Innovative Organic and Regenerative Agricultural Production

A topical collection in Agronomy (ISSN 2073-4395). This collection belongs to the section "Innovative Cropping Systems".

Viewed by 13401

Editors


E-Mail Website
Collection Editor
1. Plant Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, East Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
2. Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences (IMB), University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway
3. Livadopa Farm, Sivas Festos, 70200 Crete, Greece
Interests: soil management; crop protection; crop breeding for low-input systems; ‘low-input’ and organic agricultural systems development; nutritional quality of organic and low-input dairy production systems; resource use efficiency; food quality and safety assurance; food processing technology; nutritional control of gastrointestinal diseases in monogastric farm animals (pigs/poultry)
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Collection Editor
Olive and Agroecological Production Systems Laboratory (EOPS), Hellenic Mediterranean University, P.O. Box 1939 Estavromenos, Heraklion, 71004 Crete, Greece
Interests: soil management; crop protection; environmental impact assessments; biodiversity in agroecosystems; energy and input use in agroecosystems; green infrastructure in agroecosystems; ‘low-input’ and organic agricultural systems development; oliviculture; Mediterranean fruit tree crops; tropical and subtropical fruit trees; agroecology

E-Mail Website
Collection Editor
Nafferton Ecological Farming Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
Interests: sustainable crop production; agronomic management for sustainable food production systems; organic production systems; improvement of nutrient use efficiency of food crops; improvement of nutritional quality of food crops; improve genetic diversity of crop species—use of novel, underutilised and traditional crop species/genotypes

Topical Collection Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the last 50 years, global agricultural food production has become increasingly dependent on the use of non-renewable and/or scarce resources, particularly the fossil fuel required to produce mineral N-fertilizer and pesticides, mined minerals used as P and K fertilizer, and water used for irrigation. The cost of these inputs has increased more rapidly than farm gate prices, and this is thought to have a negative impact on farm incomes, crop yields, and food security. 

There is also increasing evidence and concern that the increased use of agrochemical inputs has had a negative impact on soil and crop health, the nutritional quality of foods, biodiversity, resource use efficiency, and the overall carbon footprint of food production, related to climate change. 

The principles and standards of organic and regenerative agriculture prohibit or limit the use of synthetic chemical N, P, and KCl fertilizers and pesticides, because these inputs are thought to have negative side effects on soils, water resources, crops and human health, biodiversity, and the environment.

Instead, the logical framework for integrated soil, crop, and human nutrition and health management is based on (a) the use of resistant and weed-competitive varieties; (b) botanically diverse rotations that include N-fixing legume crops; (c) regular inputs of animal manure and/or organic-waste-based composts; (d) the conservation and establishment of areas (green infrastructure) of biodiversity on farms; (e) minimum tillage and soil cover, especially in perennial crops; and (f) the integration of crop and outdoor grazing/foraging-based livestock production systems.

This Topical Collection aims to support the publication and access to information on Innovative Organic and Regenerative Agricultural Production Systems, including results from studies aimed at:

  • Researching and comparing/contrasting soil, crop and farm management practices/systems;
  • Developing methods/strategies to (a) improve soil health, crop yields, yield stability, resource use efficiency, biodiversity, food quality and safety; and (b) minimize negative environmental impacts, particularly greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints of crop production.

Prof. Dr. Carlo Leifert
Dr. Emmanouil Kabourakis
Dr. Leonidas Rempelos
Collection Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the collection website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Agronomy is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • organic farming
  • soil health
  • regenerative farming practices
  • integrated crop management
  • crop nutrition
  • carbon footprints
  • greenhouse gas emissions
  • human health
  • resource use efficiency
  • food security

Published Papers (5 papers)

2024

Jump to: 2023

15 pages, 2200 KiB  
Review
Circular Regenerative Agricultural Practices in Africa: Techniques and Their Potential for Soil Restoration and Sustainable Food Production
by Hamisi J. Tindwa, Ernest W. Semu and Bal Ram Singh
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2423; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102423 - 19 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1609
Abstract
The conventional linear system of global food production and consumption is unsustainable as it is responsible for a substantial share of greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity declines due land use change, agricultural water stress due resource-intensive water consumption patterns and land degradation. During the [...] Read more.
The conventional linear system of global food production and consumption is unsustainable as it is responsible for a substantial share of greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity declines due land use change, agricultural water stress due resource-intensive water consumption patterns and land degradation. During the last decade (1994–2014), for example, the greenhouse emissions from agriculture in Africa were reported to increase at an average annual rate of between 2.9% and 3.1%, equivalent to 0.44 Gt and 0.54 Gt CO2 per annum, respectively. Between 2000 and 2020, the greenhouse gas emissions from agrifood systems were shown to decrease in all major regions of the world, except in Africa and Asia, where they grew by 35 and 20 percent, respectively. With most of the circular agricultural practices still central to food production in the developing African countries, the continent can spearhead a global return to circular agriculture. Using a descriptive review approach, we explore the literature to examine the extent to which African agriculture is deploying these practices, the potential areas for improvement and lessons for the world in embracing sustainable food production. We underscore that the farming communities in sub-Saharan Africa have, for decades, been using some of the most effective circular agricultural principles and practices in agricultural production. We further show that practices and strategies akin to sustainable agricultural production include agronomic practices, smart irrigation options, renewable energy harvesting and waste-to-fertilizer technologies. All of these technologies, which are central to sustainable agricultural production, are not new to Africa, although they may require packaging and advocacy to reach a wider community in sub-Saharan Africa. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1581 KiB  
Article
Effects of Organic Agricultural Materials and Cultivation Methods on the Control of Ginger Rhizome Rot Disease and Growth in Organic Ginger Farming
by Minjeong Kim, Changki Shim and Jaehyeong Lee
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2285; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102285 - 4 Oct 2024
Viewed by 673
Abstract
This study aimed to develop eco-friendly disinfection technology for ginger seed rhizomes by evaluating the effects of various organic agricultural treatments on germination rates, fresh weight, and disease resistance. The Korean native ginger variety, Bongdongjaerae, and the Chinese variety, Laiwu xiao, were treated [...] Read more.
This study aimed to develop eco-friendly disinfection technology for ginger seed rhizomes by evaluating the effects of various organic agricultural treatments on germination rates, fresh weight, and disease resistance. The Korean native ginger variety, Bongdongjaerae, and the Chinese variety, Laiwu xiao, were treated with lime–sulfur mixtures, antifungal bacterial isolates, and microalga. Results showed that the 0.4% lime–sulfur treatment achieved the highest germination rate of 89.0% for domestic ginger grown under a single-bed cultivation. The combined treatment with Bacillus velezensis strains GT227 and GT234 and Chlorella fusca (CHK0058) significantly increased the fresh weight, highlighting its potential to enhance ginger growth under organic farming conditions. Single-bed cultivation yielded better results compared to flat-bed cultivation, showing higher fresh weights and lower infection rates. Overall, organic treatments, particularly the combination of CHK0058, GT227, and GT234, proved effective in enhancing ginger growth and reducing disease incidence, highlighting the potential for sustainable agricultural practices in ginger cultivation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

2023

Jump to: 2024

32 pages, 1131 KiB  
Article
Improving Crop Health, Performance, and Quality in Organic Spring Wheat Production: The Need to Understand Interactions between Pedoclimatic Conditions, Variety, and Fertilization
by Andrew Wilkinson, John N. Wilkinson, Peter Shotton, Enas Khalid Sufar, Gultekin Hasanaliyeva, Nikolaos Volakakis, Ismail Cakmak, Levent Ozturk, Paul Bilsborrow, Per Ole Iversen, Steve Wilcockson, Leonidas Rempelos and Carlo Leifert
Agronomy 2023, 13(9), 2349; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092349 - 9 Sep 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1779
Abstract
Organic wheat production systems have lower yields compared with intensive conventional production and often do not achieve the grain protein content and quality thresholds set by millers and bakers. In contrast, organic production methods were reported to result in higher concentrations of nutritionally [...] Read more.
Organic wheat production systems have lower yields compared with intensive conventional production and often do not achieve the grain protein content and quality thresholds set by millers and bakers. In contrast, organic production methods were reported to result in higher concentrations of nutritionally desirable micronutrients and lower concentrations of the toxic metal Cd in wheat grain and wholegrain flour. However, although N-availability and variety characteristics are known to affect both gain yields and bread-making quality, the exact reasons for the yield gap and differences in grain processing and nutritional quality between organic and conventional spring wheat production in the UK are poorly understood. The overall aim of this study was therefore to determine to what extent changes in variety choice and fertilization regimes may reduce the yield gap and improve processing quality without affecting nutritional quality in organic spring wheat production. To achieve this aim, we compared crop health, yield, grain processing, and nutritional quality parameters in spring wheat produced using (i) six contrasting spring wheat varieties grown with a standard fertilization regime and (ii) one variety widely used by organic farmers (Paragon) with nine different fertilization regimes in (iii) three UK sites/farms with contrasting pedoclimatic conditions. Significant differences in foliar disease severity, grain yield, and quality parameters were detected between six contrasting spring wheat varieties when grown under organic management regimes. Specifically, the varieties Paragon and Tybalt were identified as the best-performing varieties with respect to foliar disease resistance and grain yield under organic farming conditions and also produced high processing and nutritional quality across the three UK sites. However, the highest grain yields were obtained by Paragon at the Gilchester site and Tybalt at the Sheepdrove and Courtyard sites, while the highest protein contents were produced by Tybalt at the Gilchester site and Paragon at the Sheepdrove and Courtyard sites, which suggests that there is a need for site-specific wheat variety selection in the UK organic sector. Although organic fertilizer input type and level also affected wheat performance, differences between fertilization regimes were smaller than those observed between the five contrasting varieties, which suggests that improvements in spring wheat breeding/selection have a greater potential for increasing crop yield and quality in the organic sector compared with changes to fertilization practices. Overall, results suggest it is feasible to breed/select spring wheat varieties that combine high protein, vitamin E, and micronutrients with low toxic metal (Cd, Pb) concentrations when produced under organic farming conditions. These findings also support the hypothesis that differences in variety choice by organic and conventional farmers have contributed to the differences in nutritional quality between organic and conventional wheat products reported in previous studies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 456 KiB  
Editorial
Innovative Organic and Regenerative Agricultural Production
by Leonidas Rempelos, Emmanouil Kabourakis and Carlo Leifert
Agronomy 2023, 13(5), 1344; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051344 - 11 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4941
Abstract
Over the last 50 years, global agricultural food production has become increasingly dependent on the use of non-renewable and/or scarce resources, and, in particular, fossil fuel (e [...] Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 1330 KiB  
Article
Effect of Climatic Conditions, and Agronomic Practices Used in Organic and Conventional Crop Production on Yield and Nutritional Composition Parameters in Potato, Cabbage, Lettuce and Onion; Results from the Long-Term NFSC-Trials
by Leonidas Rempelos, Marcin Barański, Enas Khalid Sufar, Jenny Gilroy, Peter Shotton, Halima Leifert, Dominika Średnicka-Tober, Gultekin Hasanaliyeva, Eduardo A. S. Rosa, Jana Hajslova, Vera Schulzova, Ismail Cakmak, Levent Ozturk, Kirsten Brandt, Chris Seal, Juan Wang, Christoph Schmidt and Carlo Leifert
Agronomy 2023, 13(5), 1225; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051225 - 26 Apr 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3266
Abstract
Background: There is increasing evidence that the reliance on synthetic chemical pesticides and mineral fertilizers in agriculture has significant negative environmental and/or health impacts and poses a risk for future food security. Systematic reviews/meta-analyses showed that organic production systems, which omit the use [...] Read more.
Background: There is increasing evidence that the reliance on synthetic chemical pesticides and mineral fertilizers in agriculture has significant negative environmental and/or health impacts and poses a risk for future food security. Systematic reviews/meta-analyses showed that organic production systems, which omit the use of agrochemicals, produce crops with lower yields, but superior nutritional composition. However, the agronomic parameters responsible for differences in crop yields and nutritional quality are poorly understood. Methods: Here we report results for four field vegetable crops from the Nafferton Factorial Systems Comparison (NFSC) trial. This long-term factorial field experiment was designed to (i) identify effects of growing season/climatic variation, and contrasting rotational designs, crop protection protocols and fertilization regimes used in organic and conventional systems on crop health, yield and nutritional parameters and (ii) estimate the relative importance of climatic and agronomic drivers for crop health, yield and nutritionally relevant quality parameters. Quality parameters monitored in harvested products, included phenolic, glucosinolate, vitamin C, vitamin B9, carotenoid, cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb) and glycoalkaloid concentrations. Results: Climatic conditions during the growing season were found to have a larger impact on crop yield and quality than the agronomic factors (pre-crop, crop protection, fertilization) studied. However, the (i) interactions between growing season with contrasting climatic conditions and agronomic factors identified by ANOVA for crop health, yield and quality parameters and (ii) the associations between the three climatic drivers (precipitation, temperature, radiation) and crop yield and quality parameters differed substantially between the four crop plant species. Among the agronomic factors, fertilization had a substantially larger impact compared with both pre-crop and crop protection. Specifically, crop yields were found to be significantly increased by the use of (i) conventional fertilization and crop protection methods in potato, (ii) conventional fertilization, but organic crop protection methods in cabbage, and (iii) conventional fertilization regimes in lettuce, while none of the agronomic factors had a significant effect on onion yields. When important crop pest and diseases were assessed, (i) conventional crop protection resulted in significantly lower late blight severity in potato, while (ii) organic crop protection resulted in lower bird damage and cabbage root fly (CRF) incidence in cabbages, and Sclerotinia incidence in lettuce and (iii) organic fertilization resulted in lower CRF and Sclerotinia incidence in cabbage and lettuce respectively. When concentrations of nutritionally relevant phytochemicals were compared, organic fertilization resulted in significantly higher phenolic concentrations in potato, cabbage and lettuce, higher glucosinolate and carotenoid concentrations in cabbage, higher vitamin C concentrations in potato and cabbage and higher vitamin B9 concentrations in potato and lettuce—but lower concentrations of toxic glycoalkaloids in potato. Significant effects of crop protection protocols on phytochemical concentrations were only detected in cabbage with conventional crop protection resulting in higher glucosinolate and vitamin B9 concentrations. When toxic metal concentrations were compared, organic fertilization resulted in significantly lower Cd concentrations in all four crops and lower Ni concentrations in potato, cabbage and onion. Significant effects of crop protection were only detected in cabbage, where organic crop protection resulted in lower Ni concentrations. Pb concentrations were not affected by any of the agronomic factors. The potential implications of results for improving (i) strategies to reduce the use of non-renewable resources and environmental impacts of vegetable production and (ii) the productivity of organic and other low-input vegetable production systems without compromising food quality are discussed. Conclusions: The study confirms that organic vegetable production protocols result in higher concentrations of phenolics and other nutritionally desirable phytochemicals, but lower concentrations of the toxic metals Cd and Ni in harvested products. It also demonstrates, for the first time, that this is primarily due to differences in fertilization regimes. The finding that in three of the four crops (cabbage, lettuce and onion) the application of synthetic chemical crop protection products had no measurable positive impact on crop health and yield should be considered in the context of the growing concern about health impacts of pesticide use in field vegetable crops. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

  1. Effects of Rhizobium inoculation on grain legume performance; results of a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
  2. Effect of climatic conditions, crop protection and fertilisation on yield and disease severity of faba bean (Vicia faba L.); results from the long-term NFSC-trials.
  3. Effect of Rhizobium seed inoculant and micronutrient fertiliser applications on plant growth, yield and quality parameters of chickpea; results from a 2-year pilot study in Crete
  4. Effect of climatic conditions, variety, pre-crop, crop protection and fertilization on disease severity, yields and nutritional quality parameters in potato crops; results from the long-term NFSC trials.
  5. Pesticide residues and antioxidants concentration in organic and conventional grape and grape products; results of a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
  6. Effects variety, organic fertilizer type and irrigation on potato yield and disease severity in organic production systems; results from field experiments in two contrasting sites in Greece
  7. Effect of organic and conventional cereal production methods on Fusarium head blight and mycotoxins contamination levels
Back to TopTop