Disparities of Justice: Unequal Outcomes, Racial and Gender Bias, and Law in the Twenty-First Century

A special issue of Laws (ISSN 2075-471X). This special issue belongs to the section "Criminal Justice Issues".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 12 August 2025 | Viewed by 1002

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Liberal Arts, Norfolk State University, Norfolk, VA 23504, USA
Interests: US racial and ethnic politics; US election law; socioeconomic and political inequality; US constitutionalism; civil rights

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue aims to bring together multidisciplinary, transdisciplinary, and interdisciplinary research exploring the ways in which racial identity, gender identity, ethnic identity, and other social identities, and the nexus of said identities, shape disparities affecting all aspects of twenty-first century life in the United States and beyond. As such, this Special Issue aims to highlight how disparities of justice reflect linguistic, ethno-racial/ethnic, and gender biases within the criminal justice system, the law enforcement system, and within the administrative nation state. With “disparities of justice” as a guiding framework, this Special Issue seeks to further unpack the connections across unequal outcomes, especially as those connections illuminate how inequities resulting from political polarization, bureaucratic malfeasance, and structural inequalities reinforce, and are reinforced by, inequities perpetuated by the carceral state. Because many of the factors shaping perceptions about justice are both omnipresent and ever-evolving, the parameters defining what constitutes an unequal outcome and an example of disparate treatment remain in flux. Take, as an example from the United States, high court rulings in the last decade that have addressed affirmative action (inside and outside higher education), election law, redistricting, transgender rights, police powers, congressional authority, affordable housing, and federal educational loan repayment, not to mention state and appellate court rulings in the United States dealing with employment law, jury peremptory strikes, COVID-19 measures, and imminent domain. Similar rulings in regional and national courts across the world have affected justice afforded to minorities. These aspects thus demonstrate changes in the way society conceptualizes and mitigates biological and social identity bias and their relationship to equality before the law.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:  unequal outcomes emerging from all aspects of law (e.g., criminal, administrative, election, human rights, family, environmental, employment, housing, and health care law). This Special Issue welcomes contributions from a wide variety of methodological perspectives and disciplines including political science, ethnic studies, sociology, cultural studies, law, women, gender, and sexuality studies, and more.

Dr. Tyson King-Meadows
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Laws is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • inequalities in law enforcement
  • racial and ethnic politics
  • unequal outcomes
  • administrative law
  • socioeconomic inequality
  • disparate treatment
  • lawsuits about protecting the civil rights and liberties of minorities

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 227 KiB  
Article
Unjust Deprivation of Liberty During the Criminal Process: The Romanian National Standard Compared to the European Standard for the Protection of Individual Freedom in Judicial Proceedings
by Anca-Lelia Lorincz and Adriana Iuliana Stancu
Laws 2024, 13(6), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13060066 - 28 Oct 2024
Viewed by 476
Abstract
The provisions of international documents that guarantee the fundamental right to freedom and security are transposed into Romanian legislation both in the Constitution and in the Code of Criminal Procedure. In this context, the present study aims to analyze the national standard of [...] Read more.
The provisions of international documents that guarantee the fundamental right to freedom and security are transposed into Romanian legislation both in the Constitution and in the Code of Criminal Procedure. In this context, the present study aims to analyze the national standard of protection of individual freedom in judicial proceedings compared to the standard established by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Through documentation, interpretation, and scientific analysis as the main research methods, this paper emphasizes the possibility of establishing, through domestic legislation, a level of protection higher than that imposed by the conventional standard. From this perspective, by regulating a right to repair the damage suffered in the situation of unjust deprivation of liberty as a result of ordering a preventive measure, the national standard of protection established by the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure is higher than the European standard. This study concludes with a proposal to expand the current procedural framework configured by the provisions of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure (with the amendments made in 2023) regarding the special procedure for repairing the damage suffered as a result of the illegal or unjust deprivation of liberty during the criminal process. Full article
Back to TopTop