Emotional Intelligence and Creativity

A special issue of Journal of Intelligence (ISSN 2079-3200).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 October 2022) | Viewed by 39152

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Laboratoire de Psychologie et d’Ergonomie Appliquées, Université de Paris, Paris, France
Interests: creativity; imagination; emotional intelligence; empathy; skills development; personality

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Laboratoire de Psychologie et d’Ergonomie Appliquées, Université de Paris, Paris, France
Interests: creativity; social and emotional competencies; pedagogy; children; youth

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue seeks contributions which focus on the nexus or influences of the broad concepts of emotional intelligence and creativity. Both topics, of great interest among researchers and policymakers, have their origins in the beginning of the past century and are still evolving today.

The origins of EI can be traced to the beginning of the 20th century when researchers agreed that besides cognitive processes, there were non-cognitive factors that had an important influence on adaptation and life success. Petrides and Furnham (2001) posited that the EI genesis could be found in the work of Gardner (1983) and finally evolved with the work of Mayer and Salovey in 1990 and 1997. Authors agree on the importance of emotional intelligence within an educational setting (Brackett et al., 2009; Elias and Arnold, 2006; Fernández-Berrocal and Ruiz Aranda, 2018; Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development, 2020; Qualter et al., 2017), although the concept of EI remains unclear for some educational actors as the concept of EI evolves itself. Some contemporary authors continue to work with the concept of EI (Extremera and Fernandez-Berrocal, 2003) and others prefer to propose new terms such as emotional competency (Mikolajczak, Quoidbach, Kotsu, and Nelis, 2014) or socio-emotional learning (Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor, and Schellinger, 2011; Lantieri, 2009) to define this construct focused on the development of skills and traits related to interpersonal and intrapersonal relationships.

Regarding creativity, it can be understood as the capacity to generate novel, original and valuable work adapted to a context, task or constraint (e.g. Lubart, Mouchiroud, Tordjman, and Zenasni, 2015).  According to Runco and Jaeger (2012), originality and usefulness were the first basic concepts analyzed in the study of creativity at the beginning of the 20th century, establishing a standard definition of creativity. Nevertheless, the definition of creativity depends on the approaches we decide to choose, and still today we have several perspectives in order to understand or define what we call creativity (Glaveanu et al., 2019). 

At a theoretical level, original authors of the emotional intelligence conception (Salovey and Mayer, 1990) assumed that EI helps individuals to have clear thoughts that support the processes of intuition and insight, which in turn favors creative thinking. Since then, different studies have been conducted showing significant but relatively complex relationships between emotional intelligence and creativity. Early studies from Ivcevic and colleagues (2007) and Zenasni and Lubart (2008) showed that the EI/creativity link may depend on the nature of the creativity scoring examined (fluency or originality or consensual assessment scoring) and for example the nature of the EI task used (self-report versus cognitive task). The following research reveals this complexity. In this line, meta-analysis from Xiaobo Xu and colleagues (2021) confirm the moderate relationships but also confirm the existence of moderating variables such as the type of EI/creativity measure.

Thus, even if empirical evidence exists, it is not enough to explain all the diversity and complexity of the EI/creativity relationships. Moreover, there is no clear theoretical modelisation that clearly sustains a full view of the articulation between emotional intelligence and creativity. Finally, we should observe that most of the data refers to EI/creativity in adults and that very few studies examine these in children, especially considering the educational context. The few studies that attempt to make this link focus on emotions or affect in play and creative thinking (Russ and Kaugars, 2001), or mood and creative thinking (Celume, Besançon, and Zenasni, 2019; Teske et al., 2017).

In this line, we would like to propose a Special Issue that gathers original studies, reviews, and theoretical papers that would ideally combine both main concepts (creativity and emotional intelligence) or related conceptions (e.g. emotional creativity, socioemotional skills, etc.). With this broad scope, we are looking for submissions that address one or more (but not only) of the following topics:

  • The development of both creativity and emotional intelligence through training or programs in adults or children (please specify population of study in your submission);
  • Combined evaluation of both creativity and emotional intelligence/emotional competence (measurement tools or methods);
  • Influences of emotional intelligence on creativity or vice versa;
  • Theoretical links between creativity and emotional intelligence.

If your paper does not address any of the previously proposed categories, but you believe it is aligned with the main concepts we propose in this Special Issue, please feel free to submit your manuscript.

References

Brackett, M., Patti, Stern, Rivers, Elbertson, Chisholm, & Salovey, P. (2009). A sustainable, skill-based model to building emotionally literate schools. In & J. B. T. R. Thompson, M. Hughes (Ed.), Handbook of developing emotional and social intelligence: Best practices, case studies, and tools (pp. 329–358). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Celume, M.-P., Besançon, M., & Zenasni, F. (2019). How a dialogic space can impact children’s creativity and mood valence in Drama Pedagogy Training: Study with a French 4th grade sample. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100576

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x

Elias, M. J., & Arnold, H. (2006). The Connection Between Academic and Social-Emotional Learning. In Maurice J. Elias & Hariett Arnold (Eds.), The Educator’s Guide to Emotional Intelligence and Academic Achievement. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Extremera, N., & Fernandez-Berrocal, P. (2003). La Inteligencia Emocional En El Contexto Educativo: Hallazgos Científicos De Sus Efectos En El Aula. Revista de Educación, 332, 97–116.

Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Ruiz Aranda, D. (2018). La Inteligencia emocional en la Educación. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v6i15.1289

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (Basic). New York: Basic Books.

Glaveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E. P., Corazza, G. E., … Sternberg, R. J. (2019). Advancing Creativity Theory and Research: A Socio‐cultural Manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395

Ivcevic, Z., Brackett, M., & Mayer, J. (2007). Emotional Intelligence and Emotional Creativity. Journal of Personality, 75(5), 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00437.x

Lantieri, L. (2009). Cultivating Emotional Intelligence through Social and Emotional Learning: Why It Matters.

Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2015). Psychologie de la créativité (2nd ed.). Paris: Colin.

Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development. (2020). RETHINKING LEARNING: A Review of Social and Emotional Learning for Education Systems. (N. Chatterjee Singh & A. Duraiappah, Eds.). New Delhi: UNESCO MGIEP.

Mayer, J., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is Emotional Intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence (Basic, pp. 3–31). New York: Harper Collins. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480710387486

Mikolajczak, M., Quoidbach, Kotsu, &, & Nelis. (2014). Les Compétences Émotionnelles (2nd ed.). Paris: Dunod.

Petrides, K. V, & Furnham, A. (2001). Trait emotional intelligence: psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies. European Journal of Personality, 15(6), 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.416

Qualter, P., Davis, S. K., Keefer, K. V., Parker, J. D. A., Saklofske, D. H., Wigelsworth, M., … Stough, C. (2017). Emotional competency in education: core concepts and applications. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 51–71.

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

Russ, S. W., & Kaugars, A. S. (2001). Emotion in children’s play and creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1302_8

Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG

Teske, J., Clausen, C. K., Gray, P., Smith, L. L., Al Subia, S., Rod Szabo, M., … Rule, A. C. (2017). Creativity of third graders’ leadership cartoons: Comparison of mood-enhanced to neutral conditions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.003

Xu, X., Pang, W., & Xia, M. (2021). Are emotionally intelligent people happier? A meta-analysis of the relationship between emotional intelligence and subjective well-being using Chinese samples. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 24(4), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/AJSP.12445

Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2008). Emotion-related traits moderate the impact of emotional state on creative performances. Journal of Individual Differences, 29(3), 157–167.

Prof. Dr. Franck Zenasni
Dr. Macarena-Paz Celume
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Intelligence is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • emotional intelligence
  • creativity
  • social and emotional competence
  • emotional skills
  • creative thinking
  • creative process

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

3 pages, 208 KiB  
Editorial
Emotional Competency in Education: Special Issue on Emotional Intelligence and Creativity
by Macarena-Paz Celume and Franck Zenasni
J. Intell. 2024, 12(6), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12060060 - 7 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1275
Abstract
According to Salovey and Mayer (1990), having high EI allows individuals to think clearly, supports intuition and insight, and ultimately enhances creative thinking [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotional Intelligence and Creativity)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

22 pages, 2100 KiB  
Article
Performing for Better Communication: Creativity, Cognitive-Emotional Skills and Embodied Language in Primary Schools
by Sandrine Eschenauer, Raphaële Tsao, Thierry Legou, Marion Tellier, Carine André, Isabelle Brugnoli, Anne Tortel and Aurélie Pasquier
J. Intell. 2023, 11(7), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11070140 - 14 Jul 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3431
Abstract
While the diversity and complexity of the links between creativity and emotional skills as well as their effects on cognitive processes are now established, few approaches to implementing them in schools have been evaluated. Within the framework of the enactive paradigm, which considers [...] Read more.
While the diversity and complexity of the links between creativity and emotional skills as well as their effects on cognitive processes are now established, few approaches to implementing them in schools have been evaluated. Within the framework of the enactive paradigm, which considers the complexity and dynamics of language as a cognitive process, we study how an approach based on performative theatre can synergistically stimulate creativity (artistic, bodily and linguistic), emotional skills (identifying and understanding emotions) and executive functions (especially inhibition, cognitive flexibility and emotional control), all as components defined in the context of oral communication. Stimulating this synergy in the context of foreign language teaching may be especially beneficial for children with communication disorders. This paper presents the first results of the CELAVIE pilot study (Creativity, Empathy and Emotions in Language learning with Autism for an Inclusive Education) through a case study of a pupil with a neurodevelopmental disorder included in a 4th-grade class. The results show a progression in oral communication in English as a Foreign Language (EFL), in emotional skills and creativity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotional Intelligence and Creativity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 2551 KiB  
Article
A Case Study of 21st Century Cognitive, Social and Emotional Competencies Using Online-Learning
by Haïfat Maoulida, Manisha Madhukar and Macarena-Paz Celume
J. Intell. 2023, 11(6), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060116 - 9 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3648
Abstract
Based on the conceptualisation of the 21st Century Competencies Framework from the Center for Curriculum Redesign (CCR) we developed an online program to enable school-age students to increase their level on several social-emotional competencies. BE organized is a program that aims to help [...] Read more.
Based on the conceptualisation of the 21st Century Competencies Framework from the Center for Curriculum Redesign (CCR) we developed an online program to enable school-age students to increase their level on several social-emotional competencies. BE organized is a program that aims to help students to better organize themselves to be more efficient in today’s and tomorrow’s world. To do so, 12 individual sessions were designed to develop 4 out of the twelve 21st century competencies: Critical Thinking, Mindfulness, Resilience and Metacognition; collective sessions (action lab) to develop others such as Creativity. We used a mixed methodology, i.e., quantitative (two questionnaires) and qualitative (reflective questions) evaluation to test whether the targeted competencies have been developed during this program. Preliminary results (since it involves only a small number of participants, n = 27) partially confirm our hypotheses. Both qualitative and quantitative data show a development of critical thinking; the cross-sectional results are more mixed for the other three targeted competencies. Moreover, some other competencies, such as Creativity and Growth Mindset, seem to be developed during this program. However, it is difficult to determine whether it is the group and/or individual sessions that are responsible for these non-targeted competencies development. These results will be discussed in relation to the youth literature on 21st century competency and the broader literature on socio-emotional learning (SEL) and/or emotional intelligence (EI). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotional Intelligence and Creativity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2084 KiB  
Article
The Dynamic Interplay of Affective, Cognitive and Contextual Resources on Children’s Creative Potential: The Modulatory Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence
by Sergio Agnoli, Serena Mastria, Giacomo Mancini, Giovanni Emanuele Corazza, Laura Franchin and Tiziana Pozzoli
J. Intell. 2023, 11(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010011 - 4 Jan 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3197
Abstract
In the present work we explored in two separate studies the modulatory role of trait emotional intelligence (EI) over the effect exerted on children’s creative potential by two other key elements defining creativity, namely cognitive resources (here explored through basic executive functions, Study [...] Read more.
In the present work we explored in two separate studies the modulatory role of trait emotional intelligence (EI) over the effect exerted on children’s creative potential by two other key elements defining creativity, namely cognitive resources (here explored through basic executive functions, Study 1) and contextual-environmental factors (that is, teachers’ implicit conceptions of the factors influencing children’s creativity, Study 2). Confirming previous research, executive functions (particularly interference control and working memory) emerged as main predictors of children’s creative performance; however, their positive effect arose especially when associated with a high trait EI level. In the same vein, teachers’ implicit conception about children’s creative potential and about their efficacy in teaching creativity emerged to exert a facilitatory effect on children’ creative potential. This effect occurred particularly when associated with low trait EI levels, affecting differently girls and boys. Trait EI emerged from these studies as an important individual resource to consider in order to understand the potential benefit of other (cognitive and contextual-environmental) resources on children’s creative potential. The implications on the role of trait EI as a constitutional element of children’s creativity, capable of promoting the expression of their creative potential, are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotional Intelligence and Creativity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 540 KiB  
Article
Creativity and Connection: The Impact of inspirED with Secondary School Students
by Jessica D. Hoffmann, Kalee De France and Julie McGarry
J. Intell. 2023, 11(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010008 - 31 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3787
Abstract
The World Economic Forum predicts that the skills most highly valued by employers in 2025 will be problem-solving, self-management, working with people, and technology use and development. Educators are seeking ways in which to incorporate these skills into their daily instruction. Here, we [...] Read more.
The World Economic Forum predicts that the skills most highly valued by employers in 2025 will be problem-solving, self-management, working with people, and technology use and development. Educators are seeking ways in which to incorporate these skills into their daily instruction. Here, we offer one possible approach to bolster skills in each of these domains: the inspirED program. inspirED was designed for U.S. middle and high schools to support teams of students in completing projects or campaigns that they believe will make their school a better place for all. This study enrolled teams of students from 22 middle and high schools, and provided them with online training, coaching in the inspirED process, and resources to complete their project. Upon finishing their projects, students on the inspirED teams reported higher sense of purpose and self-awareness around the importance of emotions. The larger student bodies at schools in which inspirED projects took place also reported improvements in school climate including students’ perceptions of teaching quality, sense of school pride, student relationships, and emotional safety. Implications and future directions for school-based social-emotional learning and student leadership opportunities are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotional Intelligence and Creativity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 794 KiB  
Article
Abstract Graphic Creativity, Feelings about School, and Engagement in the School Environment: What Are the Interindividual Differences between Gifted and Non-Gifted Children?
by Christine Sanchez and Nathalie Blanc
J. Intell. 2023, 11(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010002 - 23 Dec 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3516
Abstract
This study examines interindividual differences between gifted and non-gifted children in the school environment. Three distinct measurement tools were used to enable a multimodal approach of gifted and non-gifted children with abstract graphic creativity, feelings about school and engagement in the school environment [...] Read more.
This study examines interindividual differences between gifted and non-gifted children in the school environment. Three distinct measurement tools were used to enable a multimodal approach of gifted and non-gifted children with abstract graphic creativity, feelings about school and engagement in the school environment being considered. The results obtained from 328 children (including 45 gifted children) revealed that the gifted children obtained scores significantly higher than non-gifted children in terms of self-determination, feelings about school, and creativity. In addition, a gap appears among gifted children between their significantly higher scores for motivation and intellectual skills versus standard scores for their socio-affective development. Such results are consistent with the idea of asynchronous development, which is characteristic of gifted children (cognitive and conative vs. socio-affective sphere), offering perspectives for more adapted support for these pupils in elementary school. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotional Intelligence and Creativity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2592 KiB  
Article
The Creative Process and Emotions of Pupils in a Training Context with a Design Project
by Marion Botella, John Didier, Marie-Dominique Lambert and Rachel Attanasio
J. Intell. 2022, 10(4), 108; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040108 - 17 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2491
Abstract
For many years, researchers have been investigating how the creative process occurs and what factors influence it. The scope of these studies is essential in the school context to enable pupils to develop their creativity and thus address the needs of the 21st [...] Read more.
For many years, researchers have been investigating how the creative process occurs and what factors influence it. The scope of these studies is essential in the school context to enable pupils to develop their creativity and thus address the needs of the 21st century society. Although very rich, these studies are generally not situated in a real teaching and learning context. The output of the present research will make it possible to model, to better understand, and to identify the creative process in pupils as they design and produce utility objects in an educational and training context with ecological validity (real context of training). In the context of teaching Creative and Manual Activities in education, in the French part of Switzerland, we are focusing on observations of the creative process in line with psychology, didactics, and pedagogy. During their class, 22 pupils were invited to create a water fountain and, in parallel, to complete a Creative process Report Diary about the stages they do and the multivariate factors (cognitive, conative, emotional, and environmental factors) they mobilize at each lesson. Results presented the main frequent stages and factors at each lesson and we proposed a model describing the transitions between the stages and how the multivariate factors are involved in each stage. They illustrate what pupils actually do in a creative learning context. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotional Intelligence and Creativity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 439 KiB  
Article
Developing Children’s Creativity and Social-Emotional Competencies through Play: Summary of Twenty Years of Findings of the Evidence-Based Interventions “Game Program”
by Maite Garaigordobil, Laura Berrueco and Macarena-Paz Celume
J. Intell. 2022, 10(4), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040077 - 2 Oct 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 6155
Abstract
This work presents the results of four cooperative-creative game programs (Game Programs). In all four studies, experimental designs with repeated pretest-posttest measures and control groups were used. Validation samples ranged from 86 to 178 participants, randomly assigning participants to the experimental and control [...] Read more.
This work presents the results of four cooperative-creative game programs (Game Programs). In all four studies, experimental designs with repeated pretest-posttest measures and control groups were used. Validation samples ranged from 86 to 178 participants, randomly assigning participants to the experimental and control conditions. Before and after each program, a battery of assessment instruments was applied to measure the variables under study. The intervention consists of conducting a weekly game session during the school year. The results of the posttest covariance analyses confirmed a significant impact: (1) in social development, by increasing various positive social behaviors and decreasing many negative social behaviors; by increasing assertive cognitive strategies and prosocial resolution of interpersonal problems; and by enhancing relationships and positive communication among group members; (2) in emotional development, by improving self-concept, peer image, and emotional stability; and (3) in cognitive development, by increasing verbal intelligence, verbal and graphic-figurative creativity, as well as creative personality behaviors and traits. This work provides empirical evidence of the relevance of cooperative-creative play in child development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotional Intelligence and Creativity)

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

12 pages, 599 KiB  
Review
Metacognitive Feelings as a Source of Information for the Creative Process: A Conceptual Exploration
by Rogelio Puente-Díaz
J. Intell. 2023, 11(3), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030049 - 28 Feb 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2463
Abstract
Philosophers and psychologists have debated the wisdom of using feelings as a source of information when making decisions. While not trying to solve this debate, a complementary approach is to examine how metacognitive feelings are used when generating, evaluating, and selecting ideas to [...] Read more.
Philosophers and psychologists have debated the wisdom of using feelings as a source of information when making decisions. While not trying to solve this debate, a complementary approach is to examine how metacognitive feelings are used when generating, evaluating, and selecting ideas to solve creative problems and whether their use leads to accurate idea evaluation and selection. Hence, this conceptual article aims to explore how metacognitive feelings are used to evaluate and select creative ideas. Interestingly, while metacognitive feelings come from the perceived ease or difficulty of generating solutions to creative problems, these feelings also inform the decision to continue generating ideas or stop. Metacognitive feelings are then an integral part of the creative process of generating, evaluating, and selecting ideas. The present article briefly reviews the history of metacognitive feelings as examined in metamemory, meta-reasoning, and judgment formation in social psychology, before discussing their implications and potential for understanding the creative process. The article ends by positing directions for future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotional Intelligence and Creativity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 366 KiB  
Review
Being Intelligent with Emotions to Benefit Creativity: Emotion across the Seven Cs of Creativity
by Daniel Sundquist and Todd Lubart
J. Intell. 2022, 10(4), 106; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040106 - 15 Nov 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 6267
Abstract
In this review of emotion, emotional intelligence (EI) and creativity, we look at the various ways that these topics can be explored together using the seven Cs of Creativity as a structuring framework. The seven Cs of creativity are: creators, creating, collaborations, contexts, [...] Read more.
In this review of emotion, emotional intelligence (EI) and creativity, we look at the various ways that these topics can be explored together using the seven Cs of Creativity as a structuring framework. The seven Cs of creativity are: creators, creating, collaborations, contexts, creations, consumption and curricula, representing the different facets of creativity research. The question of emotion and creativity has a long historical lineage, which has led up to the study of intelligent and dynamic aspects of emotion and their impact on creativity. Previous and emerging work on EI, related emotional aspects and creativity offer promising ways to advance this field of research. However, we show that some aspects of creativity and EI are less explored than others. We offer several implications for the direction of future work. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotional Intelligence and Creativity)
Back to TopTop