Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
3.1
3.0
Journals
Fire
Special Issues
Reimagining the Future of Living and Working with Fire
share announcement

Reimagining the Future of Living and Working with Fire

A special issue of Fire (ISSN 2571-6255). This special issue belongs to the section "Fire Social Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2024) | Viewed by 22133

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Shefali Juneja Lakhina

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Wonder Labs, San Jose, CA 95128, USA
Interests: social dimensions of disaster; care; equity; justice
Dr. Kelsey Copes-Gerbitz

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Tree Ring Lab., Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
Interests: wildfire governance; community wildfire resilience; indigenous fire stewardship

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue aims to foreground the diverse perspectives and experiences of living and working with fire. The objective is to bring together novel future-thinking and future-ready practices on reimagining life and work with fire in ways that can achieve caring, equitable, sustainable, and just outcomes.

A key incentive for this Special Issue is to address the growing challenge of managing catastrophic wildfires, which is one of the manifold impacts of deteriorating forest health, the fuel management crisis, and persistent social inequities that are leading to increased exposure to wildfires. Although a range of strategies are being employed to address this worsening crisis, the effective implementation will be challenging without sustained support for a skilled and diverse landscape and fire management workforce.

Efforts are currently underway in the United States to increase the workforce capacity and address retention challenges, including by ensuring that the federal firefighting workforce has family-sustaining, career-track jobs with equitable pay and benefits.

However, there is a continuing need to fully recognize the diverse lived experiences of the landscape and fire management workforce. In formal management settings, these lived experiences can include hidden or invisible labor to address persisting inequities, such as navigating racial, cultural, gendered, ableist, and generational perspectives.

There is also a need to fully recognize the labor contributed by the informal workforce, often composed of local, Indigenous, or subsistence communities as well as seasonal or temporary workers, including students, migrants, and incarcerated workers, who remain largely uncounted and inadequately compensated for the demanding work they do. This informal workforce often faces additional challenges while operating in inequitable governance contexts where their knowledge and experience can be undervalued.

This Special Issue is particularly interested in worker-led and community-centered perspectives from different fire regions around the world, with the aim to better understand diverse fire management and governance practices that are reimagining land and fire stewardship in inclusive and just ways.

Submissions can be guided by (but are not limited to) the following set of questions:

  • What might be needed to enable a workforce-led and community-centered transition to living and working with fire in caring, just, sustainable, and equitable ways?
  • How can a future-ready workforce––formal and informal––experience care, safety, and wellbeing?
  • Who is performing essential agriculture, forestry, land management, and fire stewardship work but remains uncounted and/or undercompensated?
  • How can proactive wildfire management be scaled up by enabling more equitable forms of fire governance, including learning from and with Indigenous and local fire practitioners?
  • In what ways could the development of a future-ready workforce support whole-of-community wellbeing and living with fire in sustainable ways?

Please also see this recent Research Counts article, ‘Care, equity, and justice: Reimagining the forestry and fire workforce’, for further reflections on conducting research on a reimagined future with fire.

For this Special Issue, original research articles, review articles, concept papers, and case reports are invited. The research should be grounded in the social sciences but interdisciplinary collaborations that demonstrate a convergence of research methods and applications are encouraged. Submissions can be between 6000–12,000 words, including references.

Dr. Shefali Juneja Lakhina
Dr. Kelsey Copes-Gerbitz
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Fire is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • care
  • diversity
  • equity
  • justice
  • inclusion
  • future-thinking
  • well-being
  • wildfires
  • workforce
  • labor/labour

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

16 pages, 2852 KiB  
Article
Indigenous Fire Data Sovereignty: Applying Indigenous Data Sovereignty Principles to Fire Research
by Melinda M. Adams
Fire 2024, 7(7), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7070222 - 28 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2661
Abstract
Indigenous Peoples have been stewarding lands with fire for ecosystem improvement since time immemorial. These stewardship practices are part and parcel of the ways in which Indigenous Peoples have long recorded and protected knowledge through our cultural transmission practices, such as oral histories. [...] Read more.
Indigenous Peoples have been stewarding lands with fire for ecosystem improvement since time immemorial. These stewardship practices are part and parcel of the ways in which Indigenous Peoples have long recorded and protected knowledge through our cultural transmission practices, such as oral histories. In short, our Peoples have always been data gatherers, and as this article presents, we are also fire data gatherers and stewards. Given the growing interest in fire research with Indigenous communities, there is an opportunity for guidance on data collection conducted equitably and responsibly with Indigenous Peoples. This Special Issue of Fire presents fire research approaches and data harvesting practices with Indigenous communities as we “Reimagine the Future of Living and Working with Fire”. Specifically, the article provides future-thinking practices that can achieve equitable, sustainable, and just outcomes with and for stakeholders and rightholders (the preferred term Indigenous Peoples use in partnerships with academics, agencies, and NGOs). This research takes from the following key documents to propose an “Indigenous fire data sovereignty” (IFDS) framework: (1) Articles declared in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) as identified by the author and specified in Indigenous-led and allied Indigenous fire research in Australia, Canada, and the U.S.; (2) recommendations specific to cultural fire policy and calls for research in the 2023 Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission report; (3) research and data barriers and opportunities produced in the 2024 Good Fire II report; and threads from (4) the Indigenous Fire Management conceptual model. This paper brings together recommendations on Indigenous data sovereignty, which are principles developed by Indigenous researchers for the protection, dissemination, and stewardship of data collected from Tribal/Nation/Aboriginal/First Nations Indigenous communities. The proposed IFDS framework also identifies potential challenges to Indigenous fire data sovereignty. By doing so, the framework serves as an apparatus to deploy fire research and data harvesting practices that are culturally informed, responsible, and ethically demonstrated. The article concludes with specific calls to action for academics and researchers, allies, fire managers, policymakers, and Indigenous Peoples to consider in exercising Indigenous fire data sovereignty and applying Indigenous data sovereignty principles to fire research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining the Future of Living and Working with Fire)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4644 KiB  
Article
Social Inequity and Wildfire Response: Identifying Gaps and Interventions in Ventura County, California
by Brianna Baker, Yvonne Dinh, Iris R. Foxfoot, Elena Ortiz, Alison Sells and Sarah E. Anderson
Fire 2024, 7(2), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7020041 - 28 Jan 2024
Viewed by 3319
Abstract
As climate change increases the frequency and severity of wildfires across the Western U.S., there is an urgent need for improved wildfire preparedness and responses. Socially marginalized communities are particularly vulnerable to wildfire effects because they disproportionately lack access to the resources necessary [...] Read more.
As climate change increases the frequency and severity of wildfires across the Western U.S., there is an urgent need for improved wildfire preparedness and responses. Socially marginalized communities are particularly vulnerable to wildfire effects because they disproportionately lack access to the resources necessary to prepare for and recover from wildfire and are frequently underrepresented in the wildfire planning process. As an exemplar of how to understand and improve preparedness in such communities, this research identified communities in Ventura County facing heightened marginalization and risk of wildfire using spatial analysis. Researchers then deployed a county-wide survey and held focus groups in two communities identified in the spatial analysis. Research revealed that non-English speakers, women, people of color, and newer residents in Ventura County are less prepared for wildfire than other groups. Based on these findings, this paper recommends an expansion of traditional risk mitigation programs, strengthened community engagement efforts, and strategies that increase community resources and leadership to decouple marginalization and wildfire vulnerability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining the Future of Living and Working with Fire)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 10210 KiB  
Article
Reconnecting Fire Culture of Aboriginal Communities with Contemporary Wildfire Risk Management
by Amos Atkinson and Cristina Montiel-Molina
Fire 2023, 6(8), 296; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6080296 - 2 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5854
Abstract
This paper aims to provide a better understanding of the transition towards a new paradigm of wildfire risk management in Victoria that incorporates Aboriginal fire knowledge. We show the suitability of cultural burning in the transformed landscapes, and the challenges associated with its [...] Read more.
This paper aims to provide a better understanding of the transition towards a new paradigm of wildfire risk management in Victoria that incorporates Aboriginal fire knowledge. We show the suitability of cultural burning in the transformed landscapes, and the challenges associated with its reintroduction for land management and bushfire risk reduction after the traumatic disruption of invasion and colonization. Methods of Environmental History and Regional Geography were combined with Traditional Ecological Knowledge to unravel the connections between past, present and future fire and land management practices. Our study area consists of Dja Dja Wurrung and Bangarang/Yorta Yorta Country in north-central Victoria. The results show (i) the ongoing socio-political process for building a renewed integrated fire and land management approach including cultural burning, and (ii) the opportunities of Aboriginal fire culture for restoring landscape resilience to wildfires. We conclude that both wildfire risk management and cultural burning need to change together to adapt to the new environmental context and collaborate for mutual and common benefit. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining the Future of Living and Working with Fire)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 217 KiB  
Essay
After the Greenfire Revolution: Reimagining Collective Identities of the Future Wildland Fire Workforce in a Paradigm Shift for Ecological Fire Management
by Timothy Ingalsbee
Fire 2024, 7(7), 211; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7070211 - 25 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1533
Abstract
This concept paper explores possible collective identities for a future wildland fire workforce. Taking inspiration from the work of futurists who foresee an end to the dominant fire exclusion/suppression paradigm, and assuming that an emerging fire restoration/resilience paradigm shift replaces it, this paper [...] Read more.
This concept paper explores possible collective identities for a future wildland fire workforce. Taking inspiration from the work of futurists who foresee an end to the dominant fire exclusion/suppression paradigm, and assuming that an emerging fire restoration/resilience paradigm shift replaces it, this paper engages in speculative explorations of the process and product of this paradigm shift with respect to the future collective identities of a workforce conducting ecological fire management. Social constructionist assumptions from symbolic interactionist sociological theory, Gramscian political theory’s concept of hegemony, and new social movement theory’s concept of collective identity all provide the intellectual foundations for the discussion. This concept paper argues that in order to actualize a paradigm shift, more than advances in scientific research or reforms of government policies will be required—the wildland fire community will need to become (or join) a social movement engaged in collective actions. An imaginary social movement, the “Greenfire revolution,” is invented to help illustrate how the selected theories and concepts might apply in the social construction of ecological fire management and the collective identities of its future workforce. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining the Future of Living and Working with Fire)
28 pages, 2482 KiB  
Case Report
Decolonising Fire Science by Reexamining Fire Management across Contested Landscapes: A Workshop Approach
by Abigail Rose Croker, Adriana E. S. Ford, Yiannis Kountouris, Jayalaxshmi Mistry, Amos Chege Muthiuru, Cathy Smith, Elijah Praise, David Chiawo and Veronica Muniu
Fire 2024, 7(3), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7030094 - 16 Mar 2024
Viewed by 3312
Abstract
In many landscapes worldwide, fire regimes and human–fire interactions were reorganised by colonialism and continue to be shaped by neo-colonial processes. The introduction of fire suppression policies and state-centric property-rights systems across conservation areas and the intentional erasure of Indigenous governance systems and [...] Read more.
In many landscapes worldwide, fire regimes and human–fire interactions were reorganised by colonialism and continue to be shaped by neo-colonial processes. The introduction of fire suppression policies and state-centric property-rights systems across conservation areas and the intentional erasure of Indigenous governance systems and knowledge have served to decouple Indigenous fire-dependent communities from culturally mediated fire regimes and fire-adapted landscapes. This has driven a decline in anthropogenic fires while simultaneously increasing wildfire risk where Indigenous people have been excluded, resulting in widespread social–ecological vulnerabilities. Much contemporary fire research also bears colonial legacies in its epistemological traditions, in the global geographical distribution of research institutions, and the accessibility of research outputs. We report on a two-day workshop titled ‘Fire Management Across Contested Landscapes’ convened concurrently in Nairobi, Kenya, and London, UK. The workshop formed part of a series of workshops on ‘Decolonising Fire Science’ held by the Leverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, UK. The workshop in Nairobi invited diverse Kenyan stakeholders to engage in participatory activities that facilitate knowledge sharing, aiming to establish an inclusive working fire network. Activities included rich pictures, world café discussions, participatory art, and the co-development of a declaration to guide fire management in Kenya. Meanwhile, in London, Leverhulme Wildfires researchers explored participatory research methodologies including rich pictures and participatory video, and developed a declaration to guide more equitable research. There were opportunities throughout the workshop for participants in Nairobi and London to engage in dialogue with one another, sharing their experiences and understandings of complex fire challenges in Kenya and globally. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining the Future of Living and Working with Fire)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 318 KiB  
Concept Paper
Multiple Stories, Multiple Marginalities: The Labor-Intensive Forest and Fire Stewardship Workforce in Oregon
by Emily Jane Davis, Carl Wilmsen, Manuel A. Machado and Gianna M. Alessi
Fire 2023, 6(7), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6070268 - 6 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2363
Abstract
Latino/a/x workers perform labor-intensive forestry and fire stewardship work in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, but are not well recognized in research and practice about wildfire governance. This industry has pervasive issues of unsafe working conditions, inequitable wage practices, violations of worker rights, limited [...] Read more.
Latino/a/x workers perform labor-intensive forestry and fire stewardship work in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, but are not well recognized in research and practice about wildfire governance. This industry has pervasive issues of unsafe working conditions, inequitable wage practices, violations of worker rights, limited opportunity for advancement, and a lack of recognition and inclusion of workers in decision making. We draw on a literature review and practice-based knowledge to make this workforce’s history more visible, from its origins in lumber production and reforestation to expansion into forest and fire stewardship. We suggest a new conceptual framing of “multiple marginalities” that situates this workforce as simultaneously crucial to our future with wildfire and subject to structural, distributional, recognitional, and procedural inequities. We recommend new approaches to research and practice that can better examine and address these inequities, while also acknowledging the persistent and systemic nature of these challenges. These include participatory action research, lessons learned from research and advocacy related to farmworkers and incarcerated workers, and Cooperative Extension and education programs that are learner-centered and culturally appropriate. Multiple interventions of offering education and outreach, enforcing or reforming law, and changing policy and practice must all occur at multiple scales given the many drivers of these marginalities. Study and practice can contribute new knowledge to inform this and expand current conceptions of equity and environmental justice in the wildfire governance literature to become more inclusive of the forest and fire stewardship workforce. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining the Future of Living and Working with Fire)
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-6
Back to TopTop