Innovative Curriculum and Teaching Practice for Advanced Learners

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Curriculum and Instruction".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2024) | Viewed by 7293

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Gifted Education, William & Mary School of Education, Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA
Interests: Gifted education

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Introduction

This special issue addresses the needs of academically talented students, at a time of limited resources, and support for their academic development.  Many schools have limited their gifted programs, some have eliminated them, and others have merely neglected them in the face of political interventions in school curricula and limited money to run effective operations. Talented learners also experienced a decrease in test scores during the pandemic, yet no one has mentioned the importance of this fact in respect to their learning.  We hope that this special issue will renew concerns about the academic progress of these learners, even in the face of public apathy.

The field of gifted education and talent development has experienced periods of intense activity (1974–1985) and periods of less intense engagement or support  (2010–current).  However, research efforts have grown and longitudinal studies have been conducted that verify the characteristics, predilections, and life trajectories of these learners. Research on the effectiveness of all forms of acceleration has continued to grow. Smaller studies have suggested other intervention pathways that have been successful.  Research on programmatic approaches including special schools has been ongoing. 

Purpose 

This special issue has several purposes: 

-To address the issue of talent development in schools;

-To demonstrate innovative pathways for schools to address the needs of talented K-12 learners;

-To explore differentiated learner needs, based on their profiles of strengths. 

Audience 

The audience for this special issue will be educators at all levels from K-12 through college, parents, and politicians, including school board members, who want to gain insight into this special needs population. 

Outline of the Special Issue 

In keeping with the theme of innovative practices, the chapter’s authors have been selected to address areas of their current research that speak to such practices in their work with talented students and their teachers. 

The outline of the special issue has been organized to reflect an overview of the concept of talent development, a brief review of research supporting it, and a few models that have addressed it. This chapter is followed by one that focuses on finding talent in all of its forms and domains and the individuals most likely to access the tools necessary to uncover it at different stages of development. Three chapters on domain-specific talent areas follow that attempt to lay out the interventions that have proven to be effective with students who possess talent in the verbal, mathematical, and spatial domains.  These are also the domains that schools typically address in school curricula. The next two chapters focus on underrepresented populations in schools’ gifted programs, students who are twice-exceptional, and the gifted and disabled; students from poverty; and students who are not yet proficient in English. One chapter focuses solely on Black students. Taken together, these two chapters highlight the evidence of success in finding and serving these students in gifted programs. Next, two chapters emphasize the research-based approaches to both the curriculum and instructions across content areas, one addressing curriculum models and the other focusing on innovative instructional approaches that assist teachers and parents in developing talent.  The Specia Issue concludes with a glance to the future, where the arc of talent development needs to advance in order to best serve these deserving students in the future.  

The suggested authors have extensive experience in teaching and administering gifted programs for talented learners at K-12 levels as well as working in state agencies and universities to prepare teachers and others to be effective with them in classrooms.  They also have research expertise in studying the processes of talent development in selective domains.  

References (recent) 

Books

 VanTassel-Baska, J. & Little, C. eds. (2023) Content-based curriculum for gifted learners 4th ed.Routledge. 

 Johnsen, S. & VanTassel-Baska, J. eds. (2022) Handbook on assessment: Identification, learning progress, and evaluation. Routledge. 

VanTassel-Baska, J. Ed. (2021) Talent development: Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge. 

VanTassel-Baska, J. & Baska, A. (2020) Curriculum planning and instructional design. 3rd edition.  Prufrock Press. 

Refereed Articles and guest editorships* of proposed editor 

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2023). The Case for Content-Based Curriculum for Advanced Learners. Gifted Child Today, 46(2), 142–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221149443 

VanTassel-Baska, J., & Brown, E. (2022). An analysis of stakeholder perceptions of gifted programs: A report card on gifted program performance. Gifted Child Today, 45(3), 160-175. 

*VanTassel-Baska, J. & Videgor, H. (2020) From the guest editors, a special issue on curriculum, Roeper Review, 42, (3). 

VanTassel-Baska, J., Hubbard, G., & Robbins, J. (2020) The role of teacher behaviors in differentiating instruction. Roeper Review, 42,(3). 

*VanTassel-Baska, J. (2019) Introduction to special issue on evaluation, From the editor’s perspective. Gifted Child Today, 42,(4).

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2019) A coordinator’s perspective on the utilization of gifted program evaluation. Gifted Child Today, 42, (4).

VanTassel-Baska, J. & Hubbard, G. (2019) An evaluation of eight gifted programs, using the NAGC program standards. Gifted Child Today, 42, (4).

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2019) Are We Differentiating Effectively for the Gifted or Not? A Commentary on Differentiated Curriculum Use in Schools. Gifted Child Today, Column, 42, 3, 165-167. 

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2018) Achievement unlocked: Effective curriculum interventions with low income students. Gifted Child Quarterly.  Special issue on gifted students from low income households, 62, (1) 68-82. 

*VanTassel-Baska, J & Stambaugh, T. (2018) Introduction to the special issue on gifted students from low income households. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, (1) 3-5. 

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2018) American gifted education policy. Gifted Child Today, 41,4. 

*VanTassel-Baska, J & Coleman M. R. (2018) Introduction to special international issue on policies in other countries in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 41,4. 

VanTassel-Baska, J. & Hubbard, G. F.  (2016) Rural gifted curriculum.  Journal of Advanced Academics. 

Prof. Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • talent development
  • spatial ability/aptitude
  • verbal ability/aptitude
  • mathematical ability/aptitude
  • content-based curriculum
  • advanced learning
  • instructional strategies
  • critical thinking
  • creative thinking/innovative thinking
  • problem-solving
  • independent thinking
  • innovation
  • creativity
  • open-ended questioning

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

22 pages, 1300 KiB  
Article
Conceptions Towards Early Academic Studies in Computer Science: Focusing on Students, Lecturers, and Parents
by Lior Miller-Markovitz, Gad M. Landau, Daphna Haran and Roza Leikin
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1282; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121282 - 22 Nov 2024
Viewed by 322
Abstract
The goal of this study was to identify conceptions towards early academic studies in computer science. We focus on a program which offers high school students the unique opportunity to earn a B.Sc. degree in parallel to their studies, resulting in them holding [...] Read more.
The goal of this study was to identify conceptions towards early academic studies in computer science. We focus on a program which offers high school students the unique opportunity to earn a B.Sc. degree in parallel to their studies, resulting in them holding a prestigious degree at an early age. Activity theory framed the design of this study. Fifteen voluntary participants representing three distinct research groups participated in this study: students, parents, and lecturers. The data were collected using a qualitative research paradigm through semi-structured interviews. The findings demonstrated that the research groups mostly held distinctive conceptions. Little similarity may be detected. We argue that high school students are more likely to succeed in early academic programs when they have a rigorous curriculum, an on-staff educational consultant, and lessons that are exclusively attended by other students in their peer group. These types of programs, in our opinion, are well positioned to develop exceptional and gifted individuals’ educational potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Curriculum and Teaching Practice for Advanced Learners)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 344 KiB  
Article
Identifying Gifted Potential Through Positive Psychology Content
by Fangfang Mo, Ophélie Allyssa Desmet and F. Richard Olenchak
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 1137; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101137 - 21 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1220
Abstract
Traditional identification approaches have often excluded many students from underrepresented backgrounds from gifted and talented service programs. This study introduces an innovative identification method based on the Bull’s Eye Model for Affective Development—Expansion (BEM-e), which focuses on identifying giftedness and talents through targeted [...] Read more.
Traditional identification approaches have often excluded many students from underrepresented backgrounds from gifted and talented service programs. This study introduces an innovative identification method based on the Bull’s Eye Model for Affective Development—Expansion (BEM-e), which focuses on identifying giftedness and talents through targeted positive psychological traits. This method is integrated within an affective curriculum designed to create authentic learning environments that align with students’ interests and strengths, fostering deeper engagement, motivation, and self-efficacy. Grounded in the positive psychology theory, the curriculum includes engaging, activity-oriented modules with comprehensive dynamic assessments. These assessments allow teachers to identify a broad range of talents and abilities, promoting equity and a holistic identification process, which contributes to a more equitable and comprehensive education system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Curriculum and Teaching Practice for Advanced Learners)
9 pages, 182 KiB  
Article
Curriculum Considerations for Developing Mathematical Talent in Elementary Students
by M. Katherine Gavin
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(7), 796; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070796 - 22 Jul 2024
Viewed by 976
Abstract
To effectively nurture the talents of elementary students with mathematical talent they need to be challenged with an advanced curriculum that is designed with their specific needs in mind. The purpose of this paper is to describe an effective model for developing such [...] Read more.
To effectively nurture the talents of elementary students with mathematical talent they need to be challenged with an advanced curriculum that is designed with their specific needs in mind. The purpose of this paper is to describe an effective model for developing such a curriculum and explore effective, research-based examples of curriculum and instruction using this model. The paper begins with a review of literature covering a broadened definition of mathematical talent that showcases the need for a more complex and multi-dimensional curriculum to nurture their talents. Next, evidence-based curriculum considerations for talented students at the elementary level are explored. Essential characteristics of mathematics curriculum for talented students are detailed including a focus on advanced content, conceptual development and higher-level processes akin to those used by mathematicians. Accompanying research-based instructional strategies to increase challenge, complexity, and creativity are outlined. Examples at the primary and elementary grade levels are provided to illustrate effective, research-based curriculum and instruction that develop mathematical talent in advanced students. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Curriculum and Teaching Practice for Advanced Learners)

Review

Jump to: Research

13 pages, 506 KiB  
Review
Finding Talent: An Overview of Research about Best Practices in Identification
by Susan K. Johnsen
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 1027; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091027 - 20 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1229
Abstract
Instead of the traditional identification approaches that focus on selecting students for specific programs, talent identification models are tailored to individual student talents across a variety of domains and identify emerging talents needing to be developed. This flexibility is incorporated within The Talent [...] Read more.
Instead of the traditional identification approaches that focus on selecting students for specific programs, talent identification models are tailored to individual student talents across a variety of domains and identify emerging talents needing to be developed. This flexibility is incorporated within The Talent Identification Cycle that includes (a) pre-identification development opportunities; (b) a variety of assessments to develop individual student profiles; (c) services that are customized to each student’s interests, strengths, and needs; (d) ongoing assessments of student performance that consider program revisions and changes in placements; (e) an overall assessment of the identification process to ensure that all students receive appropriate services. Research evidence is summarized for each component of the cycle, along with considerations and concrete examples for practitioners. The conclusion incorporates possible challenges for schools that are engaged in moving away from more traditional to more flexible identification approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Curriculum and Teaching Practice for Advanced Learners)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 595 KiB  
Review
Where Are We Now with the Implementation of the Talent Development Framework for Gifted Students and Where Do We Go in the Future?
by Paula Olszewski-Kubilius
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 932; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090932 - 25 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1110
Abstract
Talent development as a framework for services for advanced learners has gained traction within schools, but there are challenges that remain. In this paper, we address some of these, including identification systems that are consistent with a domain focus and geared towards the [...] Read more.
Talent development as a framework for services for advanced learners has gained traction within schools, but there are challenges that remain. In this paper, we address some of these, including identification systems that are consistent with a domain focus and geared towards the stage of talent development; exceptional abilities that are often ignored by schools but could be identified and cultivated; programming that is continuous, articulated with the school curriculum, with defined outcomes for growth and performance; better understanding and use of data for identification and monitoring of progress; and policies that support acceleration and advanced learning options. The major challenge for schools is the potential to bifurcate services into talent development for underserved learners versus gifted services for high achieving students, rather than providing multiple pathways for learners with different needs that lead to high achievement for all. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Curriculum and Teaching Practice for Advanced Learners)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 717 KiB  
Review
Spatial Reasoning Excellence: A Synergy of VanTassel-Baska’s Integrated Curriculum Model and Talent Development
by Alicia Cotabish, Debbie Dailey, Jason Trumble and Rachelle Miller
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(7), 716; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070716 - 1 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1319
Abstract
This manuscript explores the integration of spatial reasoning into K-12 education through the lens of Joyce VanTassel-Baska’s Integrated Curriculum Model (ICM) and a talent development approach. It emphasizes the significance of nurturing spatial reasoning components—visualization, rotation, orientation, and perception—for academic success, problem-solving, and [...] Read more.
This manuscript explores the integration of spatial reasoning into K-12 education through the lens of Joyce VanTassel-Baska’s Integrated Curriculum Model (ICM) and a talent development approach. It emphasizes the significance of nurturing spatial reasoning components—visualization, rotation, orientation, and perception—for academic success, problem-solving, and career prospects, especially for academically talented students. Through collaboration with talent development strategies, including mentorship and differentiated instruction, this approach provides a dynamic, real-world-focused learning experience. Inclusive and designed to engage the educational community, it aims to prepare students for complex global challenges, highlighting the transformative power of tailored education in developing versatile societal contributors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Curriculum and Teaching Practice for Advanced Learners)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop