Previous Issue
Volume 5, December
 
 

Hemato, Volume 6, Issue 1 (March 2025) – 3 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3128 KiB  
Article
Real-World Outcomes of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy for Third-Line Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single-Center Study
by Aishwarya Sridhar, Thomas S. Gunning, Alexandra Della Pia, Xiaopei Zhang, Jaeil Ahn, Brittany Sinclaire, Brittany Lukasik, Christina Cho, Michele L. Donato, Sukhdeep Kaur, Hyung C. Suh, Lori A. Leslie, Tatyana A. Feldman, Andre H. Goy and Andrew Ip
Hemato 2025, 6(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato6010003 - 28 Jan 2025
Viewed by 599
Abstract
Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphoma, with poor outcomes in those who experience relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Landmark clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy [...] Read more.
Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphoma, with poor outcomes in those who experience relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Landmark clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for patients with R/R DLBCL, though further exploration of real-world outcomes (RWOs) and safety data is warranted. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to collect patient and disease characteristics from patients with R/R DLBCL receiving CAR T-cell therapy for third-line treatment or beyond at the John Theurer Cancer Center as the standard of care. Results: We report on 82 patients with R/R DLBCL that successfully completed an infusion of an anti-CD19 CAR T-cell product at our institution. Best overall and complete response rates were 74.4% (95% CI, 64.9 to 83.8) and 67.1% (95% CI, 56.9 to 77.2), respectively. From the time of CAR T-cell infusion, median PFS was 26.5 months (95% CI, 8.6 months could not be estimated) and OS was not reached. Subgroup analyses revealed no statistical differences in outcomes by use of bridging therapy, Karnofsky performance status, transformed DLBCL status, and the type of CAR T-cell product used for this study. CAR T-cell therapy was well tolerated, with 58 patients (70.7%) experiencing cytokine-release syndrome and 17 patients (20.7%) experiencing immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Conclusions: These results of RWOs in third-line patients with R/R DLBCL receiving anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy are comparable or superior to prior clinical trials and studies of RWOs, validating the strong efficacy and manageable toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Lymphomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 537 KiB  
Article
Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Real-Life Experience Using a New In-Line Method
by Giulia De Fusco and Gianluca Gessoni
Hemato 2025, 6(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato6010002 - 7 Jan 2025
Viewed by 478
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) consists of the collection of a patient’s peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) that, after incubation with a photosensitive molecule, are exposed to ultraviolet-A (UVA) and then reinfused into the patient. There are two methods for performing the ECP procedure: [...] Read more.
Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) consists of the collection of a patient’s peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) that, after incubation with a photosensitive molecule, are exposed to ultraviolet-A (UVA) and then reinfused into the patient. There are two methods for performing the ECP procedure: the “in-line” methods and the “off-line” methods. In the “in-line” method, all the phases of ECP (leukapheresis, photoactivation, and reinfusion) are achieved sequentially in extracorporeal circulation using a single instrument and a single sterile disposable kit without disconnection from the patient’s blood circulation. In this paper, we report our real-life experience with a recently licensed in-line ECP system proposed by Fresenius-Kabi. Methods: The ECP procedures (n = 211) were performed using an Amicus cell separator and a Phelix UV irradiator with Amicus software 4.51 and Phelix software 1.0. A targeted 2000 mL of whole blood (WB) was processed, and 1.5 J/cm2 of UVA light was delivered to the collected mononuclear cells (MNCs). Results: From May 2023 to April 2024, we performed 211 ECP procedures in 11 patients with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The processed blood volume was between 1992 and 2000 mL, and the blood flow speed during the procedures was highly variable (from 30 to 50 mL/min), so the total duration of the procedure was quite variable (from 92 to 118 min). The collection efficiency (CE2) for mononuclear cells was always satisfactory (from 55% to 73%), with a minimal presence of RBCs and PLTs. Conclusions: In our experience, the Amicus system-based ECP procedure is safe and well tolerated as we observed only one side effect. The duration of the procedure was always under two hours. The collection efficiency (CE2) for MNCs was satisfactory, with minimal platelet and RBC product contamination. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1217 KiB  
Article
Hematological Side Effects of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE Therapy in Patients with NENs
by Luciano Carideo, Rosaria Meucci, Giuseppe Campagna, Vincenzo Marcello Russo, Enrico D’Ippolito, Maria Rinzivillo, Francesco Panzuto and Daniela Prosperi
Hemato 2025, 6(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato6010001 - 30 Dec 2024
Viewed by 555
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Lutathera® ([177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE) is the first radiolabelled somatostatin (SST) analog approved for the treatment of patients with well-differentiated (G1 and G2) unresectable or metastatic gastro-entero-pancreatic neuro-endocrine-neoplasms (GEP-NENs). The bone marrow and kidneys are critical organs for RLT with [ [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Lutathera® ([177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE) is the first radiolabelled somatostatin (SST) analog approved for the treatment of patients with well-differentiated (G1 and G2) unresectable or metastatic gastro-entero-pancreatic neuro-endocrine-neoplasms (GEP-NENs). The bone marrow and kidneys are critical organs for RLT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Our purpose was to evaluate hematological and renal toxicity in 29 patients (18 males, 11 females) treated with Lutathera®. Methods: According to standard protocols, four cycles of (177Lu)Lu-DOTA-TATE were administered every eight/nine weeks. Patients received pre-medication with anti-emetic and anti-acid drugs and a slow amino acid infusion for renal protection. Blood count and serum creatinine data were collected at three time points: before the first cycle, after the second cycle, and at the end of treatment. Results: We found that almost all hematological parameters significantly decreased between the baseline and/or interim and post-therapy evaluation, although without a clinical impact. The presence of total tumor load or bone metastases had no influence on these findings, while male patients showed less hematological toxicity than females. Conversely, creatinine levels did not vary during treatment. Conclusions: Our study confirms that [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE RLT is safe and well tolerated despite some minor (grade 1) hematological toxicity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Radiolabeled Blood Elements and Other Imaging Modalities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop