Next Article in Journal
Design and Flow Simulation of Resin Dispensing System for UV Laser-Based Extrusion 3D Printing Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Metal Culvert Renewal Prioritization Framework Using Fuzzy Inference System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

A Systematic Review of Urban Mobility and Preliminary Research of Transportation Trends in West Hungary †

Kautz Gyula Faculty of Business and Economics, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, 9026 Győr, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Sustainable Mobility and Transportation Symposium 2024, Győr, Hungary, 14–16 October 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 79(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024079007
Published: 28 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The Sustainable Mobility and Transportation Symposium 2024)

Abstract

:
Based on the available statistical data, most employees travel by car, which results in traffic jams, hurts the environment, and increases household expenditures. As a result of this phenomenon, our investigation aimed to present the global trends in urban mobility. It is also considered preliminary research of Hungarian transportation habits and trends by summarizing the standard fees of taxi service, parking, and maintaining a driving license. As our research methodology, we chose a systematic literature search and a summary of the available secondary data to present the main global trends characterizing urban mobility and the standards typical of Hungarian transport. The results enable the expansion of the research and provide an opportunity to learn about consumers’ attitudes at the national level.

1. Introduction

In recent years, significant changes have been observed in all areas, primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent economic impacts, such as global inflation. Regarding public transportation, the usage of buses, trolleys, and metro networks decreased from 10.4% to 7.4% from 2019 to 2020, while the proportion of train users fell from 8% to 5.4% across Europe. In Hungary, expenditures on transportation decreased in line with EU trends by 2020 [1]. This trend persisted into 2021 based on the available data [2]. However, the quality of everyday life continues to be adversely affected by traffic congestion and air pollution caused by smog. This study aims to present the trends in global urban transportation published in the literature and to detail the available secondary data about the costs of taxis, parking, and obtaining a driver’s license in the Hungarian context. The study intends to lay the foundation for deeper and more detailed research on Hungarian spending habits on transportation trends by summarizing the literature framework and topline market research data. It serves as a contextual framework for the broader study that will cover more aspects of spending habits on transportation, highlighting Győr as the center of the western region and a place of different types of transportation.

2. Methodology

We chose two methods for the processing of the available data. First, we applied the steps of a systematic literature review [3]. Then, we prepared a county-level summary of taxi services, parking fees, and the costs of obtaining a driver’s license based on publicly available data on the internet, with particular attention to trends specific to the city of Győr.
For the keyword search, we used the Web of Science database. The search was conducted on 13 June 2024, using the term “urban mobility trends”. In the initial search, we identified 2538 articles, the narrowing parameters of which are illustrated in Figure 1.
As part of the search strategy [4], specific exclusion criteria were defined. The primary criterion was that only journal articles were included in the results, and they had to be written between 2018 and 2024, as the goal was to process the most recent studies. In the initial phase, we further narrowed the results by specifying the research areas of “business economics” and “transportation”.
Using these filtering criteria, we excluded 2156 studies in the first round, leaving a total of 382 studies for review. To identify the relevant studies, we employed two methodologies. First, we utilized the advanced VOSviewer software (1.6.20.0) to import the titles and abstracts of the publications, which then identified the most central conceptual clusters in the publications. As depicted in Figure 2, the words ‘mobility’, ‘COVID-19’, ‘trends’, and ‘urban mobility’ were the most frequently occurring. We then complemented this with a full-text content analysis to determine the focus areas.
Subsequently, we filtered based on the topic, which was done by examining the titles and abstracts of the articles. Based on these criteria, we excluded 331 studies. An additional 15 studies were excluded in the final round because they were either inaccessible or not rated as Q1–Q2, leaving us with 36 relevant studies identified.
In the next chapter, the 36 filtered studies will be analyzed regarding content and methodology [5].

3. Results

In this chapter, the selected 36 sources will be analyzed based on two criteria. First, we examined which clusters they could be categorized into based on their content and research area. Following this, we analyzed the sources from a methodological perspective.

3.1. Classification by Topic

Based on the thematic analysis, we identified five different clusters. The first cluster, (1) sustainable transportation development and challenges, includes sources [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] that focus on developing sustainable mobility, reducing CO2 emissions, and increasing energy efficiency. The second cluster consists of articles on (2) land use and transportation planning [23,24,25,26,27], which discuss the integrated approach to transportation development that considers the diverse needs, opportunities, and sustainability aspects derived from land use analysis.
The third cluster, (3) ridesharing and autonomous vehicles [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36], presents a vision of the future of transportation. It highlights the potential of autonomous vehicles and ridesharing to significantly reduce traffic accidents and congestion, providing viable alternatives for those without personal cars. Ridesharing, in particular, offers a unique opportunity for car owners to share their vehicles, thereby reducing the number of cars on the roads and enhancing sustainability.
The fourth cluster, (4) impact of COVID-19 on transportation [37,38], examines the effects of the pandemic on transportation worldwide. Reducing traffic congestion during the pandemic led to decreased local air pollution and CO2 emissions, which positively impacted the environment.
The fifth and final cluster, (5) bike sharing and taxi use [39,40], underscores the significant roles that bike-sharing systems (BSS) and taxis play in urban transportation. BSS enhances individual mobility, reduces traffic congestion, and offers additional benefits such as increased physical activity and reduced emissions. These systems provide opportunities for short-term travel without the maintenance costs or ownership responsibilities. Taxis, on the other hand, continue to be fundamental transportation modes, often combined with public transportation. Recent studies have shown that BSS can be an effective alternative to taxi travel, especially in city centers during peak times.

3.2. Classification Based on Methodology

We identified four main groups in the processed sources based on the methodology. Figure 3 illustrates that the selected studies utilized qualitative and quantitative methodological approaches. The secondary data collection allowed for a systematic [15] presentation of the different focus areas. Some studies summarized empirical knowledge through case studies [24,29]. Additionally, there were instances of statistical modeling and analysis [7,10,20,28] concerning the efficiency and sustainability of urban transportation systems. Simulations [21,31] were also carried out to highlight the strategic side of ridesharing.

3.3. Summary of the Hungarian Standard Fees in Urban Mobility

Our research collected average taxi fare rates at the county level (Appendix A in Supplementary Materials), parking fees, and the costs of obtaining a driver’s license (Appendix B in Supplementary Materials). It aims to provide data about Hungarians’ average transportation costs. Drawing a parallel with the literature review will lead to choosing one of the most researched topics and preparing a deeper analysis of Hungarian households regarding their expenses on transportation.
Based on this data, we analyzed the cost-effectiveness of choosing different modes of transportation, with a particular focus on the city of Győr. We found that taxi fare rates vary significantly between counties, and the composition of fare packages also differs; some counties have mileage-based pricing, while others use uniform, area-based pricing. In Győr, these rates exceed the national averages but do not reach the highest levels; for instance, the base fare in the city is 1000 HUF, compared to the national average of 890 HUF. It is recommended for occasional use based on the cost of taxi services, as daily commuting by taxi is extremely expensive. Obtaining a driver’s license may be a better solution for daily transportation, but the high tuition fees of driving schools impose a significant financial burden on applicants. Furthermore, the number of licensed drivers significantly increases the number of individuals commuting by personal car, who then seek parking near their workplace or residence. This increase leads to a more extensive stock of parked vehicles, making finding available parking spots more challenging. Parking fees are often high, adding additional financial burdens to solo drivers. In Győr, the tuition fees for driving schools and parking fees also exceed the national average, as shown in Appendix B in Supplementary Materials. Car-sharing emerges as a financially savvy solution to these challenges. It not only offers a more affordable alternative to taxis but also presents a cost-effective option for occasional car users. With car-sharing, users pay only for the time they use the vehicle, thereby avoiding the high parking costs associated with personal car ownership. This model not only reduces individual financial burdens but also contributes to a more efficient use of urban space.

4. Conclusions

This research briefly summarizes the focus areas found in the literature, as well as the methodologies used in the studies. Overall, the studies highlight the opportunities and perceived disadvantages of the urban transportation infrastructure. Analyses were conducted ranging from identifying social needs to economic implications. The impact of changes in urban transportation on the environment during the COVID-19 pandemic was also examined. The research aims to further develop the trends that evolved and persisted from this period through various simulations and models that can assist decision-makers. The second part of the research summarizes publicly available taxis, parking, and driver’s license fees. The results indicate that these forms of urban transportation impose significant financial burdens on households. The insights gained from these two investigations lay the groundwork for sustainability-related research concerning Hungary. The limitations of this study also carry future perspectives. Firstly, the creation of a model that provides a more detailed framework for the in-depth analysis of the selected studies on the topic. Secondly, a deeper analysis of transportation habits in Hungarian society, calculating the environmental impact of harmful emissions and the spread of alternative transportation forms such as car-sharing and bike-sharing.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13329346. Appendix A: Taxi fees by county, Appendix B: Parking fees and tuition fees by county.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.V. and F.L.; methodology, T.V.; software, F.L.; validation, T.V. and F.L.; formal analysis, T.V.; investigation, F.L.; resources, F.L.; data curation, T.V. and F.L.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L.; writing—review and editing, T.V.; visualization, T.V.; supervision, T.V.; project administration, F.L.; funding acquisition, T.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The research was conducted with the support of the Széchenyi István University Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Statista. Transport as a Percentage of Final Consumption of Households in the European Union in 2021, by Country. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/449259/transport-as-share-of-household-consumption-in-europe-eu-28-by-country/ (accessed on 29 July 2024).
  2. Eurostat. Key Figures on European Transport; 2022 Edition; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2022; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/15216629/15589759/KS-07-22-523-EN-N.pdf (accessed on 29 July 2024).
  3. Müller-Bloch, C.; Kranz, J. A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Fort Worth, TX, USA, 13–16 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Braun, V.; Clark, V. Chapter Six: Textual Data Collection: Surveys, Stories, Diaries and Secondary Sources. In Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners, 1st ed.; Braun, V., Clark, V., Eds.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2013; pp. 14–16. [Google Scholar]
  6. Diao, M. Towards sustainable urban transport in Singapore: Policy instruments and mobility trends. Transp. Policy 2019, 81, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. D’Ambra, L.; Crisci, A.; Meccariello, G.; Della Ragione, L.; Palma, R. Evaluation of the social and economic impact of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions on sustainable mobility using cumulative ordinal models: Trend odds model. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2021, 75, 100817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chiquetto, J.B.; Leichsenring, A.R.; Ribeiro, F.N.D.; Ribeiro, W.C. Work, housing, and urban mobility in the megacity of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2022, 81, 101184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marz, W.; Sen, S. Does telecommuting reduce commuting emissions? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2022, 116, 102746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bouscasse, H.; Gabet, S.; Kerneis, G.; Provent, A.; Rieux, C.; Ben Salem, N.; Dupont, H.; Troude, F.; Mathy, S.; Slama, R. Designing local air pollution policies focusing on mobility and heating to avoid a targeted number of pollution-related deaths: Forward and backward approaches combining air pollution modeling, health impact assessment and cost-benefit analysis. Environ. Int. 2022, 159, 107030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Vos, J.; Alemi, F. Are young adults car-loving urbanites? Comparing young and older adults’ residential location choice, travel behavior and attitudes. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 2020, 132, 986–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shulika, O.; Bujak, M.; Ghasemi, F.; Kucharski, R. Spatiotemporal variability of ride-pooling potential—Half a year New York City experiment. J. Transp. Geogr. 2024, 114, 103767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fisch-Romito, V.; Guivarch, C. Transportation infrastructures in a low carbon world: An evaluation of investment needs and their determinants. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 2019, 72, 203–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Epicoco, N.; Falagario, M. Decision support tools for developing sustainable transportation systems in the EU: A review of research needs, barriers, and trends. Res. Trans. Bus. Manag. 2022, 43, 100819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. D’Agostino, C.; Piva, E.; Pucci, P.; Rossi, C. A systematic literature review on women’s daily mobility in the Global North. Transp. Rev. 2024, 44, 1016–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, J.; Gladson, L.; Cromar, K. A Novel Environmental Justice Indicator for Managing Local Air Pollution. Int. J. Enivorn. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fronteli, M.H.; Paladini, E.P. Trends, Enablers, and Barriers for Car Ownership. Transp. Res. Rec. 2023, 2677, 1290–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Filippi, C.; Guastaroba, G.; Peirano, L.; Speranza, M.G. Trends in passenger transport optimisation. Int. Trans. Oper. 2023, 30, 3057–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Garus, A.; Alonso, B.; Raposo, M.A.; Ciuffo, B.; Dell’Olio, L. Impact of New Mobility Solutions on Travel Behaviour and Its Incorporation into Travel Demand Models. J. Adv. Transp. 2022, 724, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ellder, E.; Larsson, A.; Sola, A.G.; Vilhelmson, B. Proximity changes to what and for whom? Investigating sustainable accessibility change in the Gothenburg city region 1990–2014. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2018, 12, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Basu, R.; Araldo, A.; Akkinepally, A.P.; Biran, B.H.N.; Basak, K.; Seshadri, R.; Deshmukh, N.; Kumar, N.; Azevedo, C.L.; Ben-Akiva, M. Automated Mobility-on-Demand vs. Mass Transit: A Multi-Modal Activity-Driven Agent-Based Simulation Approach. Transp. Res. Rec. 2018, 2672, 608–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Winkler, S.L.; Anderson, J.E.; Garza, L.; Ruona, W.C.; Vogt, R.; Wallington, T.J. Vehicle criteria pollutant (PM, NOx, CO, HCs) emissions: How low should we go? Npj. Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2018, 1, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Holz-Rau, C.; Scheiner, J. Land-use and transport planning—A field of complex cause-impact relationships. Thoughts on transport growth, greenhouse gas emissions and the built environment. Transp. Policy 2019, 74, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Agriesti, S.A.M.; Soe, R.-M.; Saif, M.A. Framework for connecting the mobility challenges in low density areas to smart mobility solutions: The case study of Estonian municipalities. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2022, 14, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bassolas, A.; Barbosa-Filho, H.; Dickinson, B.; Dotiwalla, X.; Eastham, P.; Gallotti, R.; Ghoshal, G.; Gipson, B.; Hazarie, S.A.; Kautz, H.; et al. Hierarchical organization of urban mobility and its connection with city livability. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Barbosa, H.; Hazarie, S.; Dickinson, B.; Bassolas, A.; Frank, A.; Kautz, H.; Sadilek, A.; Ramasco, J.J.; Ghoshal, G. Uncovering the socioeconomic facets of human mobility. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fernandez-Gonzalez, R.; Puime-Guillen, F.; Ferreira Moutinho, V.M.; Santos de Oliveira, H.M. Urban mobility trends and climate change: Sustainability policies in the parking industry. Environ. Sci. Pol. Res. 2023, 30, 69899–69912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tian, Z.; Feng, T.; Timmermans, H.J.P.; Yao, B. Using autonomous vehicles or shared cars? Results of a stated choice experiment. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2021, 128, 103117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ehrler, V.C.; Schoeder, D.; Seidel, S. Challenges and perspectives for the use of electric vehicles for last mile logistics of grocery e-commerce—Findings from case studies in Germany. Res. Transp. Econ. 2021, 87, 100757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Esfandabadi, Z.S.; Diana, M.; Zanetti, M.C. Carsharing services in sustainable urban transport: An inclusive science map of the field. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 357, 131981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brendel, A.B.; Lichtenberg, S.; Brauer, B.; Nastjuk, I.; Kolbe, L.M. Improving electric vehicle utilization in carsharing: A framework and simulation of an e-carsharing vehicle utilization management system. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 2018, 64, 230–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mahdavian, A.; Shojaei, A.; McCormick, S.; Papandreou, T.; Eluru, N.; Oloufa, A.A. Drivers and Barriers to Implementation of Connected, Automated, Shared and Electric Vehicles: An Agenda for Future Research. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 22195–22213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ortega, A.; Haq, G.; Tsakalidis, A. Carsharing in Europe: A critical review of policy, research, innovation, and practice. Transp. Plan. Technol. 2023, 46, 381–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Storch, D.-M.; Timme, M.; Schroeder, M. Incentive-driven transition to high ride-sharing adoption. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Roca-Riu, M.; Menendez, M. The potential of flexible reservations in a car sharing system with an auction scheme. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 154627–154639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goddeke, D.; Krauss, K.; Gnann, T. What is the role of carsharing toward a more sustainable transport behavior? Analysis of data from 80 major German cities. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2022, 16, 861–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Caballini, C.; Agostino, M.; Dalla Chiara, B. Physical mobility and virtual communication in Italy: Trends, analytical relationships and policies for the post COVID-19. Transp. Policy 2021, 110, 314–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. El Ouadi, J.; Malhene, N.; Benhadou, S.; Medromi, H. Shared public transport within a physical internet framework: Reviews, conceptualization and expected challenges under COVID-19 pandemic. IATSS Res. 2021, 4, 417–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhou, X.; Wang, M.; Li, D. Bike-sharing or taxi? Modeling the choices of travel mode in Chicago using machine learning. J. Transp. Geogr. 2019, 79, 102479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, J.; Chen, C.; Huang, H.; Xiang, C. Unifying Uber and taxi data via deep models for taxi passenger demand prediction. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2023, 27, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA Flowchart.
Figure 1. PRISMA Flowchart.
Engproc 79 00007 g001
Figure 2. Conceptual clusters created by VosViewer.
Figure 2. Conceptual clusters created by VosViewer.
Engproc 79 00007 g002
Figure 3. Summary of methodologies created by Canva tool.
Figure 3. Summary of methodologies created by Canva tool.
Engproc 79 00007 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vastag, T.; Lőrincz, F. A Systematic Review of Urban Mobility and Preliminary Research of Transportation Trends in West Hungary. Eng. Proc. 2024, 79, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024079007

AMA Style

Vastag T, Lőrincz F. A Systematic Review of Urban Mobility and Preliminary Research of Transportation Trends in West Hungary. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 79(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024079007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vastag, Tímea, and Fanni Lőrincz. 2024. "A Systematic Review of Urban Mobility and Preliminary Research of Transportation Trends in West Hungary" Engineering Proceedings 79, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024079007

APA Style

Vastag, T., & Lőrincz, F. (2024). A Systematic Review of Urban Mobility and Preliminary Research of Transportation Trends in West Hungary. Engineering Proceedings, 79(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024079007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop