Advances of Particle Therapy in Prostate Cancer

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 September 2024) | Viewed by 2462

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case School of Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
Interests: molecular imaging; prostate cancer; targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer among men in the United States. Radiation therapy has been one of the major treatment options for prostate cancer. Recent technical advances in external beam RT using photons—for example, SBRT and IMRT—have permitted the delivery of a higher dose to tumors and a lower dose to surrounding tissues. At the same time, basic and clinical research into external RT using particles (particle RT) has been carried out for the purpose of establishing more effective and non-invasive treatments. Among the particles used in such treatments, protons and carbon ions are the ones most commonly used. New technologies and clinical approaches have been developed to improve therapies. This Special Issue aims to introduce recent advances and breakthroughs in the particle treatment of prostate cancer. Submissions of communications, full papers, mini-reviews, and reviews are all welcomed. We look forward to your contributions and fruitful discussions.

Dr. Xinning Wang
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • particle therapy
  • radiation therapy
  • diagnose
  • treatment
  • SBRT
  • IMRT

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

10 pages, 1737 KiB  
Article
5-Years Analysis of Effectivity and Toxicity of Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer—A Retrospective Analysis
by Jiri Kubeš, Silvia Sláviková, Pavel Vítek, Alexandra Haas, Barbora Ondrová, Kateřina Dedečková, Michal Andrlík, Martin Domanský, Kateřina Jiránková, Veronika Schlencová, Anh Harazimová, Barbora Turková, Tomáš Doležal, Sarah Falah Abass Al-Hamami and Vladimír Vondráček
Cancers 2023, 15(18), 4571; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184571 - 15 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1534
Abstract
Background: We retrospectively analyzed the 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and occurrence of late toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiotherapy. Methodology: In the period from January 2013 to June 2018, 853 patients with prostate cancer were [...] Read more.
Background: We retrospectively analyzed the 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and occurrence of late toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiotherapy. Methodology: In the period from January 2013 to June 2018, 853 patients with prostate cancer were treated with an ultra-hypofractionated schedule (36.25 GyE/five fractions). The mean PSA value was 6.7 (0.7–19.7) µg/L. There were 318 (37.3%), 314 (36.8%), and 221 (25.9%) patients at low (LR), favorable intermediate (F-IR), and unfavorable intermediate risk (U-IR), respectively. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to 197 (23.1%) patients, and 7 (0.8%) patients had adjuvant hormonal therapy. The whole group of patients reached median follow-up time at 62.7 months, and their mean age was 64.8 (40.0–85.7) years. The bDFS rates and late toxicity profile were evaluated. Results: Median treatment time was 10 (7–38) days. Estimated 5-year bDFS rates were 96.5%, 93.7%, and 91.2% for low-, favorable intermediate-, and unfavorable intermediate-risk groups, respectively. Cumulative late toxicity (CTCAE v4.0) of G2+ was as follows: gastrointestinal (GI)—G2: 9.1%; G3: 0.5%; genitourinary (GU)—G2: 4.3%, and no G3 toxicity was observed. PSA relapse was observed in 58 (6.8%) patients: 16 local, 22 lymph node, 4 bone recurrences, and 10 combined sites of relapse were detected. Throughout the follow-up period, 40 patients (4.7%) died, though none due to prostate cancer. Conclusion: Ultra-hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy is an effective treatment for low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with long-term bDFS rates comparable to other techniques. It is promising for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer and has acceptable long-term GI and favorable GU toxicity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Particle Therapy in Prostate Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 729 KiB  
Review
Health Disparities and Inequities in the Utilization of Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer
by Cyrus Gavin Washington and Curtiland Deville
Cancers 2024, 16(22), 3837; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16223837 - 15 Nov 2024
Viewed by 367
Abstract
Our study sought to review and summarize the reported health disparities and inequities in the utilization of proton beam therapy (PBT) for prostate cancer. We queried the PubMed search engine through 12/2023 for original publications examining disparate utilization of PBT for prostate cancer. [...] Read more.
Our study sought to review and summarize the reported health disparities and inequities in the utilization of proton beam therapy (PBT) for prostate cancer. We queried the PubMed search engine through 12/2023 for original publications examining disparate utilization of PBT for prostate cancer. The query terms included the following: prostate cancer AND proton AND (disparities OR IMRT OR race OR insurance OR socioeconomic OR inequities)”. Studies were included if they involved United States patients, examined PBT in prostate cancer, and addressed health inequities. From this query, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 13 population-based analyses, 5 single-institutional analyses, 3 cost/modeling investigations, and 1 survey-based study. The analyses revealed that in addition to age-related and insurance-related disparities, race and socioeconomic status played significant roles in the receipt of PBT. The likelihood of receiving PBT was lower for non-White patients in population-based and single-institution analyses. Socioeconomic metrics, such as higher median income and higher education level, portended an increased likelihood of receiving PBT. Conclusively, substantial age-based, racial, socioeconomic/insurance-related, and facility-associated disparities and inequities existed for PBT utilization in prostate cancer. The identification of these disparities provides a framework to better address these as the utility of PBT continues to expand across the US and globally. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Particle Therapy in Prostate Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop