Treatment Personalization in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Mental Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 April 2025 | Viewed by 1564

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The topic of treatment personalization in clinical psychology and psychotherapy has recently been attracting increasing attention as an effective way of improving the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and enhancing the quality of life of people experiencing mental health problems or disorders. Recent research has emphasized the significance of the mutual relationship between the specific interventions and the patient as a crucial factor in treatment effectiveness. Personalized treatment methods enhance this collaboration by aligning treatment strategies with patient characteristics.

The essence of personalization is to tailor the specific intervention features to the individual characteristics of the patient and to decide which therapeutic interventions are likely to be beneficial and effective for the final treatment outcomes. This is important because there are now a number of different therapeutic approaches that offer diverse treatment methods. In clinical psychology and psychotherapy, personalization can take different forms, depending on the therapeutic possibilities and the goals formulated. Significant elements of this include determining the appropriate level of intervention, identifying the person’s most important personal and social characteristics, selecting constructive elements or treatment modules, setting therapeutic goals, or matching patients to specific treatments. Personalized treatment in clinical psychology and psychotherapy comprises a comprehensive understanding of the patient, integrating insights from psychological, biological, and social domains.

The aim of this Special Issue is to identify individual patient characteristics and the main ways to optimize treatment. The theoretical foundations, empirical findings, and practical applications of personalized treatment in clinical psychology and psychotherapy will be examined.

Research topics of interest include the following:

The theoretical foundations of treatment personalization;
The role of personality and social characteristics in treatment;
Individual ways of coping with stress in somatic illness;
The effectiveness of treatment personalization interventions;
The selection of optimal therapeutic approaches in treatment;
Psychosomatic interventions;
Cognitive and emotional processes in treatment personalization;
Psychological needs and treatment preferences.

Dr. Dariusz Krok
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • treatment personalization
  • clinical psychology
  • psychotherapy
  • personalized treatment
  • psychosomatic interventions
  • coping and personalization

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

14 pages, 1199 KiB  
Article
Dyadic Effects of Attachment on Illness Acceptance in Patients with Breast Cancer and Spousal Caregivers: Sense of Coherence as a Mediator
by Dariusz Krok, Ewa Telka and Marcin Moroń
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(21), 6425; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216425 - 26 Oct 2024
Viewed by 576
Abstract
Background: Attachment styles have been found to play a significant role in adjustment to cancer. Couples often cope with breast cancer through an interdependent approach to the disease rather than just acting as individuals, and a sense of coherence is an important factor [...] Read more.
Background: Attachment styles have been found to play a significant role in adjustment to cancer. Couples often cope with breast cancer through an interdependent approach to the disease rather than just acting as individuals, and a sense of coherence is an important factor that influences these relationships. This study examined how attachment styles and sense of coherence impact illness acceptance in couples facing breast cancer within a dyadic perspective. Methods: Data were analyzed from 145 women with recently diagnosed breast cancer and their 145 partners, who attended clinic appointments related to medical treatment. They completed self-report measures of attachment, sense of coherence, and illness acceptance. Results: Higher secure attachment and low insecure attachment scores were associated with a higher sense of coherence and better illness acceptance both in women and partners. Results of actor–partner interdependence mediation models indicated that most associations between attachment styles and illness acceptance were mediated by sense of coherence within both intrapersonal (actor–actor) and interpersonal (actor–partner) effects. Conclusions: The interdependence in attachment and sense of coherence brought noticeable benefits to couples’ illness acceptance when facing breast cancer. In line with the salutogenic model, these relationships predominantly depended on the mediational function of comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness, which determined cognitive and emotional reactions that influenced both patients’ and spouses’ acceptance of the disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment Personalization in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 1223 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Effectiveness of Emotional Freedom Techniques for Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis
by Ji-Woo Seok and Jaeuk U. Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(21), 6481; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216481 - 29 Oct 2024
Viewed by 681
Abstract
Background: Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) have gained attention as a potential therapy for reducing depressive symptoms. However, the evidence remains inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to assess the overall efficacy of EFT in treating depressive symptoms and explore moderators influencing its effectiveness. Methods [...] Read more.
Background: Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) have gained attention as a potential therapy for reducing depressive symptoms. However, the evidence remains inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to assess the overall efficacy of EFT in treating depressive symptoms and explore moderators influencing its effectiveness. Methods: A meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted, with depressive symptom reduction as the primary outcome. Meta-regression explored moderators such as the EFT format, duration, age, and depression severity. Results: The analysis showed a significant overall effect size of 1.268 for EFT in reducing depressive symptoms. A moderator analysis revealed that group-based EFT interventions were more effective than individual ones, and participants with moderate depression experienced the greatest benefits. Additionally, shorter interventions were found to be highly effective. Conclusions: EFT effectively reduces depressive symptoms, particularly in group settings and for those with moderate depression. Shorter, well-structured interventions may enhance treatment efficiency. Further studies should explore long-term effects and broader applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment Personalization in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop