jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Pancreatic Cancer: Biomarkers, Risk Factors, Early Detection

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Oncology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 June 2022) | Viewed by 12804

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-153 Lodz, Poland
Interests: pancreatitis; pancreatic cancer; inflammatory bowel disease; faecal microbiota transplantation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Central Clinical Hospital of Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
2. Collegium Medicum, Jak Kochanowski University, 25-516 Kielce, Poland
Interests: IBD; COVID and GI disease; chronic pancreatitis; acute pancreatitis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Diagnostics and treatment of pancreatic cancer (PDAC) represent a great challenge for modern medicine. PDAC is a highly malignant diagnosis, characterised by rapid local progression and distant metastasis formation. This is the fourth-leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide.

PDAC screening in general population is not cost effective but may be considered in high-risk groups, such as early onset diabetes or patients with genetic disorders characterised by an increased risk in PDAC, such as Lynch syndrome (HNPCC), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (FAMMM), hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and others.

Recently, there has been great interest in developing new PDAC serum biomarkers: diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive. The routinely used biomarker, CA 19-9, is not helpful in early stage  PDAC detection, but hopefully, the new markers alone or in panels may improve the PDAC diagnostics.

The most common management of early stage PDAC is radical surgery, which is rarely possible upon diagnosis. In the event of a tumour involving only the pancreas, the 5-year survival likelihood is 32%; for tumours infiltrating nearby structures, it is 12%; for PDAC with distant metastases, it is as low as 3%. Therefore, there is a strong need for further research to improve PDAC early detection and management.

Prof. Dr. Ewa Małecka-Wojciesko
Prof. Dr. Grażyna Rydzewska
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  • PDAC biomarkers
  • early onset diabetes
  • hereditary pancreatitis
  • Peutz-Jegher's syndrome
  • pancreatic tumour
  • PDAC risk factors

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

8 pages, 883 KiB  
Article
Gender-Specific Coagulation Profiles of Peripheral and Portal Blood May Help to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Pancreatic Tumour—Pilot Study
by Aneta Szmiel, Alicja Majos, Wojciech Ciesielski, Anna Kumor, Janusz Strzelczyk, Krzysztof Szwedziak, Piotr Hogendorf and Adam Durczyński
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(6), 1573; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061573 - 13 Mar 2022
Viewed by 2018
Abstract
Objective: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and mass forming chronic pancreatitis (CP) can be easily misdiagnosed due to their resemblances in clinical, radiological, and biochemical criteria. In our previous study, we reported a very high concentration of D-Dimers in portal blood in patients with pancreatic [...] Read more.
Objective: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and mass forming chronic pancreatitis (CP) can be easily misdiagnosed due to their resemblances in clinical, radiological, and biochemical criteria. In our previous study, we reported a very high concentration of D-Dimers in portal blood in patients with pancreatic cancer which may help to differentiate malignant from benign pancreatic tumours. In this study, we aim to describe other portal and peripheral coagulation profiles of PDAC in comparison to CP patients, as well to test the hypothesis; thus, it is possible to distinguish pancreatic malignancy and benign tumour based on these parameters. Methods: We included retrospectively 115 patients with the absence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), qualified to surgical treatment due to pancreatic tumours, both PDAC and CP. Patients underwent surgery in General and Transplant Surgery Unit of Medical University of Lodz between December 2011 and February 2014. Patients with distant metastases diagnosed before or during the surgery were excluded. The coagulation profile, which includes fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), and thrombin time (TT), was determined in blood samples from the portal and peripheral vein taken intraoperatively. Results: The fibrinogen level was higher and the aPTT index shortened in the peripheral and portal blood of the PDAC group, which reflects the well-known link between PDAC and general hypercoagulability. Furthermore, these effects are sex-specific. The mean age in the CP group was lower than in the PDAC group (54.63 ± 12.37 vs. 63.77 ± 3.23, p < 0.001) and correlated with the fibrinogen distribution in male patients with CP (portal r = 0.34; p = 0.07; peripheral r = 0.39; p = 0.04). We calculated sex-specific logistic regression models (male: peripheral aPTT and age, AUC: 0.795, female: portal fibrinogen and age, AUC: 0.805), both maintaining the good discrimination properties after V-fold cross validation (0.759, 0.742). Conclusions: Our study shows that the differences between coagulation profiles in PDAC and CP patients not only seems to be a reflection of gender-specific biological features, but also helps to discriminate between them. The main goal of the study was to explore the biology of pancreatic cancer and lay a solid base for further investigations of PDAC biomarkers. This paper is the first to describe the detailed coagulation profile in portal blood in patients with pancreatic solid tumors. At present, the clinical application of our results is not clear; however, we hope that it may improve our understanding of this complex disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pancreatic Cancer: Biomarkers, Risk Factors, Early Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1847 KiB  
Article
Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin (αSMA) Immunohistochemistry Use in the Differentiation of Pancreatic Cancer from Chronic Pancreatitis
by Katarzyna Winter, Monika Dzieniecka, Janusz Strzelczyk, Małgorzata Wągrowska-Danilewicz, Marian Danilewicz and Ewa Małecka-Wojciesko
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(24), 5804; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245804 - 11 Dec 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3430
Abstract
Aim: Fibrosis is observed both in pancreatic cancer (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). The main cells involved in fibrosis are pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs), which activate alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA), which is considered to be the best-known fibrosis marker. The aim of [...] Read more.
Aim: Fibrosis is observed both in pancreatic cancer (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). The main cells involved in fibrosis are pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs), which activate alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA), which is considered to be the best-known fibrosis marker. The aim of the study was to evaluate the expression of the αSMA in patients with PDAC and CP as the possible differentiation marker. Methods: We enrolled 114 patients undergoing pancreatic resection: 83 with PDAC and 31 with CP. Normal fragments of resected specimen from 21 patients represented the control tissue. The immunoexpressions of αSMA were detected in tissue specimens with immunohistochemistry (Abcam antibodies, GB). Results: Mean cytoplasmatic expression of αSMA protein in PDAC stromal cells was significantly higher compared to CP: 2.42 ± 0.37 vs 1.95 ± 0.45 (p < 0.01) and control group 0.61 ± 0.45 (p < 0.01). Strong immunoexpression of the αSMA protein was found in the vast majority (80.7%) of patients with PDAC, in about half (58%) of patients with CP, and not at all in healthy tissue. The expression of αSMA of different intensity was found in all patients with PDAC and CP, while in healthy tissue was minimal or absent. In PDAC patients, αSMA expression was significantly higher in tumors of diameter higher than 3 cm compared to smaller ones (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Presented findings confirm the significant role of fibrosis in both PDAC and CP; however, they do not confirm the role of αSMA as a marker of differentiation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pancreatic Cancer: Biomarkers, Risk Factors, Early Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

23 pages, 3253 KiB  
Review
Pancreatic Incidentaloma
by Miłosz Caban and Ewa Małecka-Wojciesko
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(16), 4648; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164648 - 9 Aug 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3442
Abstract
Pancreatic incidentalomas (PIs) represent a clinical entity increasingly recognized due to advances in and easier access to imaging techniques. By definition, PIs should be detected during abdominal imaging performed for indications other than a pancreatic disease. They range from small cysts to invasive [...] Read more.
Pancreatic incidentalomas (PIs) represent a clinical entity increasingly recognized due to advances in and easier access to imaging techniques. By definition, PIs should be detected during abdominal imaging performed for indications other than a pancreatic disease. They range from small cysts to invasive cancer. The incidental diagnosis of pancreatic cancer can contribute to early diagnosis and treatment. On the other hand, inadequate management of PIs may result in overtreatment and unneeded morbidity. Therefore, there is a strong need to evaluate the nature and clinical features of individual PIs. In this review, we summarize the major characteristics related to PIs and present suggestions for their management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pancreatic Cancer: Biomarkers, Risk Factors, Early Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 608 KiB  
Review
Simple Serum Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Protein Biomarkers—Is There Anything in Sight?
by Monika Kapszewicz and Ewa Małecka-Wojciesko
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(22), 5463; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225463 - 22 Nov 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2592
Abstract
A poor PDAC prognosis is due to a lack of effective treatment and late diagnosis. The early detection of PDAC could significantly decrease mortality and save lives. Idealbiomarkers for PDAC should be cost-effective, detectable in easily accessible biological material, and present in sufficient [...] Read more.
A poor PDAC prognosis is due to a lack of effective treatment and late diagnosis. The early detection of PDAC could significantly decrease mortality and save lives. Idealbiomarkers for PDAC should be cost-effective, detectable in easily accessible biological material, and present in sufficient concentration in the earliest possible phase of the disease. This review addresses newly selected, simple protein biomarkers—new ones such as thrombospondin-2, insulin-linked binding protein 2, lysophosphatidic acid, and autotaxin and conventional ones such as Ca19-9, inflammatory factors, and coagulation factors. Their possible use in the early detection of PDAC, differentiation from benign diseases, prognosis, and treatment response prediction is discussed. We also address the usefulness of possible combinations of biomarkers in diagnostic panels. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pancreatic Cancer: Biomarkers, Risk Factors, Early Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop