applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Civil Engineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 January 2025 | Viewed by 13155

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Calz. De Las Americas and Blvd. Universitarios S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, Culiacán de Rosales 80040, Sinaloa, Mexico
Interests: civil engineering structures

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Calz. De Las Americas and Blvd. Universitarios S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, Culiacán de Rosales 80040, Sinaloa, Mexico
Interests: Earthquake engineering; reinforced concrete structures; damping devices; steel structures; performance-based earthquake engineering; seismic hazard; risk analysis; reliability analysis; ground motion selection

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Calz. De Las Americas and Blvd. Universitarios S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, Culiacán de Rosales 80040, Sinaloa, Mexico
Interests: civil engineering structures

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Recent decades have witnessed significant damage induced in structures after the occurrence of strong earthquakes. This has led researchers around world to address many issues concerning structural seismic design and evaluation for different types of structures, including steel and concrete buildings.

This Special Issue will provide a publishing platform for the worldwide community of researchers, in traditional and emerging subdisciplines of the field related to seismic behavior assessment and structural design, to present and discuss recent advancements in this broader field. Original papers dealing with experimental and analytical evaluation procedures will be considered for publication.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of topics considered to be within the scope of this Special Issue:

  • Effects of the selection and scaling of strong motions on the seismic response of structures.
  • Evaluation of the reliability of concrete and steel structures with energy-dissipating devices.
  • Seismic performance and risk analysis of structures.
  • Deterministic and probabilistic methods of dynamic analysis in structural engineering.
  • Experimental and computational simulation of dynamic effects on structures.
  • Seismic behavior and modelling of non-structural elements.
  • Quantification of earthquake demand and structural capacity.
  • Seismic regulations and building codes.
  • Dynamic soil–structure interaction.
  • Passive and active systems for earthquake protection.
  • Methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
  • Seismic performance of new structural systems.

Prof. Dr. Alfredo Reyes-Salazar
Dr. Federico Valenzuela-Beltrán
Dr. Mario D. Llanes-Tizoc
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • structural seismic behavior
  • design for strong motions
  • deterministic and probabilistic analyses
  • building codes
  • retrofit
  • new structural systems
  • experimental and numerical simulation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

19 pages, 7550 KiB  
Article
Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Multi-Story Resistance Capacitance-Coupled Shear Wall Buildings with Energy-Dissipation Dampers
by Zafira Nur Ezzati Mustafa and Taiki Saito
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10734; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210734 - 20 Nov 2024
Viewed by 242
Abstract
This research aims to apply the displacement-based design method (DBDM) for the seismic design of reinforced concrete-coupled shear wall buildings equipped with energy dissipation dampers. The DBDM offers design simplicity by focusing on structural design based on a target design displacement, where the [...] Read more.
This research aims to apply the displacement-based design method (DBDM) for the seismic design of reinforced concrete-coupled shear wall buildings equipped with energy dissipation dampers. The DBDM offers design simplicity by focusing on structural design based on a target design displacement, where the building converts into a single degree of freedom (SDOF) system. The implementation of dampers aims to reduce repair costs and downtime for buildings following significant seismic events. Two types of dampers are utilized in this study: metallic damper and viscoelastic damper. The DBDM procedure begins with determining the target displacement, which corresponds to the specific story drift ratio of the structural system, using a nonlinear static pushover analysis. For the structural wall system considered in this study, a target drift ratio of 1/250 is selected due to the inherent rigidity of the structure. The effective damping factor is then determined from the average energy absorption, which is based on the ductility factor of each structural member. Additionally, the effective period of the building is obtained from the displacement spectrum of the design-level earthquakes. Finally, the required damper shear capacity for the SDOF system is calculated based on the target deformation and effective stiffness. The design earthquakes are generated from the acceleration response spectrum for Level 2 earthquakes, as specified in the Japanese seismic code, utilizing three different sets of phase information: Kobe, El Centro, and random phase records. The effectiveness of the DBDM is scrutinized through a comparison with results obtained from time history analysis. The results obtained for 6-, 12-, and 18-story RC-coupled shear walls with energy dissipation dampers indicate that the proposed design methodology effectively meets the specified design objectives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3957 KiB  
Article
A Consensus-Based Likert–LMBP Model for Evaluating the Earthquake Resistance of Existing Buildings
by Burak Oz and Memduh Karalar
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(15), 6492; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156492 - 25 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 890
Abstract
Almost every year, earthquakes threaten many lives, so not only do developing countries suffer negative effects from earthquakes on their economies but also developed ones that lose significant economic resources, suffer massive fatalities, and have to suspend businesses and occupancy. Existing buildings in [...] Read more.
Almost every year, earthquakes threaten many lives, so not only do developing countries suffer negative effects from earthquakes on their economies but also developed ones that lose significant economic resources, suffer massive fatalities, and have to suspend businesses and occupancy. Existing buildings in earthquake-prone areas need structural safety assessments or seismic vulnerability assessments. It is crucial to assess earthquake damage before an earthquake to prevent further losses, and to assess building damage after an earthquake to aid emergency responders. Many models do not take into account the surveyor’s subjectivity, which causes observational vagueness and uncertainty. Additionally, a lack of experience or knowledge, engineering errors, and inconspicuous parameters could affect the assessment. Thus, a consensus-based Likert–LMBP (the Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation algorithm) model was developed to rapidly assess the seismic performance of buildings based on post-earthquake visual images in the devastating Kahramanmaraş earthquake, which occurred on 6 February 2023 and had magnitudes of 7.7 and 7.6 and severely affected 11 districts in Türkiye. Vulnerability variables for buildings are assessed using linguistic variables on a five-point Likert scale based on expert consensus values derived from post-earthquake visual images. The building vulnerability parameters required for the proposed model are determined as the top hill–slope effect, weak story effect, soft story effect, short column effect, plan irregularity, pounding effect, heavy overhang effect, number of stories, construction year, structural system state, and apparent building quality. Structural analyses categorized buildings as no damage, slight damage, moderate damage, or severe damage/collapse. Training the model resulted in quite good performance (mse = 7.26306 × 10−5). Based on the statistical analysis of the entire data set, the mean and the standard deviation of the errors were 0.00068 and 0.00852, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 7788 KiB  
Article
Comparison between the Dynamic Responses of Steel Buildings with Medium and Deep Columns under Several Seismic Intensities
by Federico Valenzuela-Beltrán, Mario D. Llanes-Tizoc, Eden Bojorquez, Juan Bojorquez, J. M. Leal-Graciano, Victor Baca, Robespierre Chavez and Alfredo Reyes-Salazar
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 5067; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14125067 - 11 Jun 2024
Viewed by 640
Abstract
Structural engineers often use deep columns in high seismic areas to reduce drifts, yet this somehow contradicts what is stated in some tests in the sense that even though deep columns may satisfy current seismic provisions, they can suffer premature twisting; this is [...] Read more.
Structural engineers often use deep columns in high seismic areas to reduce drifts, yet this somehow contradicts what is stated in some tests in the sense that even though deep columns may satisfy current seismic provisions, they can suffer premature twisting; this is an indication that a lot of research is needed in this area. Numerical and experimental studies have been conducted to estimate the response of steel buildings with medium and deep columns under the action of static and cyclic loading; however, studies accounting for the dynamic characteristics of buildings and strong motions are not common. In addition, responses in terms of local parameters have not been considered either. In this study, the nonlinear seismic responses of steel buildings with perimeter moment-resisting frames and medium (W14) columns are numerically calculated and compared to those of similar steel buildings with equivalent deep columns in terms of cost (W27 and larger). Low-, mid-, and high-rise steel building models with different dynamic characteristics, as well as several strong motions with different frequency contents, are considered. Results indicate that the drifts of the models with medium columns may be up to 140% greater than those of the models with deep columns. Significant reductions are also observed for top displacements, normalized interstory shears, and combined normalized axial loads and bending moments. Hence, the seismic demands of the buildings with deep columns may be much smaller than those of the buildings with medium columns and, therefore, the buildings with deep columns exhibit a superior behavior, which results in more economical designs. The reduction is greater for the case of low- and mid-rise buildings than for high-rise buildings. One of the reasons for this is that as medium columns are replaced by deep columns, the stiffness and the strength increase, which are lower in the tallest model. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5241 KiB  
Article
A Damage Index for Assessing Seismic-Resistant Designs of Masonry Wall Buildings Reinforced with X-Bracing Concrete Frames
by Yossakorn Chonratana and Vuttichai Chatpattananan
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(23), 12566; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312566 - 21 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1354
Abstract
In this paper, a suitable damage index is demonstrated to assess the seismic-resistant design of masonry wall buildings reinforced with double x-bracing concrete frames. As a criterion indicative of the damage level that might occur after an earthquake, the damage index can be [...] Read more.
In this paper, a suitable damage index is demonstrated to assess the seismic-resistant design of masonry wall buildings reinforced with double x-bracing concrete frames. As a criterion indicative of the damage level that might occur after an earthquake, the damage index can be calculated by using analytic results, by using the Park–Ang formula on masonry wall buildings reinforced with concrete structures, and by adjusting the index values in accordance with the results of the analysed models. The data used in this study are collected from the results of four-storey concrete structures with masonry walls under cyclical lateral forces. To simulate the masonry walls’ structural behaviours for damage assessment, x-bracings placed as crosses on each bracing are used to support the compressive strength. Then, the analysis results are used to assess the damage that occurs to the masonry wall building structure by considering deformation and energy decay; additionally, a suitable damage index is calculated for each damage level. The damage index can be considered in the seismic-resistant design of masonry walls reinforced with x-bracing concrete frames. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 6064 KiB  
Article
Seismogram Rearrangement as a Perspective Basis for Defining New Attributes
by Ranko Babić and Lidija Babić
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(20), 11133; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011133 - 10 Oct 2023
Viewed by 917
Abstract
Proper regulative in earthquake risk reduction, hazard assessment, earthquake resistant design and construction of structures, should be under perpetual improvement. They are mainly the result of earthquake study and analysis of post-seismic effects. In this context, a new frame for seismogram analysis is [...] Read more.
Proper regulative in earthquake risk reduction, hazard assessment, earthquake resistant design and construction of structures, should be under perpetual improvement. They are mainly the result of earthquake study and analysis of post-seismic effects. In this context, a new frame for seismogram analysis is proposed, based on its decomposition into elementary and single (positive and negative) fluctuations (EF/SF). Decomposition enables rearrangement, both providing the frame for defining new attributes, where several main ones are proposed and elaborated in the paper: fan diagram of EFs structural axes; R- or RQ-envelope, formed over positive and over negative peaks of ordered SFs; two forms of difference functions of positive and negative R/RQ-envelopes, as a measure of seismogram’s (a)symmetry, in respect to t-axis; distributions of SFs durations. Several others are in perspective. Analogy between R-envelope and seismogram’s spectrum is considered from the aspects of arranged elements, and asymptotic behavior of these two functional attributes. More objective definition of seismogram duration is proposed, determined by linear regression across the scatter plot of SFs peaks. R-envelope showed itself as an invariant in the seismogram population, and the distribution of SFs durations as well. Results are presented through extensive graphics, backed with mathematical description. Thorough discussion of the concept and results is given. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 13906 KiB  
Article
A New Type of Bipartite Random Graph as a Transform of Seismogram and Its Potential for Organizing Seismic Databases
by Ranko Babić and Lidija Babić
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(18), 10303; https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810303 - 14 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 877
Abstract
This paper proposes a method to reduce seismogram variability as a determining factor in its interpretation, processing, and clustering. By introducing the concept of single fluctuations (SFs), the seismogram can be parsed into a sequence of random impulses with subsequent ordering. This rearrangement [...] Read more.
This paper proposes a method to reduce seismogram variability as a determining factor in its interpretation, processing, and clustering. By introducing the concept of single fluctuations (SFs), the seismogram can be parsed into a sequence of random impulses with subsequent ordering. This rearrangement of SFs, if they are assigned by positive integers, represents the formal mapping of a regular string of integers into a random one, which can be represented with a bipartite random graph (bigraph). Due to its specific randomness, such a bigraph is considered a new type of random balanced bigraph. The R-envelope and RQ-envelope, its equidistant version, are defined by tracing the peak envelope over ordered SFs. The equivalence and complementariness of the RQ and bigraph are considered and discussed, forming a combined characteristic of the seismogram. The R/RQ provided a considerable reduction in seismogram variability, which was confirmed by creating and analyzing an ensemble of RQ from several seismograms. In the RQ domain, distance is defined as a possible basis for metrics and clustering, but the ensemble variability was quite narrow and not as suitable for this purpose. Otherwise, the ensemble shows high redundancy hidden in the seismogram population. As for the bigraph, the mesh of its edges is structuralized in bundles, forming a skeleton, which reflects the internal structural content of the seismogram. The distance over the domain of bigraphs is proposed to show the possibility of clustering. This means that only a combined RQ and bigraph provides a suitable frame for seismogram representation with reduced variability and, thus, the potential for more effectively organizing seismic databases and a deeper interpretation of seismograms; therefore, RQs and bigraphs can be considered as a transform of a seismogram. Many aspects of these concepts are thoroughly discussed. The similarity between concepts of SF and wavelets is briefly considered. This very complex theme is new and promises broad further research. All issues considered in the paper are abundantly illustrated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 4350 KiB  
Article
A Fracture Model for Dynamic Sliding Safety Evaluation of a Concrete Dam Subjected to Seismic Excitation
by Jeeho Lee and Hyeong Seok Lim
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(18), 10294; https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810294 - 14 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1577
Abstract
The Sliding Safety Factor (SSF) is a crucial criterion for the sliding stability evaluation of concrete dam structures. A concrete gravity dam subjected to strong earthquakes undergoes progressive fractures, in addition to pre-existing fractures, at the dam–foundation interface, which causes a reduction in [...] Read more.
The Sliding Safety Factor (SSF) is a crucial criterion for the sliding stability evaluation of concrete dam structures. A concrete gravity dam subjected to strong earthquakes undergoes progressive fractures, in addition to pre-existing fractures, at the dam–foundation interface, which causes a reduction in the shear strength against sliding. In this study, a new SSF is suggested to take account of the progressive fractured area at the dam–foundation interface. A contact and sliding model for the dam–foundation system is also suggested to compute the dynamically varying normal forces and sliding motions for the suggested SSF. To investigate the effect of the progressively fractured area on the sliding safety evaluation, the conventional, improved, and newly suggested SSFs are compared using the dynamic seismic analysis results of a concrete gravity dam. The conventional formulation of the SSF, in which the fractured area is not represented, yields extremely overestimated sliding safety judgements when a dam is subjected to strong earthquakes. On the other hand, the newly suggested SSF with the proposed contact–sliding model provides more realistic and conservative sliding safety evaluation results than the others. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 8611 KiB  
Article
Seismic Performance of Frame Structure with Hysteretic Intermediate Discontinuity
by Angelo Di Egidio, Stefano Pagliaro and Alessandro Contento
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(9), 5373; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095373 - 25 Apr 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1242
Abstract
The introduction of an intermediate discontinuity in frame structures is commonly named inter-storey isolation. Inter-storey isolation is an effective technique for the seismic protection of new or existing frame structures. The devices that are used to perform the discontinuity, mainly of the structural [...] Read more.
The introduction of an intermediate discontinuity in frame structures is commonly named inter-storey isolation. Inter-storey isolation is an effective technique for the seismic protection of new or existing frame structures. The devices that are used to perform the discontinuity, mainly of the structural stiffness, are placed at a higher storey level of the structure and not at the base level. In the latter years, this technique has gained increasing interest because, especially for existing buildings, it is cheaper and technically easier to implement than base isolation. In this paper, the attention is focused on the effects on a frame structure of an intermediate elasto-plastic discontinuity that can be described by a Bouc-Wen model. The frame structure with the intermediate discontinuity is modelled with a 3-DOF reduced model. Its dynamical behaviour is investigated by considering both harmonic and seismic external excitation. The results are summarized in gain maps aimed at finding the parameters that optimize the seismic behaviour of the structure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

35 pages, 3748 KiB  
Review
Pushover Analysis in Seismic Engineering: A Detailed Chronology and Review of Techniques for Structural Assessment
by Kevin Karanja Kuria and Orsolya Katalin Kegyes-Brassai
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(1), 151; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010151 - 23 Dec 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3832
Abstract
This study analyzes the progression, utilization, and inherent challenges of traditional non-linear static procedures (NSPs) such as the capacity spectrum method, the displacement coefficient method, and the N2 method for evaluating seismic performance in structures. These methods, along with advanced versions such as [...] Read more.
This study analyzes the progression, utilization, and inherent challenges of traditional non-linear static procedures (NSPs) such as the capacity spectrum method, the displacement coefficient method, and the N2 method for evaluating seismic performance in structures. These methods, along with advanced versions such as multi-mode, modal, adaptive, and energy-based pushover analysis, help determine seismic demands, enriching our grasp on structural behaviors and guiding design choices. While these methods have improved accuracy by considering major vibration modes, they often fall short in addressing intricate aspects such as bidirectional responses, torsional effects, soil-structure interplay, and variations in displacement coefficients. Nevertheless, NSPs offer a more comprehensive and detailed analysis compared to rapid visual screening methods, providing a deeper understanding of potential vulnerabilities and more accurate predictions of structural performance. Their efficiency and reduced computational demands, compared to the comprehensive nonlinear response history analysis (NLRHA), make NSPs a favored tool for engineers aiming for swift seismic performance checks. Their accuracy and application become crucial when gauging seismic risks and potential damage across multiple structures. This paper underscores the ongoing refinements to these methods, reflecting the sustained attention they receive from both industry professionals and researchers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop