jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Mesh Implants for Hernia Repair

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 March 2022) | Viewed by 7323

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Chefarzt, Agaplesion Elisabethenstift, Darmstadt, Germany
Interests: hernia; colorectal; pancreas; thyroid

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Hernia surgery plays an important role in our surgical routine. The use of mesh is recommended for almost every kind of hernia: For groin hernias, for example, mesh repair is recommended as the first choice either with an open procedure or a laparo-endoscopic repair technique (HerniaSurge Group, Hernia 2018). The use of mesh is also routine for incisional hernia repair and has been shown to significantly reduce the recurrence rate independent from the surgical procedure. The choice of mesh depends on the technique used and the layer where it is placed.

In laparoroscopic IPOM, repair meshes coated with an antiadhesive layer are used, and this intraperitoneal placement address another challenge. Even for umbilical and epigatsric hernias, the use of mesh is recommended by the latest guidelines in cases of hernia defects of more than 1cm (Henriksen et al., BJS 2020).

Quite naturally, the extensive use of meshes has led to an ongoing debate about the ideal mesh. One major concern about the use of mesh is the risk of infection especially in complex hernias and infected fields. A postoperative wound infection may lead to a mesh infection. The worst-case scenario is the need for the removal of an infected mesh prothesis because of bacterial biofilm. There have been several publications about the different strategies to reduce this complication. Various biological scaffolds are on the market which support the idea that in case of an infection, these protheses do not have to be removed. The flip side, however, is that some of these biological scaffolds show severe degradation and subsequent failure in the infectious environment and may be less mechanically durable in the face of infection (Cole et al., Hernia 2014).

Lately, long-term resorbable biosynthetic meshes have been introduced. With these new products, the risk for mesh infection with subsequent mesh removal has been averted, even in high-risk patients. The newest “kid on the block” is a polypropylene mesh coated with silver to achieve antibacterial properties and keep the stability of permanent systemic meshes. The fear of mesh infection following hernia repairs is also still apparent, although there are several new strategies available to reduce that risk.

Another concern about the use of meshes is the potential of causing chronic discomfort. Postoperative chronic pain is a major concern in groin hernia repair. The role of the mesh in this is still under debate.

This Special Issue of JCM focuses on the various aspects of using different kinds of permanent or resorbable implants for hernia repair. Our hope is for highly valued publications which will help all of us hernia surgeons to deal with the everyday struggle of providing the best treatment for our patients and to avoid severe complications and achieve the best results.

Dr. Guido Woeste
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Hernia
  • Hernia repair
  • Mesh
  • Infection

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

10 pages, 1073 KiB  
Article
Is Single Gloving Still Acceptable? Investigation and Evaluation of Damages on Sterile Latex Gloves in General Surgery
by Andreas Enz, Imad Kamaleddine, Justus Groß, Clemens Schafmayer, Emad Alwafai, Larissa Sievers, Wolfram Mittelmeier and Annett Klinder
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(17), 3887; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173887 - 29 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2659
Abstract
(1) Background: The sterile latex surgical glove is an important part of protecting both the patient and the surgical team from infections. However, mechanical stress can damage the integrity of the glove material and thus may lead to infections. (2) Method: A total [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The sterile latex surgical glove is an important part of protecting both the patient and the surgical team from infections. However, mechanical stress can damage the integrity of the glove material and thus may lead to infections. (2) Method: A total of 896 gloves from 448 surgeries were tested and evaluated by the water tightening test according to EN455 and ASTM D5151-19. (3) Results: From 448 surgeries, 18.8% of the interventions showed glove damage. In vascular surgery, gloves were damaged in 20.8%, in thoracic surgery 9.1%, in laparoscopic interventions 21.7%, in the subgroup hernia surgeries (TAPP) 17.6% and in open interventions 17.6%. A total of 101 damages were found on 896 gloves; one glove could have several damages. During vascular surgery, 60% of the damages were on the subordinated hand of the surgeon, and 73.3% of the damages had a size of 1 mm. In laparoscopic procedures, the subordinated hand was also more frequently affected (61.3%) than the dominant hand; 64.5% of the damages were 1 mm in size. In the hernia surgery subgroup (TAPP), no damage was larger than 1 mm; 66.7% were in the subordinated hand area. The duration of surgery had no influence on the lesion rate. (4) Conclusion: The damage rate in low impact procedures is high and represents an underestimated problem in soft tissue surgery. The use of single gloving can therefore lead to the risk of infection. EN455 and ASTM D5151-19 does not take into consideration the risk of intraoperative lesions. Double gloving and glove change algorithms should be established. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mesh Implants for Hernia Repair)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 1219 KiB  
Review
Antimicrobial Meshes for Hernia Repair: Current Progress and Perspectives
by Simona Mirel, Alexandra Pusta, Mihaela Moldovan and Septimiu Moldovan
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(3), 883; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030883 - 8 Feb 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4013
Abstract
Recent advances in the development of biomaterials have given rise to new options for surgery. New-generation medical devices can control chemical breakdown and resorption, prevent post-operative adhesion, and stimulate tissue regeneration. For the fabrication of medical devices, numerous biomaterials can be employed, including [...] Read more.
Recent advances in the development of biomaterials have given rise to new options for surgery. New-generation medical devices can control chemical breakdown and resorption, prevent post-operative adhesion, and stimulate tissue regeneration. For the fabrication of medical devices, numerous biomaterials can be employed, including non-degradable biomaterials (silicone, polypropylene, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) or biodegradable polymers, including implants and three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering, which require particular physicochemical and biological properties. Based on the combination of new generation technologies and cell-based therapies, the biocompatible and bioactive properties of some of these medical products can lead to progress in the repair of injured or harmed tissue and in tissue regeneration. An important aspect in the use of these prosthetic devices is the associated infection risk, due to the medical complications and socio-economic impact. This paper provides the latest achievements in the field of antimicrobial surgical meshes for hernia repair and discusses the perspectives in the development of these innovative biomaterials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mesh Implants for Hernia Repair)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop