jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Clinical Frontiers in Peripheral Artery Disease

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiovascular Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 September 2022) | Viewed by 7401

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Interests: chronic limb threatening ischemia; distal bypass; abdominal aortic aneurysm; simulation; endovascular aneurysm repair; drug delivery system; motion capture; surgical education

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a highly prevalent atherosclerotic condition. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia, an advanced stage of PAD, necessitates urgent intervention, including surgical bypass and endovascular therapy for limb salvaging and to improve patients’ quality of life and prognosis. Currently, endovascular therapy and bypass procedures serve as first-line revascularization strategies for above- and below-the-knee lesions, respectively. However, such treatment strategies have been significantly changed due to technological advances and the availability of innovative endovascular devices. Additionally, the outcomes of PAD are affected by several factors, including the range of arterial lesions, degree of calcification and atheroma, systemic comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, hemodialysis, and frailty, among others), and types of cardiovascular drugs administered, including antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, and vasodilators. This Special Issue deals with, but is not limited to, topics such as molecular and genetic analysis of the atherosclerotic pathway, hemodynamic or mechanical analysis of diseased arteries, and clinical cohort studies that may contribute to future therapeutic and preventative strategies for PAD.

Dr. Katsuyuki Hoshina
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • peripheral artery disease
  • chronic limb threatening ischemia
  • surgical bypass
  • endovascular therapy
  • femoral artery
  • popliteal artery

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

8 pages, 2086 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Outcomes following Common Femoral Endarterectomy
by Takuya Hashimoto, Satoshi Yamamoto, Masaru Kimura, Masaya Sano, Osamu Sato and Juno Deguchi
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(22), 6873; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226873 - 21 Nov 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3242
Abstract
Thromboendarterectomy of the common femoral artery (CFA) for occlusive disease is a crucial procedure in vascular surgery. As an outcome reference for emerging endovascular procedures and new devices, we need more robust evidence of the outcome of this gold standard technique. The purpose [...] Read more.
Thromboendarterectomy of the common femoral artery (CFA) for occlusive disease is a crucial procedure in vascular surgery. As an outcome reference for emerging endovascular procedures and new devices, we need more robust evidence of the outcome of this gold standard technique. The purpose of this study was to report 10-year results after femoral endarterectomy (FEA). A retrospective review of medical records at our institution identified eighty consecutive patients (91 limbs) who underwent FEA for CFA lesions. Indications for FEA included 50 limbs (55%) for intermittent claudication (IC) and 39 limbs (43%) with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Two limbs (2%) underwent FEA to prevent hemodynamic steal during extra-anatomical bypass. Adjunctive procedures included endovascular therapy in 32%. CFAs were closed with patch angioplasty in 44%. With a mean follow-up period of 39 months, the survival rates at 3 and 8 years were 85% and 77%, respectively. Limb salvage rates were 92% and 87%. Primary patencies were 98% and 84%. Freedom from target lesion revascularization was 95% at 3 years and 91% at 8 years. Our findings support the durability of FEA, with comparable long-term procedural results in CLTI patients as well as IC patients. Since the FEA is a gate maneuver for hybrid revascularization in CLTI patients, our findings support a strategy combining open and endovascular approaches. Femoral endarterectomy remains a durable solution for common femoral occlusive disease in IC and CLTI in the era of endovascular therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Frontiers in Peripheral Artery Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2834 KiB  
Article
IgG Glycosylation Profiling of Peripheral Artery Diseases with Lectin Microarray
by Siting Li, Jingjing Meng, Fang Xu, Qian Wang, Xinping Tian, Mengtao Li, Xiaofeng Zeng, Chaojun Hu and Yuehong Zheng
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(19), 5727; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195727 - 27 Sep 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2011
Abstract
Background: Inflammation plays a key role in the progression of atherosclerotic plaque for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Immunoglobulin G (IgG) glycosylation could modulate immunological effector functions and has been explored as biomarkers for various diseases. Methods: Lectin microarray was applied to analyze the [...] Read more.
Background: Inflammation plays a key role in the progression of atherosclerotic plaque for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Immunoglobulin G (IgG) glycosylation could modulate immunological effector functions and has been explored as biomarkers for various diseases. Methods: Lectin microarray was applied to analyze the expression profile of serum IgG glycosylation in patients with lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (LEPAD), carotid artery stenosis (CAS), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and healthy controls. Lectin blot was performed to validate the differences. Results: SNA (Sambucus nigra agglutinin) binding (preferred sialic acid) was significantly higher in the LEPAD (3.21 ± 2.06) and AAA (3.34 ± 2.42) groups compared to the CAS (2.47 ± 1.45) group. Significantly higher binding levels of ConA (Concanavalin A) (preferred mannose) and PSA (Pisum sativum agglutinin) (preferred fucose) were also observed in LEPAD compared to CAS patients. Among LEPAD patients, a significant lower binding level of Black bean crude (preferred GalNAc) was present for dyslipidemia patients. A higher binding level of MNA-M (Morniga M agglutinin) (preferred Mannose) and Jacalin-AIA (Artocarpus integrifolia agglutinin) (preferred Galβ3GalNAc) was observed for Fontaine severe patients. Higher binding levels of PHA-E (Phaseolus vulgaris Erythroagglutinin) and PHA-L (Phaseolus vulgaris Leucoagglutinin) (preferred Galβ4GlcNAc) were observed for diabetic patients, and higher binding of ASA (Allium sativum agglutinin) (preferred Mannose) was present in patients with hypertension. The level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was positively associated with LTL (Lotus tetragonolobus lectin) (r = 0.44), PSA (r = 0.44), LCA (Lens Culinaris agglutinin) (r = 0.39), SNA (r = 0.57), and CSA (Cytisus sscoparius agglutinin) (r = 0.56). For CAS, symptomatic patients had lower binding levels of AAL (Aleuria aurantia lectin) (preferred fucose) and IAA (Iberis amara agglutinin) (preferred GalNAc). Blood total cholesterol level was positively associated with SNA-I (r = 0.36) and SBA (Soybean agglutinin) (r = r = 0.35). Creatinine levels were positively associated with lectins including, but not limited to, MNA-M (r = 0.42), CSA (r = 0.45), GHA (Glechoma hederacea agglutinin) (r = 0.42), and MNA-G (Morniga G agglutinin) (r = 0.45). Conclusion: LEPAD patients had increased IgG binding levels of SNA and ConA compared to CAS, which could provide potential diagnostic value. Fontaine severity was associated with Mannose-rich IgG N-glycan, while diabetic LEPAD correlated with bisecting GlcNAc. The levels of hsCRP and creatinine were positively associated with IgG fucosylation and galactosylation. Changes in IgG glycosylation may play important roles in PAD pathogenesis and progression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Frontiers in Peripheral Artery Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

13 pages, 4127 KiB  
Systematic Review
Drug-Coated Balloon versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Infrainguinal Vein Bypass Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Toshihiko Isaji, Yutaka Hosoi, Kota Kogure, Yohei Ichikawa, Keisuke Fujimaki, Toru Ikezoe, Masao Nunokawa and Hiroshi Kubota
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(1), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010087 - 22 Dec 2022
Viewed by 1693
Abstract
The optimal endovascular therapy for vein graft stenosis (VGS) following infrainguinal arterial bypass is yet to be established. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) have rapidly improved the inferior patency outcomes of angioplasty using a conventional plain balloon (PB). This study compares the efficacy of DCBs [...] Read more.
The optimal endovascular therapy for vein graft stenosis (VGS) following infrainguinal arterial bypass is yet to be established. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) have rapidly improved the inferior patency outcomes of angioplasty using a conventional plain balloon (PB). This study compares the efficacy of DCBs and PBs for the treatment of infrainguinal VGS. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Multiple electronic searches were conducted in consultation with a health science librarian in September 2022. Studies describing the comparative outcomes of angioplasty using DCBs and PBs in the treatment of infrainguinal VGS were eligible. Datasets from one randomized controlled trial and two cohort studies with a total of 179 patients were identified. The results indicated no significant difference in target lesion revascularization between DCBs and PBs (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.32–1.28; p = 0.21), with no significant heterogeneity between studies. Additionally, differences in primary patency, assisted primary patency, secondary patency, and graft occlusion were not significant. Subgroup analysis showed similar effects for different DCB devices. In conclusion, DCBs showed no significant benefit in the treatment of VGS compared to PBs. Given the small population size of this meta-analysis, future trials with a larger population are desired. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Frontiers in Peripheral Artery Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop