Trauma Care, Volume 4, Issue 2 (June 2024) – 7 articles

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate temporal trends in gunshot wound (GSW)-associated orthopedic injuries among children, adolescents, and young adults in New York State, and to determine the impact of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of these injuries. Methods: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) inpatient database was reviewed to identify patients ≤ 21 years of age who presented to a hospital with GSW-associated injuries from January 2016 to December 2020. Patient diagnosis codes were cross-referenced with the list of the International Classification of Diseases Version 10 Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes for orthopedic injuries to determine the incidence of GSW-associated orthopedic injuries among this cohort. The number of cases was cross-referenced with New York State census population estimates to calculate incidence per million. The geographic incidence was plotted over a map of New York State with sub-division based on facility Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) codes. Poisson regression was used to compare the injury incidence in 2020 (pandemic onset) versus the preceding years (pre-pandemic). Results: Between 2016 and 2020, there were 548 inpatient admissions for GSW-associated orthopedic injuries, representing an incidence of 5.6 cases per million. Injury incidence decreased from 2016 to 2019, with an increase in 2020 representing almost 28% of the total cases identified. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence rate ratio for 2020 compared to 2016–2019 (p < 0.001). The majority of patients were male (94%), African–American (73%), and covered by either Medicare (49%) or Managed Care (47%). Most cases were clustered around large metropolitan areas with low incidence in suburban and rural regions of the state. Conclusions: There was a two-fold increase in the incidence of GSW-associated orthopedic injuries among patients ≤ 21 years old in New York State during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Full article

Background: Given the aging of the overall U.S. population, the resulting changes in healthcare needs especially among veterans, and the high prevalence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults, additional research is needed on community participation after TBI in older veterans. The current study examined predictors of community participation trajectories over the 5 years after TBI in veterans who were 55 years of age or older upon injury. Method: This study included data from 185 participants in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs TBI Model System national study who had sustained a TBI at age 55 or older and had completed at least one of each Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O) subscale scores at one or more follow-up time points (1, 2, and 5 years post-TBI). Results: PART-O Productivity, Social, and Out and About scores remained constant over time. Lower PART-O Productivity trajectories were seen among participants who were unemployed at the time of injury (p = 0.023). Lower PART-O Social trajectories were seen among participants who had a lower education level (p = 0.021), were unmarried at injury (p < 0.001), and had private insurance coverage (p < 0.033). Conclusion: These findings add to the growing body of literature on TBI and community participation by focusing on an older adult veteran population. There is an urgency to understand the needs of this group, many of whom are aging with service-connected disabilities including TBI. Veterans with characteristics identified herein as being associated with lower community participation trajectories would be prime candidates for interventions that aim to increase community and social engagement after later-life TBI. Full article

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a mental health concern impacting a large proportion of the population. There is a growing interest in mindfulness-based treatments for PTSD. However, some individuals with PTSD do not respond to treatment. Identifying factors that may provide a more precise treatment approach has the potential to enhance response. Network analysis is a data-driven methodology that has been used to suggest specific targets for treatment. To date, there has not been a network analysis examining the interrelation between PTSD symptoms and trait mindfulness. The current study is an exploratory analysis of N = 214 adults from a non-clinical sample who endorsed a Criterion A traumatic event and completed the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 and the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Both undirected and directed networks were generated to identify links between PTSD symptom clusters and the facets of mindfulness. Both networks highlighted the connection between the PTSD symptom cluster Alterations in Arousal and Reactivity and the Awareness facet of mindfulness; and the PTSD symptom cluster Negative Alterations in Cognitions and Mood with the Non-judging facet of mindfulness. Taken together, these findings provide further evidence that greater mindfulness is generally associated with lower PTSD symptoms. Importantly, the findings highlight Non-judgement and Awareness as facets that might warrant further investigation in the context of mindfulness-based treatment efforts for PTSD. Full article

Background: Skin substitutes play a crucial role in wound care by actively modulating the wound healing process, promoting angiogenesis, and protecting the integrity of the native extracellular matrix. Consequently, surgeons have increasingly recognized these resources as excellent complements to improve reconstructive outcomes. This review focuses on the author’s experience using these biomaterials in complex cases, highlighting the benefits they bring to patient care. Methods: A literature review was conducted to evaluate the regenerative properties of skin substitutes and their applicability in head and neck, upper and lower extremities, and trunk reconstruction. Results: The reviewed literature, along with the authors’ experience, supports the adjunct use of skin substitutes in various reconstructive situations. Combining them with skin grafts improves resulting skin quality and may also enhance donor site healing. They have proven to be effective in addressing chronic venous ulcers, traumatic wounds with limited donor tissues for coverage, extensive burns, diabetic foot ulcers, and oncological resections in the face and scalp. Furthermore, combining them with autologous tissue shows promising results in achieving stable closure. Conclusions: Incorporating skin substitutes in complex reconstructive scenarios offers multiple benefits. Their regenerative properties and ability to modulate the healing process contribute to enhanced outcomes and reduced overall costs. Full article

This article is based on exploratory research on how the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals uses the language of trauma in gender-based asylum claims. Gender-based asylum claims include female genital mutilation (FGM), coercive population control (CPC) in the form of forced abortions and forced sterilizations, rape, forced marriage, and domestic violence. The Circuit Courts have reviewed appeals from petitioners with asylum claims since 1946, yet the language of trauma did not appear in the Court’s decisions until 1983. From 1983 to 2023, only 385, 3.85% or less, of the over 10,000 asylum cases before the Circuit Courts used the language of trauma in its legal interpretation of persecution. I have identified 101 gender-based asylum cases that were reviewed by one of the eleven U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that apply the language of trauma in its legal interpretation of persecution for this analysis. The research question guiding this study is: how does the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals use the language of trauma when reviewing gender-based asylum cases? This study found that U.S. Circuit Courts use the language of trauma in four ways: precedent cases, policies and reports, physical trauma, and psychological trauma when reviewing gender-based asylum claims. This study provides the first data set of gender-based asylum claims under review at the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that use the language of trauma. Full article

(1) Background: Patients who experience acute traumatic injury requiring hospitalisation represent a vulnerable population. The trauma patient often experiences multi-system injuries and complex physiology. Additionally, there are complex socio-ecological issues that impact the care and outcomes of trauma patients. Of interest, culturally and linguistically diverse populations with language barriers experience worse outcomes in trauma settings. This scoping review evaluates the current evidence on language barriers in this population and the influences on outcomes for trauma patients. (2) Methods: A scoping review was performed following a computer-assisted search of the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central databases. Papers that evaluated the impact of the language barrier in culturally and linguistically diverse populations and outcomes in acute trauma settings were included. (3) Results: A literature search identified eight articles that were eligible for inclusion. Overall, there was no robust evidence to suggest that such populations were disadvantaged in terms of length of hospital stay and overall mortality. However, studies did identify that these populations were at higher risk of disability and poor mental health outcomes, experienced communication barriers more often and had lower social functioning. (4) Conclusions: This scoping review demonstrates that individuals admitted due to trauma who are from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds experience more significant disadvantages concerning psychological and functional outcomes. It is posited this is due to their inability to communicate their complex needs in trauma, however more robust and rigorous research is required to better characterise this effect. Full article

Antibiotic prophylaxis for extremity gunshot wounds (GSWs) is highly variable. The objective of the present study is to quantify the adherence rate to a protocol for single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for extremity GSWs and the impacts on post-injury infection rates. We reviewed patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center with an extremity gunshot wound between 2019 and 2021. Infection rates were compared for patients following the protocol or not, and for patients presenting before or after the protocol’s implementation. Overall, 94% of patients received antibiotic treatment at presentation, but only 34% followed the single-dose antibiotic protocol. The rate of protocol adherence increased from 15% to 39% after the protocol was implemented in the hospital in January 2020 (p = 0.081). Infection rates were not different before and after the protocol implementation (25% vs. 18%, p = 0.45). Infection rates were also not different between patients who did and did not follow the protocol (15% vs. 20%, p = 0.52). The implementation of a single-dose cephalosporin protocol increased adherence to the protocol in a level 1 trauma center without increasing infection rates. These findings support conservative treatment along with a single dose of first-generation cephalosporin antibiotic for uncomplicated extremity GSWs in order to decrease healthcare costs without compromising infection risk. Full article