Methane Advances: Trends and Summary from Selected Studies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Trend Analysis in the Context of CH4
3. Procedures for Summarization of Advances in CH4
4. Advances: Summary of Methods, Technologies, and Breakthroughs
4.1. CH4 Measurement
4.2. Computational and Numerical Modeling and Simulation Studies for CH4
4.3. Emerging Technologies for CH4 Production, Management, and Control
4.3.1. Increasing CH4 Measurement Efficiency Production and Conversion Rate
- Improving Measurement from Ruminants
- b.
- Organic Biowaste
- c.
- Pyrolysis with Hydrogen Addition
- d.
- Evogen Microbial Additive
- e.
- Specific Additives under high pH and NH4 Concentration
- f.
- Enteric CH4 Reduction Management
4.3.2. Low-Cost Method for CH4 Leakage Detection
4.3.3. Efficient Direct CH4 Oxidation Process—Monomeric Species Identification
- i.
- Reproducibility and Consistency: Ensuring the reproducibility and consistency of the mIE method at a larger scale is essential. Maintaining uniformity in the modification process and the resulting catalyst properties across different batches is crucial for scalability.
- ii.
- Process Engineering and Equipment: Scaling up the mIE method may require process engineering to ensure efficient mass transfer and reaction kinetics. Additionally, the availability of suitable equipment for large-scale implementation is a key factor in the scalability of the mIE method.
- iii.
- Economic Viability: The cost of the mIE method at a larger scale, including the cost of raw materials, equipment, and energy, is a significant factor in its scalability. Assessing the economic viability of the method for large-scale catalyst preparation is essential.
- iv.
- Environmental Impact: Scaling up the mIE method should consider its environmental impact, including the generation of waste, energy consumption, and the use of potentially hazardous materials. Evaluating and mitigating the environmental implications of the method is important for its scalability.
- v.
- Quality Control and Characterization: Maintaining the quality and performance of the catalysts at a larger scale through rigorous quality control and characterization methods is a critical factor in the scalability of the mIE method. Ensuring that the modified catalysts meet the required specifications is essential.
4.3.4. Use of Industrial By-Products as Supplements for Low-Quality Diets
4.3.5. CH4 Storage via Hydrate Formation
- i.
- Thermodynamic and kinetic impacts: Biosurfactants can enhance the formation of gas hydrates by increasing the nucleation time and hydrate formation rate [86]. For example, the use of glycolipids as biosurfactants has been explored for CH4 hydrate generation, showing promising results in terms of thermodynamics and kinetics [85].
- ii.
- Reduced induction time: Biosurfactants can significantly reduce the induction time of hydrate nucleation, leading to the faster formation of gas hydrates [84]. This can be beneficial for applications such as natural gas storage and transportation, as well as CO2 capture and sequestration.
- iii.
- iv.
- Environmental benefits: Biosurfactants are often more environmentally friendly and stable at extreme conditions like temperature, pH, and salinity compared to synthetic surfactants [85]. This can make them a more sustainable option for gas hydrate formation, transportation, and storage applications.
4.4. Nexus of CH4–X
4.4.1. Gas Hydrate Mechanisms, Growth Rates, and Morphologies from CH4-Containing Mixtures
- Natural Gas Production and Storage:Hydrate-based gas recovery: CH4 hydrates naturally exist in vast quantities beneath the seafloor and permafrost. Understanding how to control growth rates and morphologies could enable the efficient and targeted extraction of CH4 from these hydrates, potentially providing a new source of natural gas.Hydrate-based gas storage: CH4 hydrates can store large amounts of gas in a compact form. By tailoring the growth and morphology of hydrates, it might be possible to create efficient and environmentally friendly storage facilities for natural gas.
- Carbon Capture and Storage:Hydrate-based CO2 capture: CH4 hydrates can also incorporate CO2. Controlling the growth and morphology of CO2-containing hydrates could lead to new methods for capturing and storing carbon emissions from industrial sources.
- Gas Separation and Purification:Selective hydrate formation: As mentioned previously, the competition between different guest molecules like CH4 and CO2 can be used for gas separation. By controlling the growth conditions, it might be possible to selectively form hydrates with one type of guest molecule, leaving the other in the gas phase, leading to purer gas streams.
- Pipeline Plugging Prevention:Hydrate inhibitor design: Gas pipelines transporting natural gas through cold regions are susceptible to hydrate formation, which can cause blockages. Understanding the influence of growth rates and morphologies on hydrate formation could aid in the design of more effective hydrate inhibitors.
- Fundamental Science and Engineering:Developing new materials: Studying the growth and morphology of gas hydrates can provide valuable insights into crystal growth and self-assembly processes, which can be applied to the development of new materials with tailored properties. These are just a few examples, and researchers are actively exploring the potential applications. As our understanding of gas hydrates grows and we gain better control over their growth and morphology, new and innovative applications are likely to emerge across various industries.
- i.
- Partial dissociation during growth: The study reveals that gas hydrates, including CH4-containing ones, can undergo partial dissociation during growth. This phenomenon, where the hydrate releases some of its guest molecules while incorporating others, complicates the modeling of growth processes and hinders the prediction of hydrate behavior.
- ii.
- Competition between guest molecules: When multiple guest molecules, like CH4 and CO2, are present, they compete for space within the hydrate structure. This competition can lead to unpredictable growth patterns and morphologies, making it difficult to control the formation of desired hydrates.
- iii.
- Temperature and pressure dependence: Gas hydrate growth and dissociation are highly sensitive to temperature and pressure changes. This sensitivity poses challenges for practical applications where the precise control of these parameters is crucial.
- iv.
- Tailoring hydrate morphologies: Understanding the mechanisms of dissociation during growth can open possibilities for tailoring the morphology of gas hydrates. This could be beneficial for applications where specific crystal shapes or sizes are desired.
- v.
- Controlled dissociation for gas separation: The phenomenon of partial dissociation can be exploited for gas separation purposes. By manipulating the growth conditions, it might be possible to selectively release specific guest molecules from the hydrate, leading to purer gas streams.
- vi.
- Enhanced gas storage and transportation: Gas hydrates can store large amounts of gas in a compact form, making them attractive for storage and transportation applications. If the challenges associated with dissociation during growth can be overcome, gas hydrates could become a more viable option for these purposes.
4.4.2. Oxidative Coupling of CH4
4.4.3. CH4 Synthesis and Catalysis
- A smaller Pd nanoparticle size and better dispersion on the ZnO surface.
- The higher surface area of the Pd/ZnO from the borohydride method.
- Synergistic effect between Pd and ZnO.
4.5. Case Studies’ Application in Countries
5. Recommendation and Conclusions
- i.
- Adoption and Use of Best Practices:Transitioning to sustainable agriculture offers numerous benefits, including increased food security, reduced reliance on synthetic fertilizers, and reduced CH4 leakage from natural gas systems. Implementing best practices in pipeline maintenance, leak detection, and storage technologies can boost the bottom line and mitigate the climate impact of natural gas. Additionally, reducing nitrogen-rich fertilizer runoff and proper manure management can improve aquatic ecosystem health and promote cleaner waterways.
- ii.
- Closing Knowledge Gaps:Global CH4 Mapping: develop comprehensive, high-resolution maps of global CH4 emissions from all sources, including lakes, rivers, and anthropogenic activities.Marine CH4 Processes: improve models to capture the complex dynamics of CH4 release in ocean environments, considering factors like temperature, pressure, and biological activity.Anthropogenic Emissions: refine Earth system models to accurately predict the future trajectory of human-caused CH4 emissions and their interactions with other GHGs.
- iii.
- Optimizing Mitigation Strategies:Immediate vs. Delayed Mitigation: quantify the relative impact of immediate versus delayed CH4 reduction efforts on achieving climate goals.Targeted Mitigation Strategies: identify and prioritize the most effective CH4 mitigation strategies for each sector, considering cost-effectiveness and potential co-benefits.Technology Development: invest in research and development of novel technologies for capturing, storing, or utilizing CH4 emissions, exploring both biological and engineering approaches.Pragmatic Financing: beyond the signing and an agreement for the employment of mitigation strategies, proper and timely finances should be made for the achievement of the strategies, hence matching words of mitigation with the real-time financing of development and the implementation of a technological breakthrough.
- iv.
- Industrial Integration and Benefits:Real-time Monitoring and Optimization: develop AI-powered systems that combine modeling and sensor data to continuously monitor and optimize industrial processes for minimizing CH4 emissions.Closed-loop Systems: design and implement closed-loop systems in relevant industries, such as biogas production or waste management, to minimize CH4 escape and maximize resource recovery.Lifecycle Analysis: incorporate CH₄ modeling into lifecycle assessments of products and services to identify and reduce CH4 emissions throughout the entire value chain.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Nisbet-Jones, P.B.; Fernandez, J.M.; Fisher, R.E.; France, J.L.; Lowry, D.; Waltham, D.A.; Woolley Maisch, C.A.; Nisbet, E.G. Is the destruction or removal of atmospheric methane a worthwhile option? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2022, 380, 20210108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anderson, K.; Buck, H.J.; Fuhr, L.; Geden, O.; Peters, G.P.; Tamme, E. Controversies of carbon dioxide removal. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 808–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, S.; Solanki, H. Role of Methane in Climate Change and Options for Mitigation—A Brief Review. Int. Assoc. Biol. Comput. Dig. 2022, 1, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wuebbles, D.J.; Hayhoe, K. Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2002, 57, 177–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, T.; Cheng, J.; Wang, S.; He, H.; Chen, G.; Xu, H.; Wu, S. Hotspot Detection and Estimation of Methane Emissions from Landfill Final Cover. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Gupta, H. Methane: Risk assessment, environmental, and health hazard. In Hazardous Gases; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 225–238. [Google Scholar]
- International Energy Agency. The Energy Mix. 2023. Available online: https://www.iea.org/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
- Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Why Climate and Clean Air. 2023. Available online: https://www.ccacoalition.org/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
- UNFCCC. Summary of Global Climate Action at COP 28; UNFCCC: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H.; Calvin, K.; Dasgupta, D.; Krinmer, G.; Mukherji, A.; Thorne, P.; Trisos, C.; Romero, J.; Aldunce, P.; Barret, K. Synthesis Report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), Longer Report; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- OECD. Climate Finance Provided and Mobilised by Developed Countries in 2013–2021. In Climate Finance and the USD 100 Billion Goal; OECD: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Climate Interactive. Climate Interactive. 2023. Available online: https://www.climateinteractive.org/ (accessed on 14 June 2023).
- IPCC. AR5 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2014 the Synthesis Report (SYR) of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5); IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Liebetrau, J.; Reinelt, T.; Agostini, A.; Linke, B.; Murphy, J. Methane Emissions from Biogas Plants Methods for Measurement, Results and Effect on Greenhouse Gas Balance of Electricity Produced IEA Bioenergy Task 37 Methane Emissions from Biogas Plants Methods for Measurement, Results and (Methane eM); IEA Bioenergy: Florence, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Soares, J.V.; Chopra, C.; Van De Ven, C.J.; Cahill, A.G.; Beckie, R.D.; Black, T.A.; Ladd, B.; Mayer, K.U. Towards quantifying subsurface methane emissions from energy wells with integrity failure. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2021, 12, 101223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, K.A.; Cresser, M.S. Measurement of trace gases, I: Gas analysis, chamber methods, and related procedures. In Soil and Environmental Analysis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003; pp. 394–433. [Google Scholar]
- Aybek, A.; Üçok, S. Determination and evaluation of biogas and methane productions of vegetable and fruit wastes with Hohenheim Batch Test method. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2017, 10, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, A.L.; Tkacik, D.S.; Roscioli, J.R.; Herndon, S.C.; Yacovitch, T.I.; Martinez, D.M.; Vaughn, T.L.; Williams, L.L.; Sullivan, M.R.; Floerchinger, C. Measurements of methane emissions from natural gas gathering facilities and processing plants: Measurement results. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 3219–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weidmann, D.; Hirst, B.; Jones, M.; Ijzermans, R.; Randell, D.; Macleod, N.; Kannath, A.; Chu, J.; Dean, M. Locating and Quantifying Methane Emissions by Inverse Analysis of Path-Integrated Concentration Data Using a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo Approach. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2022, 6, 2190–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirst, B.; Randell, D.; Jones, M.; Chu, J.; Kannath, A.; Macleod, N.; Dean, M.; Weidmann, D. Methane emissions: Remote mapping and source quantification using an open-path laser dispersion spectrometer. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e2019GL086725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IJzermans, R.; Jones, M.; Weidmann, D.; van de Kerkhof, B.; Randell, D. Long-term continuous monitoring of methane emissions at an oil and gas facility using a multi-open-path laser dispersion spectrometer. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diaz, C.G.; Juracka, Z.; Alexis, A.R.; Khan, M.A. Quantifying methane emissions in Delaware from field-based mid-IR sensors and satellite observations. In Proceedings of the Geospatial Informatics XI, Online Only, FL, USA, 12–17 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, J.; Dubey, L.; Hawkes, A. Methane detection and quantification in the upstream oil and gas sector: The role of satellites in emissions detection, reconciling and reporting. Environ. Sci. Atmos. 2022, 2, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollenbeck, D.; Zulevic, D.; Chen, Y. Advanced leak detection and quantification of methane emissions using sUAS. Drones 2021, 5, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collier-Oxandale, A.; Casey, J.G.; Piedrahita, R.; Ortega, J.; Halliday, H.; Johnston, J.; Hannigan, M.P. Assessing a low-cost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2018, 11, 3569–3594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beecken, J.; Mellqvist, J.; Salo, K.; Ekholm, J.; Jalkanen, J.P. Airborne emission measurements of SO2, NOx and particles from individual ships using a sniffer technique. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2014, 7, 1957–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fritz, D.; Menke, K.H.; Raab, L.; Salewski, A.; Schneider, W.; Steingass, H. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agric. Sci. 1979, 93, 217–222. [Google Scholar]
- Pell, A.; Schofield, P. Computerized monitoring of gas production to measure forage digestion in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76, 1063–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, K.; Huyler, M.; Westberg, H.; Lamb, B.; Zimmerman, P. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deighton, M.H.; Williams, S.R.O.; Hannah, M.C.; Eckard, R.J.; Boland, T.M.; Wales, W.J.; Moate, P.J. A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 197, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, S.; Moate, P.; Hannah, M.; Ribaux, B.; Wales, W.; Eckard, R. Background matters with the SF6 tracer method for estimating enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: A critical evaluation of the SF6 procedure. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 170, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berndt, A.; Boland, T.; Deighton, M.; Gere, J.; Grainger, C.; Hegarty, R.; Iwaasa, A.; Koolaard, J.; Lassey, K.; Luo, D. Guidelines for Use of Sulphur Hexafluoride (SF6) Tracer Technique to Measure Enteric Methane Emissions from Ruminants; Ministry of Primary Industries: Wellington, New Zealand, 2014; pp. 1–66. [Google Scholar]
- Tomkins, N.; McGinn, S.; Turner, D.; Charmley, E. Comparison of open-circuit respiration chambers with a micrometeorological method for determining methane emissions from beef cattle grazing a tropical pasture. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denmead, O. Approaches to measuring fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide between landscapes and the atmosphere. Plant Soil 2008, 309, 5–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loh, Z.; Chen, D.; Bai, M.; Naylor, T.; Griffith, D.; Hill, J.; Denmead, T.; McGinn, S.; Edis, R. Measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from Australian feedlot beef production using open-path spectroscopy and atmospheric dispersion modelling. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Z.; Desjardins, R.L.; Flesch, T.K. Assessment of the uncertainty of using an inverse-dispersion technique to measure methane emissions from animals in a barn and in a small pen. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 3128–3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinares-Patiño, C.; Lassey, K.; Martin, R.; Molano, G.; Fernandez, M.; MacLean, S.; Sandoval, E.; Luo, D.; Clark, H. Assessment of the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique using respiration chambers for estimation of methane emissions from sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piñeiro-Vázquez, A.; Jiménez-Ferrer, G.; Alayon-Gamboa, J.; Chay-Canul, A.; Ayala-Burgos, A.; Aguilar-Pérez, C.; Ku-Vera, J. Effects of quebracho tannin extract on intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation, and methane production in crossbred heifers fed low-quality tropical grass. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2018, 50, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doreau, M.; Arbre, M.; Rochette, Y.; Lascoux, C.; Eugène, M.; Martin, C. Comparison of 3 methods for estimating enteric methane and carbon dioxide emission in nonlactating cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 1559–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Wang, M.; Zhang, X.M.; Yang, H.M.; Wen, J.N.; Ma, Z.Y.; Feng, B.L.; Deng, J.P.; Tan, Z.L. Evaluation of interval between measurements and calculation method for the quantification of enteric methane emissions measured by respiration chamber. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 6242–6247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tremblay, F.J.; Massé, D.I. Detailed Design of Respiratory Chamber that Provides Highly Accurate Measurements of Enteric Methane Emissions. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2016, 32, 651–658. [Google Scholar]
- Storm, I.M.; Hellwing, A.L.F.; Nielsen, N.I.; Madsen, J. Methods for measuring and estimating methane emission from ruminants. Animals 2012, 2, 160–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goopy, J.P.; Woodgate, R.; Donaldson, A.; Robinson, D.L.; Hegarty, R. Validation of a short-term methane measurement using portable static chambers to estimate daily methane production in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, D.L.; Goopy, J.P.; Hegarty, R.; Oddy, V. Comparison of repeated measurements of methane production in sheep over 5 years and a range of measurement protocols. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 4637–4650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zimmerman, P.R.; Zimmerman, R.S. Method and System for Monitoring and Reducing Ruminant Methane Production. U.S. Patent US 2009/0288606A1, 26 November 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Hammond, K.; Humphries, D.; Crompton, L.; Kirton, P.; Green, C.; Reynolds, C. Methane emissions from growing dairy heifers estimated using an automated head chamber (GreenFeed) compared to respiration chambers or SF6 techniques. Adv. Anim. Biosci. 2013, 4, 391. [Google Scholar]
- Huhtanen, P.; Ramin, M.; Hristov, A. Enteric methane emission can be reliably measured by the GreenFeed monitoring unit. Livest. Sci. 2019, 222, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández, C.; López, M.; Lachica, M. Description and function of a mobile open-circuit respirometry system to measure gas exchange in small ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 172, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Place, S.E.; Pan, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Mitloehner, F.M. Construction and operation of a ventilated hood system for measuring greenhouse gas and volatile organic compound emissions from cattle. Animals 2011, 1, 433–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suzuki, T.; McCrabb, G.; Nishida, T.; Indramanee, S.; Kurihara, M. Construction and operation of ventilated hood-type respiration calorimeters for in vivo measurement of methane production and energy partition in ruminants. In Measuring Methane Production from Ruminants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 125–135. [Google Scholar]
- Patra, A.K. Recent advances in measurement and dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions in ruminants. Front. Vet. Sci. 2016, 3, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allen, D.T. Methane emissions from natural gas production and use: Reconciling bottom-up and top-down measurements. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2014, 5, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving Characterization of Anthropogenic Methane Emissions in the United States; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Filkin, T.; Lipin, I.; Sliusar, N. Integrating a UAV System Based on Pixhawk with a Laser Methane Mini Detector to Study Methane Emissions. Drones 2023, 7, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Yang, G.; Feng, Y.; Ren, G.; Han, X. Optimizing feeding composition and carbon–nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 120, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frerichs, J.; Eilts, P. A New Combustion Model for Medium Speed Dual-Fuel Engines in the Course of 0D/1D Simulation. Methane 2022, 1, 158–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muradov, N.; Smith, F.; Huang, C.; Ali, T. Autothermal catalytic pyrolysis of methane as a new route to hydrogen production with reduced CO2 emissions. Catal. Today 2006, 116, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarez-Borges, F.J.; King, O.N.; Madhusudhan, B.N.; Connolley, T.; Basham, M.; Ahmed, S.I. Comparison of Methods to Segment Variable-Contrast XCT Images of Methane-Bearing Sand Using U-Nets Trained on Single Dataset Sub-Volumes. Methane 2022, 2, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavalcante, M.H.S.; Maccari Zelioli, Í.A.; Guimarães Filho, E.É.X.; Júnior, J.M.d.S.; Souza Vidotti, A.D.; Daltro de Freitas, A.C.; Guirardello, R. Autothermal Reforming of Methane: A Thermodynamic Study on the Use of Air and Pure Oxygen as Oxidizing Agents in Isothermal and Adiabatic Systems. Methane 2023, 2, 389–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goopy, J.P.; Chang, C.; Tomkins, N. A comparison of methodologies for measuring methane emissions from ruminants. In Methods for Measuring Greenhouse Gas Balances and Evaluating Mitigation Options in Smallholder Agriculture; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 97–117. [Google Scholar]
- Alino, J.H.L.; Bastos, J.A.; Remor, P.V.; Frare, L.M.; Orssatto, F.; Damaceno, F.M.; Edwiges, T. Alkaline Pretreatment and Pre-Hydrolysis Using Acidic Biowastes to Increase Methane Production from Sugarcane Bagasse. Methane 2022, 1, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thiviya, P.; Gamage, A.; Kapilan, R.; Merah, O.; Madhujith, T. Single cell protein production using different fruit waste: A review. Separations 2022, 9, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erfani Jazi, M.; Narayanan, G.; Aghabozorgi, F.; Farajidizaji, B.; Aghaei, A.; Kamyabi, M.A.; Navarathna, C.M.; Mlsna, T.E. Structure, chemistry and physicochemistry of lignin for material functionalization. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghorbani, M.; Kianmehr, M.H.; Arabhosseini, A.; Asadi Alamouti, A.; Sadeghi, R. Ozonolysis pretreatment of wheat straw for enhanced delignification: Applying rsm technique for modeling and optimizing process. Iran. J. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 52, 37–53. [Google Scholar]
- Dey, A.; Paul, S.S.; Lailer, P.C.; Dahiya, S.S. Reducing enteric methane production from buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) by garlic oil supplementation in in vitro rumen fermentation system. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baffa, D.F.; Oliveira, T.S.; Fernandes, A.M.; Camilo, M.G.; Silva, I.N.; Meirelles Júnior, J.R.; Aniceto, E.S. Evaluation of Associative Effects of In Vitro Gas Production and Fermentation Profile Caused by Variation in Ruminant Diet Constituents. Methane 2023, 2, 344–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wnukowski, M.; Gerber, J.; Mróz, K. Shifts in Product Distribution in Microwave Plasma Methane Pyrolysis Due to Hydrogen and Nitrogen Addition. Methane 2022, 1, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voronin, V.V.; Ledovskaya, M.S.; Bogachenkov, A.S.; Rodygin, K.S.; Ananikov, V.P. Acetylene in organic synthesis: Recent progress and new uses. Molecules 2018, 23, 2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikoo, M.K.; Amin, N. Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide reforming of methane in view of solid carbon formation. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92, 678–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sfetsas, T.; Panou, M.; Chioti, A.G.; Prokopidou, N.; Dalla, I. The Effects of Using Evogen Biogas Additive on the Microbiome and Performance of Full-Scale Biogas Plant. Methane 2023, 2, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, A.; Kumar, M.; Bolan, N.S.; Kapley, A.; Kumar, R.; Singh, L. Multidimensional approaches of biogas production and up-gradation: Opportunities and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 338, 125514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Overmann, J. Principles of enrichment, isolation, cultivation and preservation of prokaryotes. Prokaryotes 2006, 1, 80–136. [Google Scholar]
- Economou, E.A.; Dimitropoulou, G.; Prokopidou, N.; Dalla, I.; Sfetsas, T. Anaerobic Digestion Remediation in Three Full-Scale Biogas Plants through Supplement Additions. Methane 2023, 2, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esen, V.K.; Palangi, V.; Esen, S. Genetic Improvement and Nutrigenomic Management of Ruminants to Achieve Enteric Methane Mitigation: A Review. Methane 2022, 1, 342–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhury, P.K.; Jena, R.; Tomar, S.K.; Puniya, A.K. Reducing enteric methanogenesis through alternate hydrogen sinks in the rumen. Methane 2022, 1, 320–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farhan, M.A.; Sugai, Y.; Widodo, N.P.; Syafrizal, S. The Development of a Low-Cost Method for Monitoring Methane Leakage from the Subsurface of Natural Gas Fields. Methane 2021, 1, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Zahab, S.; Zayed, T. Leak detection in water distribution networks: An introductory overview. Smart Water 2019, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chagunda, M. Opportunities and challenges in the use of the Laser Methane Detector to monitor enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal 2013, 7, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fan, X.; Zhang, X.; Yu, X. Machine learning model and strategy for fast and accurate detection of leaks in water supply network. J. Infrastruct. Preserv. Resil. 2021, 2, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Song, Q.; Merdanoglu, N.; Liu, H.; Klemm, E. Identifying Monomeric Fe Species for Efficient Direct Methane Oxidation to C1 Oxygenates with H2O2 over Fe/MOR Catalysts. Methane 2022, 1, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gere, J.I.; Feksa Frasson, M.; Wawrzkiewicz, M.; Fernández Pepi, M.G.; Ramos, M.L.; Bualó, R.; Cerón-Cucchi, M.E.; Jaurena, G. Enteric methane emission from Sheep fed with rhodes grass hay (Chloris gayana) alone or supplemented with dried distillers’ grains with solubles. Methane 2022, 1, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohite, J.A.; Khatri, K.; Pardhi, K.; Manvi, S.S.; Jadhav, R.; Rathod, S.; Rahalkar, M.C. Exploring the Potential of Methanotrophs for Plant Growth Promotion in Rice Agriculture. Methane 2023, 2, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganteda, R.R.; Burla, S.K.; Boggu, J.M.R.; Prasad, P.S. Efficient storage of methane in hydrate form using soybean powder. Methane 2022, 1, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Bhattacharjee, G.; Kulkarni, B.; Kumar, R. Role of surfactants in promoting gas hydrate formation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 12217–12232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, A.; Cameotra, S.S.; Kumar, R.; Balomajumder, C.; Singh, A.K.; Santhakumari, B.; Kumar, P.; Laik, S. Biosurfactant as a promoter of methane hydrate formation: Thermodynamic and kinetic studies. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bavoh, C.B.; Broni-Bediako, E.; Marfo, S.A. Review of Biosurfactants Gas Hydrate Promoters. Methane 2023, 2, 304–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falenty, A.; Kuhs, W.F.; Glockzin, M.; Rehder, G. “Self-preservation” of CH4 hydrates for gas transport technology: Pressure–temperature dependence and ice microstructures. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 6275–6283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadav, S.; Sakthipriya, N.; Doble, M.; Sangwai, J.S. Effect of biosurfactants produced by Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the formation kinetics of methane hydrates. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2017, 43, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.T.; Chen, F.L.; Yu, S.J.; Wang, F. Biopromoters for gas hydrate formation: A mini review of current status. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, T.; Cao, J.; Qiu, H.; Fu, P.; Lu, H.; Ning, Z.; Chen, D.; Deng, Y.; Yang, S. Investigation and optimization of methane purification method for natural gas by two-column gas chromatography: A preliminary test for doubly substituted isotopologue (13CH3D) measurements. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 969567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, C.; Sandoval, J.F.; Ortiz, N.; Ovalle, S.; Beltran, J.G. Mechanisms, growth rates, and morphologies of gas hydrates of carbon dioxide, methane, and their mixtures. Methane 2021, 1, 2–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitoura dos Santos Junior, J.; Gomes, J.G.; de Freitas, A.C.D.; Guirardello, R. An Analysis of the Methane Cracking Process for CO2-Free Hydrogen Production Using Thermodynamic Methodologies. Methane 2022, 1, 243–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godoi, C.M.; Gutierrez, I.M.; Gomes, P.V.R.; Coelho, J.F.; Zambiazi, P.J.; Otubo, L.; Neto, A.O.; de Souza, R.F. Production of Methanol on PdCu/ATO in a Polymeric Electrolyte Reactor of the Fuel Cell Type from Methane. Methane 2022, 1, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dummer, N.F.; Willock, D.J.; He, Q.; Howard, M.J.; Lewis, R.J.; Qi, G.; Taylor, S.H.; Xu, J.; Bethell, D.; Kiely, C.J. Methane oxidation to methanol. Chem. Rev. 2022, 123, 6359–6411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Latimer, A.A.; Kakekhani, A.; Kulkarni, A.R.; Nørskov, J.K. Direct methane to methanol: The selectivity–conversion limit and design strategies. Acs Catal. 2018, 8, 6894–6907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vali, S.A.; Markeb, A.A.; Moral-Vico, J.; Font, X.; Sánchez, A. Recent advances in the catalytic conversion of methane to methanol: From the challenges of traditional catalysts to the use of nanomaterials and metal-organic frameworks. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuniar, G.; Saputera, W.H.; Sasongko, D.; Mukti, R.R.; Rizkiana, J.; Devianto, H. Recent Advances in Photocatalytic Oxidation of Methane to Methanol. Molecules 2022, 27, 5496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, L.; Li, D.; Tian, D.; Jiang, L.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, K. Optimization of Ni-based catalysts for dry reforming of methane via alloy design: A Review. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 5102–5151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marinho, A.L.; Rabelo-Neto, R.C.; Epron, F.; Toniolo, F.S.; Noronha, F.B.; Bion, N. Effect of Metal Dopant on the Performance of Ni@ CeMeO2 Embedded Catalysts (Me= Gd, Sm and Zr) for Dry Reforming of Methane. Methane 2022, 1, 300–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manan, W.N.; Wan Isahak, W.N.R.; Yaakob, Z. CeO2-based heterogeneous catalysts in dry reforming methane and steam reforming methane: A short review. Catalysts 2022, 12, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safavinia, B.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, C.; Roman, C.; Darapaneni, P.; Larriviere, J.; Cullen, D.A.; Dooley, K.M.; Dorman, J.A. Enhancing Ce x Zr1–x O2 Activity for Methane Dry Reforming Using Subsurface Ni Dopants. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 4070–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacífico, J.A.; Lima Filho, N.M.; de Abreu, C.A.M. Efficient Performance of the Methane-Carbon Dioxide Reform Process in a Fluidized Bed Reactor. Methane 2023, 2, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, J.; Maitra, A. The chemistry of methane reforming with carbon dioxide and its current and potential applications. Fuel Process. Technol. 1995, 42, 269–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, J.; Zhu, C.; Pan, C.; Lin, W.; Lemmon, J.P.; Chen, F.; Li, C.; Xie, K. Highly efficient electrochemical reforming of CH4/CO2 in a solid oxide electrolyser. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaar5100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birkedal, K.A.; Hauge, L.P.; Graue, A.; Ersland, G. Transport mechanisms for CO2-CH4 exchange and safe CO2 storage in hydrate-bearing sandstone. Energies 2015, 8, 4073–4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsudani, F.T.; Saeed, A.N.; Ali, N.S.; Majdi, H.S.; Salih, H.G.; Albayati, T.M.; Saady, N.M.C.; Shakor, Z.M. Fisher–Tropsch Synthesis for Conversion of Methane into Liquid Hydrocarbons through Gas-to-Liquids (GTL) Process: A Review. Methane 2023, 2, 24–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrews, A.; Logan, J.S. Fischer-Tropsch Fuels from Coal, Natural Gas, and Biomass: Background and Policy; Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress: Washington, DC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q.; Cheng, K.; Kang, J.; Deng, W.; Wang, Y. Fischer–Tropsch catalysts for the production of hydrocarbon fuels with high selectivity. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 1251–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steynberg, A. Introduction to fischer-tropsch technology. In Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 1–63. [Google Scholar]
- Rytter, E.; Holmen, A. Deactivation and regeneration of commercial type Fischer-Tropsch Co-catalysts—A mini-review. Catalysts 2015, 5, 478–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argyle, M.D.; Bartholomew, C.H. Heterogeneous catalyst deactivation and regeneration: A review. Catalysts 2015, 5, 145–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahangiri, H.; Lappas, A.A.; Ouadi, M.; Heracleous, E. Production of biofuels via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Biomass-to-liquids. In Handbook of Biofuels Production; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 449–509. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y.; Masuku, C. BTL-FT to Transportation Fuels. In Chemicals and Fuels from Biomass via Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: A Route to Sustainability; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2022; pp. 305–336. [Google Scholar]
- Premachandra, D.; Heagy, M.D. Morphology-Controlled WO3 for the Photocatalytic Oxidation of Methane to Methanol in Mild Conditions. Methane 2023, 2, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novak, T.G.; Kim, J.; DeSario, P.A.; Jeon, S. Synthesis and applications of WO3 nanosheets: The importance of phase, stoichiometry, and aspect ratio. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 5166–5182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shandilya, P.; Sambyal, S.; Sharma, R.; Mandyal, P.; Fang, B. Properties, optimized morphologies, and advanced strategies for photocatalytic applications of WO3 based photocatalysts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 428, 128218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dutta, V.; Sharma, S.; Raizada, P.; Thakur, V.K.; Khan, A.A.P.; Saini, V.; Asiri, A.M.; Singh, P. An overview on WO3 based photocatalyst for environmental remediation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahir, M.B.; Nabi, G.; Rafique, M.; Khalid, N. Nanostructured-based WO3 photocatalysts: Recent development, activity enhancement, perspectives and applications for wastewater treatment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 14, 2519–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adhikari, S.; Chandra, K.S.; Kim, D.H.; Madras, G.; Sarkar, D. Understanding the morphological effects of WO3 photocatalysts for the degradation of organic pollutants. Adv. Powder Technol. 2018, 29, 1591–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murillo-Sierra, J.; Hernández-Ramírez, A.; Hinojosa-Reyes, L.; Guzmán-Mar, J. A review on the development of visible light-responsive WO3-based photocatalysts for environmental applications. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2021, 5, 100070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pignataro Machado, A.; Amaral Carminati, S.; Ribeiro Januário, E.; Silvaino Ferreira, P.; Moreira Vaz, J.; Spinacé, E.V. Photocatalytic Methane Conversion over Pd/ZnO Photocatalysts under Mild Conditions. Methane 2023, 2, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Januario, E.R.; Silvaino, P.F.; Machado, A.P.; Moreira Vaz, J.; Spinace, E.V. Methane Conversion Under Mild Conditions Using Semiconductors and Metal-Semiconductors as Heterogeneous Photocatalysts: State of the Art and Challenges. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 685073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maia, V.A.; Nandenha, J.; Gonçalves, M.H.; de Souza, R.F.; Neto, A.O. Methane to Methanol Conversion Using Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells and PdAu/Antimony-Doped Tin Oxide Nanomaterials. Methane 2023, 2, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.; Ma, T.; Tao, H.; Fan, Q.; Han, B. Fundamentals and challenges of electrochemical CO2 reduction using two-dimensional materials. Chem 2017, 3, 560–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banoth, P.; Kandula, C.; Kollu, P. Introduction to Electrocatalysts. In Noble Metal-Free Electrocatalysts: New Trends in Electrocatalysts for Energy Applications; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2022; Volume 2, pp. 1–37. [Google Scholar]
- Satpathy, P.; Pradhan, C. Biomethanation of Crop Residues to Combat Stubble Burning in India: Design and Simulation Using ADM1 Mathematical Model. Methane 2022, 1, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco, H.; Nijs, W.; Ruf, J.; Faaij, A. Potential of Power-to-Methane in the EU energy transition to a low carbon system using cost optimization. Appl. Energy 2018, 232, 323–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, N.F.; Schoeler, G.P.; Lourenco, V.A.; de Souza, P.L.; Caballero, C.B.; Salamoni, R.H.; Romani, R.F. First order models to estimate methane generation in landfill: A case study in south Brazil. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, M.; Roshchanka, V. Russian policy on methane emissions in the oil and gas sector: A case study in opportunities and challenges in reducing short-lived forcers. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 92, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulongoski, J.T.; McMahon, P.B. Methane emissions from groundwater pumping in the USA. NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2019, 2, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Ge, Z.; Chen, C.; Hou, Y.; Ye, M. Current status and effective suggestions for efficient exploitation of coalbed methane in China: A review. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 9102–9123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berhanu, Y.; Olav, L.; Nurfeta, A.; Angassa, A.; Aune, J.B. Methane emissions from ruminant livestock in Ethiopia: Promising forage species to reduce CH4 emissions. Agriculture 2019, 9, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arutyunov, V.; Savchenko, V.; Sedov, I.; Arutyunov, A.; Nikitin, A. The Fuel of Our Future: Hydrogen or Methane? Methane 2022, 1, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, L.N.; Shibata, K.; Ito, H.; Yugami, N.; Nishida, Y. Conversion of methane to hydrogen via pulsed corona discharge. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2004, 13, 82–86. [Google Scholar]
Sector/Technique | Description | Application | Pros | Cons | Cost | Accuracy and Precision | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy Production | |||||||
Chamber method | The chamber method involves placing a closed chamber over the digestate storage tank and measuring the CH4 concentration inside the chamber over time. The change in concentration is then used to calculate the CH4 emission rate. | This method is suitable for measuring emissions from small and medium-sized digestate storage tanks. It is also a relatively simple and inexpensive method to implement. | It is relatively simple and inexpensive to implement. This method can provide accurate measurements of CH4 emissions under controlled conditions. | It may not be representative of real-world conditions, as the chamber can create an artificial environment that does not reflect the actual temperature, wind, and mixing conditions of the storage tank. It can be time-consuming and labor-intensive to set up and operate. | The cost of the chamber method can vary depending on the size and complexity of the chamber, but it is generally less expensive than other methods, such as the open path method. |
The accuracy of the chamber method can be good, but it is important to ensure that the chamber is properly sealed and that the measurements are taken under controlled conditions. The precision of the chamber method is also good, but it can be affected by factors such as the size of the chamber and the frequency of measurements. | [14,15,16] |
Batch test | The batch test method involves taking a sample of digestate from the storage tank and measuring the CH4 production rate in a sealed container under controlled conditions. | This method is suitable for measuring the potential CH4 emissions from digestate. | It is less costly to implement and relatively simple to operate. It can provide useful information about the biodegradability of the digestate and the potential for CH4 emissions. | It does not provide information about the actual emissions from the storage tank, as the test is conducted under controlled conditions that may not be representative of real-world conditions. | The cost of the batch test method is relatively low, as it only requires a few basic laboratory instruments. | The accuracy of the batch test method can be good, but it is important to ensure that the sample is representative of the digestate in the storage tank. The precision of the batch test method is also good, but it can be affected by factors such as the size of the sample and the frequency of measurements. | [14,17] |
Open path method | The open path method involves using a laser or other optical instrument to measure the CH4 concentration along a path between two points near the digestate storage tank. | This method is suitable for measuring emissions from large digestate storage tanks. | It can provide continuous measurements of CH4 emissions over time. | It is more complex to implement than other methods. It can be affected by weather conditions and other factors that can interfere with the laser beam. | The cost of the open path method is more expensive than other methods, such as the chamber method or the batch test method, due to the need for specialized equipment. | The accuracy and precision of the open path method can be good, but it is important to ensure that the instrument is properly calibrated and that the measurements are taken under appropriate conditions. | [14] |
Downwind tracer flux measurement | This technique is used to estimate CH4 emissions from natural gas production and use. | The method involves releasing a tracer gas, such as SF6, into the atmosphere at a known location upwind of a source of CH4 emissions. The tracer gas is then tracked downwind using a mobile laboratory equipped with a gas analyzer. By measuring the concentration of the tracer gas at different locations downwind of the source, it is possible to estimate the total amount of CH4 emitted by the source. | It can be used to measure CH4 emissions from a wide range of sources, including individual wells, compressor stations, and processing plants. It can provide estimates of emissions over large areas. It is relatively inexpensive. | It can be difficult to measure CH4 emissions from sources that are located in complex terrain. It can be difficult to distinguish between CH4 emissions from natural gas sources and other sources of CH4, such as livestock. | The cost of the downwind tracer flux measurement method varies depending on the size and complexity of the project. However, it is generally considered to be a relatively inexpensive method. | The accuracy of this method can be affected by wind and speed. The precision of the downwind tracer flux measurement method is typically within 5%. Precision refers to the reproducibility of the measurements, while accuracy refers to the closeness of the measurements to the true value. | [18] |
Laser CH4 detector | It monitors long-term continuous CH4 emissions at an oil and gas plants using a multi-open-path laser dispersion spectrometer, combined with Bayesian analysis algorithms using Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) inference | This methodology enables the identification, localization, and quantification of fugitive CH4 emissions using the CH4 path-averaged concentrations that are geographically distributed across the facility under study, in conjunction with the wind vector. | The capacity to measure a facility's overall emissions. Controlled, short gas emissions of 5 kg/h can beclearly detected and accurately measured. | Due to their low intensity, quantification of individual sources is difficult. | Still at developmental stage and total cost for actual implementation uncertain | Two distinct inference techniques could be used to establish a consistent estimate of a facility's overall CH4 output. | [19,20,21] |
Remote Sensing and Satellite Imaging | Satellites measure the amount of CH4 in the atmosphere; typically, they do so by calculating the column-average dry mole fraction (XCH4). This is converted into a flux via atmospheric inversion modeling42, from which emission sources can be located. | A spectrometer mounted on a satellite is used to measure the quantity of sunlight that is reflected off the Earth's surface. Depending on the gas, light from the sun is absorbed by the atmosphere and then reemitted at a different wavelength. The spectrometer scans the incoming light to identify the relevant wavelengths in the data—in this case, the CH4-indicating wavelengths. | Possibility of application in developing emission profiles, tracking if emission targets are being reached, and long-term monitoring | There are location restrictions on their application, and the emission estimates they provide are highly uncertain. | Still at developmental stage and total cost for actual implementation uncertain. | Still at developmental stage and certainty of precision accuracy are yet to be fully ascertained. | [22,23,24] |
Urban Environment | |||||||
Embedded sensor systems | It monitors the pollutant concentration and compares it with urban ambient environmental values | The integrated sensor systems are placed in weatherproof plastic casings with fans to suck outside air through the enclosure and over the sensor surfaces, with several air exchanges taking place per minute. | Quick identification of potential “hotspots” through sensor data, which could aid in resource allocation or early detection of potential air quality issues. | Due to their affordability and portability, they may be swiftly deployed over a range of geographical scales, especially tiny and localized ones. | It is important to calibrate and quantify sensors to satisfy the requirements of a particular environment and in response to the specific deployment circumstances, as they are likely to be extremely application dependent. | The accuracy and precision of the sensor data are minimal and can be mainly used as preliminary or supplementary data | [25] |
Agriculture | |||||||
Sniffer technique | This technique includes the placement of components in automatic concentrate feeders, milking boxes, and milking parlors during milking. | During the milking process, gas samples are taken from the air in the feeding trough of an automatic milking system. | Performs hundreds of measurements in succession over long periods. | A greater coefficient of variation (CV) between animals compared to respiratory chambers (RC) or flux. In contrast to alternative methods (e.g., respiration chambers at 3000 L/min and the GreenFeed system for automatic emission monitoring (GF) at 1200 to 2250 L/min), this approach uses only the gas concentrations (typically achieved by passively pumping air to the sensor at 1.4 L/min) near the cow’s muzzle. | Time-efficient and more cost-effective than the SF6 tracer method. | Primarily offers the most accurate and precise measurement values for emissions. In scenarios where low CH4 concentrations need to be evaluated reliably and with high accuracy, the amount of CH4 lost increases with the CH4 e emission concentration. | [26] |
Lab-based (in vitro) incubation | Before analyzing gas samples for CH4 concentrations, the feed substrate is incubated in airtight bottles or sacks to allow gas accumulation. | This method can initially be used to evaluate potential starting materials and additives in a controlled environment. | Time efficient and less costly compared to respiration chambers. It can be employed as a preliminary method for the evaluation of future feed ingredients and additives in regulated environments. | It could not accurately reflect the emissions of complete (in vivo) animals. | More cost-effective and time-efficient compared to respiration chambers. | This method may not reflect the emissions of the whole animal (in vivo). | [27,28] |
Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) | The concentrations of SF6 and CH4 are determined near the cow’s mouth and nostrils using a small permeation tube containing SF6, which is inserted into the rumen. | Enables motion for the animal. Affordable but more abundant in quantity; well suited for grazing systems. Instrumental method that can quantify significant numbers of individuals requires training. | Grazing systems are compatible with this feature, which allows animals to move freely. Ideal for handling large numbers of individual animals. | Extremely high risk of equipment failure and higher labor costs compared to ration chambers. CH4 emissions from the hindgut are not measured. SF6 is particularly potent and has a GWP value of 22,800. An additional difficulty is that SF6 is a GHG. | Although they are cheaper, they require more ventilation and are more likely to fail. | Primarily offers less accurate and precise measurement values for emissions. | [29,30,31,32] |
Open path laser | Beams of light are transmitted via wireless sensor networks and lasers across the pasture areas where the animals graze. The reflected light is analyzed for the concentration of GHGs. | Conducts assessments of CH4 emissions from livestock and enables comprehensive measurements on several pastures on the farm. It is impossible to attribute emissions to a single source. | Measures CH4 emissions from herds of animals and facilitates whole-farm measurements across a number of pastures. | It is costly. Depending on the environmental factors and the location of the test animals, sensitive measuring devices are required to analyze the CH4 concentration. | Further monitoring of the equipment is necessary. It is costly. The analysis of CH4 concentration and the collection of micrometeorological data require the use of sensitive instruments. | The location of the test animals and the environmental conditions have a considerable influence on the accuracy. The data must be screened thoroughly. | [33,34,35,36] |
Open-circuit respiration chamber | As the animal is confined in a chamber, the CH4 concentration in the exhaled air is measured. | Only a limited number of animals can be used for measurement at any given time. Unsuitable for investigating the effects of grazing management. The movement and normal behavior of the animals are hindered; feed intake may be reduced. | Emissions, including CH4 produced during rumen and hindgut fermentation, are measured with extreme precision and accuracy. | Impractical to study the effects of grazing; it hinders the natural behavior and mobility of animals. Technically, its use is not mandatory. Both construction and maintenance are costly. | Both the construction and maintenance of buildings are expensive. Their use is technologically demanding. | Provides highly accurate and precise measurements of emissions, especially CH4, from rumen and hindgut fermentation. | [37,38,39,40,41] |
Estimation from diet (models) | CH4 is calculated based on the amount of feed consumed, using models often derived from previous experimental data. | Applicable in situations where measurements are not feasible. Requires estimates of feed intake which may be difficult to obtain. | Relevant in situations where measurements are not feasible. Effortless in predicting domestic or global emissions, they have a straightforward applicability. | Models are not suitable for investigating inter-individual variance in animals. Although there are numerous models for estimating CH4 emissions from ruminants, most of them are based on feed intake data, which are difficult to collect on a large scale. Consequently, this limitation hinders their practical application. The use of experimental data for training limits the applicability of the models. The empirical models that have been developed focus primarily on the range of intake values within the data set used to generate the equations. | Once developed, it is inexpensive to use and makes CH4 measurement unnecessary. | An accurate prediction of CH4 production is complicated by the conditions and assumptions that each equation must satisfy. | [42] |
Portable Accumulation Chambers | The animal is confined in a transparent polycarbonate cage for an estimated period of one hour; the measurement of CH4 production is based on the increase in concentration that takes place during this time. | Tested on a sheep population. Intended for the genetic screening of a large number of animals for relative CH4 production. | Developed to quantify a significant number of animals for genetic analysis of their proportional CH4 emissions. | It is unclear whether they are comparable to respiratory chambers. | Comparable in price to open-circuit respiration chambers, but the measurement time is significantly shorter. | The degree of comparability with respiratory chambers is currently uncertain. Further research is required before allocating extensive resources to this method. | [43,44] |
GreenFeed | A patented device is used to quantify and document the short-term (3–6 min) CH4 emissions of individual cattle over 24 h. This procedure can be achieved by luring the animals to the device with a bait of pelleted concentrated feed. | Requires the use of an “attractant” to lure the animal into the plant and thus changes the results. Suitable for evaluating the effects of different meals or supplements. | Comparable to the respiratory chamber and SF6 methods in terms of calculation accuracy. | Does not measure hindgut CH4. | The device is patented and can only be obtained from the supplier, C-lock, Inc., based in Rapid City, South Dakota, USA. | Does not quantify CH4 emissions from the hindgut. Results in similar estimates as the respiratory chamber and SF4 techniques. | [45,46,47] |
Head Box System or Ventilated Hood Chamber | An airtight box surrounds the animal’s head. Instead of measuring the gas exchange in the entire body, only the head is measured. | Prevents animals from moving and behaving normally, which is unsuitable for grazing systems. Can evaluate the emissions of different feedstuffs. | They are useful for obtaining continuous measurements over consecutive 24 h periods. In addition, this technique can be used to assess the nutritional value and energy metabolism of feed. | In this approach, the amount of CH4 produced in the hindgut is not measured. | Training is necessary to familiarize the test animals with the hood device. Less expensive than a chamber that holds the entire animal. | It does not quantify the CH4 in the hindgut. | [48,49,50] |
Handheld laser CH4 detector | It measures the amount of exhaled CH4 in the air near the mouth or nose of an animal in a typical environment. | This method allows repeated CH4 measurements in the same animal in its natural environment, whereas the sniffer and GF methods limit measurements to milking and feeding times. | A responsive, non-contact, non-invasive method that enables real-time assessment. On commercial farms, the handheld laser is easy to operate. | Influenced by variables like humidity, air pressure, temperature, wind speed, and the proximity of other animals. | Less expensive and easy to operate. | Humidity, temperature, and wind velocity (particularly important for pasture conditions) are environmental variables that can influence the accuracy of measurements. | [51] |
Landfills | |||||||
Micrometerological | This method measures CH4 emissions using towers equipped with fast-response CH4 sensors and wind speed and direction sensors. These measurements are then combined with atmospheric transport models to estimate emissions. | This method can be employed to quantify all gas emissions entering and exiting a specific volume of air surrounding the source. The emission rate is determined by subtracting the output flux from the input flux. | It measures the absorption of CH4 from the atmosphere, often referred to as negative emissions. Performs continuous measurements over some time to capture the temporal patterns of emissions. This method quantifies with precision the total CH4 emissions emanating from specific sources or small open areas. | It is not suitable for a CH4 mitigation study. Measuring the variability of emissions can be challenging when considering the relationship between the footprint of the technology and the total source area, especially when the ratio is very small. This method can lead to either over- or underestimating emissions. | This method is usually expensive. | The measurement of CH4 is influenced by the surrounding weather conditions, such as wind speed and landscape, resulting in variations in accuracy and precision. | [52] |
Aircraft mass balance | A common strategy for this technique is to fly circular trajectories at different altitudes around a source, continuously measuring CH4 concentrations, wind speed, and wind direction. | This technique can be employed to estimate the amount of emissions from specific facilities such as an animal feeding operation, a landfill, or a natural gas processing plant. | Simplified flow-through models and sophisticated inversion models are employed for the analysis. Vertical profiles of CH4 concentrations can be obtained by searching for specific emission sources. | The process of quantifying the spatial and temporal variations in emissions is labor-intensive. | Costly to utilize. | This method can detect emissions only when they are encountered at the specific altitude and radial distance of the flight. | [53] |
Wetlands | |||||||
Dynamic chamber (DC) | The system quantifies the inflow and outflow of air as well as the concentration of certain gases in the air. It also monitors the initial and final concentration of gases in the chamber. | The chamber approach has been applied in various contexts, including quantification of emissions from landfills and via pipelines, water surfaces (using floating chambers) in lagoons for manure management, small groups of animals, and individual or small groups of animals. | Surface measurement chambers usually have an area of no more than 1 m2 and are valuable for quantifying emission variations. | They are a labor-intensive process that can be partially mitigated using automated chamber systems and special chambers with a volume of more than 1 m3. | They are costly and labor-intensive in terms of requirements for maintenance and power supply. | Measurement of high frequency with minimal disturbance DC is more likely to detect actual CH4 emissions from the aquatic environment. | [53] |
Generic | |||||||
Enclosure (chambers) technique | The emissions of a limited area (or a population of animals) are quantified directly. | This method can be used to precisely measure the emissions of small groups of animals or industrial activities in a controlled environment. | Quantifies the rates at which atmospheric CH4 is oxidized in the soil, especially “negative” emissions caused by significant soil oxidation capacities. Relies on atmospheric modeling to calculate fluxes independently. Determines the rates of diffusive emission from a small source area (usually 1 m2 or less) under day and night conditions. | Single enclosures may not be able to capture the full variability of emissions. Measuring the variability of emissions in extensive source areas is a labor-intensive process that requires the use of geostatistical techniques, a considerable number of chamber measurements, and additional data. An instantaneous measurement is obtained, which needs to be repeated to capture temporal trends. | They require higher financial investment and maintenance costs. | CH4 emissions in the range from 1.02 to 512 g h−1 can be quantified with an accuracy of +14/−14%. Accurate measurements can be made for emissions from single animals or small groups of animals kept in a controlled environment. | [14,18,52,53] |
UAV with Laser detectors | An airborne laser absorption spectroscopy, performed using portable CH4 detectors mounted on board UAV | The methods comprise integrating an unmanned aerial remote sensing complex with the Laser CH4. This complex is built around a multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a Pixhawk flying controller, built on the Arduino platform. | The integration method adopts a more rational approach by giving the UAV flight controller the main responsibility for gathering and processing data. This removes the need for alternative hard-to-replicate technologies, highly sophisticated serial CH4 detectors, and the necessity to install extra devices (such as smartphones, GNSS sensors) on board the UAV. | The technology is still at infancy and may not be applicable for situations with no laser detector employment for CH4 emissions measurement. | The cost appears relatively low. However, the applicability of these technology to CH4 measurement across many sectors is needed to ascertain it actual cost implication. | The accuracy of result obtained is constrained by the precision of the laser sensor. | [54] |
Source | Methodology | Operating Conditions | Model | Material Used | Obtained Results | Suitability | Limitation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wang et al. [55] | RSM analysis | DM/CM of 40.3:59.7 C/N ratio of 27.2:1 | n/a | Dairy manure (DM), chicken manure (CM) and wheat straw (WS) | The study found that the optimal C/N ratio for co-digestion was 27.2:1, and the optimal feeding composition was DM/CM of 40.3:59.7. | These results suggest that optimizing feeding composition and C/N ratio can improve the performance of anaerobic co-digestion. | n/a |
Frerichs and Eilts [56] | Predictive combustion model | n/a | Standard Extended Zeldovich Mechanism | GT power | Prediction with an accuracy of approx. ±2 °CA for different charge air temperatures and different air–fuel ratios at one operation point with 450 1/min and 9.1 bar BMEP | It can be used to predict unburned fuel and thus improves the prediction of brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC). | Calibration of the models using measurement data from a single-cylinder engine is time consuming. |
Mitoura dos Santos Junior et al. [57] | Thermodynamic | CH4/H2 ratio 1:10 at 1600 K and 50 bar | Convex nonlinear programming (CONOPT) model | GAMS software using the CONOPT 3 solver | CH4 conversion = 94.712% | It is suitable for the CH4 thermal process, incorporating thermodynamic modeling of Gibbs energy, thereby avoiding the formation of solid carbon in the heating system. | The amount of solid carbon is another barrier to its application, as the solid carbon formed is deposited in the equipment, causing clogging in addition to deactivating the catalysts. |
Alvarez-Borges et al. [58] | (i) A bespoke 3D hierarchical method, (ii) a 2D multi-label, multi-axis method, and (ii) RootPainter, a 2D U-Net application with interactive corrections | Hydration time—30 h Temp—2 °C Pressure—10 MPa | U-Nets (Convolutional Neural Network Model) | Custom rig | It was found that the segmentation accuracy of all three methods surpassed mainstream watershed and thresholding techniques. | The study demonstrated that the U-Net methods used were suitable for accurately identifying the CH4 gas phase using a small number of training images. | However, it is often time consuming, with its computing being resource-intensive, operator-dependent, and tailored for each XCT dataset due to differences in greyscale contrast. |
Cavalcante et al. [59] | Gibbs energy minimization and entropy maximization methods | 1 to 10 atm 873 and 1073 K steam/CH4 ratio was varied in the range of 1.0/1.0 and 2.0/1.0 oxygen/CH4 ratios in the feed stream, in the range of 0.5/1.0 to 2.0/1.0 | Thermodynamic model: virial equation of state (EoS) | The software GAMS® 23.9 and the CONOPT3 solver | The mean reductions with increasing temperature in the percentage increase of H2 and syngas using air under 1.5 and 10 atm, at the different O2/CH4 ratios, were 5.3%, 13.8%, and 16.5%, respectively. | This study is suitable for the auto thermal reforming of CH4 using atmospheric air as an oxidizing agent to increase the production of hydrogen and synthesis gas. | The ideality of the gas phase is a factor that brings a certain limitation to the analyses conducted and consequently affects the range of application of the results obtained. |
Emerging Methods | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Polytunnel | Suitable for quantifying CH4 emissions from a small herd of grazing animals. This device is very portable and easy to use. | Regulating the temperature and humidity in the tunnel is a major challenge. |
CO2 as a tracer gas | It can easily be used on a wide range of animal species. | It is subject to major fluctuations from day to day, which makes it unsuitable for precise measurements. CH4 emissions from efficient cows were overestimated, while those from ineffective cows were underestimated. |
Intraruminal Telemetry | Perfect for collecting and analyzing data in real-time. | The electronic circuit of an electrical device is subject to corrosion in the rumen due to the harsh rumen environment. |
Infrared Thermography | Straightforward method requiring no intrusion or invasion and is comparatively affordable. | No correlation has been observed between the temperature of a particular body region and the emission of CH4. |
Blood CH4 Concentration tracer | The ability to quantify a large number of animals. | A disruptive technique used when taking a blood sample. The approach provides only a limited representation of CH4 concentration. |
Countries | Description of Application | Method/Category | Summary and Implication | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|
India | A virtual plant was developed using a mathematical model for the biomethanization of crop residue in India to mitigate the burning of stubbles. Focusing on India’s small-scale farmers, the research used the ADM1 mathematical model to develop a fictitious biogas facility. | Computational modeling | The mathematical simulation of agricultural waste showed that 9–10 m3 of CH4, or 90–100 kWh of power, might be produced daily. The process stability and pH avoidance were both attributed to the co-fermentation with animal manures. The study recommends that policymakers and farmers investigate the use of less harmful alternatives for burning stubble to lessen its negative effects on the environment and public health. | [126] |
Europe (EU) | This study examines the methanation component of Power-to-Methane (PtM) in 2050, focusing on scenarios with 80–95% CO2 reduction. Capacity deployed across the EU is 40 GW, increasing to 122 GW when liquefied CH4 gas is used for marine transport. Annual costs range from 2.5 to 10 blnEUR/year | Systems modeling | The results show that PtM arises for scenarios with 95% CO2 reduction, no underground storage, and low CAPEX. Systems’ drivers favor PtM more in determining PtM potential than technological drivers because of the poor CO2 storage potential. Hence, direct subsidy is more effective than taxing fossil gas. | [127] |
Brazil | Data on the amount of waste disposed of in the landfill from 2002 to 2018 and the gravimetric composition of the waste estimated based on data from Porto Alegre, the municipality with the largest contribution of waste to the landfill, were analyzed and estimated. | Measurement and Integrated modeling (first-order decay models of LandGem, CDM Tool, and IPCC resources) | This study found that peak CH4 gas generation in landfills will occur in 2026, with estimates ranging from 107,000 to 28,000 cubic meters per year. First-order decay models can estimate CH4 gas generation potential, but accuracy can be affected by landfill characteristics and waste disposal. The implications of the study include informing landfill design, operation, and CH4 gas capture and utilization. By understanding CH4 gas generation potential, landfills can be designed and operated to minimize emissions and maximize energy recovery potential. | [128] |
Russia | The Russian government’s policy framework for reducing CH4 emissions and the role of the oil and gas industry in implementing this policy were outlined. An overview was also given of the status of CH4 emissions from the oil and gas sector in Russia and the challenges and opportunities for reducing these emissions. | Qualitative modeling | This framework emphasizes a comprehensive approach with various interconnected actions and incentives to effectively manage CH4 emissions within the Russian oil and gas sector. By focusing on improved data collection, technological solutions, stricter regulations, financial incentives, international cooperation, and continuous improvement, the policy aims to mitigate CH4 emissions and contribute to global climate efforts. | [129] |
USA | The previously unquantified contribution of CH4 emissions from groundwater pumping to the overall US CH4 budget was investigated. | Measurement and Estimation Method: Aquifer selection, data acquisition, emission estimation | The study discovered substantial CH4 emissions from groundwater pumping, with peak estimates for the Los Angeles Basin (LAB) aquifer reaching 2.9 × 10−3 Tg/a (Teragrams per annum) in 2026. For Northeastern Pennsylvania (NE PA), lower emissions were observed due to the lower CH4 concentrations and pumping volume. Therefore, by encouraging further research and collaboration, this study paves the way for the improved understanding and potential mitigation of this unaccounted-for source of GHG. | [130] |
China | The status of coalbed CH4 (CBM) exploitation in China was reviewed, and suggestions for improving its efficiency were provided. | Literature review method | The study’s findings have several implications for the future of CBM exploitation in China. First, there is a need for continued investment in research and development to develop new technologies that can improve the efficiency of CBM exploitation. Second, the government needs to implement policies that support CBM development, such as providing tax breaks and subsidies for CBM producers. Finally, the industry needs to work together to develop best practices for CBM exploitation. If these recommendations are implemented, China can unlock the potential of its vast CBM resources and play a leading role in the global energy market. | [131] |
Ethiopia | The potential of fodder plants to reduce CH4 emissions while simultaneously improving animal productivity in Ethiopia. Furthermore, the CH4 production of seven forages, including three tropical multipurpose trees (Leucaena leucocephala, Moringa stenopetala, and Sesbania sesban), one shrub (Cajanus cajan), two legumes (Crotalaria juncea and Lablab purpureus), and maize stover, which is a widely used feed for ruminants. | Mixed-method approach: quantitative and qualitative data collection methods | This study implies that farmers can reduce CH4 emissions from their livestock by feeding them a diet that includes M. stenopetala, C. juncea, or L. leucocephala. These forages are not only high in CP, but they also have the potential to reduce CH4 production by up to 16%. This could have a significant impact on the environment, as livestock are a major source of CH4 emissions. Additionally, these forages are also preferred by farmers, which suggests that they are a sustainable and practical solution for reducing CH4 emissions from livestock. | [132] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Akpasi, S.O.; Akpan, J.S.; Amune, U.O.; Olaseinde, A.A.; Kiambi, S.L. Methane Advances: Trends and Summary from Selected Studies. Methane 2024, 3, 276-313. https://doi.org/10.3390/methane3020016
Akpasi SO, Akpan JS, Amune UO, Olaseinde AA, Kiambi SL. Methane Advances: Trends and Summary from Selected Studies. Methane. 2024; 3(2):276-313. https://doi.org/10.3390/methane3020016
Chicago/Turabian StyleAkpasi, Stephen Okiemute, Joseph Samuel Akpan, Ubani Oluwaseun Amune, Ayodeji Arnold Olaseinde, and Sammy Lewis Kiambi. 2024. "Methane Advances: Trends and Summary from Selected Studies" Methane 3, no. 2: 276-313. https://doi.org/10.3390/methane3020016
APA StyleAkpasi, S. O., Akpan, J. S., Amune, U. O., Olaseinde, A. A., & Kiambi, S. L. (2024). Methane Advances: Trends and Summary from Selected Studies. Methane, 3(2), 276-313. https://doi.org/10.3390/methane3020016