jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 July 2023) | Viewed by 13740

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan
Interests: ERCP; EUS; pancreaticobiliary disease; cholangiocarcinoma; pancreatic cancer; gallbladder cancer; biliary stricture; bile duct stones; endoscopic stenting; endoscopic radiofrequency ablation; chemotherapy; development of medical device

E-Mail
Guest Editor
1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Interests: hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer; surgical outcome; risk calculator; minimally invasive surgery; prediction model

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Nowadays, endoscopic procedures, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), are essential in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreaticobiliary diseases. While rapid progress has been made in the development and use of these techniques, many unresolved issues still exist. Thus, it is necessary to identify these issues and conduct various well-designed studies. Moreover, in terms of treatment, new advanced methods, such as interventional EUS, cholangioscopic/pancreatoscopic-related procedures, balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP, and endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, have been developed in recent years, spurring significant progress. In order to further standardize and accelerate the use of these techniques, it will be necessary to accumulate evidence, refine existing techniques, and develop more sophisticated devices.

In this Special Issue, we sincerely welcome authors to submit any type of paper, such as research articles, review articles, and case series studies, relating to the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of pancreaticobiliary disease.

Dr. Tadahisa Inoue
Dr. Kota Sahara
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
  • endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)
  • pancreaticobiliary disease
  • endoscopic diagnosis and treatment
  • interventional EUS
  • cholangioscopic/pancreatoscopic-related procedures
  • balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP
  • endoscopic radiofrequency ablation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

3 pages, 176 KiB  
Editorial
Editorial: Surgical Advances in Pancreaticobiliary Diseases
by Kota Sahara
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1268; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041268 - 6 Feb 2023
Viewed by 1399
Abstract
Pancreaticobiliary diseases include malignant tumors arising in organs with a complex anatomy, such as the pancreas and bile ducts, often presenting as locally advanced or metastatic lesions, and they frequently have a poor prognosis [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

9 pages, 1940 KiB  
Article
Pancreaticobiliary Diseases with Severe Complications as a Rare Indication for Emergency Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature
by Maximilian Fickenscher, Oleg Vorontsov, Thomas Müller, Boris Radeleff and Christian Graeb
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(17), 5760; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175760 - 4 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1337
Abstract
The pancreaticobiliary system is a complex and vulnerable anatomic region. Small changes can lead to severe complications. Pancreaticobiliary disorders leading to severe complications include malignancies, pancreatitis, duodenal ulcer, duodenal diverticula, vascular malformations, and iatrogenic or traumatic injuries. Different therapeutic strategies, such as conservative, [...] Read more.
The pancreaticobiliary system is a complex and vulnerable anatomic region. Small changes can lead to severe complications. Pancreaticobiliary disorders leading to severe complications include malignancies, pancreatitis, duodenal ulcer, duodenal diverticula, vascular malformations, and iatrogenic or traumatic injuries. Different therapeutic strategies, such as conservative, interventional (e.g., embolization, stent graft applications, or biliary interventions), or surgical therapy, are available in early disease stages. Therapeutic options in patients with severe complications such as duodenal perforation, acute bleeding, or sepsis are limited. If less invasive procedures are exhausted, an emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) can be the only option left. The aim of this study was to analyze a single-center experience of EPD performed for benign non-trauma indications and to review the literature concerning EPD. Between January 2015 and January 2022, 11 patients received EPD due to benign non-trauma indications at our institution. Data were analyzed regarding sex, age, indication, operative parameters, length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. Furthermore, we performed a literature survey using the PubMed database and reviewed reported cases of EPD. Eleven EPD cases due to benign non-trauma indications were analyzed. Indications included peptic duodenal ulcer with penetration into the hepatopancreatic duct and the pancreas, duodenal ulcer with acute uncontrollable bleeding, and penetration into the pancreas, and a massive perforated duodenal diverticulum with peritonitis and sepsis. The mean operative time was 369 min, and the median length of hospital stay was 35.8 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 out of 11 patients (36.4%). Total 90-day postoperative mortality was 9.1% (1 patient). We reviewed 17 studies and 22 case reports revealing 269 cases of EPD. Only 20 cases of EPD performed for benign non-trauma indications are reported in the literature. EPD performed for benign non-trauma indications remains a rare event, with only 31 reported cases. The data analysis of all available cases from the literature revealed an increased postoperative mortality rate of 25.8%. If less invasive approaches are exhausted, EPD is still a life-saving procedure with acceptable results. Performed by surgeons with a high level of experience in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, mortality rates below 10% can be achieved. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 1769 KiB  
Article
Proposal and Validation of New Diagnostic Criteria for Diagnostic Weights of Endoultrasonographic Findings for Early Chronic Pancreatitis
by Ken Kashima, Akira Yamamiya, Yoko Abe, Kazunori Nagashima, Takahito Minaguchi, Yasuhito Kunogi, Fumi Sakuma, Koh Fukushi, Yasunori Inaba, Takeshi Sugaya, Keiichi Tominaga, Kenichi Goda and Atsushi Irisawa
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(16), 5320; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165320 - 16 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1290
Abstract
[Background and study aim] A commonly applied method for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis (CP) uses endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), assigning weights to each EUS diagnostic finding. It is the Rosemont classification (RC). In 2019, to improve EUS diagnostic specificity, Japanese diagnostic criteria for early chronic [...] Read more.
[Background and study aim] A commonly applied method for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis (CP) uses endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), assigning weights to each EUS diagnostic finding. It is the Rosemont classification (RC). In 2019, to improve EUS diagnostic specificity, Japanese diagnostic criteria for early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) were revised. Nevertheless, the criteria use no weighting of EUS diagnostic findings, as the RC does. This study was undertaken to propose diagnostic criteria that would weight each EUS finding of ECP and that would be more specific than the RC. [Methods] By EUS of the pancreas, 773 patients underwent detailed observation from January 2018 to March 2019 at our institution. An expert finalized all cases when patients were diagnosed. Using data from the medical records, 97 consecutive patients with EUS diagnostic findings of ECP based on the Japanese diagnostic criteria of ECP2009 (JDCECP2009) were selected. The definition under the RC of “Indeterminate for CP” was equivalent to ECP. Each case was diagnosed using (1) JDCECP2009 and (2) the Japanese diagnostic criteria of ECP2019 (JDCECP2019). Moreover, the four diagnostic EUS findings in JDCECP2019 were applied to the RC, weighted (modified-JDCECP2019), and subsequently compared with the earlier diagnostic criteria. As Modified-JDCECP2019, we suggested (3) RC-A—the current four items scored related to the RC, and (4) RC-B—the five items scored by dividing lobularity with and without honeycombing. [Results] Diagnoses produced based on each criterion were normal: ECP = (1) 20:77, (2) 46:51, (3) 52:42, and (4) 60:35. [Conclusions] Modified-JDCECP2019 may provide EUS diagnoses for ECP with higher specificity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2135 KiB  
Article
Risk Factors for Early- and Late-Onset Cholecystitis after Y-Configured Metal Stent Placement in Patients with Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction: A Single-Center Study
by Jonghyun Lee, Sung Yong Han, Donghoon Baek, Gwang Ha Kim, Geun Am Song and Dong Uk Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4354; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134354 - 28 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1462
Abstract
This study evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of early- (within 7 days of placement) and late-onset (after 7 days of placement) cholecystitis after Y-configured metal stent placement. Between June 2005 and August 2020, 109 patients who had been treated with Y-configured metal [...] Read more.
This study evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of early- (within 7 days of placement) and late-onset (after 7 days of placement) cholecystitis after Y-configured metal stent placement. Between June 2005 and August 2020, 109 patients who had been treated with Y-configured metal stents for malignant hilar obstruction were enrolled in the study. We retrospectively analyzed the potential risk factors for post-stent cholecystitis. The presence of diabetes (p = 0.042), the length of the common part of the Y-stent (p = 0.017), filling of the gallbladder with contrast medium during the procedure (p = 0.040), and tumor invasion of the cystic duct accompanied by filling the gallbladder with contrast medium during metal stent placement (p = 0.001) were identified as important risk factors. In cases of late-onset cholecystitis, stent obstruction (p = 0.004) and repeated endoscopic procedures due to stent malfunction (p = 0.024) were significant risk factors. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, significant risk factors were the length of the common part of the Y-stent (p = 0.032) in early-onset cholecystitis and stent obstruction (p = 0.007) in late-onset cholecystitis. This study demonstrated that early-onset cholecystitis may occur in patients according to the length of the common portion of the Y-stent. In contrast, late-onset cholecystitis may occur in patients with stent obstruction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1426 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Two Types of Guidewires for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Sung Yong Han, Jung Wan Choe, Dong Uk Kim, Jong Jin Hyun, Joung-Ho Han, Hoonsub So, Sung Jo Bang, Dong Hee Koh and Seok Jeong
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(10), 3590; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103590 - 22 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1791
Abstract
Background: There is insufficient information regarding the optimal guidewire for managing malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). Therefore, a newly designed 0.025-inch guidewire was compared with the conventional 0.035-inch guidewire for selective cannulation of both intrahepatic ducts (IHDs) in patients with MHBO. Methods: Patients [...] Read more.
Background: There is insufficient information regarding the optimal guidewire for managing malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). Therefore, a newly designed 0.025-inch guidewire was compared with the conventional 0.035-inch guidewire for selective cannulation of both intrahepatic ducts (IHDs) in patients with MHBO. Methods: Patients were randomly enrolled into the curved type newly designed 0.025-inch guidewire group (0.025 group) or the curved type conventional 0.035-inch guidewire group (0.035 group). The primary outcome was the selective cannulation rate of IHD. If the assigned guidewire failed to pass the stricture within 5 min, the crossover guidewire was selected. If the crossover guidewire failed to cross the stricture within the next 5 min, it was judged as a failed selective cannulation of both IHDs. Results: A total of 90 patients were enrolled (0.025 group, n = 47; 0.035 group, n = 43). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the groups regarding sex, age, BMI, obstruction level, and clinical presentation. Four patients (8.5%) in the 0.025 group the cannulation of the IHD failed and the conventional 0.035-inch guidewire was substituted in a second attempt; the 0.035-inch guidewire failed to cross the stricture in all four patients. In the 0.035 group, eleven patients (25.6%) failed to achieve selective cannulation of IHD, and the 0.025-inch guidewire was substituted; the newly designed 0.025-inch guidewire crossed the stricture in ten of these (10/11, 90.9%). The selective cannulation rate of IHD was significantly higher in the 0.025 group (95.1% vs. 85.5%, p = 0.043). Conclusions: The 0.025 group exhibited a higher success rate for selective cannulation of both IHDs in MHBO than did the 0.035 group. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1261 KiB  
Article
Efficacy of a Newly Developed Guidewire for Selective Biliary Cannulation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
by Sung Yong Han, Sung Ill Jang, Dong Hee Koh, Jong Hyun Lee, Dong Uk Kim, Jae Hee Cho, Kyong Joo Lee, Seong-Hun Kim, Min Je Sung and Chang-Il Kwon
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(10), 3440; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103440 - 12 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1465
Abstract
Background and Aims: Various guidewires are used for biliary cannulation, and each one has its own characteristics affecting its effectiveness. This study aimed to measure the basic properties and evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed 0.025-inch guidewire for selective biliary cannulation. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background and Aims: Various guidewires are used for biliary cannulation, and each one has its own characteristics affecting its effectiveness. This study aimed to measure the basic properties and evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed 0.025-inch guidewire for selective biliary cannulation. Methods: A total of 190 patients at five referral hospitals were randomly allocated to undergo selective biliary cannulation using the newly developed guidewire (NGW group, n = 95) or a conventional guidewire (CGW group, n = 95). The primary outcome was the selective biliary cannulation rate in naïve papillae. The secondary outcome was to measure the NGW basic properties, compare them with those of the CGW, and analyze the importance of basic property differences. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome (75.8% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.102) and adverse event rate (6.3% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.374) were similar in both groups. However, compared with the CGW group, the NGW group showed a higher number of ampulla contacts (2.58 vs. 2.02, p = 0.011) and longer cannulation time (216.5 vs. 135.1 s, p = 0.016). Furthermore, the NGW group had higher maximum friction (34.6 ± 1.34 vs. 30.2 ± 4.09), lower stiffness, and better elastic resiliency. In the multivariate analysis, a curved-tip GW (OR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.62, p = 0.002) and normal papillary shape (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.86, p = 0.021) were contributing factors for successful selective biliary cannulation. Conclusions: The NGW group had high friction and low stiffness, characteristics affecting biliary cannulation. Clinically, the NGW group had similar success and adverse event rates as the CGW, but they showed a higher number of ampulla contacts and longer cannulation time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2087 KiB  
Article
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Survival Analysis
by Junya Toyoda, Kota Sahara, Tomoaki Takahashi, Kentaro Miyake, Yasuhiro Yabushita, Yu Sawada, Yuki Homma, Ryusei Matsuyama, Itaru Endo and Timothy M. Pawlik
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(7), 2654; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072654 - 2 Apr 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2765
Abstract
Background: Although surgery is the mainstay of curative-intent treatment for extrahepatic biliary tract cancer (EBTC), recurrence following surgery can be high and prognosis poor. The impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) relative to upfront surgery (US) among patients with EBTC remains unclear. Methods: The [...] Read more.
Background: Although surgery is the mainstay of curative-intent treatment for extrahepatic biliary tract cancer (EBTC), recurrence following surgery can be high and prognosis poor. The impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) relative to upfront surgery (US) among patients with EBTC remains unclear. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases was utilized to identify patients who underwent surgery from 2006 to 2017 for EBTC, including gallbladder cancer (GBC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). Trends in NAT utilization were investigated, and the impact of NAT on prognosis was compared with US using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Results: Among 6582 EBTC patients (GBC, n = 4467, ECC, n = 2215), 1.6% received NAT; the utilization of NAT for EBTC increased over time (Ptrend = 0.03). Among patients with lymph node metastasis, the lymph node ratio was lower among patients with NAT (0.18 vs. 0.40, p < 0.01). After PSM, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among patients treated with NAT versus US (5-year OS: 24.0% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.14, 5-year CSS: 38.0% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.21). A subgroup analysis revealed that NAT was associated with improved OS and CSS among patients with stages III–IVA of the disease (OS: HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.46–0.92, p = 0.02, CSS: HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.41–0.92, p = 0.01). Conclusions: While NAT did not provide an overall benefit to patients undergoing surgery for EBTC, individuals with advanced-stage disease had improved OS and CSS with NAT. An individualized approach to NAT use among patients with EBTC may provide a survival benefit. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 2872 KiB  
Article
Successful Intubation Using a Cap-Assisted Colonoscope for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients Undergoing Roux-en-Y Reconstruction
by Kyong Joo Lee, Se Woo Park, Hyun Joo Jang, Da Hae Park, Jung Hee Kim, Jang Han Jung, Dong Hee Koh and Jin Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1353; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041353 - 8 Feb 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1758
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is challenging in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y (REY) reconstruction; although balloon-assisted enteroscopy is the first-line treatment, it is not always available considering equipment and expertise. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a cap-assisted colonoscope as the primary approach [...] Read more.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is challenging in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y (REY) reconstruction; although balloon-assisted enteroscopy is the first-line treatment, it is not always available considering equipment and expertise. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a cap-assisted colonoscope as the primary approach for ERCP in REY reconstruction. We included 47 patients with REY who underwent ERCP using a cap-assisted colonoscope between January 2017 and February 2022. The primary outcome was intubation success for ERCP using a cap-assisted colonoscope during REY reconstruction. The secondary outcomes were cannulation success, procedure-related adverse events, and variables affecting successful intubation. Comparing side-to-side jejunojejunostomy (SS-JJ) and side-to-end jejunojejunostomy (SE-JJ) groups, the intubation success rate using a cap-assisted colonoscope in the SS-JJ group was higher than that in the SE-JJ group (34 of 38 (89.5%) vs. 1 of 9 (11.1%), p < 0.001). Successful intubation was achieved in 37 (97.4%) and 8 (88.9%) patients in the SS-JJ and SE-JJ groups, respectively, after applying the rescue technique using a balloon-assisted enteroscope for failed ERCP using only a colonoscope. No perforation occurred. Multivariable analysis showed that SS-JJ was a predictive factor for successful intubation (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 37.06 [3.91–925.56], p = 0.005). Usage of a cap-assisted colonoscope can be crucial for ERCP in patients undergoing REY reconstruction. Anatomically, SS-JJ can facilitate easy and accurate identification of the afferent limb and a highly successful ERCP using a cap-assisted colonoscope. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop