Next Article in Journal
Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Population Dynamics of Two Sympatric Species: The Rock Shrimps Sicyonia dorsalis Kingsley, 1878 and Sicyonia typica (Boeck, 1864) (Penaeoidea: Sicyoniidae) on the Coast of Ilhéus, Bahia, Northeastern Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
The Prevalence of Egg Parasitoids of Two Cobweb Spiders in a Tropical Urban Gradient
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Two New Species of Crayfish of the Genus Cherax (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae) from Western and Eastern Indonesian New Guinea †

by
Christian Lukhaup
1,*,
Rury Eprilurahman
2 and
Thomas von Rintelen
3
1
Independent Researcher, 66999 Hinterweidenthal, Germany
2
Animal Systematics Laboratory, Department of Tropical Biology, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Teknika Selatan, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
3
Museum für Naturkunde—Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9AC7BBF5-CA21-4105-BDB0-FC17794AF481.
Arthropoda 2024, 2(4), 264-293; https://doi.org/10.3390/arthropoda2040019
Submission received: 18 October 2024 / Revised: 11 December 2024 / Accepted: 16 December 2024 / Published: 20 December 2024

Abstract

:
Two new species of the genus Cherax are described and illustrated. Cherax rayko n. sp., endemic to the Bian River drainage basin in the Muting District, in the northern part of the Merauke Regency, South Papua, Indonesia, is described, figured, and compared with its closest relatives, Cherax alyciae, Lukhaup, Eprilurahman & von Rintelen, 2018, and Cherax peknyi Lukhaup & Herbert, 2008. The new species may be easily distinguished from both by the shape of the rostrum, the shape of the chelae, the shape of the scaphocerite, and the coloration. Cherax phing n. sp., endemic to the Kali Ombak River drainage basin in the western part of the Kepala Burung (Vogelkop) Peninsula, Southwest Papua, Indonesia, is described, figured, and compared with its closest relatives, Cherax pulcher Lukhaup, 2015a, Cherax boesemani Lukhaup & Pekny, 2008, Cherax wagenknechtae Lukhaup and Eprilurahman, 2022, and Cherax gherardii Patoka, Bláha & Kouba, 2015. The new species may be easily distinguished from the latter species by the shape of the chelae, rostrum, and body and by the coloration. A molecular phylogeny based on a mitochondrial gene fragment, 16S, supports the morphology-based description of the two new species, which can also be clearly distinguished by sequence differences.

1. Introduction

The crayfishes of the island of New Guinea of the genus Cherax, which is a species-rich taxon occurring in Indonesia (Papua), Papua New Guinea, and Australia, were extensively studied by Holthuis [1,2,3,4,5,6], with additions by Lukhaup and Pekny [7,8], Lukhaup and Herbert [9], Lukhaup [10], Lukhaup et al. [11,12,13], Patoka et al. [14,15,16], and Lukhaup and Eprilurahman [17].
Nevertheless, over the last two decades, there has been an increasing number of colorful crayfish specimens, presumed to be a further undescribed species, sold from New Guinea in the ornamental fish trade in Europe and Asia under the names Cherax “tiger” and “zebra”. These have been exported to many countries in Europe and East Asia and recently also to the USA and Canada. While they are clearly a species of Cherax, their exact provenance could not be ascertained, with dealers claiming they came from Merauke (Southwest Papua) and other places in the area that could not be confirmed. In the present contribution, this species is described as new to science, and it is established that it is in fact native and endemic to the Bian River drainage basin in the Muting District, in the northern part of the Merauke Regency.
Cherax rayko n. sp. is genetically and morphologically most similar to Cherax alyciae Lukhaup et al., 2018 [13], endemic to creeks in the Digul River drainage basin in the eastern part of the Boven Digoel Regency, Papua, Indonesia, and to Cherax peknyi Lukhaup & Herbert, 2008 [9], from the Fly River drainage basin, in the Western Province of Papua New Guinea.
In January 2016, the first author received a picture of an undescribed crayfish from Heiko Bleher, a well-known fish collector and explorer, which he photographed on one of his trips to the Lake Ajamaru region. Unfortunately, no exact location was provided for this crayfish. Shortly afterwards, the first author showed the picture to Liauw Pauw Phing, who advised his crayfish search team in Sorong, West Papua, to find the crayfish that was believed to inhabit some rivers north of Lake Ajamaru in the Hutan District, Tambrauw Regency (pers. comm. to first author by Heiko Bleher).
In 2020, Mr. Phing and his team were able find the crayfish in the Kali Ombak River, which is close to the Seni Village, Hutan District, Tambrauw Regency. The crayfish were shipped to Aquarium Dietzenbach and Christian Lukhaup by Mr. Phing and his team. Here, this species is also described as new to science.

2. Materials and Methods

Cherax rayko n. sp. were collected from creeks in the Bian River drainage basin in the Muting District, in the neighborhood of the village Muting (Table 1). According to the dealer, several people in the village collect these crayfish for the pet trade. After collection, they are kept for several days in cages in the river before the dealer picks them up and brings them to Merauke, from where they are shipped to Jakarta and then to Europe. We received several animals from one of these shipments. Holotypes and allotypes were photographed and kept alive in indoor tanks until samples were obtained for DNA analysis.
Samples of Cherax phing sp.nov., C. pulcherC. boesemaniC. wagenknechtaeC. woworae, and C. gherardii were collected from creeks in West Papua and Papua Provinces (Table 1). Holotypes and allotypes were photographed and kept alive in indoor tanks until samples were obtained for DNA analysis.
After this procedure, the animals were preserved in 70% ethanol. Morphometric parameters of all individuals were taken using an electronic digital caliper with an accuracy of 0.1 mm. For the molecular analyses, sequences from an additional ten species of Cherax and from two other parastacid genera used as outgroups were downloaded from GenBank (see Table 1).
All studied material has been deposited at the Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense (=Bidang Zoologi) Research Centre for Biosystematics and Evolution (=Pusat Riset Biosistematika dan Evolusi), National Research and Innovation Agency (=BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km 46 Cibinong 16911, Indonesia (MZB), and the Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin (ZMB).
DNA was purified from about 2 mm3 of muscle tissue with a Qiagen QiaCube using the manufacturer’s protocol. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify a mitochondrial gene fragment, a ~535 bp region of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene (16S) using primers 1471 and 1472 [18].
The PCR was performed in 25 µL volumes containing 1x Taq buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM each dNTP, 1 U Taq polymerase, ca. 50–100 ng DNA, and ddH2O. After an initial denaturation step of 3 min at 94 °C, the cycling conditions were 35 cycles at 94 °C for 35 s, 50 °C for 60 s, and 72 °C for 90 s, with a final elongation step of 5 min at 72 °C. The same primers were used in PCR and sequencing. The PCR products were sent to Macrogen Europe for the purification and cycle sequencing of both strands of each gene.
The sequences were aligned with MAFFT using the G-INS-i strategy suitable for thorough alignments of sequences with global homology [19]. The resulting alignment had a length of 542 bp. To determine the best substitution model for Bayesian information analyses (see below), hierarchical likelihood ratio tests were carried out with jModelTest [20] (24 models tested). Based on the Akaike Information Criterion and the Bayesian Inference Criterion, the HKY + G model was chosen.
Table 1. Material studied with GenBank accession numbers. Sequences of species represented by more than one sequence are listed consecutively, as labeled in Table 1.
Table 1. Material studied with GenBank accession numbers. Sequences of species represented by more than one sequence are listed consecutively, as labeled in Table 1.
SpeciesLocation (Adjusted to the Current Regional Division)GenBank Acc. NO. 16SSources
 Cherax boesemaniAjamaru Lake, Maybrat Regency, Southwest Papua, Indonesia; 1°17′19.97″ S, 132°14′49.14″ E; 23 January 2016KY654089
KY654090
Lukhaup et al., 2017 [12]
 Cherax alyciaeUnnamed creek, Boven Digoel Regency, South Papua, Indonesia; 7 December 2016MH457588
MH457589
MH457590
Lukhaup et al., 2018 [13]
 Cherax communisPaniai Lake, Paniai Regency, Central Papua, IndonesiaMH457602Lukhaup et al., 2018 [13]
 Cherax gherardiiPet tradeKU821417Blaha et al., 2016 [21]
 Cherax holthuisiUter-Aitinjo Lake, Maybrat Regency, Southwest Papua, IndonesiaKU821433Blaha et al., 2016 [21]
 Cherax misolicusMisool Island, Raja Ampat Regency, Southwest Papua, Indonesia (Leiden Museum)KJ920813Eprilurahman et al. (unpublished)
 Cherax monticolaBaliem River, Wamena, Jayawijaya Regency, Highland Papua, IndonesiaKF649851
KJ920818
Gan et al., 2014 [22]
 Cherax mosessalossaKlademak Creek, Sorong City, Southwest Papua, Indonesia; 0°52′23.59″ S, 131°16′24.40″ E; 26 January 2016MH457594
MH457595
Lukhaup et al., 2018 [13]
 Cherax paniaicusTage Lake, Paniai Regency, Central Papua, IndonesiaKJ920830Eprilurahman et al. (unpublished)
 Cherax peknyiUnnamed creek, tributary of Fly River, Papua New GuineaMH457591
MH457592
MH457596
Lukhaup et al., 2018 [13]
Cherax phing n. sp.Unnamed creek, Klasabun River drainage basin, Sorong Regency, Southwest Papua, Indonesia; 1°02′41.8″ S, 132°15′51.9″ E; January 2020PQ777188
PQ777189
PQ777190
This study
 Cherax pulcherHoa Creek (Teminabuan District), South Sorong Regency, Southwest Papua, Indonesia; 1°28′32.73″ S, 132°3′54.94″ E; 23 January 2016KY654088Lukhaup et al., 2017 [12]
Cherax rayko n. sp.Unnamed creek of Bian River drainage basin, Muting District, Merauke Regency, South Papua, Indonesia; January 2015PQ777193
PQ777194
PQ777195
This study
 Cherax snowdenOinsok (Ainsok River drainage basin), Southwest Papua, Indonesia; 1°11′40,07″ S, 131°50′1.14″ E; 24 January 2016KY654087Lukhaup et al., 2017 [12]
Cherax sp. AMogoi, West Papua, Indonesia; September 2020PQ777191
PQ777192
This study
Cherax sp. BMisool Barat, Raja Ampat, Southwest Papua, IndonesiaPQ777185
PQ777186
PQ777187
This study
 Cherax wagenknechtaeAlong banks of unnamed creek of the Klasabun River drainage basin, Sorong Regency, Southwest Papua, Indonesia; 1°15′59.91″ S, 131°18′21.29″ E; 2016 OP737872
OP737873
Lukhaup and Eprilurahman, 2022 [17]
 Cherax warsamsonicusSmall tributary to Warsamson River, Sorong Regency, Southwest Papua, Indonesia; 0°49′16.62″ S, 131°23′3.34″ E; 20 January 2016KY654091Lukhaup et al., 2017 [12]
 Cherax woworaeTeminabuan District, South Sorong Regency, Southwest Papua, IndonesiaOQ474905
OQ474906
Patoka et al., 2023 [15]
 Engaeus strictifronsCrawford River, Victoria, AustraliaAF492812Munasinghe et al., 2003 [23]
 Euastacus bispinosusCrawford River, Victoria, AustraliaAF492813Munasinghe et al., 2003 [23]
Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed by maximum parsimony (MP) using the heuristic search algorithm, as implemented in PAUP* [24], with gaps treated as the fifth base. Support for nodes was estimated by bootstrap analysis (1000 bootstrap replicates with 10 random addition sequence replicates each). Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were run with IQ-TREE [25] using W-IQ-TREE [26], and branch support was obtained through the implemented ultrafast bootstrap (10,000 replicates [27]). In addition, Bayesian inference was employed to infer phylogeny by using MrBayes 3.2.7 [28]. The MCMCMC algorithm was run with four independent chains for 20,000,000 generations, samplefreq = 500, and burnin = 25%, using the models specified above. Genetic distances were calculated using MEGA 11.0.13 [29].
All new sequences have been deposited in GenBank (see Table 1).
Systematics.
Parastacidae Huxley, 1879 [30].
Genus Cherax Erichson, 1846 [31].
Cherax rayko n. sp.
Material examined. Holotype: male (MZB Cru 5792), under rocks and among roots and in debris along banks of unnamed creek of the Bian River drainage basin in the Muting District, South Papua, Indonesia. Coll. local people. January 2015. Crayfish were sent to us by KKCrayfish Farm in Jakarta. Allotype: female (MZB Cru 5793), same data as holotype. Paratypes: 5 males and 4 females (MZB Cru 5794); 4 males and 2 females (ZMB 33408); same data as holotype.
Diagnosis. Carapace surface smooth; one small spine and two granules posterior to cervical groove on lateral carapace present. Eyes large, pigmented. Cornea as broad as eyestalk. Rostrum triangular in shape with elevated, thickened margins, non-setose. Rostral margins with two prominent teeth. Rostral carinae prominent. Postorbital ridges prominent with one acute spine at anterior terminus. Propodal cutting edge with short setae in posterior part and one large tubercle. Chelipeds white and blueish, sometimes blue. Other walking legs blue-gray. Carapace usually blue and orange to yellow; pleon with orange-yellowish lateral stripes on a dark green or blackish background.
Description of male holotype (Figure 1A,B, Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4A,B). Body and eyes pigmented. Eyes not reduced. Body subovate, slightly compressed laterally. Pleon narrower than cephalothorax (width 23.3 mm and 26.2 mm, respectively). Rostrum (Figure 4A) broad in shape, reaching the end of ultimate antennular peduncle and about 2.5 times as long as wide (width 6.9 mm at base, length 15.7 mm). Margins slightly elevated continuing in rostral carinae on carapace, almost straight in basal part, distal third, pointing upwards at angle of approximately 45°. Acumen with anteriorly orientated spine. A few scattered hairs present on anterior third of rostrum.
Rostral carinae extending as slight elevations posteriorly on carapace terminating at half of postorbital ridges. Postorbital ridges well developed, terminating in spiniform tubercle anteriorly, fading at half of occipital carapace length, posteriorly. Postorbital ridges about 2/3 of CL. Cervical and branchiocardiac grooves distinct, non-setose; 1 small spine and 2–3 granules present at middle part behind cervical groove on lateral sides of carapace. Carapace (57.9 mm) surface smooth; anterior margin strongly produced; rounded upper margin directed inward.
Areola smooth; length, 19.5 mm; narrowest width, 8.1 mm. Length of areola 33.6% of total length of carapace (57.9 mm).
Scaphocerite (Figure 4B), broadest at posterior third, convex in distal part becoming narrower in basal part; thickened lateral margin terminating in corneous spine, slightly overreaching ultimate segment of antennular peduncle. Left scaphocerite 12.4 mm long and 4.1 mm wide. Proximal margins setose. Antennulae and antennae typical for genus. Antennae slightly longer than body. Antennular peduncle reaching acumen; antennal peduncle slightly overreaching apex of scaphocerite. Antennal protopodite smooth, without spine, with row of hairs on inner margin; basicerite with one lateral and one ventral spine.
Mouthparts typical for genus. Epistome with subcordiform cephalic lobe anteriorly bearing lanceolate cephalomedian projection constricted at base. Lateral margins of lobe not thickened; each lateral margin with a group of very small tubercles separated by a smooth region. Central part smooth, not pitted, excavate. Eyes rather large; cornea globular, darkly pigmented, nearly as long as eyestalk; eyestalk slightly narrower than cornea.
First pereopods (Figure 3A,B) equal in form, chela, gaping. Right cheliped 63.0 mm long, 13.5 mm high, and 24.0 mm wide. Left chelae 63.2 mm long and 13.8 mm high, 23.8 mm wide, strongly compressed. Fingers shorter than palm (right dactylus 29.9 mm long). Dactylus broad at base (10.2 mm), tapering slightly towards tip.
Tip with sharp, corneous, hooked tooth pointing outwards at an angle of 10°. Cutting edge of dactyl with continuous row of small granular teeth posteriorly and one prominent larger tooth at middle of cutting edge. Ventral and dorsal surface of movable finger smooth with scattered punctuation. Ventral posterior half of cutting edge with dense setae reaching from base to prominent larger tooth. Fixed finger smooth, scattered punctuation, triangular, merging gradually into palm, ending in sharp, corneous, hooked tooth, parallel to x-axis of finger. Tips of fingers slightly cross when fingers clasp. Upper surface of palm practically smooth, slightly pitted, more densely pitted at margins. Fixed finger slightly broader than dactyl at base (11.3 mm). Dense, short setae present in posterior ventral part of fixed finger, reaching from palm to about half of cutting edge. Cutting edge of fixed finger with row of rather small granular teeth at posterior half and one prominent larger one at first third. Outer lateral margin of chelae smooth. Row of 23–24 mesial probodal granules at dorsolateral margin. Dorsolateral margins elevated.
Dorsal surface of carpus (17.1 mm) smooth, with slight excavation in middle part and with a well-developed mesial carpal spine. Ventral carpal surface margins slightly elevated, non-setose, and with fovea; inner margin with well-developed ventral carpal spine and a prominent ventromesial carpal spine oriented at an angle of approx. 45°.
Merus (25.5 mm) laterally depressed in basal part; surface smooth; small dorsal meral spine present. Inner ventrolateral margin densely covered with small granules; three ventral meral spines present, one at mid-length, other in middle of anterior part, and third on distal ventrolateral inner margin.
Ischium (16.1 mm) smooth with two small spines at ventrolateral inner margin.
Second pereopods reaching anteriorly to approximately mid-length of scaphocerite. Propodus (13.7 mm) and dactylus (6.9 mm) slightly longer than fixed finger (6.5 mm), of same height. A few scattered short setae present on dactyl and fixed finger. Cutting edge of dactyl and propodus with row of dense, short setae. Carpus (10.7 mm), smooth, slightly pitted. Merus (28.3 mm); ischium (8.5 mm) about one-third as long as merus.
Third pereopods overreaching second pereopods by length of finger of second pereopods. Fingers shorter than palm.
Fourth pereopods reaching distal margin of scaphocerite. Dactylus (5.2 mm) with corneous tip. Short, scattered setae present. Propodus (11.1 mm) more than twice as long as dactylus, somewhat flattened, carrying many stiff setae on lower margin. Merus (14.7 mm) slightly longer than propodus.
Fifth pereopods similar to fourth, slightly shorter.
Dorsal surface of pleon smooth, with scattered pits; abdominal segments (1–5) with short setae present on caudal margins of segment. Pleon length 65.9 mm.
Telson with posterolateral spines; dense short setae present in posterior third. Posterior margins setose. Uropodal protopod with two distal spines on mesial lobe. Exopod of uropod with transverse row of posteriorly directed diminutive spines ending in one more prominent spine, posteriorly directed on outer margin of mesial lobe. Terminal half of exopod with small spines and short hairs, slightly corrugated. Endopod of uropod smooth. Short, scattered hairs present on posterior third of dorsal exopod. Posterolateral spine on outer margin present. Second spine on medial dorsal surface present, directed posteriorly.
Description of female allotype (Figure 5). Chela of first pereopods equal, 2.4 times as long as broad (33.7 mm and 13.7 mm, respectively). Mesial margin of palm slightly elevated, forming slender serrated ridge with row of 15–16 small granular teeth. Cutting edge of dactylus with 10–11 rather small granular teeth. Cutting edge of fixed finger with 11–12 small granules. Small scattered short setae visible along ventral cutting edges of chelae, denser and longer in ventral posterior area. Tips of fingers slightly cross when fingers clasp, not gaping. Rostrum broad in shape, reaching the end of ultimate antennular peduncle. Margins slightly elevated continuing in rostral carinae on carapace, almost straight in basal part, distal third, pointing upwards at angle of approximately 45°. Acumen with anteriorly orientated spine. A few scattered hairs present on anterior third of rostrum. Cervical groove distinct, non-setose; three small granules present. Cephalothorax just slightly wider than pleon (widths 17.7 mm and 18.0 mm, respectively). Same color pattern as in males. Size 90 mm.
Size. The biggest male examined is the holotype, and it has a carapace length of 57.9 mm and a total length of 123.8 mm. The other males have a total length of between 82.1 mm and 122.9 mm; the allotype has a carapace length of 56.6 mm and a total length of 90.0 mm. The other females have a total length of between 96.4 mm and 79.2 mm (n = 11).
Color. The living animals (Figure 1A–C) are colored as follows. Individuals of Cherax rayko sp.nov. usually have white to creamy and sometimes blueish-white chelae; the cephalon is blueish fading to creamy-white ventrolaterally. Rostral margins are usually orange. The thorax is usually orange to yellow, fading to a creamy-yellow ventrolaterally. Chelae are creamy with blue becoming blueish-gray to the outer lateral margin. In some individuals, the chelae can be bright blue or grayish-blue. The pleon is usually dark green or blackish-green with broad orange to yellowish stripes. Females: same color as males, sometimes less intense with smaller chelae.
Molecular phylogenetic results. Cherax rayko n. sp. forms a highly supported, distinct clade that is the sister species to C. alyciae with moderate support; both species are in turn sister to C. peknyi (Figure 6). The clade comprising these three species is highly supported and very distinct; its next relatives are C. communis and C. panaicus (which are sister groups with high support) and C. monticola and C. misolicus. The relationship of these four species to the clade containing Cherax rayko n. sp. is unresolved. Cherax rayko n. sp. is well isolated from C. alyciae and C. peknyi with a sequence divergence (p-distance, 16S) of 1.3–1.5% and 2.4–2.9%, respectively, supporting the morphology-based description of C. rayko as a new species. Cherax rayko n. sp. is genetically and morphologically most similar to C. alyciae Lukhaup et al., 2018 [1], endemic to creeks in the Digul River drainage basin in the eastern part of the Boven Digoel Regency, Papua, Indonesia, and to Cherax peknyi from the Fly River drainage basin, in the Western Province of Papua New Guinea.
Systematic position. Holthuis [1] in his publication on the New Guinea Cherax considered that the species should be placed into two groups, one with the rostral and median carinae absent or weakly developed and referred to as the Cherax group following the characteristics of the type species, C. preissii (Erichson, 1846) [31] from southwest Australia, and the other group containing species that have the rostral and sometimes the median carina well developed and referred to as the Astaconephrops group with Nobili’s (1899) [32Astaconephrops albertisii as the type. Newly described species have been placed into one or the other of the two subgenera [6,7,9,11,14]. Munasinghe et al. [33,34], Austin [35], and Austin and Knott [36], however, identified three lineages with different geographic ranges within Cherax based on molecular genetics and phylogenetic studies. These consist of a southwestern group, an eastern group, and a northern group. While support for the latter group, however, was based on only very limited sampling (e.g., single samples of C. quadricarinatusC. rhynchotus, and C. peknyi in the Munasinghe et al. study [23]), a later study by Blaha et al. [20] confirmed these results based on a more extensive dataset. These findings suggest that the division of Cherax into two subgenera, as conceived by Holthuis and subsequent authors dealing with New Guinea crayfish, has to be reconsidered, as pointed out by Crandall and De Grave [37]. Based on these studies [20,23,32,33], Cherax rayko n. sp. clearly belongs to the northern species group lineage, now consisting of 28 species.

3. Systematic Remarks

In comparison to all species of the northern group, the new species, C. rayko n. sp., is most similar to C. peknyi and C. alyciae. Cherax rayko n. sp. may be easily distinguished from both species by using sequence divergence, by the coloration and pattern of live individuals, by the shape of the chelae, and by the shape of the rostrum.
Cherax rayko n. sp. differs from C. peknyi in the following characters: the size, shape of the chelae, shape of the body, and coloration. Catchers also presented some other color forms that are genetically and morphologically very close to Cherax rayko n. sp., claiming they are from the Wanggo, Bian, and Kumbe Rivers in the Merauke Regency.
Size comparison. In C. rayko n. sp., the biggest males reach up to 130 mm (n = 300); the biggest male in C. peknyi is the holotype with 92 mm (n = 120), while the biggest males in C. alyciae reach 123 mm (n = 124).
Coloration comparison. C. rayko n. sp., C. peknyi, and C. alyciae (Figure 7). Individuals of Cherax rayko n. sp. from the Bian River drainage basin in the Muting District usually have white to creamy and sometimes blueish-white chelae; the cephalon is blueish fading to creamy-white ventrolaterally. The rostral margins are usually orange. The thorax is usually orange to yellow, fading to a creamy-yellow ventrolaterally. The chelae are creamy with blue, becoming blueish-gray to the outer lateral margin. In some individuals the chelae can be bright blue or grayish-blue. The pleon is usually dark green or blackish-green with broad orange to yellowish stripes.
The coloration of C. peknyi is as follows. The chelae are red to orange, fading to pinkish-white anteriorly; the distal tip is blueish-gray. The legs (except for first pair) are greenish-gray with orange joints. The cephalic region is greenish-gray, fading to a yellowish-green laterally; the dorsal thoracic region is brown-orange, fading to yellow laterally and becoming cream ventrolaterally. The pleon is green with broad yellow bands. The telson is green, becoming yellow to orange mesolaterally. The distal margin of the tail fan is pale orange.
In C. alyciae, the chelae are light to dark blue with white margins and a white patch. The anterior part is usually dark blue, more intensely colored. The corneous tooth on the tip of the fingers is orange. The cephalothorax is bright blue, dorsally more intense from purple to greenish-blue, fading ventrally to light blue. The joints between the propodus and carpus and between the carpus and merus are bright orange-red. Segments of the pleon are dark blue to black; the lateral pleura is lighter, becoming blueish-green. There are light blue transverse bands in the posterior part of each pleonary somite. The walking legs are light blue with orange joints. The distal margin of the tail fan is creamy-orange to orange. Some animals are darker and differ in the coloration of the chelae. The chelae are dark blue to black, becoming orange-red at the outer lateral margin. The dorsolateral margins are light blue. These males usually also have orange or yellow rostral margins.
Chelae comparison (Figure 8A–F). In C. rayko n. sp., the movable finger is usually as long as the dorsolateral margin of the palm. No soft patch is present on the outer margin. In total, 23–24 mesial probodal granules are present at the dorsolateral margin. Dense, short setae are present on the ventral part of the fixed finger and palm. In C. alyciae, the movable finger is about one-third shorter than the dorsolateral margin of the palm. A soft patch at the outer margin of the palm is present in males. The dorsolateral margins of the palm are just slightly elevated, with a row of 12–15 rather weakly developed granules present. Scattered, short setae are present on the ventral part of the fixed finger and palm. In C. peknyi, the carpus with the mesiolateral part is slightly elevated to form a slender serrated ridge with row of 16–18 small, blunt spines. The movable finger is about one-third longer than the dorsolateral margin of the palm. Dense, long setae are present on the ventral part of the fixed finger and palm.
Rostrum comparison (Figure 9A–C). The rostrum of C. rayko n. sp. is broad at the base, and at about one-third of the length, it bends inwards. The rostrum of C. alyciae is rather straight and triangular-shaped, while the rostrum of C. peknyi is clearly bent outwards at the middle part.
C. rayko n. sp. has 4–5 small granules at the middle part behind the cervical groove on the lateral side of the carapace, while C. peknyi has 3–4 anteriorly directed spines present, and C. alyciae has six tiny and weakly developed tubercles there.
Cherax rayko n. sp. is found in the Bian River drainage basin in the Muting District in South Papua, Indonesia, while C. peknyi is known to be present in the Fly River floodplain and in the foothills of the mountains near the provincial capital of Kiunga, Western Province, Papua New Guinea. C. alyciae is found in creeks and rivers of the Digul River drainage basin in the eastern part of the Boven Digoel Regency, Papua, Indonesia (Figure 10).
Etymology. Cherax rayko n. sp. is named after Rayko Eloy Lukhaup, the son of the first author. Rayko was very present in the process of the description, providing love and understanding.
Ecology. It is endemic to the Bian River drainage basin and its tributaries. One of the creeks harboring these crayfish is shallow (20–100 cm) with a moderate flow. The temperature is around 25–26 °C. In most parts, no water plants are present. The substrate of the creek is silt or sand and soil mostly covered with silt and detritus. Crayfish hide in short burrows in the riverbank, under larger rocks, or in detritus that is present in all the parts of the creek. The creek is surrounded by forest. To improve the knowledge of the distribution of this species, more field surveys will be necessary.
Common name. As the common name for this crayfish, we propose the Tiger Crayfish, as it is already available under this name in the pet trade.
 Cherax phing n. sp.
Material examined. Holotype: male (MZB Cru 5795), under rocks and among roots and in debris along banks of unnamed creek of the Kali Ombak River drainage basin, West Papua, Indonesia. Coll. Jumrah Sukawati, Ripa Maricel Nicolae, and local people. January, 2020. GPS (1°02′41.8″ S, 132°15′51.9″ E). Crayfish samples sent to us by KKCrayfish in Jakarta. Allotype: female (MZB Cru 5796), same data as holotype. Paratypes: six males, four females (MZB Cru 5797); four males, three females (ZMB 33781); same data as holotype.
Diagnosis. Carapace surface smooth; three bigger spines and one small posterior to cervical groove on lateral carapace present. Eyes large, pigmented. Eyestalk slightly narrower than cornea. Rostrum lance-shaped with elevated, thickened margins, non-setose. Rostral margins with three prominent teeth on one side and two on the other. Posterior extensions of the rostral margins prominent. Postorbital ridges prominent with one acute spine at anterior terminus. Uncalcified patch on lateral margin of chelae of adult male, white, translucent. Propodal cutting edge with very few short setae in posterior part and one larger tubercle. Chelae dark blue, becoming whitish pale to creamy in the lateral part. Fixed finger and dactyl with hooked dark orange tips anteriorly. Dorsolateral margins of chelae slightly elevated in posterior third, same color as chelae. Other walking legs blueish, becoming creamy-blue posteriorly. Carapace blueish to green-creamy, and pleon blue-greenish with horizontal creamy bands.
Description of male holotype (Figure 11 and Figure 12A–C). Body and eyes pigmented. Eyes not reduced, rather large; cornea globular, darkly pigmented, nearly as long as eyestalk; eyestalk slightly narrower than cornea. Body subovate, slightly compressed laterally. Pleon narrower than cephalothorax (width 25.7 mm and 28.6 mm, respectively). Rostrum (Figure 12C) broad in shape, reaching end of ultimate antennular peduncle and about two times as long as wide (width 6.8 mm at base, length 13.05 mm). Margins slightly elevated, continuing in rostral carinae on carapace, almost straight in basal part, distally tapering towards apex. Lateral rostral margin bearing three prominent teeth in distal half on one side and two on the other side, pointing upwards at angle of approximately 45°. A few scattered short hairs present between the distal teeth and the acumen. Acumen with anteriorly orientated spine.
Rostral carinae extending as slight elevation posteriorly on carapace terminating at ending of postorbital ridges. Postorbital ridges well developed, terminating in spiniform tubercle anteriorly, fading at half of occipital carapace length, posteriorly. Postorbital ridges about one-sixth of CL. Cervical and branchiocardiac grooves distinct, non-setose; three small spines and one small tubercle present. Carapace surface smooth; ventrolateral margins rounded, slightly elevated.
Areola length, 21.7 mm; narrowest width, 10.3 mm. Length of areola 34.3% of total length of carapace (63.1 mm). Sparsely pitted.
Scaphocerite broadest at posterior third, convex in distal part, becoming narrower in basal part; thickened lateral margin terminating in corneous spine, slightly overreaching ultimate segment of antennular peduncle. Right scaphocerite 15.0 mm long and 5.1 mm wide. Rounded inner margin strongly covered by setae. Antennulae and antennae typical for genus. Antennae slightly longer than body. Antennular peduncle slightly overreaching acumen; antennal peduncle slightly overreaching tip of apex of scaphocerite. Antennal protopodite smooth, no spine, with row of hairs on inner margin; basicerite with one lateral and one ventral spine.
Mouthparts typical for the genus. Epistome with subcordiform cephalic lobe anteriorly bearing lanceolate cephalomedian projection constricted at base. Lateral margins of lobe not thickened; each lateral margin with two groups of 10–12 tubercles separated by the smooth central part. Central part smooth, not pitted, excavate.
First pereopods equal in form, chela gaping. Right chela 65.0 mm long, 12.7 mm high, and 26.5 mm wide. Left chelae (Figure 12A,B) 65.1 mm long and 13.1 mm high, 25.9 mm wide, strongly compressed. Fingers shorter than palm (right dactylus 21.5 mm long). Dactylus broad at base (11.6 mm), tapering slightly towards tip.
Tip with sharp, corneous, hooked tooth pointing outwards at an angle of about 45°. Cutting edge of dactyl with continuous row of 9–10 small granular teeth and 1 slightly larger tooth at middle of cutting edge. Ventral and dorsal surface of movable finger smooth with scattered punctuation. No setae present. Fixed finger smooth, scattered punctuation, triangular, merging gradually into palm, ending in sharp, corneous tip. Tips of fingers slightly cross when fingers clasp. Upper surface of palm practically smooth, slightly pitted, more densely pitted at margins. Fixed finger broader than dactyl at base (13.4 mm). Very few scattered short setae present in posterior ventral part of fixed finger, reaching from base to about one-third of fixed finger. Cutting edge of fixed finger with row of 4–5 rather small granular teeth at posterior half and 1 larger one at mid-length. Outer lateral margin of chelae with swollen soft and uncalcified patch (37.7 mm on the right chelae and 40.7 mm on the left chelae). Row of 9–10 mesial granules at dorsolateral margin. Dorsolateral margins elevated in the posterior third.
Dorsal surface of carpus (21.3 mm) smooth, with slight excavation in middle part and with a well-developed mesial carpal spine. Ventral carpal surface distal margins slightly elevated, non-setose and with fovea; proxilateral margin with well-developed ventral carpal spine and a prominent ventromesial carpal spine oriented at an angle of approximately 45°.
Merus (31.3 mm) laterally depressed in basal part; surface smooth; small dorsal meral spine present. Inner ventrolateral margin with 8–9 small granules; three ventral meral spines present, one at mid-length, other in middle of anterior part, and third on distal ventrolateral inner margin.
Ischium (17.0 mm) smooth with one to two small spines at ventrolateral inner margin.
Second pereopods reaching anteriorly to approximately corneus spine of scaphocerite. Finger (7.5 mm) slightly longer than palm (4.6 mm), of same depth. A few scattered short setae present on dactyl and fixed finger. Cutting edge of fixed finger and carpus with row of dense, short setae. Propodus, 15.3 mm. Carpus, 12.0 mm, smooth, slightly pitted, slightly longer than propodus. Merus (20.4 mm) 1.7 times longer than carpus. Ischium (10.0 mm) about half as long as merus.
Third pereopods overreaching second by length of finger of second pereopods. Fingers shorter than palm.
Fourth pereopods slightly overreaching distal margin of scaphocerite. Dactylus with corneous tip. Short scattered setae present. Propodus (13.0 mm) more than 3 times as long as dactylus (4.0 mm), 1.6 times as long as carpus (8.0 mm); somewhat flattened, with many stiff setae on lower margin. Merus just slightly longer than propodus.
Fifth pereopods similar to fourth, slightly shorter.
Dorsal surface of pleon smooth, with scattered pits; abdominal segments (3–5) with short setae present on caudal margins of segment.
Telson with posterolateral spines; dense short setae present in posterior third. Posterior margins setose. Uropodal protopod with two distal spines on mesial lobe. Exopod of uropod with transverse row of posteriorly directed diminutive spines ending in one more prominent spine, posteriorly directed on outer margin of mesial lobe. Terminal half of exopod with small spines and short hairs, slightly corrugated. Endopod of uropod smooth. Short, scattered hairs present on posterior third of dorsal exopod. Posterolateral spine on outer margin present. Second spine on medial dorsal surface present, directed posteriorly.
Description of female allotype (Figure 13). Chela of first pereopods equal, 2.7 times as long as broad (30.0 mm and 10.9 mm, respectively). No soft patch in distal lateral margin of the chelae of females observed (n = 18). Mesial margin of palm slightly elevated, forming slender serrated ridge with row of 7–8 small granular teeth. Cutting edge of dactylus with 7–8 rather small granular teeth. Cutting edge of fixed finger with 10–11 small granules. Small scattered short setae visible along ventral cutting edges of chelae, denser and longer in ventral posterior area. Tips of fingers slightly cross when fingers clasp, not gaping. Cervical groove distinct, non-setose. Pleon just slightly wider than cephalothorax (widths 19.3 mm and 18.3 mm, respectively). Same color pattern as in males.
Size. The biggest male examined is the paratype with a carapace length of 75.5 mm and a total length of 160 mm; the holotype male has a total length of 136.4 mm, and the other animals have a total length of between 78.5 mm and 139.5 mm; the allotype has a carapace length of 42.6 mm and a total length of 94.0 mm (n = 18).
Color. The living animals (Figure 14A–C) are colored as follows. Chelae dark blue, becoming whitish pale to creamy in the lateral part. Fixed finger and dactyl with hooked dark orange tips anteriorly. Soft patch creamy-whitish. Dorsolateral margins of chelae slightly elevated in the posterior third, same color as chelae. Other walking legs blueish, becoming creamy-blue posteriorly. Carapace blueish to green-creamy, and pleon blue-greenish with horizontal creamy bands. Distal margin of tail fan brownish-red to orange. Females: same color as males, sometimes less intense. Some individuals show less blue-green on the carapax and pleon and are more creamy colored.
Molecular phylogenetic results. C. phing n. sp. is part of a weakly supported clade also comprising C. gherardiiC. woworaeC. boesemaniC. pulcher, and C. wagenknechtae (Figure 6). This clade is a sister group to a highly supported clade comprising C. warsamsonicusC. mosessalossa, and a probably undescribed species of CheraxC. phing n. sp. is well isolated from its closest relatives with a sequence divergence (p-distance) of 3.2% (C. gherardii), 2.2–2.4% (C. woworae), 3.9% (C. boesemani), 4.7% (C. pulcher), and 4.7% (C. wagenknechtae), supporting the morphology-based description of C. phing n. sp. as a new species.
Systematic position. C. phing sp. n. belongs to the northern species group lineage, now consisting of 28 species (please see the respective section for C. rayko n. sp. above for details).

Systematic Remarks

In comparison to all species of the northern group, the new species, C. phing n. sp., is most similar to the crayfish of the C. boesemani group including C. boesemaniC. pulcherC. wagenknechtaeC. gheradiaeC. woworae, and two undescribed species in this group. C. boesemani is a species that is known from the Ajamaru Lake and surrounding creeks. C. wagenknechtae is known to be endemic to the drainage basins of the Beraur and Klasabun Rivers in the Western part of the Kepala Burung (Vogelkop) Peninsula, while C. pulcher is found in Hoa Creek and some other nameless creeks in and around Teminabuan. C. gherardiae Patoka et al. (2015) [6] is described as endemic to the Ajamaru Lake but we cannot confirm this information. In our expedition in 2010, we found this species in creeks on the road between Ajamaru and Teminabuan. No animals of this species were found in Ajamaru Lake at the time of our expedition, and the locals did not identify it from the lake either. As far as we know, the catchers deliberately spread false information to protect the fishing grounds, as the crayfish are sold to the pet trade. C. woworae was described from creeks close to the city of Teminabuan. In our expedition, we found it more south of the city of Teminabuan. In Teminabuan, just C. pulcher is present. Cherax phing n. sp. may be easily distinguished from the crayfish of the Cherax boesemani group by the coloration and pattern of live individuals, the shape of the chelae, the shape of rostrum, and using sequence divergence.
C. phing n. sp. differs from C. boesemani in the following characters: the shape of the chelae (Figure 15) and the coloration (Figure 16). While C. phing n. sp. has dark blue chelae, a blueish to green-creamy carapax, and a blue-greenish pleon with horizontal creamy bands, C. boesemani is usually purple-reddish with some black, sometimes blueish-orange, blue, or purplish-blue. In general, C. boesemani can vary in coloration depending on what river in the Ajamaru area they originate from. The palm is about 3 times longer than the dactyl in C. phing n. sp., while the palm in C. boesemani is about 3.5 longer than the dactyl. There is a row of 8–10 mesial granules at the dorsolateral margin of the chelae in C. phing n. sp., while there are 13–15 in C. boesemani. The dorsolateral margins are elevated in the posterior third in C. phing n. sp., while in C. boesemani, they are elevated in the posterior half. Three small spines and one small tubercle are present in the cervical groove in C. phing n. sp., while there are usually 0–2 spines present in C. boesemani.
C. phing n. sp. differs from C. wagenknechtae in the shape of the chelae (Figure 15), the shape of the rostrum (Figure 17), and the coloration (Figure 16). While C. phing n. sp. has dark blue chelae, a blueish to green-creamy carapace, and a blue-greenish pleon with horizontal creamy bands, C. boesemani is usually purple-reddish with some black, sometimes blueish-orange, blue, or purplish-blue. C. wagenknechtae males from the Klasabun River drainage basin have light to dark red chelae with pink or creamy dorsolateral margins and a white patch. The anterior part is usually dark blue or black, more intensely colored. The corneous tooth on the tip of the fingers is orange. The cephalothorax is bright red to dark red to black, dorsally more intense, fading ventrally to light red or creamy. Segments of the pleon are dark red to bright red; the lateral pleura is lighter, becoming creamy-red. The walking legs are blue or gray-blue. The distal margin of the tail fan is brownish-red to orange. Animals from the village of Klamono (Beraur River drainage basin) differ in the coloration of the chelae. The chelae are dark blue to black, sometimes creamy-blue. The dorsolateral margins are light, creamy. These males usually also have orange or yellow rostral margins. The dorsolateral margins of the chelae are elevated in the posterior third in C. phing n. sp., while they are elevated in three-quarters of C. wagenknechtae. The granules of the dorsolateral margins of the chelae are very prominent in C. wagenknechtae, while in C. phing n. sp., they are smaller. Usually, 12–13 are present in C. wagenknechtae, while 8–10 are present in C. phing n. sp. The rostrum of C. wagenknechtae is clearly bent outwards at the base, while it is more straight in C. phing n. sp. The spines on the rostrum are more prominent in C. wagenknechtae.
Cherax phing n. sp. differs from C. pulcher in the shape of the chelae, the shape of the rostrum, and the coloration (Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17).
The dorsolateral margins of the chelae are elevated in the posterior third in C. phing n. sp., while they are elevated in three-quarters of C. pulcher. The granules of the dorsolateral margins of the chelae are prominent in C. wagenknechtae, while in C. phing n. sp., they are smaller; usually, 10–12 are present in C. wagenknechtae, while 8–10 are present in C. phing n. sp. The rostrum of C. wagenknechtae clearly reaches or overreaches the end of the ultimate antennular peduncle, while in C. phing n. sp., it reaches about the end of the first antennular peduncle.
The coloration of C. pulcher is as follows. The chelae are light blue to dark blue, becoming white on the outer lateral margins. The elevated dorsolateral margins are blue. The anterior part of the cephalothorax is pinkish to strikingly pink, fading laterally to a greenish-gray. The dorsal pleon is dark blue to black, becoming pinkish-gray and pinkish at the margins. Older individuals are usually darker blue in coloration. As the distribution area of Cherax pulcher is very restricted, not many color variations of this species are known.
Cherax phing n. sp. differs from Cherax gherardii in the shape of the rostrum, the shape of the chelae, and the coloration (Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17). The rostrum is 3.6 times as long as broad in C. gherardii versus 1.7–2.1 times in C. phing n. sp. The first chelae are 2.6–3.4 times as long as broad in C. gherardii versus 2.3–2.7 times as long as broad in C. phing n. sp. The coloration of C. gherardii is dark brown, marbled on the sides of the carapace with pale brown spots. The cervical groove and the distal end of the carapace are orange. The pleon has a prominent orange spot on both lateral sides on each pleomere. The soft distal part of the caudal fan is orange. The chelipeds are blue with orange joints; the palm of the propodus is blue in the basal part and pale in the distal part. The fingers are orange; the distal third is black with orange tips.
C. phing n. sp. differs from C. woworae in the shape of the rostrum, the shape of the chelae, and the coloration (Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17). The rostrum is 2.0–2.5 times as long as broad in C. woworae versus 1.7–2.1 times in C. phing n. sp. The first chelae are 2.1–2.5 times as long as broad in C. woworae versus 2.3–2.7 times as long as broad in C. phing n. sp. The background color is steel blue, marbled on the carapace sides with numerous tiny pale spots. The soft distal part of the caudal tail fan is orange. The chelipeds are steel blue with pale joints. The palm of the chelae is steel blue.
Etymology. C. phing n. sp. is named in honor of Liauw Pauw Phing, a crayfish enthusiast, for his noteworthy contribution to the knowledge of the crayfish of Papua.
His continuing effort to search and find unknown species is very needed work for our better understanding of the crayfish of this region.
Ecology. C. phing n. sp. is endemic to the Kali Ombak River drainage basin in the western part of the Kepala Burung (Vogelkop) Peninsula, Southwest Papua, Indonesia (Figure 18). One of the creeks harboring these crayfish is clear and shallow (0.2–1 m) with a fast to moderate flow and has a pH of approximately 5.5. The temperature is around 23–24 °C. In most parts, no water plants are present. The substrate of the creek is rocky or sandy, with some parts covered with silt and detritus (Figure 19). Crayfish hide in short burrows in the riverbank, under larger rocks, or in detritus that is present in all the parts of the creek. Big males have been observed as active during the day. In some villages, these crayfish are harvested for food by locals, but it seems that, even if they are collected for the pet trade and in some villages for human consumption, the population is stable. The creek is surrounded by dense forest. To improve the knowledge of the distribution of this species, more field surveys will be necessary.
Common name. As a common name for this crayfish, we propose the Green Hornet Crayfish, as it is already available under this name in the pet trade.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L.; methodology, C.L. and T.v.R.; data analysis, C.L., R.E. and T.v.R., writing—original draft preparation, C.L.; writing—review and editing, C.L., R.E. and T.v.R.; visualization, C.L. and T.v.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The new sequences have been made available in GenBank, other data are available upon request from the first author.

Acknowledgments

Aquarium Dietzenbach is thanked for bringing C. rayko n. sp. to our attention and helping to import the species. We are grateful to Irianto Wahid and Liauw Pauw Phing for helping us to obtain the species and for information about the species location. Heiko Bleher is thanked for bringing C. phing n. sp. to our attention. Liauw Pauw Phing is thanked for helping to collect the species and for sending it to us. We would like to thank Aquarium Dietzenbach for helping to obtain the species. Daisy Wowor is thanked for her cooperation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Holthuis, L.B. Decapoda Macrura with a revision of the New Guinea Parastacidae. Zoological results of the Dutch New Guinea Expedition. Nova Guinea (n. ser.) 1949, 5, 289–328. [Google Scholar]
  2. Holthuis, L.B. Native fisheries of freshwater Crustacea in Netherlands New Guinea. Contributions to New Guinea Carcinology. I. Nova Guinea (n. ser.) 1956, 7, 123–137. [Google Scholar]
  3. Holthuis, L.B. Freshwater crayfish in Netherlands New Guinea Mountains. South Pac. Comm. Quart. Bull. 1958, 8, 36–39. [Google Scholar]
  4. Holthuis, L.B. Freshwater Crustacea Decapoda of New Guinea. In: Gressitt JL (Ed.) Biogeography and Ecology of New Guinea (Vol. 2). Monogr. Biol. 1982, 42, 603–619. [Google Scholar]
  5. Holthuis, L.B. The freshwater crayfish of New Guinea. Freshw. Crayfish 1986, 6, 48–58. [Google Scholar]
  6. Holthuis, L.B. Cherax (Astaconephropsminor new species, a parastacid from the mountains of Irian Jaya (W. New Guinea) Indonesia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae). Zool. Med. Leiden 1996, 70, 361–366. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lukhaup, C.; Pekny, R. Cherax (Cheraxholthuisi, a new species of crayfish (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae) from the centre of the Vogelkop Peninsula in Irian Jaya (West New Guinea), Indonesia. Zool. Med. 2006, 80, 101–107. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lukhaup, C.; Pekny, R. Cherax (Astaconephropsboesemani, a new species of crayfish (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae) from the centre of the Vogelkop Peninsula in Irian Jaya (West New Guinea), Indonesia. Zool. Med. Leiden 2008, 82, 331–340. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lukhaup, C.; Herbert, B. Cherax (Cheraxpeknyi n. sp., a new species of crayfish (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae) from the Fly River Drainage, Western Province, Papua New Guinea. Mem. Queensl. Mus. 2008, 52, 213–219. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lukhaup, C. Cherax (Astaconephropspulcher, a new species of freshwater crayfish (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae) from the Kepala Burung (Vogelkop) Peninsula, Irian Jaya (West Papua), Indonesia. ZooKeys 2015, 502, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lukhaup, C.; Panteleit, J.; Schrimpf, A. Cherax (Astaconephropssnowden a new species of freshwater crayfish (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae) from the Kepala Burung (Vogelkop) Peninsula, Irian Jaya (West Papua), Indonesia. ZooKeys 2015, 518, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lukhaup, C.; Eprilurahman, R.; von Rintelen, T. Cherax warsamsonicus, a new species of crayfish from the Kepala Burung (Vogelkop) peninsula in West Papua, Indonesia (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae). ZooKeys 2017, 660, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lukhaup, C.; Eprilurahman, R.; von Rintelen, T. Two new species of crayfish of the genus Cherax from Indonesia New Guinea (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae). ZooKeys 2018, 769, 89–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Patoka, J.; Blaha, M.; Kouba, A. Cherax (Astaconephropsgherardii, a new crayfish (Decapoda: Parastacidae) from West Papua, Indonesia. Zootaxa 2015, 3964, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Patoka, J.; Akmal, S.G.; Bláha, M.; Kouba, A. Cherax woworae, a new freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Parastacidae) from Southwest Papua Province, Indonesia. Zootaxa 2023, 5325, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Patoka, J.; Bláha, M.; Kouba, A. Cherax acherontis (Decapoda: Parastacidae), the first cave crayfish from the Southern Hemisphere (Papua Province, Indonesia). Zootaxa 2017, 4363, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lukhaup, C.; Eprilurahman, R. A new species of crayfish of the genus Cherax from Indonesian New Guinea (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae). Zoosyst. Evol. 2022, 98, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Crandall, K.A.; Fitzpatrick, J.F. Crayfish molecular systematics: Using a combination of procedures to estimate phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 1996, 45, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.I.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Posada, D. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bláha, M.; Patoka, J.; Kozák, P.; Kouba, A. Unrecognized diversity in New Guinean crayfish species (Decapoda, Parastacidae): The evidence from molecular data. Integr. Zool. 2016, 11, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gan, H.M.; Tan, M.H.; Eprilurahman, R.; Austin, C.M. The complete mitogenome of Cherax monticola (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae), a large highland crayfish from New Guinea. Mitochondrial DNA A 2016, 27, 337–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Munasinghe, D.H.N.; Murphy, N.P.; Austin, C.M. Utility of mitochondrial DNA sequences from four gene regions for systematic studies of Australian freshwater crayfish of the genus Cherax (Decapoda: Parastacidae). J. Crust. Biol. 2003, 23, 402–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Swofford, D.L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0b10; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, A.H.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Trifinopoulos, J.; Nguyen, L.T.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W232–W235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Huxley, T.H. The Crayfish: An Introduction to the Study of Zoology; C. Kegan Paul & Co.: London, UK, 1879; 371p. [Google Scholar]
  31. Erichson, W.F. Übersicht der Arten der Gattung Astacus. Arch. Naturgeschichte 1846, 12, 86–103, 375–377. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nobili, D.G. Contribuzioni alia conoscenza della fauna carcinologica della Papuasia. delle Molucche e dell’ Australia. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova 1899, 40, 230–282. [Google Scholar]
  33. Munasinghe, D.H.N.; Burridge, C.P.; Austin, C.M. The systematics of freshwater crayfish of the genus Cherax Erichson (Decapoda: Parastacidae) in eastern Australia re-examined using nucleotide sequences from 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Invertebr. Syst. 2004, 18, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Munasinghe, D.H.N.; Burridge, C.P.; Austin, C.M. Molecular phylogeny and zoogeography of the freshwater crayfish genus Cherax Erichson (Decapoda: Parastacidae) in Australia. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2004, 81, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Austin, C.M. Systematics of the freshwater crayfish genus Cherax Erichson (Decapoda: Parastacidae) in northern and eastern Australia: Electrophoretic and morphological variation. Aust. J. Zool. 1996, 44, 259–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Austin, C.M.; Knott, B. Systematics of the freshwater crayfish genus Cherax Erichson (Decapoda: Parastacidae) in south-western Australia: Electrophoretic, morphological and habitat variation. Aust. J. Zool. 1996, 44, 223–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Crandall, K.A.; De Grave, S. An updated classification of the freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidea) of the world, with a complete species list. J. Crust. Biol. 2017, 37, 615–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cherax rayko n. sp. (A) Holotype male (MZB Cru 5792), Bian River drainage basin in the Muting District, West Papua, Indonesia. (B) Idem, side view. (C) Female, same data as holotype.
Figure 1. Cherax rayko n. sp. (A) Holotype male (MZB Cru 5792), Bian River drainage basin in the Muting District, West Papua, Indonesia. (B) Idem, side view. (C) Female, same data as holotype.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g001aArthropoda 02 00019 g001b
Figure 2. Cherax rayko n. sp., holotype male (MZB Cru 5792). Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 2. Cherax rayko n. sp., holotype male (MZB Cru 5792). Scale bar: 10 mm.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g002
Figure 3. Right chela of Cherax rayko n. sp., holotype male (MZB Cru 5792). (A) Dorsal view. (B) Ventral view. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 3. Right chela of Cherax rayko n. sp., holotype male (MZB Cru 5792). (A) Dorsal view. (B) Ventral view. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g003aArthropoda 02 00019 g003b
Figure 4. Cherax rayko n. sp., holotype male (MZB Cru 5792). (A) Dorsal view of cephalothorax. Scale bar: 10 mm. (B) Scaphocerite. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 4. Cherax rayko n. sp., holotype male (MZB Cru 5792). (A) Dorsal view of cephalothorax. Scale bar: 10 mm. (B) Scaphocerite. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g004aArthropoda 02 00019 g004b
Figure 5. Cherax rayko n. sp., allotype female (MZB Cru 5793). Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 5. Cherax rayko n. sp., allotype female (MZB Cru 5793). Scale bar: 10 mm.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g005
Figure 6. Phylogenetic relationships of C. phing n. sp. and C. rayko n. sp. within the northern New Guinea Cherax lineage, reconstructed by BI analyses of the 16S rRNA mitochondrial gene fragment. Numbers on branches show, from top, Bayesian posterior probabilities (>0.7) and ML/MP bootstrap values (>50). An asterisk indicates nodes with full support (1/100/100) in all analyses. The scale bar indicates the substitution rate. See Table 1 for information on the sequenced specimens.
Figure 6. Phylogenetic relationships of C. phing n. sp. and C. rayko n. sp. within the northern New Guinea Cherax lineage, reconstructed by BI analyses of the 16S rRNA mitochondrial gene fragment. Numbers on branches show, from top, Bayesian posterior probabilities (>0.7) and ML/MP bootstrap values (>50). An asterisk indicates nodes with full support (1/100/100) in all analyses. The scale bar indicates the substitution rate. See Table 1 for information on the sequenced specimens.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g006
Figure 7. Coloration comparison of Cherax rayko n. sp. with C. peknyi and C. alyciae. (ACherax rayko n. sp. from Muting. (BC. peknyi from the type locality close to Kiunga, PNG. (C,DC. alyciae from Boven Digoel Regency, West Papua, Indonesia.
Figure 7. Coloration comparison of Cherax rayko n. sp. with C. peknyi and C. alyciae. (ACherax rayko n. sp. from Muting. (BC. peknyi from the type locality close to Kiunga, PNG. (C,DC. alyciae from Boven Digoel Regency, West Papua, Indonesia.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g007
Figure 8. Chelae comparison of C. rayko n. sp. (A,F) with C. peknyi (C,D) and C. alyciae (B,E).
Figure 8. Chelae comparison of C. rayko n. sp. (A,F) with C. peknyi (C,D) and C. alyciae (B,E).
Arthropoda 02 00019 g008
Figure 9. Rostrum comparison of C. rayko n. sp. (A) with C. peknyi (C) and C. alyciae (B).
Figure 9. Rostrum comparison of C. rayko n. sp. (A) with C. peknyi (C) and C. alyciae (B).
Arthropoda 02 00019 g009
Figure 10. New Guinea with the distribution of C. rayko sp.nov, C. alyciae, and C. peknyi.
Figure 10. New Guinea with the distribution of C. rayko sp.nov, C. alyciae, and C. peknyi.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g010
Figure 11. Cherax phing n. sp., holotype male (MZB Cru 5795). Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 11. Cherax phing n. sp., holotype male (MZB Cru 5795). Scale bar: 10 mm.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g011
Figure 12. Cherax phing n. sp., holotype male (MZB Cru 5795). (A) Dorsal view of left chelae. (B) Ventral view of left chelae. (C) Dorsal view of carapace. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 12. Cherax phing n. sp., holotype male (MZB Cru 5795). (A) Dorsal view of left chelae. (B) Ventral view of left chelae. (C) Dorsal view of carapace. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g012
Figure 13. Cherax phing n. sp., allotype female (MZB Cru 5796). Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 13. Cherax phing n. sp., allotype female (MZB Cru 5796). Scale bar: 10 mm.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g013
Figure 14. Cherax phing n. sp., Kali Ombak River drainage basin. (A) Paratype male (MZB Cru 5797). (B) Paratype male color variation. (C) Paratype male color variation.
Figure 14. Cherax phing n. sp., Kali Ombak River drainage basin. (A) Paratype male (MZB Cru 5797). (B) Paratype male color variation. (C) Paratype male color variation.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g014aArthropoda 02 00019 g014b
Figure 15. Chelae comparison. (AC. phing n. sp. from Kali Ombak drainage basin. (BC. boesemani from Ajamaru Lake. (CC. wagenknechtae from Beraur River drainage basin. (DC. pulcher from Hoa Creek in Teminabuan. (EC. woworae. (FC. gherardii.
Figure 15. Chelae comparison. (AC. phing n. sp. from Kali Ombak drainage basin. (BC. boesemani from Ajamaru Lake. (CC. wagenknechtae from Beraur River drainage basin. (DC. pulcher from Hoa Creek in Teminabuan. (EC. woworae. (FC. gherardii.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g015
Figure 16. Coloration comparison. (AC. phing n. sp. with (BC. boesemani from Ajamaru Lake, (CC. woworae, (DC. gherardii, (EC. wagenknechtae from Beraur River drainage basin, and (FC. pulcher from Hoa Creek in Teminabuan.
Figure 16. Coloration comparison. (AC. phing n. sp. with (BC. boesemani from Ajamaru Lake, (CC. woworae, (DC. gherardii, (EC. wagenknechtae from Beraur River drainage basin, and (FC. pulcher from Hoa Creek in Teminabuan.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g016
Figure 17. Rostrum comparison. (AC. wagenknechtae from Beraur River drainage basin. (BC. boesemani from Ajamaru Lake. (CC. pulcher from Hoa Creek in Teminabuan. (DC. phing n. sp. from Kali Ombak drainage basin. (EC. gherardii. (FC. woworae.
Figure 17. Rostrum comparison. (AC. wagenknechtae from Beraur River drainage basin. (BC. boesemani from Ajamaru Lake. (CC. pulcher from Hoa Creek in Teminabuan. (DC. phing n. sp. from Kali Ombak drainage basin. (EC. gherardii. (FC. woworae.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g017
Figure 18. The Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia, with the Kali Ombak River drainage basin, the type locality of C. phing n. sp.
Figure 18. The Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia, with the Kali Ombak River drainage basin, the type locality of C. phing n. sp.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g018
Figure 19. Kali Ombak River, habitat of C. phing n. sp.
Figure 19. Kali Ombak River, habitat of C. phing n. sp.
Arthropoda 02 00019 g019
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lukhaup, C.; Eprilurahman, R.; von Rintelen, T. Two New Species of Crayfish of the Genus Cherax (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae) from Western and Eastern Indonesian New Guinea. Arthropoda 2024, 2, 264-293. https://doi.org/10.3390/arthropoda2040019

AMA Style

Lukhaup C, Eprilurahman R, von Rintelen T. Two New Species of Crayfish of the Genus Cherax (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae) from Western and Eastern Indonesian New Guinea. Arthropoda. 2024; 2(4):264-293. https://doi.org/10.3390/arthropoda2040019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lukhaup, Christian, Rury Eprilurahman, and Thomas von Rintelen. 2024. "Two New Species of Crayfish of the Genus Cherax (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae) from Western and Eastern Indonesian New Guinea" Arthropoda 2, no. 4: 264-293. https://doi.org/10.3390/arthropoda2040019

APA Style

Lukhaup, C., Eprilurahman, R., & von Rintelen, T. (2024). Two New Species of Crayfish of the Genus Cherax (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae) from Western and Eastern Indonesian New Guinea. Arthropoda, 2(4), 264-293. https://doi.org/10.3390/arthropoda2040019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop