Multidisciplinary Approaches in Cancer Healthcare

A special issue of Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032). This special issue belongs to the section "Chronic Care".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2025 | Viewed by 2114

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
William James Center for Research, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal
Interests: health psychology; psycho-oncology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
1. Center for Health Technology and Services Research of the Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2. Department of Psychology and Education, Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal
Interests: multidisciplinary intervention; cancer survivors; group intervention; strategies of emotional adaptation; mental health; oncological psychology; cognitive complains; cognitive rehabilitation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to invite you to our forthcoming Special Issue, focused on "Multidisciplinary Approaches in Cancer Healthcare". We aim to assemble a collection of research works that illuminate various strategies targeting the promotion of health and the enhancement of the quality of life of cancer survivors.

Cancer treatment and care have evolved significantly over the years, with an increasing recognition of the importance of holistic approaches in addressing the complex needs of cancer patients. In today's landscape, there exists a pressing need for coordinated and comprehensive care tailored to the unique needs of both survivors and their caregivers. This necessitates the dissemination and implementation of novel care methods as well as interventions. Vital to this effort is the development and integration of rehabilitation programs that address not only the physical but also the psychosocial aspects of recovery. While traditional medical interventions undoubtedly play a crucial role in cancer management, there is growing acknowledgment of the significance of holistic interventions that encompass the physical, emotional, social, and psychological aspects of cancer care.

In this Special Issue, we aim to explore the diverse facets of holistic interventions in cancer healthcare, examining their relevance, effectiveness, and implications for patient outcomes and quality of life.

To this end, multidisciplinary approaches in cancer healthcare are advocated, ensuring a collaborative approach that stays abreast of current advancements. Within this framework, we seek to explore a spectrum of themes including, but not limited to, the following:

  • Combined interventions;
  • Psychological support;
  • Physical rehabilitation;
  • Integrative medicine practices;
  • Exercise regimens;
  • Nutritional guidance;
  • Nursing protocols;
  • Oncological strategies;
  • Lifestyle interventions;
  • Complementary therapies;
  • Caregiver care.

Furthermore, we encourage submissions that provide perspectives on the role of interdisciplinary collaboration, patient-centered care models, and evidence-based practices in shaping cancer healthcare, as they will be of particular interest.

Through this Special Issue, we aim to foster a deeper understanding of the holistic dimensions of cancer healthcare and provide a platform for sharing cutting-edge research, best practices, and transformative ideas in this vital area.

We invite researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to contribute original research articles, reviews, case studies, and perspectives that contribute to advancing our knowledge and practice in holistic interventions in cancer healthcare.

Thank you for considering this invitation, and we look forward to receiving your valuable contributions to this crucial dialogue, as, together, we strive to advance the frontier of cancer healthcare.

Kind regards,

Dr. Ana Carla Seabra Torres
Dr. Tânia Brandão
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Healthcare is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • multidisciplinary approaches
  • cancer healthcare
  • cancer survivors
  • combined interventions
  • biopsychosocial interventions
  • holistic approaches
  • health promotion
  • health-related quality of life

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

11 pages, 766 KiB  
Article
Satisfaction with Social Support and Quality of Life Among Portuguese Patients with Breast Cancer: Mediating Effects of Coping Styles—Cross-Sectional Study
by Joana Carreiro, Susana Cardoso, Pedro Teques, Andreia P. Teques and José Luís Pais-Ribeiro
Healthcare 2025, 13(3), 297; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030297 - 1 Feb 2025
Viewed by 346
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the mediating effects of coping styles on the relationship between satisfaction with social support (SSS) and quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer patients. Methods: A cross-sectional structural equation modeling (SEM) approach [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the mediating effects of coping styles on the relationship between satisfaction with social support (SSS) and quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer patients. Methods: A cross-sectional structural equation modeling (SEM) approach was used to examine the mediating effects. The participants were 311 women who were breast cancer patients, aged between 27 and 86 years (M = 46.61, SD = 9.53). Results: SEM analyses showed that SSS was positively associated with fighting spirit (β = 0.31, p < 0.05), cognitive avoidance (β = 0.19, p > 0.05), and QoL (β = 0.21, p < 0.05), and negatively associated with helplessness–hopelessness (β = −0.28, p < 0.05). Furthermore, fighting spirit and helplessness–hopelessness showed significant relationships with QoL. Anxious preoccupation was negatively related to QoL. Furthermore, fighting spirit and helplessness–hopelessness showed significant relationships with quality of life (β = 0.18, p < 0.05; β = −0.15, p < 0.05, respectively). In addition, the mediation analysis revealed that coping styles (i.e., fighting spirit and helplessness–hopelessness) mediated the relationship between SSS and QoL. Conclusions: The findings suggest that perceptions of SSS from family and friends may promote perceived QoL via adaptive coping, such as fighting spirit and helplessness–hopelessness strategies to deal with the cancer experience. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multidisciplinary Approaches in Cancer Healthcare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

10 pages, 240 KiB  
Brief Report
Impact of an Asian Community-Based Cancer Rehabilitation Program on Health-Related Quality of Life
by Matthew Rong Jie Tay, Chin Jung Wong and Vijayalaxmi Chadachan
Healthcare 2024, 12(22), 2251; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12222251 - 11 Nov 2024
Viewed by 851
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Inpatient exercise-based rehabilitation has been shown to improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer survivors. However, there is a lack of studies on the impact of community-based cancer rehabilitation programs on health-related quality of life, especially in Asian countries. Methods: This [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Inpatient exercise-based rehabilitation has been shown to improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer survivors. However, there is a lack of studies on the impact of community-based cancer rehabilitation programs on health-related quality of life, especially in Asian countries. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study involving patients with cancer at an outpatient community-based rehabilitation center. There were 197 patients who were recruited and enrolled in a physician-led rehabilitation program which included physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nutritionists and exercise physiologists. Results: Most of the patients had a diagnosis of breast cancer (61.4%), while 76 (38.6%) had a diagnosis of other cancers. On initial assessment, we found a mean Distress Thermometer (DT) level of 3.37 (SD = 2.41) and a mean Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General-7 Item Version (FACT-G7) score of 11.83 (SD = 4.01). On follow-up assessment after 3–6 months of rehabilitation, there was a significant reduction in mean DT level to 2.42 (SD = 2.25) and an improvement in mean FACT-G7 score to 13.09 (SD = 4.77). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that significant factors for improvement in FACT-G7 scores were age (p = 0.046) and number of exercise therapy sessions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the positive impact of a community-based cancer rehabilitation program on HRQOL among cancer patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multidisciplinary Approaches in Cancer Healthcare)
Back to TopTop