Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
2.7
2.0
Journals
Children
Special Issues
Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Pediatrics
share announcement

Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Pediatrics

A special issue of Children (ISSN 2227-9067). This special issue belongs to the section "Pediatric Nursing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 November 2024 | Viewed by 5400

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Holger Hauch

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Children's Pain Therapy and Paediatric Palliative Care, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
Interests: home-based palliative care; pediatrics; cancer; end-of-life-care
Dr. Julia Wager

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. German Paediatric Pain Center, Children’s and Adolescents’ Hospital, Datteln, Germany
2. Department of Children’s Pain Therapy and Paediatric Palliative Care, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University School of Medicine, Witten, Germany
Interests: pain management; clinical psychology; health psychology; pain medicine; public health; pain assessment; anaesthesiology; anesthesiology; palliative medicine; health literacy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the UK, a rising prevalence of children and adolescents with life-limiting diseases has been reported. Thus, there is a need for increasing care in both the in- and outpatient sectors. Especially in end-of-life care, children with life-limiting diseases can suffer from various symptoms, which can have a negative effect on the quality of life This Special Issue invites you to contribute original research articles and reviews on “Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Pediatrics”. The editors are delighted to review manuscripts which focus on symptom management, psychological aspects of care, special needs and problems in end-of-life care with all the perspectives of a multidisciplinary team. If you would like to contribute, please feel free to contact us.

Dr. Holger Hauch
Dr. Julia Wager
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Children is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • end-of-life care
  • palliative home care
  • pediatric palliative care
  • pediatric oncology
  • cancer
  • psychological aspects of care

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

13 pages, 843 KiB  
Article
Utilization and Evaluation of Ethics Consultation Services in Neonatal Intensive Care
by Pia Göbert, Pia von Blanckenburg, Rolf F. Maier and Carola Seifart
Children 2024, 11(11), 1349; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11111349 - 4 Nov 2024
Viewed by 492
Abstract
Background: The opportunities of perinatal medicine have improved, but this has also been accompanied by increasing ethical challenges. Clinical ethics consultation services (CEC) could support medical teams facing these. However, nothing is currently known about the availability, utilization and evaluation of CEC in [...] Read more.
Background: The opportunities of perinatal medicine have improved, but this has also been accompanied by increasing ethical challenges. Clinical ethics consultation services (CEC) could support medical teams facing these. However, nothing is currently known about the availability, utilization and evaluation of CEC in German neonatology units. Methods: This study was designed as a national, descriptive, mixed quantitative–qualitative questionnaire study. The head physicians of the pediatric departments and the heads (medical and nursing) of the corresponding neonatal intensive care units of the 213 German perinatal centers were asked to participate. Results: Ninety percent of the respondents (responding rate 24.4–38.0%) stated that CEC are established and available. However, utilization is rather low [rarely N = 40 (54.1%), never N = 12, (16.2%), occasionally N = 19 (25.7%)], although it was rated as very helpful. There was a significant correlation between utilization and perceived general usefulness (r = 0.224, p = 0.033) and support (r = 0.41, p < 0.001); whereas evaluations differed significantly between professional groups (t = −2.298, p = 0.23, Cohen’s d = 0.42). Conclusions: The contradiction between the low utilization despite positive evaluations could be related to perceived hurdles. These and the different perceptions within the professional groups give rise to the consideration of whether alternative approaches, e.g., liaison services, would be preferable in neonatology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Pediatrics)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1291 KiB  
Article
Dronabinol Is Not a Game Changer in Pediatric Palliative Care: Results from a Retrospective Study
by Holger Hauch, Annika Lisakowski, Julia Wager and Boris Zernikow
Children 2024, 11(9), 1054; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091054 - 28 Aug 2024
Viewed by 752
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Patients with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) often suffer from restlessness, spasticity, pain, and seizures. Dronabinol (DRB) may have a relieving effect; however, data on the effectiveness of DRB in children with LLCs are limited to outpatients. The aim of this study was to [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Patients with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) often suffer from restlessness, spasticity, pain, and seizures. Dronabinol (DRB) may have a relieving effect; however, data on the effectiveness of DRB in children with LLCs are limited to outpatients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DRB. Methods: Retrospective analysis of inpatients. Results: From 2011 to 2021, 1219 patients were admitted. Of these, 63 patients (63.5% male, age: 10.4 (SD = 6.3) years) were treated with DRB; 96.8% had a neurological disease, and 26 patients were started on DRB (group A), while 37 were admitted with existing DRB (group B). The effective doses were 0.21 (SD = 0.11) in group A and 0.48 (SD = 0.5) mg/kg/BW/day in group B (p = 0.01). Subjective response rates to DRB in both groups (good/moderate effect) were 9.5%/38.1% for spasticity and 1.6%/25.4% for restlessness. However, no reduction in seizures, restlessness, or demand medication was observed in 24 h protocols when patients started DRB in group A. Three patients experienced severe side effects (e.g., respiratory depression). Other side effects included fatigue (22.2%) and behavioral problems (14.3%). Conclusions: Subjective positive effects could not be confirmed by more objective data. Side effects can be severe. Thus, DRB should be started in a well-monitored setting and only with clear indications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Pediatrics)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 226 KiB  
Article
The Practical Application of the Individual Care Plan for Pediatric Palliative Care: A Mixed-Method Study
by Chantal Y. Joren, Judith L. Aris-Meijer, Leontien C. M. Kremer, Suzanne C. Hofman, Hester Rippen-Wagner, Ria Slingerland-Blom, Chantal van der Velden, Meggi A. Schuiling-Otten, Project Team ICP, A. A. Eduard Verhagen and Marijke C. Kars
Children 2024, 11(8), 967; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11080967 - 11 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1299
Abstract
Background/Objective: The Individual Care Plan (ICP) for pediatric palliative care was developed to provide person-centered care for the individual child and family. Currently, a lack of clarity remains regarding the use and function of the ICP in daily practice. To further implement the [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: The Individual Care Plan (ICP) for pediatric palliative care was developed to provide person-centered care for the individual child and family. Currently, a lack of clarity remains regarding the use and function of the ICP in daily practice. To further implement the ICP, it is important to identify how parents and healthcare professionals use the ICP and which obstacles or benefits are experienced. Methods: This mixed-method study used qualitative interviews and quantitative questionnaires in (bereaved) parents and healthcare professionals with experience with the ICP. Results: Parents and healthcare professionals used the ICP to establish a joint plan for care and treatment of the child to coordinate care and to achieve child- and family-centered care. This includes both obstacles that complicate achieving care goals and benefits that make it easier. Furthermore, responsibilities for the ICP remained unclear, and there was no set point in the illness trajectory for drawing up the ICP. Conclusions: Parents and healthcare professionals use the ICP as intended. However, uncertainties regarding timing, roles and responsibilities prevent optimal use of the ICP. Agreements on timing and responsibilities are needed for further ICP implementation in daily pediatric palliative care practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Pediatrics)

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 657 KiB  
Review
Quality of Care in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Scoping Review
by Tania Ruiz-Gil and Francisco Ródenas-Rigla
Children 2023, 10(12), 1922; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10121922 - 13 Dec 2023
Viewed by 2218
Abstract
Palliative care (PC) enhances the quality of life for patients and families facing life-threatening conditions. While PC is well-established for adults, not all practices apply to pediatrics. Consequently, specific quality indicators for Pediatric Palliative Care (PPC) must be identified. This scoping review aimed [...] Read more.
Palliative care (PC) enhances the quality of life for patients and families facing life-threatening conditions. While PC is well-established for adults, not all practices apply to pediatrics. Consequently, specific quality indicators for Pediatric Palliative Care (PPC) must be identified. This scoping review aimed to identify the variables associated with the quality of care of PPC patients in Spain, focusing specifically on three areas: structure and process of care, psychological aspects of care, and care of patients approaching the end of life. The review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, and Dialnet databases covering the period extending from January 2000 to May 2023. Finally, 35 studies were identified for the complete review. A total of 30 studies include variables associated with the structure and process of care, 20 include variables associated with psychological aspects of care, and 23 studies integrate variables related to patient care at the end of life. Analysis suggests that enhancing professional training in aspects such as communication with patients and families, creating intimate spaces with flexible visiting hours, increasing emotional support, promoting frequent contact with healthcare teams, and transparently communicating about illness and imminent death to both families and minors could improve the quality of PPC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Pediatrics)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-4
Back to TopTop