Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.8
2.7
Journals
Brain Sciences
Special Issues
Unilateral Neglect Assessment and Rehabilitation
share announcement

Unilateral Neglect Assessment and Rehabilitation

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2019) | Viewed by 14787

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Cecilia Guariglia

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
2. Cognitive and Motor Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa, Rome, Italy
Interests: spatial cognition and memory; human navigation; clinical neuropsychology; neuropsychological rehabilitation; topographical disorientation; developmental topographical disorientation; individual differences and aging
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Dr. Mauro Mancuso

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
National Health Service, Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine Unit, Az.USL Tuscany, SouthEst-Grosseto, Italy
Interests: hemispatial Neglect; stroke rehabilitation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a frequent and often underestimated cognitive disorder which impairs the recovery of patients with acquired brain lesions.

In recent years, efforts have been directed towards developing new assessment tools and effective treatments, however, shared approaches for the assessment of USN and tailored treatments are still presently lacking.

The aim of this Special Issue is to give an overview of the recent advancements in the treatment of USN and the evaluation of rehabilitation efficacy. We are also interested in studies regarding the effectiveness of traditional or novel treatments on functionality and long-term outcomes, in particular, studies aimed at facilitating the recovery of daily life functioning, or assessing and/or treating selective aspects of USN syndrome.

Prof. Dr. Cecilia Guariglia
Dr. Mauro Mancuso
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Unilateral spatial neglect
  • USN
  • cognitive disorder
  • rehabilitation efficacy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 748 KiB  
Article
Caloric Vestibular Stimulation Reduces the Directional Bias in Representational Neglect
by Julie Holé, Karen T. Reilly, Stuart Nash and Gilles Rode
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(6), 323; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10060323 - 26 May 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2912
Abstract
Caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS) can temporarily reduce visuospatial neglect and related symptoms. The present study examined the effect of CVS on representational neglect during free exploration of the map of France. We asked patients to name cities they could mentally “see” on the [...] Read more.
Caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS) can temporarily reduce visuospatial neglect and related symptoms. The present study examined the effect of CVS on representational neglect during free exploration of the map of France. We asked patients to name cities they could mentally “see” on the map of France, without giving them any directional instructions related to the left or right sides of the map. In right brain damaged patients with left visuospatial neglect, the mental representation of the map was asymmetrical (favoring the right side). After stimulation, neglect patients named more towns on the left side of the map, leading to a significant reduction in map representation asymmetry. Our findings are consistent with previous studies on visuospatial neglect and are in favor of a central effect of vestibular stimulation on mechanisms involved in space representation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Unilateral Neglect Assessment and Rehabilitation)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 219 KiB  
Article
Spatial Neglect in Stroke: Identification, Disease Process and Association with Outcome During Inpatient Rehabilitation
by Ulrike Hammerbeck, Matthew Gittins, Andy Vail, Lizz Paley, Sarah F Tyson and Audrey Bowen
Brain Sci. 2019, 9(12), 374; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9120374 - 13 Dec 2019
Cited by 39 | Viewed by 7726
Abstract
We established spatial neglect prevalence, disease profile and amount of therapy that inpatient stroke survivors received, and outcomes at discharge using Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) data. We used data from 88,664 National Health Service (NHS) admissions in England, Wales and Northern [...] Read more.
We established spatial neglect prevalence, disease profile and amount of therapy that inpatient stroke survivors received, and outcomes at discharge using Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) data. We used data from 88,664 National Health Service (NHS) admissions in England, Wales and Northern Ireland (July 2013–July 2015), for stroke survivors still in hospital after 3 days with a completed baseline neglect National Institute for Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Thirty percent had neglect (NIHSS item 11 ≥ 1) and they were slightly older (78 years) than those without neglect (75 years). Neglect was observed more commonly in women (33 vs. 27%) and in individuals with a premorbid dependency (37 vs. 28%). Survivors of mild stroke were far less likely to present with neglect than those with severe stroke (4% vs. 84%). Those with neglect had a greatly increased length of stay (27 vs. 10 days). They received a comparable amount of average daily occupational and physiotherapy during their longer inpatient stay but on discharge a greater percentage of individuals with neglect were dependent on the modified Rankin scale (76 vs. 57%). Spatial neglect is common and associated with worse clinical outcomes. These results add to our understanding of neglect to inform clinical guidelines, service provision and priorities for future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Unilateral Neglect Assessment and Rehabilitation)
13 pages, 431 KiB  
Article
Effects of Prism Adaptation on Reference Systems for Extrapersonal Space in Neglect Patients
by Laura Abbruzzese, Alessio Damora, Gabriella Antonucci, Pierluigi Zoccolotti and Mauro Mancuso
Brain Sci. 2019, 9(11), 327; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9110327 - 16 Nov 2019
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3407
Abstract
Up to now, rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect has focused on egocentric forms of neglect, whereas less is known about the possibility to improve allocentric deficits. The present study aimed to examine the efficacy of prism adaptation (PA) training on patients with different [...] Read more.
Up to now, rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect has focused on egocentric forms of neglect, whereas less is known about the possibility to improve allocentric deficits. The present study aimed to examine the efficacy of prism adaptation (PA) training on patients with different forms of neglect: egocentric, allocentric, or mixed. Twenty-eight patients were assessed with specific neglect tests before (T0) and after (T1) 10 sessions of PA training. Performance in the Apples Cancellation test was used to identify patients with egocentric (n = 6), allocentric (n = 5), or mixed (n = 17) forms of neglect. In the overall group of patients, PA training produced significant improvements in performance across different neglect tests. In terms of the egocentric–allocentric distinction, the training was effective in reducing omissions in the left part of space in the Apples Cancellation test both for patients with egocentric neglect and mixed neglect. By contrast, errors of commissions (marking the inability to detect the left part of the target stimulus, i.e., allocentric neglect) remained unchanged after PA in patients with allocentric neglect and actually increased marginally in patients with mixed neglect. The PA training is effective in improving egocentric neglect, while it is ineffective on the allocentric form of the disturbance. Notably, the allocentric component of neglect is frequently impaired, although this is most often in conjunction with the egocentric impairment, yielding the mixed form of neglect. This stresses the importance of developing exercises tuned to improving allocentric neglect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Unilateral Neglect Assessment and Rehabilitation)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop