g., significant peritoneal protein loss [3,4,5] and the considerable risk of infections such as dialysis peritonitis [6,7]. To prevent serious complications associated with PD, regular control of patients’ health status, including laboratory tests of the peritoneal dialysis effluent, is required. Conventional clinical laboratory methods are not designed for peritoneal dialysate and are not suitable for point-of-care testing (POCT), which can be especially important for outpatients living in rural or remote areas.
A more viable approach to this problem is the use of compact and affordable sensors designed in the POCT paradigm. Microfluidic platforms and other types of POCT instruments for rapid urine testing, which can determine the concentration of proteins, glucose, and other substances [8,9,10], have been actively developed in recent decades; however, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports about such devices specifically designed for the analysis of peritoneal dialysis effluent, despite the fact that urine is quite similar (but not identical) in composition to peritoneal dialysate.
We demonstrated earlier that an affordable, compact, multiple-use, reagentless optical sensor based on the fast protein and metabolites liquid chromatography (FPMLC) technique can efficiently facilitate both screening proteinuria [11] and monitoring peritoneal protein loss in patients on chronic PD [12], serving as a possible alternative to conventional clinical laboratory methods. FPMLC chromatograms of urine and peritoneal dialysate have three combined peaks corresponding to the groups of metabolites and other components with different molecular weights (Figure 1). Previously, we established a high correlation (R2 > 0.95) between the area of the first peak and the total protein concentration determined by gold-standard biochemical methods; it was shown that the sensor can determine the protein concentration in urine [11], peritoneal dialysis effluent [12] and peritoneal protein loss [13] with an accuracy of 10–15%. Detailed information about the sensor as applied to quantitative protein determination in urine and effluent dialysate, e.g., the limit of detection, selectivity, accuracy, and reproducibility, can be found in our earlier works [11,12,13].
The diagnostic value of the FPLMC sensor would be substantially expanded if other clinically significant substances in effluent dialysate, e.g., indoxyl sulphate [14] and advanced glycation end products [15,16], could be determined from chromatographic data simultaneously with the total protein. By now, the exact origin and possible clinical significance of the second and third chromatographic peaks (Figure 1), which are generally associated with middle and low molecular-weight metabolites, still remain unclear [13].
The main objectives of the current research are as follows:
  • To perform the manual collection of three FPMLC chromatographic fractions separated with a PD-10 chromatographic column in the sensor in real samples of peritoneal dialysate effluent taken from a substantial group of chronic PD patients;
  • To qualitatively analyze the dialysate fractions by UV–Vis absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy;
  • To identify spectroscopically clinically significant metabolites that presumably contribute to the FPMLC chromatographic peaks of dialysate.
This study is essentially aimed at finding ways to further develop the existing FPLMC sensor to expand its functionality, e.g., by incorporating a fluorescent optical detector.

2. Materials and Methods

Dialysate samples. The residual samples of effluent peritoneal dialysate taken from 20 ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients during regular hospital visits were provided by the Mariinsky City Hospital (Saint Peterburg, Russia). The study was coordinated and approved by the Institute of Experimental Medicine (Saint Peterburg, Russia). Permission from the Institute Ethics Committee, confirming that it meets ethical standards, was obtained, and patients’ personal information was not disclosed by the hospital.
The chromatographic optical sensor. Detailed descriptions of the FPLMC technology, optical sensor, and analytical protocol are provided in previous studies [12,13]. The optical sensor employs PD-10 gel desalting columns (Code No. 17-0851-01) from GE Healthcare® Bio-Sciences AB (Uppsala, Sweden) for the separation of metabolites and other components in peritoneal dialysate samples, and a deep UV–LED (285 nm) and visible-blind UV photodiode as a photometric detection system. FPLMC chromatograms were processed according to the gravity protocol, with direct detection of the eluate UV absorption in a quartz flow-through cuvette. The sensor is PC controlled. The schematic diagram of the sensor is shown in Figure 2.
Analytical protocol. Briefly, the processing of a chromatogram is performed as follows. After equilibration of the column with 25 mL of TRIS buffer (pH = 8.0), a sample of peritoneal dialysate (500 μL) is introduced into the column. Within 20–40 s, as soon as the dialysate is absorbed by the gel, 25 mL of buffer is introduced for a second time, and the processing of the chromatogram is initiated. The whole measurement procedure takes up to 15 min; the optical density of the eluate can be viewed in real time on the computer screen.
Fractionation. Three chromatographic fractions responsible for the presence of the substances of different molecular weights in the effluent were manually collected from the drainage pipe of the sensor. Each fraction corresponds to a chromatographic peak in the order shown in Figure 1. To provide better separation, the first fraction was collected starting from the initial increase in optical density and up to the maximum of the first chromatographic peak. After the local minimum, the second fraction was collected up to the maximum of the second peak. The third fraction was collected after the third maximum down to the optical density level of 10%, relative to the maximum of the third peak.
Spectroscopy. Absorption spectra of the fractionated dialysate samples were recorded with a UV–Vis CCD spectrophotometer with a deuterium lamp as a UV source (the working spectral range is 200–400 nm, the spectral resolution is 1 nm). Fluorescence spectra were recorded using the CM 2203 SOLAR spectrofluorometer (JSC “SOLAR”, Minsk, Belarus) with a pulsed xenon lamp as a light source. Quartz cuvettes with an optical length of 10 mm were used to analyze the absorption and fluorescence spectra. The excitation wavelengths were 250 nm, 270 nm, 310 nm, 330 nm, 370 nm. The fractionated samples were diluted with TRIS buffer at a ratio of 1:2 to increase the volume.

3. Results

We consistently analyzed the UV–Vis absorption and fluorescence spectra of three dialysate fractionations, separated from real effluent dialysate samples according to the protocol described above, to make grounded suggestions about the origin of the chromatographic peaks strongly based on the experimental data and to find possible solutions to determine additional clinically significant components of peritoneal dialysate effluent using the FPMLC sensor that was developed by Ldiamon AS (Tartu, Estonia).
Absorption and fluorescence spectra of the first fraction of peritoneal dialysate are shown in Figure 3 (three typical spectra were randomly selected from a set of twenty). A characteristic UV absorption band of proteins with a maximum at 285 nm due to radicals of sulfur-containing and aromatic amino acids, i.e., tryptophan, tyrosine, and phenylalanine [17], is clearly noticeable in the diagram. Taking into account that albumin with a characteristic absorption peak at 280 nm [18,19] is the most abundant protein in the peritoneal dialysate effluent [20], these data confirm our previous suggestion regarding the origin of the first chromatographic peak. Moreover, in Figure 3b, we can easily recognize the characteristic fluorescence peaks of tyrosine (λexem = 202/304 nm, λexem = 220/304 nm and 275/304 nm) and tryptophan (λexem = 230/348 nm and 280/348 nm) contributing to the intrinsic fluorescence of proteins [21].
Absorption and fluorescence spectra of the second fraction are presented in Figure 4. An extremely wide and strong absorption band with a maximum at 240 nm is clearly seen in the diagram; the UV absorption gradually decreases into a longer wavelength area of the spectra up to 400 nm. According to [22], this absorption band could be associated with advanced glycation end products (AGE), which are considered an important biomarker associated with the progression of chronic kidney disease and the complications of dialysis therapy [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Strong fluorescence at λexem = 370/440–450 nm (Figure 4b), typical for AGE, further strengthens our suggestion [29]. The second weaker absorption maximum observed in a wavelength range of 260–270 nm (Figure 4a), which is overlapped by the stronger maximum at 240 nm, could be associated with free nucleotides [30].
The absorption spectra of the third fraction (Figure 5a) have two maxima at 240…250 nm and 295…296 nm. These peaks can be associated with creatinine and uric acid, with characteristic peaks at 234 nm and 233 nm/290 nm, respectively [31,32]. The fluorescence spectrum of the third fraction at λex = 270 nm has a maximum at λem = 375 nm (Figure 5b), which is characteristic for indoxyl sulfate [33], which is related to the development of various medical conditions associated with ESKD and dialysis therapy [34,35,36,37].
Table 1 shows all the fluorescent peaks detected during this study. Some peaks occur in two or three fractions, in which case the intensity is indicated in parentheses in comparison with the rest of the fractions as either high (H), or low (L). The wavelengths for each fraction are arranged in order of decreasing peak intensity.

4. Conclusions

In this study, twenty residual samples of effluent peritoneal dialysate collected from a group of chronic PD outpatients during a regular hospital visit were manually fractioned using an optical chromatographic sensor based on the simplified FPMLC technique and consistently analyzed by UV–Vis spectrophotometry and fluorescence spectroscopy. It was further confirmed that the first peak in the FPLMC chromatograms is firmly associated with proteins (serum albumin being a major contributor) and could be used for qualitative protein determination in peritoneal dialysis effluent [12,13].
The UV–Vis absorption and fluorescence spectra of the second fraction suggest that the second peak in the FPMLC chromatograms is at least partially related to low molecular-weight AGE products (a significant absorption band at 240–400 nm coupled with intensive fluorescence at excitation/emission wavelengths λex/λem = 370/440–450 nm were observed) and free nucleotides (noticeable absorption at 260–270 nm). Probably, the third peak in the chromatograms is responsible for low molecular-weight substances, i.e., uric acid, creatinine and free indoxyl sulfate (intensive fluorescence at λex = 270 nm, λem = 375 nm).
According to the experimental data, the autofluorescence of the second chromatographic fraction of dialysate at 440–450 nm and the third fraction of dialysate at 375 nm could be potentially used for the quantitative determination of AGE products and indoxyl sulphate, respectively. AGE products and indoxyl sulfate are associated with cardiovascular risk and other dialysis complications; therefore, their determination may be important for patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis [15,16,23,24,25,26,27,28,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
The optical chromatographic sensor with photometric detection used in this research can reliably determine the concentration of total protein in urine and dialysate with good accuracy and reproducibility and assess peritoneal protein loss [11,12,13]. The sensor can be upgraded by incorporating a fluorescence detecting module for the determination of AGE products and free indoxyl sulfate. This would significantly expand the capabilities of this sensor as a POCT device for ambulatory PD patients.
As other studies show [14,15,16], the rapid determination of indoxyl sulfate and AGE products by optical methods is feasible; however, the possibility of developing and implementing such a module and ensuring its accuracy is the subject of future research. At the current stage, which could be only considered as preliminary, only the qualitative determination of metabolites was performed, and perspectives on the future development of the sensor based on the FPMLC approach have been demonstrated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.K. and A.K.; methodology, A.S. and G.K.; software, V.K.; validation, Z.R.; formal analysis, A.K.; investigation, N.O. and M.M.; resources, R.G. and A.I.; writing—original draft preparation, N.O.; writing—review and editing, G.K., O.S. and A.F.; visualization, M.M.; supervision, G.K.; funding acquisition, A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Experimental Medicine (protocol #2/22 from 6 April 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived according to the Decision of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission No. 29 of 12 February 2016 “On Rules for Clinical and Clinical Laboratory Trials (Studies) of Medical Products”. The document states that written informed consent is not required when residual laboratory samples are used exclusively for in vitro research and testing of clinical laboratory equipment. Patients’ personal data or medical history were not disclosed by the hospital.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request due to the hospital’s ethical policy.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the Saint Petersburg City Mariinsky Hospital doctors and nursing staff for their assistance in obtaining residual peritoneal dialysate samples and for their valuable comments, and to Roman Korsakov for assistance in the software development.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Artur Kuznetsov and Aleksandr Frorip were employed by the company AS Ldiamon, and author Vadim Korsakov was employed by the company Jeko Disain OÜ. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, P.K.-T.; Chow, K.M.; Van de Luijtgaarden, M.W.M.; Johnson, D.W.; Jager, K.J.; Mehrotra, R.; Naicker, S.; Pecoits-Filho, R.; Yu, X.Q.; Lameire, N. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2017, 13, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mehrotra, R.; Devuyst, O.; Davies, S.J.; Johnson, D.W. The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 27, 3238–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blumenkrantz, M.J.; Gahl, G.M.; Kopple, J.D.; Kamdar, A.V.; Jones, M.R.; Kessel, M.; Coburn, J.W. Protein losses during peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int. 1981, 19, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chang, T.I.; Kang, E.W.; Lee, Y.K.; Shin, S.K. Higher Peritoneal Protein Clearance as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease in Peritoneal Dialysis Patient. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lu, W.; Pang, W.-F.; Jin, L.; Li, H.; Chow, K.M.; Kwan, B.C.-H.; Leung, C.B.; Li, P.K.-T.; Szeto, C.C. Peritoneal protein clearance predicts mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2018, 23, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dong, J.; Chen, Y.; Luo, S.; Xu, R.; Xu, Y. Peritoneal Protein Leakage, Systemic Inflammation, and Peritonitis Risk in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit. Dial. Int. 2013, 33, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fung, W.W.-S.; Li, P.K.-T. Recent advances in novel diagnostic testing for peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 2022, 41, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. de Oliveira, R.A.G.; Camargo, F.; Pesquero, N.C.; Faria, R.C. A simple method to produce 2D and 3D microfluidic paper-based analytical devices for clinical analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 957, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, W.; Ding, S.; Wang, Z.; Lv, Q.; Zhang, Q. Electrochemical paper-based microfluidic device for on-line isolation of proteins and direct detection of lead in urine. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 187, 113310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sechi, D.; Greer, B.; Johnson, J.; Hashemi, N. Three-dimensional paper-based microfluidic device for assays of protein and glucose in urine. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 10733–10737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sünter, A.; Frorip, A.; Korsakov, V.; Kurruk, R.; Kuznetsov, A.; Ots-Rosenberg, M. Optical method for screening and a new proteinuria focus group. J. Biomed. Photonics Eng. 2015, 1, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kuznetsov, A.; Frorip, A.; Sünter, A.; Korsakov, V.; Konoplev, G.; Stepanova, O.; Roschina, N.; Ovsyannikov, N.; Lialin, D.; Gerasimchuk, R.; et al. Optical Chemical Sensor Based on Fast-Protein Liquid Chromatography for Regular Peritoneal Protein Loss Assessment in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Konoplev, G.; Kuznetsov, A.; Frorip, A.; Sünter, A.; Korsakov, V.; Stepanova, O.; Roschina, N.; Ovsyannikov, N.; Gerasimchuk, R.; Isachkina, A.; et al. Simple Chromatographic Sensor with UV LED Optical Detection for Monitoring Patients Treated with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. Eng. Proc. 2023, 35, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Holmar, J.; Uhlin, F.; Ferenets, R.; Lauri, K.; Tanner, R.; Arund, J.; Luman, M.; Fridolin, I. Estimation of removed uremic toxin indoxyl sulphate during hemodialysis by using optical data of the spent dialysate. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2013, 2013, 6707–6710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kuznetsov, A.; Frorip, A.; Gerasimchuk, R.P.; Konoplev, G.A.; Rosenberg, M.; Sinijärv, H.; Sünter, A.; Vasilevsky, A.M.; Zemchenkov, A.Y. Multimode monitoring of AGE excretion in hemodialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2016, 31, i500–i501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zemchenkov, G.A.; Konoplev, G.A.; Korsakov, V.; Kuznetsov, A.I.; Roshchina, N.V.; Stepanova, O.S.; Frorip, A. An Optoelectronic Spectral Sensor for Monitoring the Elimination of Uremic Markers with Low and Middle Molecular Weight during Hemodialysis Therapy. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 56, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Biter, A.B.; Pollet, J.; Chen, W.-H.; Strych, U.; Hotez, P.J.; Bottazzi, M.E. A method to probe protein structure from UV absorbance spectra. Anal. Biochem. 2019, 587, 113450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, C.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J. Uncovering the molecular and physiological processes of anticancer leads binding human serum albumin: A physical insight into drug efficacy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abu Teir, M.; Ghithan, J.; Darwish, S.; Abu-hadid, M. Study of progesterone interaction with human serum albumin: Spectroscopic approach. J. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2015, 1, 35–47. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bonomini, M.; Borras, F.E.; Troya-Saborido, M.; Carreras-Planella, L.; Di Liberato, L.; Arduini, A. Proteomic Research in Peritoneal Dialysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, H.; Xiao, X.; Zhao, X.; Wu, Y. Intrinsic fluorescence spectra of tryptophan, tyrosine and phenylalanine. In Proceedings of the Selected Papers of the Chinese Society for Optical Engineering Conferences held October and November 2016, Jinhua, Suzhou, Chengdu, Xi’an, Wuxi, China, 20 October 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rempel, L.C.T.; Finco, A.B.; Maciel, R.A.P.; Bosquetti, B.; Alvarenga, L.M.; Souza, W.M.; Pecoits-Filho, R.; Stinghen, A.E.M. Effect of PKC-β Signaling Pathway on Expression of MCP-1 and VCAM-1 in Different Cell Models in Response to Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs). Toxins 2015, 7, 1722–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nakano, T.; Mizumasa, T.; Kuroki, Y.; Eriguchi, M.; Yoshida, H.; Taniguchi, M.; Masutani, K.; Tsuruya, K.; Kitazono, T. Advanced glycation end products are associated with immature angiogenesis and peritoneal dysfunction in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Perit. Dial. Int. 2020, 40, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Noce, A.; Rovella, V.; Marrone, G.; Cattani, G.; Zingaretti, V.; Limongi, D.; D’Agostini, C.; Sorge, R.; Casasco, M.; Di Daniele, N.; et al. Hemodialysis biomarkers: Total advanced glycation end products (AGEs) against oxidized human serum albumin (HSAox). Acta Diabetol. 2019, 56, 1323–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Perkins, R.K.; van Vliet, S.; Miranda, E.R.; Fuller, K.N.Z.; Beisswenger, P.J.; Wilund, K.R.; Paluska, S.A.; Burd, N.A.; Haus, J.M. Advanced Glycation End Products and Inflammatory Cytokine Profiles in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients After the Ingestion of a Protein-Dense Meal. J. Ren. Nutr. 2023, 33, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tauer, A.; Zhang, X.; Schaub, T.P.; Zimmeck, T.; Niwa, T.; Passlick-Deetjen, J.; Pischetsrieder, M. Formation of advanced glycation end products during CAPD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2003, 41, S57–S60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yabuuchi, J.; Ueda, S.; Yamagishi, S.-I.; Nohara, N.; Nagasawa, H.; Wakabayashi, K.; Matsui, T.; Yuichiro, H.; Kadoguchi, T.; Otsuka, T.; et al. Association of advanced glycation end products with sarcopenia and frailty in chronic kidney disease. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yamamoto, S.; Fuller, D.S.; Komaba, H.; Nomura, T.; Massy, Z.A.; Bieber, B.; Robinson, B.; Pisoni, R.; Fukagawa, M. Serum total indoxyl sulfate and clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients: Results from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Clin. Kidney J. 2020, 14, 1236–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Münch, G.; Keis, R.; Wessels, A.; Riederer, P.; Bahner, U.; Heidland, A.; Niwa, T.; Lemke, H.D.; Schinzel, R. Determination of advanced glycation end products in serum by fluorescence spectroscopy and competitive ELISA. Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 1997, 35, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fischer, J. Specific detection of nucleotides, creatine phosphate, and their derivatives from tissue samples in a simple, isocratic, recycling, low-volume system. LC-GC Int. 1995, 8, 254–264. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gaede, K.; Grttner, R. Photometrische Bestimmung der Umwandlung von Kreatin in Kreatinin. Naturwissenschaften 1952, 39, 63–64. (In German) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shukla, M.K.; Mishra, P.C. Electronic structures and spectra of two antioxidants: Uric acid and ascorbic acid. J. Mol. Struct. Theochem 1996, 377, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Perinchery, S.M.; Kuzhiumparambil, U.; Vemulpad, S.; Goldys, E.M. The influence of indoxyl sulfate and ammonium on the autofluorescence of human urine. Talanta 2010, 80, 1269–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Caggiano, G.; Amodio, L.; Stasi, A.; Colabufo, N.A.; Colangiulo, S.; Pesce, F.; Gesualdo, L. Gut-Derived Uremic Toxins in CKD: An Improved Approach for the Evaluation of Serum Indoxyl Sulfate in Clinical Practice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Adoberg, A.; Paats, J.; Arund, J.; Dhondt, A.; Fridolin, I.; Glorieux, G.; Holmar, J.; Lauri, K.; Leis, L.; Luman, M.; et al. Treatment with Paracetamol Can Interfere with the Intradialytic Optical Estimation in Spent Dialysate of Uric Acid but Not of Indoxyl Sulfate. Toxins 2022, 14, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shafiee, S.; Dastmalchi, S.; Gharekhani, A.; Shayanfar, A. Analysis of indoxyl sulfate in biological fluids with emphasis on sample preparation techniques: A comprehensive analytical review. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shafiee, S.; Dastmalchi, S.; Gharekhani, A.; Shayanfar, A. Determination of indoxyl sulfate by spectrofluorimetric method in human plasma through extraction with deep eutectic solvent. BMC Chem. 2024, 18, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Stinghen, A.E.M.; Massy, Z.A.; Vlassara, H.; Striker, G.E.; Boullier, A. Uremic Toxicity of Advanced Glycation End Products in CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 27, 354–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jiang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Yang, X.; Mei, C.; Xiong, F.; Shi, W.; Zhou, W.; Liu, X.; Sun, S.; et al. Serum and Tissue Levels of Advanced Glycation End Products and Risk of Mortality in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis. Am. J. Nephrol. 2021, 52, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Niwa, T. Indoxyl sulfate is a nephro-vascular toxin. J. Ren. Nutr. 2010, 20, S2–S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. An example of an effluent peritoneal dialysate chromatogram.
Figure 1. An example of an effluent peritoneal dialysate chromatogram.
Engproc 73 00008 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the sensor.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the sensor.
Engproc 73 00008 g002
Figure 3. The absorption (a); and the fluorescence (λex = 270 nm) spectra (b) of the first fraction of the peritoneal dialysis effluent for three samples.
Figure 3. The absorption (a); and the fluorescence (λex = 270 nm) spectra (b) of the first fraction of the peritoneal dialysis effluent for three samples.
Engproc 73 00008 g003
Figure 4. The absorption (a); and the fluorescence (λex = 370 nm) spectra (b) of the second fraction of the peritoneal dialysis effluent for three samples.
Figure 4. The absorption (a); and the fluorescence (λex = 370 nm) spectra (b) of the second fraction of the peritoneal dialysis effluent for three samples.
Engproc 73 00008 g004
Figure 5. The absorption s (a); and fluorescence (λex = 270 nm) spectra (b) of the third fraction of the peritoneal dialysis effluent for three samples.
Figure 5. The absorption s (a); and fluorescence (λex = 270 nm) spectra (b) of the third fraction of the peritoneal dialysis effluent for three samples.
Engproc 73 00008 g005
Table 1. Excitation and emission wavelengths for all fractions.
Table 1. Excitation and emission wavelengths for all fractions.
Fractionλex, nm250270310330370
1λem, nm330 (H)330 (H)-440440 (L)
2λem, nm310, 330 (L), 405300405410440 (H)
3λem, nm380, 335 375, 330 (L)370–410425-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ovsyannikov, N.; Konoplev, G.; Kuznetsov, A.; Sünter, A.; Korsakov, V.; Stepanova, O.; Mikhailis, M.; Gerasimchuk, R.; Isachkina, A.; Rustamova, Z.; et al. An In-Depth Analysis of Peritoneal Dialysate Effluent Composition with a Deep-UV-LED-Based Affordable Optical Chromatographic Sensor. Eng. Proc. 2024, 73, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024073008

AMA Style

Ovsyannikov N, Konoplev G, Kuznetsov A, Sünter A, Korsakov V, Stepanova O, Mikhailis M, Gerasimchuk R, Isachkina A, Rustamova Z, et al. An In-Depth Analysis of Peritoneal Dialysate Effluent Composition with a Deep-UV-LED-Based Affordable Optical Chromatographic Sensor. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 73(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024073008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ovsyannikov, Nikolay, Georgii Konoplev, Artur Kuznetsov, Alar Sünter, Vadim Korsakov, Oksana Stepanova, Milana Mikhailis, Roman Gerasimchuk, Alina Isachkina, Zarina Rustamova, and et al. 2024. "An In-Depth Analysis of Peritoneal Dialysate Effluent Composition with a Deep-UV-LED-Based Affordable Optical Chromatographic Sensor" Engineering Proceedings 73, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024073008

APA Style

Ovsyannikov, N., Konoplev, G., Kuznetsov, A., Sünter, A., Korsakov, V., Stepanova, O., Mikhailis, M., Gerasimchuk, R., Isachkina, A., Rustamova, Z., & Frorip, A. (2024). An In-Depth Analysis of Peritoneal Dialysate Effluent Composition with a Deep-UV-LED-Based Affordable Optical Chromatographic Sensor. Engineering Proceedings, 73(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024073008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop