ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Workplace Health, Wellbeing and Productivity

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Occupational Safety and Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2023) | Viewed by 7710

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
Interests: wellbeing theory; wellbeing in policy formation; wellbeing and organizations

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
Interests: social exchange; psychological contracts

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
Interests: wellbeing and productivity; gender and diversity; public administration

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
Interests: workplace health and wellbeing; organizing work for wellbeing; policy to support workplace wellbeing

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK
Interests: health economics; sleep; econometrics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK
Interests: supporting healthy work behaviors; economic impacts of wellbeing; policy to support workplace wellbeing; wellbeing in the public sector

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The evidence of a link between workplace health and wellbeing and indicators of organizational performance is robust and reliable. There is also considerable evidence of strong relationships between indicators of health, wellbeing and employee engagement. However, with questions over the strength of the evidence that workplace health and wellbeing interventions cause better health and wellbeing, there are also questions over whether the actions taken by organizations to improve health and wellbeing will also address organizational and societal concerns around productivity and performance.

The purpose of this Special Issue is to further explore the links between workplace health, wellbeing and productivity, and to examine how organizations may act to achieve the twin aims of better worker health and higher productivity. We take broad definitions of productivity and performance that include not just financial performance, but also issues related to worker motivation, absenteeism and presenteeism, for example. We welcome empirical or conceptual submissions that address issues such as:

  • The mechanisms through which health/wellbeing and productivity are linked and the direction of causation of these relationships;
  • The specific actions and initiatives organizations can take to achieve simultaneously better health/wellbeing and productivity as well as the actions and initiatives that may increase one at the expense of the other;
  • The cost-effectiveness of specific organizational actions and initiatives that can improve worker health/wellbeing;
  • How organizations implement and manage actions and initiatives to improve health/wellbeing in ways that also enhance performance or productivity;
  • The relationships between health/wellbeing and productivity at the meso-organizational level and the broader macro-country or societal level.

Dr. David Watson
Dr. Marijana Baric
Prof. Dr. Sara Connolly
Prof. Dr. Kevin Daniels
Dr. Marco Hafner
Dr. Christian van Stolk
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • workplace health and wellbeing
  • productivity
  • organizational performance
  • wellbeing economics
  • mutual gains

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 697 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Return to Work for Workers with Mental Health and Musculoskeletal Conditions
by Abasiama Etuknwa, Kevin Daniels, Rachel Nayani and Constanze Eib
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1057; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021057 - 6 Jan 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3846
Abstract
Common mental health and musculoskeletal disorders (CMDs and MSDs) are two of the most significant causes of non-participation in employment amongst working age adults. Background: This case study fills an important gap in the scientific literature on reintegration back to work after sickness [...] Read more.
Common mental health and musculoskeletal disorders (CMDs and MSDs) are two of the most significant causes of non-participation in employment amongst working age adults. Background: This case study fills an important gap in the scientific literature on reintegration back to work after sickness absence due to CMDs and MSDs. It particularly examines the return to work (RTW) experiences of sick-listed employees to understand the facilitators and barriers of sustainable RTW. Methods: Using a realist evaluation approach within a qualitative inquiry, perceptions of employees were explored to provide in-depth understanding of what, how and under what circumstances sustainable RTW can be enabled for employees absent on a short- or long-term basis. Repeat face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 participants (15 women and 7 men, aged 30–50 years and sick-listed with MSDs and CMDs) who were recruited using purposive sampling. Data was thematically analysed. Results: A total of 2 main codes and 5 subcodes were developed and grouped into three theoretical abstractions. As a result of validating the context, mechanism, and outcome configurations with accounts of participants, all three initial theories explaining the most prominent mechanisms that either facilitates or impedes a sustainable RTW for people with CMDs and MSDs were justified. Conclusions: Our findings reveal the active role of line managers on the RTW outcomes of returning employees. However, line-manager’s competence and ability to effectively support and implement appropriate RTW strategies suited to employees’ hinges on working in alignment with key stakeholders and returning employees. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Workplace Health, Wellbeing and Productivity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 547 KiB  
Article
The Benefits of an Employee-Friendly Company on Job Attitudes and Health of Employees: Findings from Matched Employer–Employee Data
by Raphael M. Herr, Luisa Leonie Brokmeier, Joachim E. Fischer and Daniel Mauss
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(15), 9046; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159046 - 25 Jul 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2450
Abstract
Background: This study explored the association of an employee-friendly work environment with employees’ job attitudes (engagement, commitment, turnover intentions, and job satisfaction), and health (mental and general health), applying matched employer–employee data. Methods: The German Linked Personnel Panel (LPP; n = 14,182) survey [...] Read more.
Background: This study explored the association of an employee-friendly work environment with employees’ job attitudes (engagement, commitment, turnover intentions, and job satisfaction), and health (mental and general health), applying matched employer–employee data. Methods: The German Linked Personnel Panel (LPP; n = 14,182) survey simultaneously captures the data of employees and the human resources (HR) management of companies. A two-step cluster analysis of 16 items of the HR valuation identified relatively more- and less-employee-friendly companies (EFCs). Logistic regressions tested differences between these companies in the assessment of job attitudes and health of their employees. Results: Compared to less-EFCS, more-EFCS had a reduced risk of poorer job attitudes and substandard health of their employees. For example, the risk for higher turnover intentions was reduced by 33% in more-EFCS (OR = 0.683, 95% C.I. = 0.626–0.723), and more-EFCS had an 18% reduced chance of poor mental health reporting of their employees (OR = 0.822, 95% C.I. = 0.758–0.892). Conclusions: More-EFCS have more motivated and healthier employees. The most distinct factors for more-EFCS were: the existence of development plans for employees, opportunities for advancement and development, and personnel development measures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Workplace Health, Wellbeing and Productivity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop