Submit to IJERPH Review for IJERPH Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health

Print Special Issue Flyer
Special Issue Editors
Special Issue Information
Keywords
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
Published Papers

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Public Health Statistics and Risk Assessment".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 July 2022) | Viewed by 25791

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Nicola Bartolomeo

E-Mail Website
Assistant Guest Editor

Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy
Interests: biomedical science; biostatistics; Markov model; spatial analysis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Dr. Margherita Fanelli

E-Mail Website
Assistant Guest Editor

Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
Interests: clinical research; epidemiology; diagnostic and prognostic study; breast cancer epidemiology; probiotic administration and infant nutrition
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Dr. Paolo Trerotoli

E-Mail Website
Chief Guest Editor

Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy
Interests: biomedical sciences; human oncology; biostatistics; quality of health systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to announce the Special Issue “Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decision in Public Health”. The aim of this issue is to collect research papers on methods to analyze and connect databases (registers, administrative databases, open data from institutions, etc.). Papers showing results of research based on surveillance data are also welcome.

We think that public health decisions should be based on strong evidence coming both from traditional experimental trials and real-world evidence, applying new technology of data analysis.

The main topics of the papers can be:

Statistical methods to analyze real world data, validation of quality indicators, evaluation of outcome indicators for prevention (screening, care setting, patients pathways, etc.), evaluation of value in health assistance;
Surveillance in public health with innovative methods;
Studies of health outcome applying prevention strategies;
Observational studies in areas with environmental risk;
Studies on diagnostic accuracy and screening.

Prof. Paolo Trerotoli
Prof. Nicola Bartolomeo
Prof. Margherita Fanelli
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

Real world data
Machine learning in public health
Outcome indicators
Quality indicators
Screening
Diagnostic accuracy
Prevention
Bayesian analysis
Spatial analysis
Environment and health
Vaccine effectiveness

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Download All Papers

Order results

Result details

Show export options Show export options

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 1223 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Application of a Decision Tree Model to Predict the Outcome of Non-Intensive Inpatients Hospitalized for COVID-19

by Massimo Giotta, Paolo Trerotoli, Vincenzo Ostilio Palmieri, Francesca Passerini, Piero Portincasa, Ilaria Dargenio, Jihad Mokhtari, Maria Teresa Montagna and Danila De Vito

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(20), 13016; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013016 - 11 Oct 2022

Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2808

Abstract

Many studies have identified predictors of outcomes for inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in intensive care units. However, most retrospective studies applied regression methods to evaluate the risk of death or worsening health. Recently, new studies have based their conclusions on retrospective studies by applying machine learning methods. This study applied a machine learning method based on decision tree methods to define predictors of outcomes in an internal medicine unit with a prospective study design. The main result was that the first variable to evaluate prediction was the international normalized ratio, a measure related to prothrombin time, followed by immunoglobulin M response. The model allowed the threshold determination for each continuous blood or haematological parameter and drew a path toward the outcome. The model’s performance (accuracy, 75.93%; sensitivity, 99.61%; and specificity, 23.43%) was validated with a k-fold repeated cross-validation. The results suggest that a machine learning approach could help clinicians to obtain information that could be useful as an alert for disease progression in patients with COVID-19. Further research should explore the acceptability of these results to physicians in current practice and analyze the impact of machine learning-guided decisions on patient outcomes. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 463 KiB

Open AccessArticle

A Survey on Methodological Issues of Clinical Research Studies Reviewed by Independent Ethic Committees during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy

by Alberto Milanese, Paolo Trerotoli, Annarita Vestri and on behalf of the Biostatisticians Collaborative Group and SISMEC Directive Council

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11673; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811673 - 16 Sep 2022

Viewed by 1301

Abstract

The struggle for information and the hasty search for answers caused by the COVID-19 pandemic threatened the possibility of lowering study quality, as well as ethical committees’ review standards during the outbreak. Our investigation aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the quality of clinical research studies submitted to Italian Ethics Committees in the period between April and July 2020. All 91 Italian ethics committees were contacted via email in order to collect anonymized information on the type and quality of COVID-19-related studies submitted to each committee during the study period. The present study summarizes the characteristics of the 184 study applications collected, pointing out, especially, how the quality of the study population and statistical analysis are crucial variables in determining the study approval. Nevertheless, despite the need for high-quality and open scientific information, especially exacerbated by this particular historical period, only a minority of the ethics committees (20.9%) agreed to share their data; such scarce participation, beyond biasing the representativeness of the results obtained by the present study, more importantly, hinders the broader goal of creating trust between researchers and the general public. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 615 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Comparison of Three Comorbidity Measures for Predicting In-Hospital Death through a Clinical Administrative Nacional Database

by Iván Oterino-Moreira, Susana Lorenzo-Martínez, Ángel López-Delgado and Montserrat Pérez-Encinas

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11262; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811262 - 7 Sep 2022

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1705

Abstract

Background: Various authors have validated scales to measure comorbidity. However, the prognosis capacity variation according to the comorbidity measurement index used needs to be determined in order to identify which is the best predictor. Aims: To quantify the differences between the Charlson (CCI), Elixhauser (ECI) and van Walraven (WCI) comorbidity indices as prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality and to identify the best comorbidity measure predictor. Methods: A retrospective observational study that included all hospitalizations of patients over 18 years of age, discharged between 2017 and 2021 in the hospital, using the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS). We calculated CCI, ECI, WCI according to ICD-10 coding algorithms. The correlation and concordance between the three indices were evaluated by Spearman’s rho and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), respectively. The logistic regression model for each index was built for predicting in-hospital mortality. Finally, we used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for comparing the performance of each index in predicting in-hospital mortality, and the Delong method was employed to test the statistical significance of differences. Results: We studied 79,425 admission episodes. The 54.29% were men. The median age was 72 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 56–80) and in-hospital mortality rate was 4.47%. The median of ECI was = 2 (IQR: 1–4), ICW was 4 (IQR: 0–12) and ICC was 1 (IQR: 0–3). The correlation was moderate: ECI vs. WCI rho = 0.645, p < 0.001; ECI vs. CCI rho = 0.721, p < 0.001; and CCI vs. WCI rho = 0.704, p < 0.001; and the concordance was fair to good: ECI vs. WCI Intraclass Correlation Coefficient type A (ICC_A) = 0.675 (CI 95% 0.665–0.684) p < 0.001; ECI vs. CCI ICC_A = 0.797 (CI 95% 0.780–0.812), p < 0.001; and CCI vs. WCI ICC_A = 0.731 (CI 95% 0.667–0.779), p < 0.001. The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that comorbidity increased the risk of in-hospital mortality, with differences depending on the comorbidity measurement scale: odds ratio [OR] = 2.10 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.00–2.20) p > |z| < 0 using ECI; OR = 2.31 (CI 95% 2.21–2.41) p > |z| < 0 for WCI; and OR = 2.53 (CI 95% 2.40–2.67) p > |z| < 0 employing CCI. The area under the curve [AUC] = 0.714 (CI 95% 0.706–0.721) using as a predictor of in-hospital mortality CCI, AUC = 0.729 (CI 95% 0.721–0.737) for ECI and AUC = 0.750 (CI 95% 0.743–0.758) using WCI, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Comorbidity plays an important role as a predictor of in-hospital mortality, with differences depending on the measurement scale used, the van Walraven comorbidity index being the best predictor of in-hospital mortality. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 6775 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Bayesian Modeling of COVID-19 to Classify the Infection and Death Rates in a Specific Duration: The Case of Algerian Provinces

by Hani Amir Aouissi, Ahmed Hamimes, Mostefa Ababsa, Lavinia Bianco, Christian Napoli, Feriel Kheira Kebaili, Andrey E. Krauklis, Hafid Bouzekri and Kuldeep Dhama

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(15), 9586; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159586 - 4 Aug 2022

Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3004

Abstract

COVID-19 causes acute respiratory illness in humans. The direct consequence of the spread of the virus is the need to find appropriate and effective solutions to reduce its spread. Similar to other countries, the pandemic has spread in Algeria, with noticeable variation in mortality and infection rates between regions. We aimed to estimate the proportion of people who died or became infected with SARS-CoV-2 in each provinces using a Bayesian approach. The estimation parameters were determined using a binomial distribution along with an a priori distribution, and the results had a high degree of accuracy. The Bayesian model was applied during the third wave (1 January–15 August 2021), in all Algerian’s provinces. For spatial analysis of duration, geographical maps were used. Our findings show that Tissemsilt, Ain Defla, Illizi, El Taref, and Ghardaia (Mean = 0.001) are the least affected provinces in terms of COVID-19 mortality. The results also indicate that Tizi Ouzou (Mean = 0.0694), Boumerdes (Mean = 0.0520), Annaba (Mean = 0.0483), Tipaza (Mean = 0.0524), and Tebessa (Mean = 0.0264) are more susceptible to infection, as they were ranked in terms of the level of corona infections among the 48 provinces of the country. Their susceptibility seems mainly due to the population density in these provinces. Additionally, it was observed that northeast Algeria, where the population is concentrated, has the highest infection rate. Factors affecting mortality due to COVID-19 do not necessarily depend on the spread of the pandemic. The proposed Bayesian model resulted in being useful for monitoring the pandemic to estimate and compare the risks between provinces. This statistical inference can provide a reasonable basis for describing future pandemics in other world geographical areas. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 741 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Randomised Controlled Study on Measures to Increase Vaccination Rates among German Armed Forces Soldiers

by Jana Nele Arnold, Nils Gundlach, Irina Böckelmann and Stefan Sammito

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(14), 8568; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148568 - 14 Jul 2022

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1562

Abstract

Vaccination is one of the most effective medical measures for preventing infectious diseases. Even though there are recommendations for specific occupational groups that have an increased risk of infection, e.g., armed forces personnel, there are gaps in the vaccination rates of this personal. We conducted a randomised and controlled cohort study to examine whether a computerised reminder system would increase the vaccination rates of active soldiers over a period of twelve months. A total of 506 soldiers with a mean age of 27.7 ± 6.5 years (experimental group (EG)) and 27.9 ± 6.3 years (control group (CG)) were included in our study. Only 26.2% of the EG and 31.3% of the CG had received the required vaccinations at the beginning of our study. The vaccination rates for influenza (50.5% and 49.1%) and tick-borne encephalitis (57.1% and 60.7%) were particularly low, for measles, mumps, and rubella they were high (94.3% and 97.8%). A highly significant increase (p < 0.001) in vaccination rates was observed for both groups during our study. The results revealed considerable vaccination gaps among German armed forces soldiers. Despite a highly significant increase in vaccination rates during the study, there is still a clear need for action. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1367 KiB

Open AccessArticle

In-Hospital Mortality in Non-COVID-19-Related Diseases before and during the Pandemic: A Regional Retrospective Study

by Nicola Bartolomeo, Massimo Giotta and Paolo Trerotoli

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(20), 10886; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010886 - 16 Oct 2021

Cited by 19 | Viewed by 2461

Abstract

Italy was one of the nations most affected by SARS-CoV-2. During the pandemic period, the national government approved some restrictions to reduce diffusion of the virus. We aimed to evaluate changes in in-hospital mortality and its possible relation with patient comorbidities and different restrictive public health measures adopted during the 2020 pandemic period. We analyzed the hospital discharge records of inpatients from public and private hospitals in Apulia (Southern Italy) from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. The study period was divided into four phases according to administrative restriction. The possible association between in-hospital deaths, hospitalization period, and covariates such as age group, sex, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) class, and length of hospitalization stay (LoS) class was evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model. The risk of death was slightly higher in men than in women (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07) and was lower for every age group below the >75 years age group. The risk of in-hospital death was lower for hospitalizations with a lower CCI score. In summary, our analysis shows a possible association between in-hospital mortality in non-COVID-19-related diseases and restrictive measures of public health. The risk of hospital death increased during the lockdown period. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 745 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Characteristics and Trends of the Hospital Standardized Readmission Ratios for Pneumonia: A Retrospective Observational Study Using Japanese Administrative Claims Data from 2010 to 2018

by Ryo Onishi, Yosuke Hatakeyama, Kunichika Matsumoto, Kanako Seto, Koki Hirata and Tomonori Hasegawa

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(14), 7624; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147624 - 17 Jul 2021

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2079

Abstract

Previous studies indicated that optimal care for pneumonia during hospitalization might reduce the risk of in-hospital mortality and subsequent readmission. This study was a retrospective observational study using Japanese administrative claims data from April 2010 to March 2019. We analyzed data from 167,120 inpatients with pneumonia ≥15 years old in the benchmarking project managed by All Japan Hospital Association. Hospital-level risk-adjusted ratios of 30-day readmission for pneumonia were calculated using multivariable logistic regression analyses. The Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation in each consecutive period. In the analysis using complete 9-year data including 54,756 inpatients, the hospital standardized readmission ratios (HSRRs) showed wide variation among hospitals and improvement trend (r = −0.18, p = 0.03). In the analyses of trends in each consecutive period, the HSRRS were positively correlated between ‘2010–2012’ and ‘2013–2015’ (r = 0.255, p = 0.010), and ‘2013–2015’ and ‘2016–2018’ (r = 0.603, p < 0.001). This study denoted the HSRRs for pneumonia could be calculated using Japanese administrative claims data. The HSRRs significantly varied among hospitals with comparable case-mix, and could relatively evaluate the quality of preventing readmission including long-term trends. The HSRRs can be used as yet another measure to help improve quality of care over time if other indicators are examined in parallel. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1145 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Effectiveness of an Innovative Sensory Approach to Improve Children’s Nutritional Choices

by Domenico Meleleo, Giovanna Susca, Valentina Andrulli Buccheri, Giovanna Lamanna, Liliana Cassano, Valeria De Chirico, Sergio Mustica, Margherita Caroli and Nicola Bartolomeo

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(12), 6462; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126462 - 15 Jun 2021

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2118

Abstract

A case-control study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the Edueat^® Method, through experiential workshops focused on the use of all 5 senses. In two different primary schools in the same city, questionnaires were administered in two months with a follow-up one year later. Participants: 119 children (age 8.2–9.0) chosen randomly; control group 66 (55.5%). Seven lessons of 2 h each were held in the schools by experts of the Edueat^® method and seven extra lessons by the teachers. The main outcome measures were the children’s changes in their approach and attitude towards their eating habits. The answers were grouped with factor analysis and summarized through scores. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted in order to identify the relationships between scores and treatment over time. At the end of treatment, the intervention group showed a significant appreciation towards healthy foods (+4.15 vs. −0.05, p = 0.02) and a greater capacity in identifying foods which are very good for the health (+15.6 vs. +14.4, p = 0.02). In conclusion, the Edueat^® method was found to be particularly promising in transmitting knowledge of those foods which are healthy. Greater involvement of teachers and parents is crucial. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 676 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Response Activity in Mixed-Method Survey Data Collection—The Methods Used in a Survey among the Foreign-Born Population in Finland (FinMonik)

by Hannamaria Kuusio, Anna Seppänen, Laura Somersalo, Satu Jokela, Anu E Castaneda, Rekar Abdulhamed and Eero Lilja

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(6), 3300; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063300 - 23 Mar 2021

Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4101

Abstract

In terms of the number of respondents, Survey on Well-Being among Foreign Born Population (FinMonik) is so far the most extensive survey carried out among the population with foreign background in Finland. It comprises a wide range of self-reported data, including information on the respondent’s health, well-being and access to care, which can be widely utilized in planning and assessing integration, health and welfare policies. A mixed-method approach (an electronic questionnaire, a paper questionnaire and phone interviews) was used in collecting the data which consists of responses by 6836 respondents aged 18–64 years. All response types included, the response rate was 53.1% (n = 6836). This study describes in detail the methods used in the FinMonik survey. In addition, we describe the demographics of the respondents partaking in each response format. The aim of the study is to promote the development of mixed-method survey as a way of collecting reliable data that can be used to enhance foreign-born people’s health, well-being and access to health care. The survey responses will be used as a baseline in observing the respondents’ well-being through the register-based data available in several national registers on health, medicine use and access to care as well as the data collected in the study Impact of Coronavirus Epidemic on Well-Being among Foreign Born Population Study (MigCOVID). Furthermore, the FinMonik study protocol will be repeated every four years. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1924 KiB

Open AccessArticle

In the Subtropical Monsoon Climate High-Density City, What Features of the Neighborhood Environment Matter Most for Public Health?

by Wei Gao, Ruoxiang Tu, Hao Li, Yongli Fang and Qingmin Que

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(24), 9566; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249566 - 21 Dec 2020

Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3444

Abstract

Urbanization and climate change have been rapidly occurring globally. Evidence-based healthy city development is required to improve living quality and mitigate the adverse impact of the outdoor neighborhood environment on public health. Taking Guangzhou as an example to explore the association of neighborhood environment and public health and preferably to offer some implications for better future city development, we measured ten environmental factors (temperature (T), wind-chill index (WCI), thermal stress index (HSI), relative humidity (RH), average wind speed (AWS), negative oxygen ions (NOI), PM2.5, luminous flux (LF), and illuminance (I)) in four seasons in four typical neighborhoods, and the SF-36 health scale was employed to assess the physical and mental health of neighborhood residents in nine subscales (health transition(HT), physiological functions (PF), general health status (GH), physical pain (BP), physiological functions (RP), energy vitality (VT), mental health (MH), social function (SF), and emotional functions (RE)). The linear mixed model was used in an analysis of variance. We ranked the different environmental factors in relation to aspects of health and weighted them accordingly. Generally, the thermal environment had the greatest impact on both physical and mental health and the atmospheric environment and wind environment had the least impact on physical health and mental health, respectively. In addition, the physical health of the resident was more greatly affected by the environment than mental health. According to the results, we make a number of strategic suggestions for the renewal of the outdoor neighborhood environment in subtropical monsoon climate high-density cities and provide a theoretical basis for improving public health through landscape architecture at the neighborhood scale. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health)

► Show Figures

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Data and Methods for Monitoring and Decisions in Public Health

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Published Papers (10 papers)

Research

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI