Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery: From Up-to-Date Practitioners, 2nd Edition

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Neurology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 March 2025 | Viewed by 1500

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Neurosurgery, Medical School, Catholic University of Rome, 00513 Rome, Italy
Interests: general neurosurgery; craniovertebral junction; complex spine neurosurgery; neurotraumatology; functional neurosurgery
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The “Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery: From Up-to-Date Practitioners, 2nd Edition” Special Issue provides a comprehensive summary of the latest advancements and best practices in the neurosurgery and spine surgery fields. This collection of articles showcases cutting-edge research, techniques, and clinical experiences from leading experts in these disciplines.

The Special Issue focuses on research articles and reviews, emphasizing the exclusion of case reports to maintain a high level of scientific rigor. The topics covered include innovative surgical approaches, emerging technologies, perioperative care, patient outcomes, and interdisciplinary collaboration in the treatment of neurological and spinal disorders.

This compilation serves as a valuable resource for healthcare professionals, researchers, and students interested in staying current with the rapidly evolving landscape of neurosurgery and spine surgery. The contributions of seasoned practitioners shed light on the most pressing issues and promising developments in these crucial medical specialties.

Dr. Massimiliano Visocchi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • neurosurgery
  • spine surgery
  • surgical techniques
  • research
  • advances
  • patient outcomes
  • interdisciplinary collaboration
  • healthcare
  • medical innovation
  • clinical practices

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

10 pages, 1452 KiB  
Article
Impact of Treatment Modalities and Fracture Stability on Survival in Thoracolumbar Fractures: A 5-Year Observational Study
by Reka Viola, Ádám Juhász, Dávid Süvegh, Dániel Sándor Veres, András Gati, Árpád Viola and Mohammad Walid Al-Smadi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 933; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030933 - 31 Jan 2025
Viewed by 267
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Thoracolumbar fractures are a significant health burden, commonly caused by trauma, osteoporosis, or degenerative conditions, and can severely reduce quality of life and survival. These fractures, classified by the AO Spine Classification System, range from stable to unstable and require tailored management [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Thoracolumbar fractures are a significant health burden, commonly caused by trauma, osteoporosis, or degenerative conditions, and can severely reduce quality of life and survival. These fractures, classified by the AO Spine Classification System, range from stable to unstable and require tailored management strategies. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes and survival probabilities in patients aged 50+ with AO A1–A4 fractures, comparing conservative treatment, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), and surgical stabilization, including minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1356 patients treated for thoracolumbar fractures at Hungary’s largest trauma center (2014–2019). Patients aged 50+ with low-impact trauma-induced AO A1–A4 fractures were included. Fractures were categorized into stable (A1–A2) and unstable (A3–A4) groups. Treatments included conservative management, PVP, and surgical stabilization. Survival probabilities were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, and outcomes between open and MISS techniques were compared. Results: Spine stability is a crucial factor in determining patient outcomes. MISS enabled stabilization in older patients, reducing hospital stays compared to open surgery (median 6 vs. 10 days). Minimally invasive techniques increased surgical likelihood for unstable fractures, especially in patients over 70 years. Older age and male sex were associated with higher mortality. Conclusions: MISS offers reduced recovery time and broader surgical eligibility, making it effective for managing unstable thoracolumbar fractures in older patients. Tailored management strategies are essential for improving survival outcomes, particularly in elderly and frail populations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 2494 KiB  
Review
Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia Secondary to Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia: Review of the Literature and Illustrative Case
by Massimiliano Visocchi, Fabio Zeoli and Francesco Signorelli
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(21), 6342; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216342 - 23 Oct 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 946
Abstract
Classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic pain disorder characterized by severe, unilateral facial pain, often resulting from vasculonervous conflict. A less common cause of TN is vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD). Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the preferred surgical intervention for TN, but in case [...] Read more.
Classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic pain disorder characterized by severe, unilateral facial pain, often resulting from vasculonervous conflict. A less common cause of TN is vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD). Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the preferred surgical intervention for TN, but in case of VBD, the surgical procedure is more complex due to the aberrant vascular anatomy. This study aims to review the evidence on MVD for VBD-induced TN, and analyze operative challenges, efficacy, and postoperative outcomes. An illustrative case is also presented. We report on the case of a 62-year-old male with a 7-year history of right-sided TN affecting the maxillary (V2) and mandibular (V3) territories. The patient underwent MVD using the interposition technique, where Teflon sponges were placed between the basilar artery and the nerve. Postoperatively, the patient experienced complete pain relief without neurological deficits. At 12 months follow-up, the patient remained pain-free and off medications. We performed an extensive literature review using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Sciences, highlighting the most relevant studies and findings on the topic. The literature review showed that, while MVD is effective in providing long-term pain relief in VBD-induced TN, the choice between interposition and transposition techniques remains debated. Interposition is easier to perform but may inadvertently increase nerve compression in some cases, whereas transposition offers more definitive decompression but carries higher technical risks. Our case and the available literature highlight the importance of individualized treatment planning in achieving optimal outcomes for patients with VBD-induced TN. Further research is needed to refine surgical techniques and minimize complications in this subset of TN patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop