Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
5.3
2.5
Journals
Applied Sciences
Special Issues
Implant Dentistry: Advanced Materials, Methods and Technologies
applsci-logo
Submit to Special Issue Submit Abstract to Special Issue Review for Applied Sciences Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Implant Dentistry: Advanced Materials, Methods and Technologies

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 10 July 2025 | Viewed by 6137

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Alexandru Mester

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Oral Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Interests: biopolymer; biomaterial; resin based composite; bone augmentation; soft tissue; periodontal disease; oral oncology; oral health; implant dentistry; systemic disease
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are thrilled to invite you to contribute to an upcoming Special Issue titled "Implant Dentistry: Advanced Materials, Methods, and Technologies". This Special Issue aims to assemble groundbreaking research, innovative methodologies, and cutting-edge technologies in the dynamic field of implant dentistry.

Implant dentistry stands at the forefront of modern dental practice, offering transformative solutions for patients around the world. In this Special Issue, we aim to showcase the latest advancements in materials science, novel methodologies, and technological innovations that propel the field forward.

Potential topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Novel biomaterials in implant dentistry and bone regeneration;
  • Advanced surface modifications for enhanced osseointegration;
  • Digital dentistry applications in implantology;
  • Regenerative techniques for peri-implant tissue augmentation;
  • Clinical, in vivo, and in vitro studies and outcome assessments of implant procedures;
  • Patient-specific treatment planning and customized implant solutions;
  • Emerging trends and future directions in implant dentistry.

This Special Issue provides a unique platform for researchers, clinicians, and industry professionals to disseminate their latest findings, exchange insights, and contribute to the collective advancement of implant dentistry.

Manuscripts submitted to this Special Issue will undergo rigorous peer review by experts in the field, ensuring the highest standards of quality and scientific rigor.

We cordially invite you to submit your original research, review articles, or case studies for consideration in this Special Issue. Your valuable contributions will enrich the discourse surrounding implant dentistry and pave the way for future innovations in patient care.

We eagerly anticipate your participation in this exciting endeavor and look forward to the impactful contributions that will shape the future of implant dentistry.

Dr. Alexandru Mester
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • dental implant
  • osseointegration
  • guided bone regeneration
  • oral health

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

12 pages, 3517 KiB  
Article
Bone Integration of Femtosecond Laser-Treated Dental Implants with Nanostructured Surfaces: A Controlled Animal Study
by Woo-Seok Do, Keun-Ba-Da Son, Young-Tak Son, Yong-Gun Kim, Sung-Min Hwang, Jun-Ho Hwang, Jong-Hoon Lee, Hyun-Deok Kim, Kyu-Bok Lee and Jae-Mok Lee
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 10913; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310913 - 25 Nov 2024
Viewed by 692
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to compare bone union and soft-tissue healing in titanium implants with sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched surfaces (SLA group) and femtosecond laser-treated surfaces (FEMTO group) in a rabbit model. Methods: Implants were inserted into rabbit tibiae, and implant [...] Read more.
Background: The purpose of this study is to compare bone union and soft-tissue healing in titanium implants with sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched surfaces (SLA group) and femtosecond laser-treated surfaces (FEMTO group) in a rabbit model. Methods: Implants were inserted into rabbit tibiae, and implant stability, soft-tissue healing, and microscopic analyses (micro-CT and biopsy) were conducted. All animals maintained normal weight and health post-surgery. Results: Hemostasis was achieved at the laser incision site on the surgery day, but healing was slower compared to conventional methods. Micro-CT showed no significant differences in new bone formation or inflammatory tissue infiltration between groups. Tissue biopsy revealed slightly higher bone-implant contact in the FEMTO group compared to the SLA group, though not statistically significant. Conclusion: These findings suggest that femtosecond laser surface treatment may provide bone union comparable to or better than SLA treatment, though laser-assisted soft-tissue incisions heal more slowly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Implant Dentistry: Advanced Materials, Methods and Technologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

34 pages, 3363 KiB  
Review
Peri-Implant Bone Stability Around Tapered Implant Prosthetic Connection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Different Cone Morse and Conometric Implants Angle Contact and Coupling Interface Designs
by Iris Alla, Antonio Scarano, Bruna Sinjari, Edit Xhajanka and Felice Lorusso
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 1237; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031237 - 25 Jan 2025
Viewed by 587
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Internal implant–abutment connection has been proposed to increase interface stability and reduce biological and prosthetic issues. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the influence of the implant abutment conical angle on marginal bone loss and mechanical complications. Methods: The [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Internal implant–abutment connection has been proposed to increase interface stability and reduce biological and prosthetic issues. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the influence of the implant abutment conical angle on marginal bone loss and mechanical complications. Methods: The literature screening was performed by considering Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar sources. The eligibility process was conducted in order to perform a descriptive synthesis, determine the risk of bias, and carry out network meta-analyses. The following categories were considered for pairwise comparisons: external hexagon (EI), internal hexagon (HI), cone morse (CM) (<8° contact angle), and conometric joint (>8° contact angle). For the descriptive data synthesis, the following parameters were considered: sample size, implant manufacturer, prosthetic joint type, prosthetic complications, marginal bone loss, and study outcomes. Results: A total of 4457 articles were screened, reducing the output to the 133 studies included in the descriptive synthesis, while 12 articles were included in the statistical analysis. No significant differences in marginal bone loss were reported when comparing a cone angle of <8° and a cone angle of >8; Conclusions: Within the limits of the present investigation, the cone interface seems to produce lower marginal bone loss compared to external and internal hexagon connection. No differences were found when comparing a cone angle of <8° and a cone angle of >8°. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Implant Dentistry: Advanced Materials, Methods and Technologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 531 KiB  
Review
Heat Generated during Dental Implant Placement: A Scoping Review
by Valerio Cimini, Alexandre Perez, Tommaso Lombardi and Roberto Di Felice
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(15), 6773; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156773 - 2 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2161
Abstract
Background: Osseointegration is fundamental to achieving successful implant therapy in dentistry. However, the heat generated during implant placement emerges as a critical factor predisposing to implant failure. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the different factors related to heat generation during implant placement, [...] Read more.
Background: Osseointegration is fundamental to achieving successful implant therapy in dentistry. However, the heat generated during implant placement emerges as a critical factor predisposing to implant failure. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the different factors related to heat generation during implant placement, offering insights to clinicians in their daily clinical practice. Methods: Utilizing the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, we conducted an electronic search for articles published between January 2013 and December 2023. The analysis focused on several factors including bone type, drill shape, drill speed, drill material, drilling force, osteotomy depth, drill load, drilling technique (intermittent or continuous), presence of a surgical guide, irrigation methods, drill wear, and preparation tools available. Results: Initially, 2525 records were identified. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and full-text assessment, 93 articles were included in this scoping review. Additionally, some articles published before 2013 were incorporated in the bibliography to ensure completeness of the review. Conclusions: Heat generation during implant placement arises from a complex interplay of multiple factors. While irrigation and bone hardness appear to be crucial determinants of heat generation during the osteotomy phase, the involvement of other factors remains less clear. Further studies are needed to better understand the precise contribution of these factors towards increasing temperature at the implant site. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Implant Dentistry: Advanced Materials, Methods and Technologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

14 pages, 7608 KiB  
Case Report
Peri-Implant Tissue Stability: A Series of Five Case Reports on an Innovative Implant Design
by Marco Aurélio Bianchini, Mario Escobar, Maria Elisa Galarraga-Vinueza, Thalles Yurgen Balduino and Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(18), 8354; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188354 - 17 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1442
Abstract
Background/Aim: The stability of peri-implant tissues is crucial for the long-term success of dental implant treatments. A new cervical implant design has been developed to address the challenges associated with peri-implant tissue stability, featuring a concave cervical portion to increase tissue volume in [...] Read more.
Background/Aim: The stability of peri-implant tissues is crucial for the long-term success of dental implant treatments. A new cervical implant design has been developed to address the challenges associated with peri-implant tissue stability, featuring a concave cervical portion to increase tissue volume in this area. The present study aimed to clinically evaluate the effectiveness of the new cervical implant design in maintaining peri-implant tissue stability. Materials and Methods: Five clinical cases involving completely edentulous patients were selected, in which 25 implants were installed. The marginal bone level around each implant was assessed at three different time points—T0: immediately after the prosthesis installation, T1: 6 months post installation, and T2: at the last control visit, up to 38 months later. Measurements were taken to analyze changes in marginal bone levels (MBLs) and the keratinized mucosa (KM) over time. Furthermore, the keratinized mucosa (KM) around the implants was evaluated. Results: The mean and standard deviation values of the marginal bone levels at each time point were as follows—T0: 0.59 ± 0.55 mm; T1: 1.41 ± 0.59 mm; T2: 1.76 ± 0.69 mm. Statistical analysis showed significant differences across the time points (ANOVA p < 0.0001). The overall mean KM values were 3.85 mm for T1 and T2, showing the stability of the peri-implant soft tissues at ≥1-year controls. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the results showed that the Collo implants presented measured MBL values increasing within the time range analyzed in each case but within the normal values cited in the literature for these types of rehabilitation treatments. However, the measured KM values presented, in all cases, an average above the values referenced in the literature as a minimum for maintaining the health of the peri-implant tissues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Implant Dentistry: Advanced Materials, Methods and Technologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 705 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Biological Impact of Residual Aluminum Particles on Sand-Blasted Dental Implant Surfaces: A Systematic Review of Animal Studies
by Sourav Panda, Margherita Tumedei, Sital Panda, Funda Goker, Cristina Maria Depalma, Tejas Pande and Massimo Del Fabbro
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(17), 7745; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177745 - 2 Sep 2024
Viewed by 909
Abstract
(1) Background: The use of alumina particles for surface treatment of dental implants is a common practice aimed at enhancing osseointegration. However, the biological effects of residual alumina particles on implant surfaces remain a subject of debate. This systematic review evaluates the impact [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The use of alumina particles for surface treatment of dental implants is a common practice aimed at enhancing osseointegration. However, the biological effects of residual alumina particles on implant surfaces remain a subject of debate. This systematic review evaluates the impact of residual alumina particles on the osseointegration, biocompatibility, and bacterial adhesion of dental implants based on available in vivo experimental animal studies. (2) Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify relevant studies. The inclusion criteria focused on experimental animal studies that assessed the biological effects of alumina-blasted dental implants. Data extraction was carried out, and quality assessments were performed using the SYRCLE risk-of-bias tool. (3) Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, involving various animal models, such as rabbits, pigs, dogs, and sheep. The findings demonstrated that residual alumina particles did not negatively impact osseointegration. Some studies reported accelerated bone growth and improved osseointegration with residual alumina. Additionally, residual alumina showed potential bactericidal properties, reducing bacterial adhesion. (4) Conclusions: The available evidence from animal studies suggests that residual alumina particles do not adversely affect the osseointegration and biocompatibility of dental implants. These particles may even enhance bone growth and reduce bacterial adhesion. However, due to the scarcity of human studies and the impracticality of histological assessments in humans, further research, including long-term clinical trials, is necessary to confirm these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Implant Dentistry: Advanced Materials, Methods and Technologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-5
Back to TopTop