Next Article in Journal
Crises in Antimicrobial Stewardship: Misuse of Clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Effectiveness of Tigecycline in the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile-Associated Diarrhea
Previous Article in Journal
“My Addiction Doesn’t Define Me”—Experiences of Stigma among Mothers with Opioid Use Disorder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Antibiotic De-Escalation on Antibiotic Consumption, Length of Hospitalization, Mortality, and Cost: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmacoepidemiology
Volume 3
Issue 1
10.3390/pharma3010005
pharmacoepidemiology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Remdesivir and the Liver: A Concise Narrative Review of Remdesivir-Associated Hepatotoxicity in Patients Hospitalized Due to COVID-19

by
Alireza FakhriRavari
1,* and
Mazyar Malakouti
2
1
Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA
2
Texas Digestive Disease Consultants/GI Alliance, Southlake, TX 76092, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmacoepidemiology 2024, 3(1), 69-81; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma3010005
Submission received: 1 January 2024 / Revised: 5 February 2024 / Accepted: 8 February 2024 / Published: 13 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anti-Infectives: Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has infected millions of people, but about 20% of infected individuals do not develop symptoms. COVID-19 is an inflammatory disease that affects a portion of individuals infected with the virus and it is associated with liver injury and other complications, leading to hospitalization, critical illness, and death. Remdesivir is an antiviral agent used for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 to improve the time to recovery, reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation, decrease the need for supplemental oxygen, and decrease the risk of mortality. Remdesivir-associated hepatotoxicity has been observed as increased transaminases more than five times the upper limit of normal in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, but causality has not been proven. It is generally difficult to distinguish between remdesivir-associated hepatotoxicity and COVID-19-induced hepatotoxicity. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence for remdesivir-associated hepatotoxicity. Current evidence suggests that elevated liver enzymes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients are more likely to be due to the infection than remdesivir, and a 5-day course of remdesivir seems to be safe in regard to hepatotoxicity.

1. Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel betacoronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has rapidly spread worldwide, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare it a pandemic on 11 March 2020 [1,2]. The SARS-CoV-2 virus presents a wide spectrum of clinical outcomes, from mild infections to severe cases marked by critical health issues and high mortality rates [3]. Initially, all patients undergo a phase without symptoms. Subsequently, around 20% remain asymptomatic, 64% develop mild symptoms, and 16% face severe respiratory issues, like dyspnea or hypoxemia, necessitating hospitalization; of these, 12% are severe and 4% are critical cases [1,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Mild cases are often controlled by the initial immune response, whereas in severe cases, an overactive immune response can cause organ damage, requiring intensive care or leading to death [3]. The most common complications of severe illness include acute respiratory distress syndrome (20–67%), arrhythmia (17–18%), acute cardiac injury (7–23%), shock (6–10%), acute kidney injury (3–29%), hepatic dysfunction (1–33%), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (1%) [1,4,5,6,9,10,16,17,18]. The severity of complications appears to be linked to the intensity of inflammation, as indicated by elevated biomarkers, such as D-dimer, ferritin, and others, which are correlated with more severe disease and increased mortality rates [19]. In ICU settings, patients with elevated biomarkers, including liver enzymes, are likely to experience more severe illness [20]. This often results in extended stays in the ICU and greater complication risks, with notable differences in biomarker levels observed across various age groups and sexes [20]. Importantly, about 15% to 65% of patients with severe COVID-19 display signs of hepatobiliary damage [21].
By binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on the surface of cholangiocytes, SARS-CoV-2 may directly damage the biliary ducts [22]. However, given the low number of ACE2 receptors on hepatocyte surfaces, any injury to the hepatocytes may be indirect, which is supported by the fact that the majority of patients have normal alkaline phosphatase [22,23]. In addition, hepatocyte injury is more common than cholangiocyte injury [23]. Systemic inflammation, cytokine storm, and pneumonia-associated hypoxia might contribute to hepatocyte injury, especially in critically ill patients. Data from retrospective observational studies evaluating hepatic injury in patients with COVID-19 suggest that the pattern of liver injury is predominantly hepatocellular rather than cholestatic [24]. Abnormal liver enzymes are typically only minimally elevated (1–2 times the upper limit of normal) [21,24]. Therefore, it is important to monitor COVID-19 patients’ liver enzymes and manage drug-induced hepatotoxicity to avoid further injury to the liver.
Initially developed for the treatment of Ebola, remdesivir (also known as GS-5734) is a nucleotide analog with a broad spectrum of viral activity, including activity against SARS-CoV-2 [25,26]. Although a clinical trial investigating remdesivir for the treatment of Ebola did not report any severe hepatotoxicity, there have been concerns over remdesivir-associated hepatotoxicity among clinicians since its widespread use during the COVID-19 pandemic [27]. The objective of this narrative review is to evaluate and summarize the evidence for remdesivir-associated hepatotoxicity in patients with COVID-19, using elevated liver enzymes more than five times the upper limit of normal as the cut-off to distinguish between liver adaptation and clinically significant liver injury [28].

2. Results

2.1. Remdesivir’s Role in the Treatment of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Patients

Remdesivir inhibits viral replication of SARS-CoV-2 by incorporating its active metabolite into viral RNA, resulting in chain termination [29]. Remdesivir is administered to hospitalized adult patients intravenously over 30 min at a typical dose of 200 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg once daily on day 2 onward for a total of 5 to 10 days [25,29]. Remdesivir is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adults and pediatric patients 28 days of age and older and weighing at least 3 kg for the treatment of COVID-19 requiring hospitalization (also approved for non-hospitalized patients who have mild to moderate COVID-19 and are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death). While many randomized clinical trials have failed to show a clear mortality benefit with remdesivir, the primary benefit of treatment with remdesivir seems to be improved time to recovery, reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, decreased need for supplemental oxygen, and increased rate of hospital discharge [30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Moreover, the final results of ACCT-1 and WHO solidarity randomized clinical trials suggest that remdesivir offers no substantial benefit to ventilated COVID-19 patients but aids in reducing death or the need for ventilation in other hospital cases, especially in patients requiring low-flow supplemental oxygen [32,37,38]. Additionally, multiple observational studies, but not all, have shown an association with remdesivir use in hospitalized patients and reduced mortality [35,36,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Finally, a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) consisting of 10,480 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 found a significant reduction in mortality with remdesivir use compared to non-use (OR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.00; p = 0.045) [38]. However, the results were significant only for a subgroup of patients on low-flow oxygen or no oxygen (OR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.93; pinteraction = 0.019) but not for those on high-flow oxygen or ventilated (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.38).
Although there were disagreements between various clinical practice guidelines initially regarding the use of remdesivir, the current guidelines are generally in agreement. As of January 2023, the WHO recommends the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 but recommends against its use in patients with critical COVID-19 [48]. As of February 2022, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients requiring supplemental oxygen but not mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [49]. As of October 2023, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines recommend its use in hospitalized patients requiring low-flow supplemental oxygen, high-flow oxygen, or noninvasive ventilation but not in those on mechanical ventilation or ECMO [50]. Additionally, the NIH guidelines recommend remdesivir for hospitalized patients who do not require supplemental oxygen if they are immunocompromised or are at high risk of progressing to severe disease [50]. For patients with liver disease or liver transplant recipients, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends a 5-day course of remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring supplemental oxygen [51].

2.2. Remdesivir-Associated Hepatotoxicity

In the context of remdesivir-induced hepatotoxicity, a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms is crucial for effective clinical management. However, the mechanism of remdesivir-induced hepatotoxicity is not fully understood [52]. As an ester prodrug, remdesivir is hydrolyzed by carboxylesterase-1 to its active metabolite [53]. Additionally, remdesivir is a potent inhibitor of carboxylesterase-2, an enzyme that metabolizes many drugs and toxicants, which may result in toxicity [53,54]. It has been shown on a cellular level that remdesivir can be toxic to human hepatocytes, although the exact mechanism is unknown [55]. Emerging evidence suggests that remdesivir may interfere with mitochondrial function in hepatocytes, leading to oxidative stress and cell injury [56]. Additionally, the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, coupled with remdesivir’s pharmacological effects, might exacerbate liver inflammation, thereby potentiating hepatotoxicity [57]. In a phase 1 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of healthy volunteers, mild (grade 1) to moderate (grade 2) elevation of ALT was observed in individuals receiving 10 days of remdesivir, which resolved upon the discontinuation of remdesivir. As a result, there is a warning listed in remdesivir prescribing information, and both the prescribing information and AASLD recommend considering remdesivir discontinuation if ALT levels increase to greater than 10 times the upper limit of normal and to discontinue remdesivir if ALT elevation is accompanied by signs or symptoms of liver inflammation [51].
The safety profile of remdesivir has been evaluated in multiple studies, including clinical trials, observational studies, descriptive case reports, and case series (Table 1). Prior to COVID-19, a clinical trial investigating remdesivir for the treatment of Ebola did not report any severe hepatotoxicity [27]. Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, Grein and colleagues reported the first compassionate use of remdesivir in 61 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 [58]. Increased hepatic enzymes occurred in 23% of the patients, which were mild to moderate. Antinori and colleagues reported even higher rates of hypertransaminasemia (43%), including in both intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients [59]. Reports of compassionate remdesivir use by Burwick and colleagues had similar findings [60]. Leegwater and colleagues reported a case of increased liver enzymes 5 days after the start of remdesivir, resulting in the discontinuation of remdesivir [55]. However, this patient also received amiodarone and chloroquine, both of which are inhibitors of P-glycoprotein with very long half-lives. Since remdesivir is a substrate of P-glycoprotein, inhibitors of P-glycoprotein may reduce the efflux rate of remdesivir, leading to increased concentrations of remdesivir in the hepatocytes above the toxic threshold [55]. Zampino and colleagues reported a case series of five patients in the ICU receiving remdesivir for 10 days, demonstrating increases in bilirubin and liver enzymes, suggesting liver injury [61]. However, these patients were also receiving hydroxychloroquine, and it is not clear if the liver injury was due to remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, or the combination.
A pharmacovigilance analysis conducted by Montastruc and colleagues found 387 reports with remdesivir [62]. Hepatic adverse effects were reported in 34% of patients, most of whom had increased liver enzymes (88%) with a median time to onset of 5.4 days. Compared to other drugs prescribed for COVID-19, remdesivir was associated with an increased risk of reporting hepatic disorders (OR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.54 to 2.45). The severity of these hepatic disorders was not reported. Van Laar and colleagues conducted a retrospective single-center observational study evaluating 103 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received remdesivir [63]. In patients with normal AST and ALT at baseline, AST and ALT were increased mildly (grade 1) in 39% and 35% of patients, and grade 2 increases were observed in 3% and 6% of patients, respectively. Only one patient had grade 3 increases in AST and ALT (grade 3 is defined as elevation > 5 times the upper limit of normal). The investigators found that patients who met the contraindication criteria for remdesivir due to liver impairment were not more likely to develop hepatotoxicity when receiving remdesivir treatment. Garibaldi and colleagues conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study comparing 285 patients who received remdesivir to 285 propensity score-matched control patients hospitalized with COVID-19 [36]. The rate of increased ALT or AST was equal between the remdesivir (10.2%) and control (10.2%) groups. Increased bilirubin was higher in the control group (6.0%) compared to the remdesivir group (3.5%). Only four patients stopped taking remdesivir early due to increased levels of liver enzyme or bilirubin. It is important to note that none of these studies utilized the full Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) criteria to identify drug-induced liver injury nor the widely used Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) to assess causality [66,67]. Therefore, these studies could not establish causality of drug-induced liver injury due to remdesivir.
Given the observational nature of these studies, it was difficult to attribute hepatotoxicity to either remdesivir or COVID-19. Wang and colleagues conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, enrolling enrolled 236 hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia [30]. They excluded patients with cirrhosis, ALT, or AST more than five times the upper limit of normal. About 66% of patients received corticosteroid therapy concurrently. The increased total bilirubin rate was the same in the remdesivir (10%) and placebo (9%) groups, with only one grade 3 case in the remdesivir group, but the rate of elevated AST was actually lower in remdesivir (5%) group compared to placebo (12%), none of which were grade 3 or higher in severity. Changes in ALT were not reported. Only two patients discontinued treatment due to increased liver enzymes, and both were in the remdesivir group. More patients in the placebo group received invasive mechanical ventilation compared to the remdesivir group, which might explain the higher rate of ALT elevation in this group due to the higher severity of COVID-19. In the SIMPLE-1 severe trial, Goldman and colleagues conducted a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial to evaluate 5 days vs. 10 days of remdesivir [64]. The study excluded patients with ALT or AST more than five times the upper limit of normal. It is not clear what percentage of patients received corticosteroids. The preliminary results, including 397 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, showed similar rates of increased ALT with remdesivir for 5 days (6%) compared to 10 days (8%), although fewer patients in the 5-day group discontinued remdesivir due to increased liver enzymes compared to the 10-day group (2.5% vs. 3.6%). Again, it was not clear whether increased liver enzymes were due to the severity of COVID-19 or the duration of remdesivir, as more patients in the 10-day group were receiving high-flow oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or ECMO.
In the SIMPLE-2 moderate trial, Spinner and colleagues conducted a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial of 5 days vs. 10 days of remdesivir in 584 hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19, which excluded patients with AST or ALT more than five times the upper limit of normal [31]. The study also included a third group that received the standard of care without remdesivir. About 17% of patients received corticosteroids concomitantly. The rate of increased ALT more than five times the upper limit of normal was similar between the 10-day and 5-day groups and slightly higher in the standard of care group (3%, 2%, and 8%, respectively). These results suggest that even with moderate COVID-19, patients not receiving remdesivir are likely to have elevated liver enzymes. In the ACTT-1 trial, Beigel and colleagues conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 1062 hospitalized patients with moderate (15%) or severe (85%) COVID-19 [32]. Patients with ALT or AST more than five times the upper limit of normal at baseline were excluded. About 23% of patients also received corticosteroids. The rate of increased liver enzymes was numerically lower in the remdesivir (6.0%) compared to placebo group (10.7%), including grade 3 or higher nonserious elevations of AST or ALT (4.1% in remdesivir and 5.9% in placebo group).
Moreover, in the ACTT-2 trial, Kalil and colleagues conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the combination of baricitinib and remdesivir vs. remdesivir plus placebo [65]. They enrolled 1033 hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19, excluding those with AST or ALT more than five times the upper limit of normal. About 12% of patients received concurrent corticosteroids. The rate of increased ALT was similar between the combination of remdesivir plus baricitinib (0.8%) and remdesivir alone (0.6%). Finally, in the DisCoVeRy trial, Ader and colleagues conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to evaluate 5 to 10 days of remdesivir plus standard of care compared to standard of care alone in 857 hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 [34]. Patients with elevated liver enzymes at baseline were excluded, and about 40% of patients also received concomitant corticosteroid therapy. Transaminases were increased in 3% and 1% of the remdesivir and control groups, respectively. AST and ALT increases were not reported separately. Collectively, these clinical trials suggest that remdesivir is unlikely to be the cause of elevated liver enzymes, which is more likely to be due to COVID-19 itself. Moreover, the lower rate of ALT elevation seen in the remdesivir groups compared to control groups in the study by Wang and colleagues, SIMPLE-2, and ACTT-1 (Figure 1), may suggest that the antiviral activity of remdesivir can indirectly reduce COVID-19-associated elevated liver enzymes. Interestingly, some evidence suggests that the concomitant administration of systemic corticosteroids, specifically dexamethasone, may alleviate elevation of serum AST and ALT levels compared to remdesivir administration without corticosteroids [68]. Most remdesivir studies were conducted before systemic corticosteroids became the standard of care for hospitalized patients requiring supplemental oxygen [69].
A systematic review and meta-analysis (SR-MA) of four RCTs conducted by Shrestha and colleagues found that compared to placebo, remdesivir recipients had similar rates of overall adverse events (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.72; I2 74%) but significantly lower rates of severe adverse effects (OR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; I2 0%) [70]. Compared to 5 days of remdesivir treatment, those who received 10 days of remdesivir had significantly higher rates of serious adverse effects (OR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.65; I2 20%), although the rates of overall adverse effects were not significantly different (OR 1.26; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.69; I2 0%). Similar results were reported in a systematic review and network meta-analyses of five RCTs conducted by Lai and colleagues, an SR-MA of five RCTs by Santenna and colleagues, and a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of eight RCTs [38,71,72]. However, hepatotoxicity specifically was not analyzed in these studies. Nevertheless, another meta-analysis of three RCTs conducted by Chen and colleagues found no statistically significant increase in AST (OR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.18; I2 39%), ALT (OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.11; I2 0%), or death (OR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.90; I2 0%) in patients receiving remdesivir compared to the control group [73]. Overall, the evidence suggests that a 5-day course of remdesivir seems to be safe in patients with COVID-19 in regard to hepatotoxicity and may even reduce the rate of COVID-19-associated liver enzyme elevation.
To minimize potential risks, various practices can be implemented in a clinical setting. Ongoing liver enzyme monitoring is essential for patients treated with remdesivir. An increase in liver enzyme levels should lead to a careful reassessment of the treatment’s risk versus benefit. Prior to initiating remdesivir in patients with existing liver diseases, a thorough evaluation is necessary. High vigilance is needed to avoid concomitant use of remdesivir and P-glycoprotein inhibitors (e.g., amiodarone, carvedilol, clarithromycin, propranolol, tacrolimus, etc.) [74]. In the rare event of acute liver failure, the use of acetylcysteine has been reported to be of potential benefit [75].

2.3. Limitations and Future Research

In this review, while we have endeavored to present a comprehensive analysis of remdesivir-associated hepatotoxicity in COVID-19 patients, we recognize certain limitations that pave the way for future research in this area. Firstly, the majority of the studies included in our review were short-term and focused on acute outcomes, highlighting the need for long-term follow-up studies to understand the extended impact of remdesivir on liver function. Additionally, the variability in patient demographics and comorbidities in the current literature suggests the necessity for more targeted research, particularly in populations with pre-existing liver conditions. This is crucial for developing a more nuanced understanding of patient-specific risk factors and treatment responses. Furthermore, the advent of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 and evolving treatment protocols underscore the need for ongoing pharmacovigilance and updated studies to continuously assess the safety profile of remdesivir.
Whereas this review primarily focuses on the direct hepatotoxic effects of remdesivir in the treatment of COVID-19, we acknowledge a notable gap in the current literature regarding the hepatotoxicity risks stemming from drug interactions. Remdesivir, like many antiviral agents, is often administered in a clinical setting where patients may be receiving multiple medications, raising the possibility of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Particularly in the elderly and those with pre-existing liver conditions, the implications of such interactions could be significant. The hepatotoxic potential of remdesivir in the context of polypharmacy, therefore, presents an important area for future research. Investigating these interactions could provide critical insights into the safety profile of remdesivir, especially in populations with heightened vulnerability to liver complications. As the medical community continues to respond to COVID-19 and similar viral threats, understanding the full spectrum of drug safety, including interaction-related hepatotoxicity, becomes increasingly essential. This topic, thus, represents a valuable direction for future pharmacological and clinical studies, potentially guiding more nuanced and safer therapeutic strategies.
Moreover, the complexities in differentiating drug-induced hepatotoxicity from liver injuries associated with COVID-19 present a significant challenge in clinical practice and research. This ambiguity complicates the task of establishing a direct causal link between the use of remdesivir and the occurrence of liver injury. The overlapping clinical manifestations of drug-induced liver damage and hepatotoxicity directly attributable to the viral infection itself necessitate a nuanced approach in both diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic decision making. Future research in this area is imperative to develop more definitive diagnostic criteria and refine our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these conditions. Such efforts should aim to unravel the intricate interplay between pharmacological interventions and the disease process, particularly in the context of multi-faceted treatment regimens for COVID-19. Studies focused on this differentiation will not only inform safer prescribing practices but also contribute to the optimization of treatment protocols for patients with COVID-19, ultimately enhancing patient safety and clinical outcomes. The incorporation of advanced diagnostic tools, comprehensive clinical data analysis, and possibly the exploration of novel biomarkers may play pivotal roles in this endeavor, offering clearer insights into the causal relationships between treatment modalities, like remdesivir, and liver injury. Addressing these gaps will not only enhance our understanding of remdesivir’s hepatotoxic potential but will also significantly contribute to optimizing the management of COVID-19, particularly in vulnerable patient groups.

3. Materials and Methods

We searched PubMed and EMBASE from inception through November 2023 using keyword terms remdesivir, hepatotoxicity, COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2. References of selected articles were also screened for additional studies. Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 published in the English language are evaluated. We included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness and safety of remdesivir in adult patients hospitalized for the treatment of COVID-19. We excluded studies conducted in the outpatient setting. Hepatotoxicity was defined as the elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) more than five times the upper limit of normal [66]. Per the American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for the evaluation of abnormal liver chemistries, a normal ALT level is considered to range from 29 to 33 IU/L for males and 19 to 25 IU/L for females [76]. Levels above these thresholds warrant further evaluation.

4. Conclusions

The clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 vary significantly, extending from mild infections to severe illnesses with critical complications and a high risk of death. About 20% of patients do not show symptoms, 64% exhibit mild symptoms, and 16% develop serious respiratory conditions, like dyspnea or hypoxemia, which require hospital care, with 12% being severe cases and 4% critical [3]. In cases of mild infection, the body’s early immune response usually manages the virus effectively. However, in severe infections, an overzealous immune response can lead to complications, including liver injury, organ failure, and death [14,15]. Remdesivir is an antiviral agent used for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 to improve time to recovery, reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation, decrease the need for supplemental oxygen, and reduce the risk of mortality (remdesivir is also approved for non-hospitalized patients who have mild to moderate COVID-19 and are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death). Remdesivir has been associated with liver injury due to reports of increased transaminases in patients who received this treatment, resulting in a warning in the prescribing information and a requirement for monitoring of hepatic function before initiation and during remdesivir therapy. However, causality has not been proven. It is generally difficult to distinguish between remdesivir-associated hepatotoxicity and COVID-19-induced hepatotoxicity. Current evidence suggests that elevated liver enzymes are more likely to be due to COVID-19 and that a 5-day course of remdesivir seems to be safe in regard to hepatotoxicity.

Author Contributions

A.F. and M.M. contributed equally to conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, and writing—review and editing; supervision, A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020. World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 (accessed on 30 March 2020).
  3. Meyerowitz, E.A.; Scott, J.; Richterman, A.; Male, V.; Cevik, M. Clinical course and management of COVID-19 in the era of widespread population immunity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024, 22, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, N.; Zhou, M.; Dong, X.; Qu, J.; Gong, F.; Han, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Wei, Y.; et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020, 395, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, D.; Hu, B.; Hu, C.; Zhu, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Xiang, H.; Cheng, Z.; Xiong, Y.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020, 323, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guan, W.J.; Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Y.; Liang, W.H.; Ou, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, L.; Shan, H.; Lei, C.L.; Hui, D.S.C.; et al. China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1708–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tian, S.; Hu, N.; Lou, J.; Chen, K.; Kang, X.; Xiang, Z.; Chen, H.; Wang, D.; Liu, N.; Liu, D.; et al. Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Young, B.E.; Ong, S.W.X.; Kalimuddin, S.; Low, J.G.; Tan, S.Y.; Loh, J.; Ng, O.T.; Marimuthu, K.; Ang, L.W.; Mak, T.M.; et al. Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore. JAMA 2020, 323, 1488–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lian, J.; Jin, X.; Hao, S.; Cai, H.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, L.; Jia, H.; Hu, J.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Analysis of Epidemiological and Clinical features in older patients with Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outside Wuhan. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 740–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, F.; Yu, T.; Du, R.; Fan, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, B.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, C.; Chen, X.; Cai, Y.; Xia, J.; Zhou, X.; Xu, S.; Huang, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, X.; Du, C.; et al. Risk Factors Associated with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 934–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bhatraju, P.K.; Ghassemieh, B.J.; Nichols, M.; Kim, R.; Jerome, K.R.; Nalla, A.K.; Greninger, A.L.; Pipavath, S.; Wurfel, M.M.; Evans, L.; et al. Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region—Case Series. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2012–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oran, D.P.; Topol, E.J. The Proportion of SARS-CoV-2 Infections That Are Asymptomatic: A Systematic Review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2021, 174, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Angulo, F.J.; Finelli, L.; Swerdlow, D.L. Estimation of US SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Symptomatic Infections, Hospitalizations, and Deaths Using Seroprevalence Surveys. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e2033706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hu, B.; Guo, H.; Zhou, P.; Shi, Z.-L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, X.; Yu, Y.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.; Xia, J.; Liu, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Z.; Fang, M.; et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cao, J.; Hu, X.; Cheng, W.; Yu, L.; Tu, W.-J.; Liu, Q. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 18 patients with corona virus disease 2019 in intensive care unit. Intensiv. Care Med. 2020, 46, 851–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cao, J.; Tu, W.-J.; Cheng, W.; Yu, L.; Liu, Y.-K.; Hu, X.; Liu, Q. Clinical Features and Short-term Outcomes of 102 Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 748–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khedar, R.S.; Gupta, R.; Sharma, K.; Mittal, K.; Ambaliya, H.C.; Gupta, J.B.; Singh, S.; Sharma, S.; Singh, Y.; Mathur, A. Biomarkers and outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: A prospective registry. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e067430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Genc, S.; Taghizadehghalehjoughi, A.; Naldan, M.E.; Gülcü, O.; Caglayan, C.; Spanakis, M.; Nikolouzakis, T.K.; Alegakis, A.; Docea, A.O.; Drocas, A.I.; et al. Evaluation of various blood biomarkers associated with the outcomes of patients with COVID-19 treated in intensive care units. Exp. Ther. Med. 2024, 27, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marjot, T.; Webb, G.J.; Barritt, A.S.; Moon, A.M.; Stamataki, Z.; Wong, V.W.; Barnes, E. COVID-19 and liver disease: Mechanistic and clinical perspectives. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 348–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jothimani, D.; Venugopal, R.; Abedin, M.F.; Kaliamoorthy, I.; Rela, M. COVID-19 and the liver. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 1231–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Praveen, S.; Ashish, K.; Anikhindi, S.A.; Naresh, B.; Vikas, S.; Khare, S.; Anil, A. Effect of COVID-19 on pre-existing liver disease: What Hepatologist should know? J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2020, 11, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hundt, M.A.; Deng, Y.; Ciarleglio, M.M.; Nathanson, M.H.; Lim, J.K. Abnormal Liver Tests in COVID-19: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study of 1,827 Patients in a Major U.S. Hospital Network. Hepatology 2020, 72, 1169–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lamb, Y.N. Remdesivir: First Approval. Drugs 2020, 80, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jorgensen, S.C.J.; Kebriaei, R.; Dresser, L.D. Remdesivir: Review of Pharmacology, Pre-clinical Data, and Emerging Clinical Experience for COVID-19. Pharmacotherapy 2020, 40, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mulangu, S.; Dodd, L.E.; Davey, R.T., Jr.; Tshiani Mbaya, O.; Proschan, M.; Mukadi, D.; Lusakibanza Manzo, M.; Nzolo, D.; Tshomba Oloma, A.; Ibanda, A.; et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 2293–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Andrade, R.J.; Chalasani, N.; Björnsson, E.S.; Suzuki, A.; Kullak-Ublick, G.A.; Watkins, P.B.; Devarbhavi, H.; Merz, M.; Lucena, M.I.; Kaplowitz, N.; et al. Drug-induced liver injury. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019, 5, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aleissa, M.M.; Silverman, E.A.; Paredes Acosta, L.M.; Nutt, C.T.; Richterman, A.; Marty, F.M. New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Remdesivir Treatment for COVID-19. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 65, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Du, G.; Du, R.; Zhao, J.; Jin, Y.; Fu, S.; Gao, L.; Cheng, Z.; Lu, Q.; et al. Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 2020, 395, 1569–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Spinner, C.D.; Gottlieb, R.L.; Criner, G.J.; Arribas López, J.R.; Cattelan, A.M.; Viladomiu, A.S.; Ogbuagu, O.; Malhotra, P.; Mullane, K.M.; Castagna, A.; et al. Effect of Remdesivir vs Standard Care on Clinical Status at 11 Days in Patients With Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2020, 324, 1048–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Beigel, J.H.; Tomashek, K.M.; Dodd, L.E.; Mehta, A.K.; Zingman, B.S.; Kalil, A.C.; Hohmann, E.; Chu, H.Y.; Luetkemeyer, A.; Kline, S.; et al. Remdesivir for the Treatment of COVID-19—Final Report. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1813–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Consortium WHOST; Pan, H.; Peto, R.; Henao-Restrepo, A.M.; Preziosi, M.P.; Sathiyamoorthy, V.; Abdool Karim, Q.; Alejandria, M.M.; García, C.H.; Kieny, M.; et al. Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for COVID-19—Interim WHO Solidarity Trial Results. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 497–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ader, F.; Bouscambert-Duchamp, M.; Hites, M.; Peiffer-Smadja, N.; Poissy, J.; Belhadi, D.; Diallo, A.; Lê, M.-P.; Peytavin, G.; Staub, T.; et al. Remdesivir plus standard of care versus standard of care alone for the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (DisCoVeRy): A phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lapadula, G.; Bernasconi, D.P.; Bellani, G.; Soria, A.; Rona, R.; Bombino, M.; Avalli, L.; Rondelli, E.; Cortinovis, B.; Colombo, E.; et al. Remdesivir Use in Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation due to COVID-19. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, ofaa481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Garibaldi, B.T.; Wang, K.; Robinson, M.L.; Zeger, S.L.; Bandeen-Roche, K.; Wang, M.-C.; Alexander, G.C.; Gupta, A.; Bollinger, R.; Xu, Y. Comparison of Time to Clinical Improvement With vs Without Remdesivir Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e213071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Consortium WHOST. Remdesivir and three other drugs for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: Final results of the WHO Solidarity randomised trial and updated meta-analyses. Lancet 2022, 399, 1941–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Amstutz, A.; Speich, B.; Mentre, F.; Rueegg, C.S.; Belhadi, D.; Assoumou, L.; Burdet, C.; Murthy, S.; Dodd, L.E.; Wang, Y.; et al. Effects of remdesivir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir. Med. 2023, 11, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pasquini, Z.; Montalti, R.; Temperoni, C.; Canovari, B.; Mancini, M.; Tempesta, M.; Pimpini, D.; Zallocco, N.; Barchiesi, F. Effectiveness of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19 under mechanical ventilation in an Italian ICU. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3359–3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Olender, S.A.; Perez, K.K.; Go, A.S.; Balani, B.; Price-Haywood, E.G.; Shah, N.S.; Wang, S.; Walunas, T.L.; Swaminathan, S.; Slim, J.; et al. Remdesivir for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Versus a Cohort Receiving Standard of Care. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 73, e4166–e4174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Olender, S.A.; Walunas, T.L.; Martinez, E.; Perez, K.K.; Castagna, A.; Wang, S.; Kurbegov, D.; Goyal, P.; Ripamonti, D.; Balani, B.; et al. Remdesivir Versus Standard-of-Care for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: An Analysis of 28-Day Mortality. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofab278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Garibaldi, B.T.; Wang, K.; Robinson, M.L.; Betz, J.; Caleb Alexander, G.; Andersen, K.M.; Joseph, C.S.; Mehta, H.B.; Korwek, K.; Sands, K.E.; et al. Real-World Effectiveness of Remdesivir in Adults Hospitalized with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Retrospective, Multicenter Comparative Effectiveness Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 75, e516–e524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Benfield, T.; Bodilsen, J.; Brieghel, C.; Harboe, Z.B.; Helleberg, M.; Holm, C.; Israelsen, S.B.; Jensen, J.; Jensen, T.; Johansen, I.S.; et al. Improved Survival Among Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treated With Remdesivir and Dexamethasone. A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, 2031–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dunay, M.A.; McClain, S.L.; Holloway, R.L.; Norris, S.L.W.; Bendixsen Randall, T.; Mohr, C.E.; Sasaki, B.H.; Coones, J.A.; Vietri, N.J. Pre-Hospital Administration of Remdesivir During a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Outbreak in a Skilled Nursing Facility. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 74, 1476–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Garcia-Vidal, C.; Alonso, R.; Camon, A.M.; Cardozo, C.; Albiach, L.; Marcos, M.A.; Ambrosioni, J.; Bodro, M.; Chumbita, M.; de la Mora, L.; et al. Impact of remdesivir according to the pre-admission symptom duration in patients with COVID-19. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 3296–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Metchurtchlishvili, R.; Chkhartishvili, N.; Abutidze, A.; Endeladze, M.; Ezugbaia, M.; Bakradze, A.; Tsertsvadze, T. Effect of remdesivir on mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation among hospitalized patients with COVID-19: Real-world data from a resource-limited country. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2023, 129, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Margalit, I.; Tiseo, G.; Ripa, M.; Borghi, V.; Green, H.; Prendki, V.; Riccardi, N.; Perego, G.B.; Grembiale, A.; Galli, L.; et al. Real-life experience with remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19 among older adults: A multicentre retrospective study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2023, 78, 1505–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Therapeutics and COVID-19: Living Guideline; World Health Organization: Geneva, Swizerland, 2023; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-therapeutics-2023.1 (accessed on 13 January 2023).
  49. Bhimraj, A.; Morgan, R.L.; Shumaker, A.H.; Baden, L.; Cheng, V.C.C.; Edwards, K.M.; Gallagher, J.C.; Gandhi, R.T.; Muller, W.J.; Nakamura, M.M.; et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2022, ciac724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes of Health. Available online: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/ (accessed on 17 January 2022).
  51. Fix, O.K.; Hameed, B.; Fontana, R.J.; Kwok, R.M.; McGuire, B.M.; Mulligan, D.C.; Brown, K.A.; Price, J.C.; Chu, J.; Reau, N.S.; et al. AASLD Expert Panel Consensus Statement: COVID-19 Clinical Best Practice Advice for Hepatology and Liver Transplant Providers. 2022, pp. 1–12. Available online: https://www.aasld.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/AASLD%20COVID-19%20Guidance%20Document%2010.06.2022F.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2023).
  52. Fan, Q.; Zhang, B.; Ma, J.; Zhang, S. Safety profile of the antiviral drug remdesivir: An update. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 130, 110532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shen, Y.; Eades, W.; Yan, B. Remdesivir potently inhibits carboxylesterase-2 through covalent modifications: Signifying strong drug-drug interactions. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 35, 432–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, D.; Zou, L.; Jin, Q.; Hou, J.; Ge, G.; Yang, L. Human carboxylesterases: A comprehensive review. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2018, 8, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Leegwater, E.; Strik, A.; Wilms, E.B.; Bosma, L.B.E.; Burger, D.M.; Ottens, T.H.; van Nieuwkoop, C. Drug-induced Liver Injury in a Patient with Coronavirus Disease 2019: Potential Interaction of Remdesivir With P-Glycoprotein Inhibitors. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 72, 1256–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Akbari, H.; Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. COVID-19 induced liver injury from a new perspective: Mitochondria. Mitochondrion 2023, 70, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aleem, A.; Mahadevaiah, G.; Shariff, N.; Kothadia, J.P. Hepatic manifestations of COVID-19 and effect of remdesivir on liver function in patients with COVID-19 illness. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. Proc. 2021, 34, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Grein, J.; Ohmagari, N.; Shin, D.; Diaz, G.; Asperges, E.; Castagna, A.; Feldt, T.; Green, G.; Green, M.L.; Lescure, F.X.; et al. Compassionate Use of Remdesivir for Patients with Severe COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2327–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Antinori, S.; Cossu, M.V.; Ridolfo, A.L.; Rech, R.; Bonazzetti, C.; Pagani, G.; Gubertini, G.; Coen, M.; Magni, C.; Castelli, A.; et al. Compassionate remdesivir treatment of severe Covid-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit (ICU) and Non-ICU patients: Clinical outcome and differences in post-treatment hospitalisation status. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 158, 104899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Burwick, R.M.; Yawetz, S.; Stephenson, K.E.; Collier, A.Y.; Sen, P.; Blackburn, B.G.; Kojic, E.M.; Hirshberg, A.; Suarez, J.F.; Sobieszczyk, M.E.; et al. Compassionate Use of Remdesivir in Pregnant Women with Severe COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, e3396–e4004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zampino, R.; Mele, F.; Florio, L.L.; Bertolino, L.; Andini, R.; Galdo, M.; De Rosa, R.; Corcione, A.; Durante-Mangoni, E. Liver injury in remdesivir-treated COVID-19 patients. Hepatol. Int. 2020, 14, 881–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Montastruc, F.; Thuriot, S.; Durrieu, G. Hepatic Disorders with the Use of Remdesivir for Coronavirus 2019. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 18, 2835–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Van Laar, S.A.; de Boer, M.G.J.; Gombert-Handoko, K.B.; Guchelaar, H.; Zwaveling, J.; Group LU-C-r. Liver and kidney function in patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 87, 4450–4454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Goldman, J.D.; Lye, D.C.; Hui, D.S.; Marks, K.M.; Bruno, R.; Montejano, R.; Spinner, C.D.; Galli, M.; Ahn, M.-Y.; Nahass, R.G.; et al. Remdesivir for 5 or 10 Days in Patients with Severe COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1827–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kalil, A.C.; Patterson, T.F.; Mehta, A.K.; Tomashek, K.M.; Wolfe, C.R.; Ghazaryan, V.; Marconi, V.C.; Ruiz-Palacios, G.M.; Hsieh, L.; Kline, S.; et al. Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 795–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chalasani, N.; Fontana, R.J.; Bonkovsky, H.L.; Watkins, P.B.; Davern, T.; Serrano, J.; Yang, H.; Rochon, J. Causes, Clinical Features, and Outcomes from a Prospective Study of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in the United States. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 1924–1934.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Danan, G.; Teschke, R. RUCAM in Drug and Herb Induced Liver Injury: The Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 17, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, K.; Stern, S.; Heil, E.L.; Li, L.; Khairi, R.; Heyward, S.; Wang, H. Dexamethasone mitigates remdesivir-induced liver toxicity in human primary hepatocytes and COVID-19 patients. Hepatol. Commun. 2023, 7, e0034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. FakhriRavari, A.; Jin, S.; Kachouei, F.H.; Le, D.; Lopez, M. Systemic corticosteroids for management of COVID-19: Saving lives or causing harm? Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2021, 35, 20587384211063976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shrestha, D.B.; Budhathoki, P.; Syed, N.-I.; Rawal, E.; Raut, S.; Khadka, S. Remdesivir: A potential game-changer or just a myth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Life Sci. 2021, 264, 118663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lai, C.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Wang, C.-Y.; Chen, K.-H.; Wang, Y.-H.; Hsueh, P.-R. Clinical efficacy and safety of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 1962–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Santenna, C.; Vidyasagar, K.; Amarneni, K.C.; Ghanta, S.N.; Sadasivam, B.; Pathan, S.; Padmavathi, R. The safety, tolerability and mortality reduction efficacy of remdesivir; based on randomized clinical trials, observational and case studies reported safety outcomes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther. Adv. Drug Saf. 2021, 12, 20420986211042517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chen, H.; Chao, C.; Lai, C. The safety of remdesivir for COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 1910–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Inhibitors and inducers of CYP enzymes and P-glycoprotein. Med. Lett. Drugs Ther. 2017, 59, e56. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28323813 (accessed on 10 December 2023).
  75. Carothers, C.; Birrer, K.; Vo, M. Acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Suspected Remdesivir-Associated Acute Liver Failure in COVID-19: A Case Series. Pharmacotherapy 2020, 40, 1166–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kwo, P.Y.; Cohen, S.M.; Lim, J.K. ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 112, 18–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pharmacoepidemiology 03 00005 g001
Figure 1. Comparison of the rates of increased AST and ALT in the intervention vs. control groups in randomized clinical trials [30,31,32,64,65]. This figure presents a visual comparison of liver enzyme elevation rates between the intervention group (patients receiving remdesivir) and the control group across various randomized controlled trials. This back-to-back bar chart format allows for a direct and clear comparison between the two groups. Panel (A) focuses on the elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), showcasing the relative frequency of elevated AST levels in both groups. Similarly, Panel (B) illustrates the comparison for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations. These panels collectively provide a concise and comparative view of the impact of remdesivir on liver enzymes, as indicated by changes in AST and ALT levels in patients. * The intervention group received 10 days of remdesivir and the control group received 5 days of remdesivir. ** The intervention group received remdesivir plus baricitinib and the control group received remdesivir plus placebo.
Figure 1. Comparison of the rates of increased AST and ALT in the intervention vs. control groups in randomized clinical trials [30,31,32,64,65]. This figure presents a visual comparison of liver enzyme elevation rates between the intervention group (patients receiving remdesivir) and the control group across various randomized controlled trials. This back-to-back bar chart format allows for a direct and clear comparison between the two groups. Panel (A) focuses on the elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), showcasing the relative frequency of elevated AST levels in both groups. Similarly, Panel (B) illustrates the comparison for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations. These panels collectively provide a concise and comparative view of the impact of remdesivir on liver enzymes, as indicated by changes in AST and ALT levels in patients. * The intervention group received 10 days of remdesivir and the control group received 5 days of remdesivir. ** The intervention group received remdesivir plus baricitinib and the control group received remdesivir plus placebo.
Pharmacoepidemiology 03 00005 g001
Table 1. Studies evaluating remdesivir use in patients with COVID-19.
Table 1. Studies evaluating remdesivir use in patients with COVID-19.
StudyDesign (Size)PatientsInterventionControlHepatotoxicity
Leegwater et al. [55]Retrospective
(N = 1)		Hospitalized with severe COVID-19, critically illRemdesivir for 5 days plus chloroquine for 5 daysNone↑ liver enzymes (severe)
Zampino et al. [61]Retrospective
(N = 5)		Hospitalized with severe COVID-19, critically illRemdesivir for up to 10 days; four patients received hydroxychloroquineNone↑ liver enzymes in all four patients who also received hydroxychloroquine (moderate–severe)
Montastruc et al. [62]Retrospective
(N = 387)		WHO’s VigiBase database of safety reportsRemdesivir up to 10 daysNone30% ↑ liver enzymes (severity not specified)
Van Laar et al. [63]Retrospective
(N = 103)		Hospitalized with severe COVID-19, non-critically illRemdesivir for 5 daysNone42% ↑ liver enzymes (mild–moderate, except for one patient with severe)
Garibaldi et al. [36]Retrospective
(N = 2299; 570 propensity matched)		Hospitalized with severe COVID-19Remdesivir for 5 to 10 daysStandard of care10% ↑ liver enzymes (severity not specified)
Grein et al. [58]Prospective, descriptive (N = 61)Hospitalized with severe COVID-19, including critically illRemdesivir for 10 daysNone23% ↑ liver enzymes (mild–moderate)
Antinori et al. [59]Prospective, descriptive (N = 35)Hospitalized with severe COVID-19, including critically illRemdesivir up to 10 daysNone43% ↑ liver enzymes (severity not specified)
Burwick et al. [60]Prospective, descriptive (N = 86)Pregnant or postpartum womenRemdesivir up to 10 daysNone9% ↑ ALT (grade 3), 5% ↑ AST (grade 3)
Wang et al. [30]RCT, double blind (N = 236)Hospitalized with severe COVID-19; excluded cirrhosis or baseline grade 3 ↑ liver enzymesRemdesivir up to 10 daysPlacebo10% vs. 9% ↑ liver enzymes (grade 3 or higher),
5% vs. 12% ↑ AST (grade 3 or higher)
Goldman et al. [64] (SIMPLE-1 Severe)RCT, open label (N = 397)Hospitalized with severe COVID-19, non-critically ill; excluded baseline grade 3 ↑ liver enzymesRemdesivir up to 10 daysRemdesivir up to 5 days8% vs. 6% ↑ ALT (grade 3 or higher),
6% vs. 7% ↑ AST (grade 3 or higher)
Spinner et al. [31] (SIMPLE-2 Moderate)RCT, open label (N = 584)Hospitalized with moderate COVID-19; excluded baseline grade 3 ↑ liver enzymesRemdesivir up to 10 daysStandard of care3% vs. 8% ↑ ALT (grade 3 or higher),
1% vs. 6% ↑ AST (grade 3 or higher)
Beigel et al. [32] (ACTT-1)RCT, double blind (N = 1062)Hospitalized patients with mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19; excluded baseline grade 3 ↑ liver enzymesRemdesivir up to 10 daysPlacebo2.3% vs. 4.7% ↑ ALT (grade 3 or higher),
3.4% vs. 6.4% ↑ AST (grade 3 or higher)
Kalil et al. [65]
(ACTT-2)		RCT, double blind (N = 1033)Hospitalized patients with mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19; excluded baseline grade 3 ↑ liver enzymesRemdesivir up to 10 days plus baricitinib up to 14 daysRemdesivir up to 10 days plus placebo0.8% vs. 0.6% ↑ ALT (grade 3 or higher),
1.4% vs. 0.6% ↑ AST (grade 3 or higher)
WHO Solidarity Interim Results [33]RCT, open label (N = 5475)Hospitalized with mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19, including critically illRemdesivir up to 10 daysStandard of careSafety data not reported
Ader et al. [34] (DisCoVeRy)RCT, open label (N = 857)Hospitalized with moderate or severe COVID-19, including critically illRemdesivir up to 10 days plus standard of careStandard of care alone3% vs. 1% ↑ transaminases
WHO Solidarity Final Results [37]RCT, open label (N = 8275)Hospitalized with mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19, including critically illRemdesivir up to 10 daysStandard of careSafety data not reported
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

FakhriRavari, A.; Malakouti, M. Remdesivir and the Liver: A Concise Narrative Review of Remdesivir-Associated Hepatotoxicity in Patients Hospitalized Due to COVID-19. Pharmacoepidemiology 2024, 3, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma3010005

AMA Style

FakhriRavari A, Malakouti M. Remdesivir and the Liver: A Concise Narrative Review of Remdesivir-Associated Hepatotoxicity in Patients Hospitalized Due to COVID-19. Pharmacoepidemiology. 2024; 3(1):69-81. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma3010005

Chicago/Turabian Style

FakhriRavari, Alireza, and Mazyar Malakouti. 2024. "Remdesivir and the Liver: A Concise Narrative Review of Remdesivir-Associated Hepatotoxicity in Patients Hospitalized Due to COVID-19" Pharmacoepidemiology 3, no. 1: 69-81. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma3010005

APA Style

FakhriRavari, A., & Malakouti, M. (2024). Remdesivir and the Liver: A Concise Narrative Review of Remdesivir-Associated Hepatotoxicity in Patients Hospitalized Due to COVID-19. Pharmacoepidemiology, 3(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma3010005

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop