ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Attachment and Mental Health

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Mental Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2022) | Viewed by 9155

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast (USC), Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore BC 4558, Queensland, Australia
2. Occupational Therapy, School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland (UQ), Saint Lucia 4072, Queensland, Australia
Interests: attachment; mental health; parenting; neuroscience; therapeutic relationship; trust; mentalizing; trauma; stress

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Attachment theory was first introduced in the seminal work of British psychoanalyst John Bowlby [1], who later famously claimed that “Successful parenting is a principal key to the mental health of the next generation” [2]. While this tenet holds true more than 30 years later, the field has evolved substantially. This is related, in part, to the massive growth of neuroscience [3], the ongoing emergence of attachment measures for all age groups, and the evolution of new concepts such as “attachment neuroscience” [4] and “modern attachment theory” [5].

Fundamental to attachment theory are our early experiences of stress, and appropriate co-regulation/self-regulation, for development of the neural systems supporting behavioural, social/interpersonal (e.g., trust, mentalization), emotional, motivational, and developmental outcomes. Insecure attachment patterns have, in turn, been linked to longer term physical and mental health challenges through individuals’ implicit internal working models. While evidence regarding the links between attachment and mental health have grown, there is still much to understand to improve the evidence base and inform better ways of preventing, diagnosing, and treating mental illness.

Potential topics for this special issue include, but are not limited to:

  • Attachment insights for diagnoses e.g., borderline personality disorder.
  • Long-term implications of childhood stress/trauma and attachment for mental health.
  • Links between attachment and mental health in clinical samples.
  • Attachment and regulation, including self-regulation and dyadic regulation.
  • Attachment and trauma.
  • Attachment and substance use in relation to trauma and mental health.
  • Attachment theory and mental health treatment, including the therapeutic relationship and client behaviours.
  • Outcomes from attachment-informed interventions.
  • Attachment and mental health care utilization.

Submissions relating to links between attachment patterns and mental health during childhood and adolescence, and prospective studies, are especially welcome.

References

  1. Bowlby, J. The nature of the child’s tie to his mother. Int. J. Psychoanal. 1958, XXXIX, 1–23.
  2. Bowlby, J. A Secure Base. Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1988.
  3. Yeung, A. W. K., Goto, T. K., Leung, W. K. The changing Landsc. of neuroscience research, 2006–2015: A bibliometric study. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00120
  4. Coan, J. A. Toward a neuroscience of attachment. In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. Cassidy J. & Shaver P. R., Eds.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008, pp. 241–265.
  5. Schore. J. R., Schore, A. N. Modern Attachment Theory: The Central Role of Affect Regulation in Development and Treatment. Clin. Soc. Work. J. 2008, 36, 9–20. doi 10.1007/s10615-007-0111-7

Prof. Dr. Pamela Meredith
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 1224 KiB  
Article
Effects of Mobile Identity on Smartphone Symbolic Use: An Attachment Theory Perspective
by Jie Lou, Nianlong Han, Dong Wang and Xi Pei
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(21), 14036; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114036 - 28 Oct 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2052
Abstract
Smartphones are not only multifunctional tools but also users’ personal extensions and identity symbols, as they are constantly with users and highly visible to the public while in use. Due to this public property as well as the close bond between smartphones and [...] Read more.
Smartphones are not only multifunctional tools but also users’ personal extensions and identity symbols, as they are constantly with users and highly visible to the public while in use. Due to this public property as well as the close bond between smartphones and users, they are frequently used for personal identity expression besides functional purposes. The current study conceptualizes such behavior as symbolic use and aims to understand it. Anchoring on the attachment theory, mobile identity is postulated as an important antecedent of symbolic use. Mobile identity in turn is formed by mobile symbolism and mobile design esthetics. The research model was tested by a hybrid of both online and offline survey with 271 valid responses. SEM analysis was used to test the research model and SPSS was used for descriptive statistics. The results confirmed the role of mobile identity in affecting smartphone symbolic use. Additionally, individual materialism was confirmed as a moderator using hierarchical analysis. By defining and explaining smartphone symbolic use, this study clarifies the unique characteristics of the smartphone usage context as compared to non-portable technologies, thereby enriching the mobile usage literature and the application of attachment theory. It also defines the boundary condition of attachment formation by studying the contingent role of individual characteristics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Attachment and Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 349 KiB  
Article
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Self-Attachment to Treat Chronic Anxiety and/or Depression in Iranian Women
by Abbas Edalat, Massoumeh Farsinezhad, Makhsoos Bokharaei and Fateme Judy
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(11), 6376; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116376 - 24 May 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2689
Abstract
The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy of the new Self-Attachment Technique (SAT) in treating resistant anxiety and depression, lasting at least three years, among Iranian women from different social backgrounds. In this self-administrable and algorithmic intervention, the participant, [...] Read more.
The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy of the new Self-Attachment Technique (SAT) in treating resistant anxiety and depression, lasting at least three years, among Iranian women from different social backgrounds. In this self-administrable and algorithmic intervention, the participant, using their childhood photos, imaginatively creates an affectional bond with their childhood self, vows to consistently support and lovingly re-raise this child to emotional well-being. We conducted a longitudinal study with repeated measurement to evaluate the efficacy of SAT using ANOVA. Thirty-eight women satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited from different parts of Tehran. To describe the SAT protocols, a total of eight one-to-one sessions were offered to the recruits, the first four were weekly while the last four were fortnightly. The participants were expected to practice the protocols for twenty minutes twice a day. Two questionnaires, GAD-7 and PHQ-9, were used to measure anxiety and depression levels before and after the intervention and in a three-month follow-up. Thirty women completed the course. The change in anxiety level between the pre-test and the post-test was significant at p < 0.001 with effect size 2.5. The change in anxiety between pre-test and follow-up test was also significant at p < 0.001 with effect size 3.5. The change in anxiety between the post-test and the follow-up was significant at p < 0.05 with effect size 0.6. For depression, the changes between pre-test and post-test as well as between pre-test and follow-up were significant at p < 0.001 with effect size 2.3 and 3.1 respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Attachment and Mental Health)
13 pages, 363 KiB  
Article
Infant Developmental Outcomes: Influence of Prenatal Maternal–Fetal Attachment, Adult Attachment, Maternal Well-Being, and Perinatal Loss
by Grace Branjerdporn, Pamela Meredith, Trish Wilson and Jennifer Strong
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(4), 2433; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042433 - 20 Feb 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3455
Abstract
Identification of prenatal characteristics that predict later infant development may afford opportunities for early intervention, potentially optimizing childhood development outcomes. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of selected prenatal factors (maternal–fetal attachment, maternal adult attachment, maternal well-being, and [...] Read more.
Identification of prenatal characteristics that predict later infant development may afford opportunities for early intervention, potentially optimizing childhood development outcomes. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of selected prenatal factors (maternal–fetal attachment, maternal adult attachment, maternal well-being, and previous perinatal loss) on later infant development. Pregnant women were recruited from two antenatal clinics at one tertiary hospital and asked to complete self-report questionnaires. The Bayley’s Scales of Infant and Toddler Development were then completed one to two years after their baby’s birth. Independent samples t-tests, correlational analyses, and multivariate linear regression models were conducted. Results from 40 dyads revealed that more favorable maternal–fetal attachment, more secure/less anxious maternal attachment, and higher maternal well-being predicted maternal reports of infant adaptive behavior regardless of previous perinatal loss. Infants of women without perinatal loss scored higher in external observer-rated cognitive development compared to infants of women with previous perinatal loss. While further research is required, findings indicate that a mother’s well-being and her relationship with her baby during pregnancy contributes to positive perceptions of her infant’s daily living skills. Supporting the parenting of women with perinatal loss is required to, in turn, promote optimal cognitive development in infants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Attachment and Mental Health)
Back to TopTop