ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Improving Health Outcomes for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Global Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (24 March 2023) | Viewed by 11360

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
Interests: transgender health; trans sexual health; LGBTQ+ psychology
Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: transgender and non-binary health; minority stress; LGBTQ+ aging; intersectionality

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The scientific literature from the last two decades has acknowledged the impact of minority stress on the psychological and mental health of those who identify with stigmatized gender and sexual identities. Although social attitudes and policies have improved in recent years, the most recent research indicates that the minority stress continues to have negative impact on the wellbeing of LGBTQ+ people (Frost, Fingerhut & Meyer, 2022). Studies across the generations demonstrate how even younger individuals are still adversely affected by microaggressions and structural and interpersonal inequality. Moreover, a growing number of people perceive and/or express their gender in a way that disrupts cis/heteronormativity (e.g., non-binary and queer individuals), thus experiencing a higher risk of harassment, victimization, and internalization of negative feelings toward the self. In order to determine what safeguards against minority stress's harmful consequences exist, as well as what professional interventions may be made at the social, organizational, and institutional levels, psychologists must deepen their knowledge in this area. It is crucial to understand more about proximal stressors, such as internalized trans/homo-negativity and the specific way in which each sexual and gender minority subgroup is affected by stigma. Ultimately, we are called in to investigate ways to enhance the health outcomes of the LGBTQ+ community, both in the setting of mental health practitioners' consultation rooms and in society at large.

This Special Issue aims to collect research (considering different methodological approaches) addressing the factors involved in LGBTQ+ mental health, including minority stress, social attitudes, protective factors, and resilience.

Dr. Annalisa Anzani
Dr. Fau Rosati
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • minority stress
  • LGBTQ+ health
  • internalized homonegativity
  • internalized trans-negativity
  • LGBTQ+ well-being

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 362 KiB  
Article
Stress and Resilience Experiences during the Transition to Parenthood among Belgian Lesbian Mothers through Donor Insemination
by Salvatore D’Amore, Alexandre Maurisse, Alessio Gubello and Nicola Carone
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 2800; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042800 - 4 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2232
Abstract
The present research explored parenting, stress, and resilience experiences among 16 Belgian, lesbian, first-time parental couples with donor-conceived children aged 3–72 months. In each couple, both mothers participated in a conjoint, semi-structured interview focused on their parenthood desire; the impact of stigmatization and [...] Read more.
The present research explored parenting, stress, and resilience experiences among 16 Belgian, lesbian, first-time parental couples with donor-conceived children aged 3–72 months. In each couple, both mothers participated in a conjoint, semi-structured interview focused on their parenthood desire; the impact of stigmatization and social support from families of origin, friends, and institutions; and couple and family resources. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s reflective thematic analysis. Four themes were identified: (1) “The precious baby”: Realizing the parenthood project; (2) “Can we show ourselves in public without prying eyes?”: Family social visibility; (3) “It’s complicated!”: Parental legal recognition and role imbalance; and (4) “How can we handle this?”: Family resilience. The themes indicated that the child’s donor conception, the parents’ coming out, the non-gestational mother’s role, the legal obstacles encountered, and the need to find a balance between the two mothers in childcare tasks generated stress and required mothers to develop resilience strategies. The results suggest several potential areas for mental health practitioners to explore in clinical contexts when supporting intended lesbian mothers in their transition to parenthood through donor insemination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improving Health Outcomes for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations)
12 pages, 513 KiB  
Article
Internalized Homonegativity, Emotion Dysregulation, and Isolating Behaviors Perpetration among Gay and Lesbian Couples
by Tommaso Trombetta, Virginia Balocco, Fabrizio Santoniccolo, Maria Noemi Paradiso and Luca Rollè
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1593; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021593 - 16 Jan 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2276
Abstract
Same-sex intimate partner violence (SSIPV) is a serious health concern and may manifest in various forms. Nevertheless, controlling behaviors of isolation are still poorly investigated. Due to their marginalized status, sexual minorities can face SSIPV-specific risk factors, such as internalized homonegativity, as well [...] Read more.
Same-sex intimate partner violence (SSIPV) is a serious health concern and may manifest in various forms. Nevertheless, controlling behaviors of isolation are still poorly investigated. Due to their marginalized status, sexual minorities can face SSIPV-specific risk factors, such as internalized homonegativity, as well as general psychological stress factors, such as emotion dysregulation. While the literature is growing, there is still a lack of understanding of the complex pathways linking sexual minorities and minority stress to IPV and isolating controlling behavior. To fill this gap, we explored the relation between internalized homonegativity and controlling behaviors of isolation, assessing the mediating role of emotion dysregulation. In total, 120 gay and lesbian people (mean age = 33.8, SD = 11.5) involved in a same-sex relationship participated in the study. Results showed a direct and positive association between internalized homonegativity and difficulties in emotion regulation and a direct and positive association between emotion dysregulation and controlling behaviors of isolation; the mediating role of emotion dysregulation in the relation between internalized homonegativity and isolating controlling behaviors was supported as well. Emerging results can provide valuable information at the clinical level, although further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improving Health Outcomes for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1264 KiB  
Article
Masculinity and Leadership Effectiveness (Self-)Perceptions: The Case of Lesbian Leaders
by Soraya Elizabeth Shamloo, Valeria De Cristofaro, Valerio Pellegrini and Marco Salvati
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(24), 17026; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417026 - 18 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2469
Abstract
In line with the gay glass ceiling effect, sexual minorities are often target of discrimination within work-related contexts, thus potentially undermining their wellbeing at work. For gay men, discrimination may partially be attributed to gay men’s stereotypical feminine perception, which does not fit [...] Read more.
In line with the gay glass ceiling effect, sexual minorities are often target of discrimination within work-related contexts, thus potentially undermining their wellbeing at work. For gay men, discrimination may partially be attributed to gay men’s stereotypical feminine perception, which does not fit with the stereotypically masculine traits required for leadership positions. Yet, when considering lesbian women, the masculine stereotypical view associated with them may come to represent an advantage in work-related contexts, especially when compared to heterosexual women. In Study 1, N = 303 heterosexual participants rated a lesbian vs. a heterosexual woman as a job candidate on stereotypical gender (masculine vs. feminine) traits as well as leadership effectiveness. Results showed that being lesbian was associated with higher levels of masculinity (but not femininity), which in turn was related to high leadership effectiveness. In Study 2, N = 268 lesbian and heterosexual women rated themselves on the same measures. Results showed that both groups associated masculine traits with enhanced leadership effectiveness. These studies provide a better comprehension regarding how lesbian women may be perceived in work-related contexts and shed light on the role played by gender stereotypical perceptions in shaping both heterosexual and lesbian perceptions of leadership effectiveness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improving Health Outcomes for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 396 KiB  
Article
Sexual Orientation and Infidelity-Related Behaviors on Social Media Sites
by Ionela Șerban, Marco Salvati and Violeta Enea
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15659; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315659 - 25 Nov 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3644
Abstract
Little research has been focused on offline or online infidelity in GL dating relationships, especially in a post-communist socio-cultural context. Infidelity–related (IR) behaviors on social media sites might be as hurtful to relationships as offline infidelity, both in gay, lesbian (GL) and heterosexual [...] Read more.
Little research has been focused on offline or online infidelity in GL dating relationships, especially in a post-communist socio-cultural context. Infidelity–related (IR) behaviors on social media sites might be as hurtful to relationships as offline infidelity, both in gay, lesbian (GL) and heterosexual romantic monogamous relationships. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to examine the associations between dyadic satisfaction, attitudes toward infidelity, and problematic internet usage, with IR behaviors on social media sites among GL and heterosexual unmarried individuals in Romanian sexual minority communities. Results showed that GL respondents did not significantly differ from heterosexual participants regarding IR behaviors. Furthermore, we found the main effect of attitudes toward infidelity and problematic internet use on IR behaviors. Sexual orientation highlights the main effect of IR behaviors when analyzed with dyadic satisfaction. The current study may be a precursor to further research investigating correlations in online IR behavior among lesbian and gay individuals engaging in consensual nonmonogamy. Implications of the findings are discussed in the social context of a post-communist country where GL individuals may face discrimination and stigma because of their sexual orientation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improving Health Outcomes for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations)
Back to TopTop