Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
7.3
Journals
IJERPH
Special Issues
Burden of Cancer Treatment
ijerph-logo
Submit to IJERPH Review for IJERPH Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Burden of Cancer Treatment

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Global Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2024) | Viewed by 9154

Special Issue Editor

Dr. SeungJin Bae

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Republic of Korea
Interests: health economics; epidemiology; second-hand smoking; particulate matter; burden of disease

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

With the development of various high-priced oncology drugs, such as cancer immunotherapy, the financial burden of cancer drugs raises concerns in many countries. However, their prices are frequently confidential, and various complicated policies, such as risk sharing agreements, forbid discussions at the domestic or international level. Further, although some cancer drugs have their generic versions including biosimilars, which could ameliorate the fiscal stress, their use varies greatly from country to country. 

Moreover, with the aging population, the aggressive use of cancer treatment in the end-of life stage is prevalent, yet the “rational” use of end-of-life treatment is controversial.

Therefore, there is an imminent need to compare the utilization of cancer treatment internationally as well as domestically based on quantitative (using panel data to compare utilization of cancer treatment based on disease status or demographic characteristics or comparing prices and volumes of drugs internationally) or qualitative (such as focused group interviews among various stakeholders) assessments. 

This Special Issue of the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) highlights end-of-life care and cancer drugs. New research papers, reviews, case reports and conference papers are welcome to this issue. Other manuscript types accepted include methodological papers, position papers, brief reports and commentaries.

Dr. SeungJin Bae
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • oncology drug
  • administrative claim database
  • international comparison study
  • biologics
  • biosimilars
  • health care utilization
  • cancer care
  • end-of-life cancer
  • health insurance
  • chemotherapy
  • Korea

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

12 pages, 564 KiB  
Article
Economic Burden of Cervical Cancer in Bulgaria
by Hristina Lebanova, Svetoslav Stoev, Emilia Naseva, Violeta Getova, Wei Wang, Ugne Sabale and Elina Petrova
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2746; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032746 - 3 Feb 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2756
Abstract
Bulgaria is among the European Union (EU) countries with the highest burden of cervical cancers and life expectancy below the EU average. The majority of cervical cancer cases (more than 95%) are caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). The aim of this retrospective, [...] Read more.
Bulgaria is among the European Union (EU) countries with the highest burden of cervical cancers and life expectancy below the EU average. The majority of cervical cancer cases (more than 95%) are caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). The aim of this retrospective, cost of illness study is to identify direct healthcare costs of cervical cancer in Bulgaria from the payer perspective and to calculate indirect costs and the associated years of life lost. Costs data were sourced from the National Health Insurance Fund from January 2018 to December 2020. Years of life lost were calculated based on the country and gender-specific life expectancy. Indirect costs due to productivity loss were calculated using the human capital approach. The total treatment costs for 3540 patients with cervical cancer are EUR 5,743,657 (2018), EUR 6,377,508 (2019), and EUR 6,751,182 (2020). The costs associated with drug acquisition and administration accounted for the majority (63%) of total healthcare costs followed by hospital management costs (14%). An estimated total of 20,446 years of life were lost due to cervical cancer for the period 2018–2020. The costs of productivity losses are estimated at EUR 7,578,014. Our study showed that the economic burden of cervical cancer in Bulgaria is substantial. Focus on cervical cancer prevention via vaccination against the human papillomavirus, timely screening, early diagnosis, and higher vaccine coverage rates could reduce its economic burden in Bulgaria. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Burden of Cancer Treatment)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 683 KiB  
Article
Value-Based Pricing and Budget Impact Analysis for Multi-Indication Drugs: A Case Study of Immunotherapies
by So-Young Ha, Dong-Won Kang, Hye-In Jung, Eui-Kyung Lee and Mi-Hai Park
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(7), 4105; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074105 - 30 Mar 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3357
Abstract
We aimed to calculate the value-based price of each indication and compare the drug price and budget impact among value-based pricing (VBP) scenarios, using immunotherapy as a case. Atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab prices were estimated for VBP scenarios, namely indication value-based pricing (IBP), [...] Read more.
We aimed to calculate the value-based price of each indication and compare the drug price and budget impact among value-based pricing (VBP) scenarios, using immunotherapy as a case. Atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab prices were estimated for VBP scenarios, namely indication value-based pricing (IBP), IBP with refund, and weighted-average pricing (WAP). To estimate the value-based price of each indication, cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted by setting the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the first reimbursed indication to the threshold. The budget impact for each scenario was compared with that of the pricing system in Korea (which has a 4.75% price reduction). The value-based prices of non-reimbursed indications were lower for atezolizumab and higher for nivolumab than those for the reimbursed indication. The drug price fluctuations were the largest in IBP, varying between 28.56–328.81% of the current list price. The net price of the non-reimbursed indications decreased from 0% to 71.44% in IBP with refund, and the budget impact was the lowest among VBPs. Although the fluctuation in the budget impact in WAP was smaller than IBP, higher drug prices were identified for low-value indications. In conclusion, IBP with refund is a viable method for multi-indication drugs, because it has minimal drug price and budget impact changes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Burden of Cancer Treatment)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

4 pages, 569 KiB  
Commentary
For Whom the Price Escalates: High Price and Uncertain Value of Cancer Drugs
by Gyeongseon Shin, Hye-Young Kwon and SeungJin Bae
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(7), 4204; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074204 - 1 Apr 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2144
Abstract
The price of cancer drugs has skyrocketed, yet it is not clear whether their value is commensurate with their price. More cancer drugs are approved under expedited review, which considers less rigorous clinical evidence, yet only 20% of them show an overall survival [...] Read more.
The price of cancer drugs has skyrocketed, yet it is not clear whether their value is commensurate with their price. More cancer drugs are approved under expedited review, which considers less rigorous clinical evidence, yet only 20% of them show an overall survival gain in the confirmatory trial. Moreover, clinical data are often generated based on small, single-arm studies with surrogate outcomes, challenging economic evaluation. With their high price and uncertain (marginal) clinical value, cancer drugs are frequently rejected by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. Therefore, agencies, including the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), have adopted cancer drug funds (CDF) or risk-sharing schemes to provide extra access for expensive cancer drugs which fail to meet NICE’s cost effectiveness threshold. With rising pricing and fewer new cancer medications with novel mechanisms of action, it is unclear if newly marketed cancer therapies address unmet clinical needs or whether we are paying too much. Transparency, equity, innovativeness, and sustainability are all harmed by a “special” approach for cancer medications. If early access is allowed, confirmatory trials within a certain time frame and economic evaluation should be conducted, and label changes or disinvestment should be carried out based on those evaluations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Burden of Cancer Treatment)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop