Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of New Tetradentate N2O2-Based Schiff’s Base Cu (II) Complexes for Dye Photodegradation
Previous Article in Journal
Photodynamic Activity of Acridine Orange in Keratinocytes under Blue Light Irradiation
 
 
Tutorial
Peer-Review Record

Photophysical Properties of Anthracene Derivatives

Photochem 2023, 3(2), 227-273; https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem3020015
by Agonist Kastrati, Franck Oswald, Antoine Scalabre and Katharina M. Fromm *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Photochem 2023, 3(2), 227-273; https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem3020015
Submission received: 7 March 2023 / Revised: 23 March 2023 / Accepted: 27 March 2023 / Published: 4 May 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this tutorial review, the authors introduce the principle of photophysical process for organic compounds. Especially, anthracene and its derivatives are presented and discussed as examples. I do believe the background knowledge, such as fluorescence and Jablonski diagram, could be find in any textbook of photo-physics.  So, I would like suggest to accept this review paper for publication after careful revision. Generally, every data and picture appeared in the manuscript should be carefully checked.

For example,

Page 16, first paragraph, in the text “the singlet excited state (S1) and of the triplet excited state (T1) are in close proximity (Scheme 3, left) ”. However, in the Scheme 3, the S1 close to T2. Could the author label the S1 and T1 energy level of Antheracene and diphenylanthracene exactly?

Author Response

Dear Reviewer
Thank you for your proofreading.
I made some changes.

Reviewer 2 Report

 

This manuscript is a tutorial article by Fromm et al. describing general introductions and photophysical properties of anthracene derivatives as concrete examples. The introductory part is instructive and suitable for the reading even for undergraduate students. The authors introduce typical and recent examples of the studies of optical properties of anthracene derivatives in sections 3.3-3.8. The manuscript seems to be suitable for publication, but there are so many points to be corrected, writing, terminology, graphics, nomenclature, symbol and units, abbreviations, and editorial consistencies, listed in the pdf file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Hello Reviewer
Thank you for your thorough review.
I made some changes.
I am sending you your pdf with my corrections and comments for each point.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop