Submit to MCA Review for MCA Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization

Print Special Issue Flyer
Special Issue Editors
Special Issue Information
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
Published Papers

A special issue of Mathematical and Computational Applications (ISSN 2297-8747). This special issue belongs to the section "Engineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2019) | Viewed by 46828

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization book cover image

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Adriana Lara

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Instituto Politécnico Nacional ESFM-IPN, Mexico City 07730, Mexico
Interests: multi-objective optimization; optimization; evolutionary computation; mathematical programming; memetic algorithms
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Dr. Marcela Quiroz-Castellanos

E-Mail
Guest Editor

Centro de Investigación en Inteligencia Artificial, University of Veracruz, Xalapa 91000, Mexico
Interests: experimental algorithmics; metaheuristics; genetic algorithms; bin packing; machine learning; causal inference applications
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Dr. Efrén Mezura-Montes

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, University of Veracruz, Xalapa, Veracruz 91097, Mexico
Interests: evolutionary computing; machine learning; swarm intelligence; optimization
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Prof. Dr. Oliver Schütze

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Depto de Computacion, Cinvestav, Mexico City 07360, Mexico
Interests: multi-objective optimization; evolutionary computation (genetic algorithms and evolution strategies); numerical analysis; engineering applications
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The development of powerful search and optimization techniques is of great importance in science and engineering, particularly in today's world, which requires researchers and practitioners to tackle a variety of challenging real-world problems as technology becomes an ever-more-important aspect of everyday life. There are two well-established and widely-known fields that are addressing these issues: (i) traditional numerical optimization techniques and (ii) comparatively recent bio-inspired heuristics, such as evolutionary algorithms and genetic programming. Both of these fields have developed approaches with their unique strengths and weaknesses, allowing them to solve some challenging problems while sometimes failing in others.

Recent studies have shown that the consideration of elements coming from both fields can lead to great synergies, e.g., in understanding of certain algorithms or in the design of new search techniques.

The aim of this Special Issue is to collect papers on the intersection of numerical and evolutionary optimization. We strongly encourage the development of fast and reliable hybrid methods, that maximize the strengths and minimize the weaknesses of each underlying paradigm, while also being applicable to a broader class of problems. Moreover, this Special Issue fosters the understanding and adequate treatment of real-world problems, particularly in emerging fields that affect us all, such as health care, smart cities, and big data, among many others.

Topics of interest include (but are not limited to): 

(A) Search and Optimization:

Single- and multi-objective optimization
Advances in evolutionary algorithms and genetic programming
Hybrid and memetic algorithms
Set oriented numerics
Stochastic optimization
Robust optimization

(B) Real World Problems:

Health systems
Computer vision and pattern recognition
Energy conservation and prediction
Modeling and control of real-world systems
Smart cities

Dr. Adriana Lara
Dr. Marcela Quiroz
Dr. Efrén Mezura-Montes
Prof. Dr. Oliver Schütze
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Mathematical and Computational Applications is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Download All Papers

Order results

Result details

Show export options Show export options

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 4119 KiB

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Variation Rate to Maintain Diversity in Decision Space within Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

by Oliver Cuate and Oliver Schütze

Math. Comput. Appl. 2019, 24(3), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca24030082 - 13 Sep 2019

Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3202

Abstract

The performance of a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) is in most cases measured in terms of the populations’ approximation quality in objective space. As a consequence, most MOEAs focus on such approximations while neglecting the distribution of the individuals of their populations in decision space. This, however, represents a potential shortcoming in certain applications as in many cases one can obtain the same or very similar qualities (measured in objective space) in several ways (measured in decision space). Hence, a high diversity in decision space may represent valuable information for the decision maker for the realization of a given project. In this paper, we propose the Variation Rate, a heuristic selection strategy that aims to maintain diversity both in decision and objective space. The core of this strategy is the proper combination of the averaged distance applied in variable space together with the diversity mechanism in objective space that is used within a chosen MOEA. To show the applicability of the method, we propose the resulting selection strategies for some of the most representative state-of-the-art MOEAs and show numerical results on several benchmark problems. The results demonstrate that the consideration of the Variation Rate can greatly enhance the diversity in decision space for all considered algorithms and problems without a significant loss in the approximation qualities in objective space. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2078 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Improved Differential Evolution Algorithm for Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problems

by Prasert Sriboonchandr, Nuchsara Kriengkorakot and Preecha Kriengkorakot

Math. Comput. Appl. 2019, 24(3), 80; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca24030080 - 6 Sep 2019

Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4935

Abstract

This research project aims to study and develop the differential evolution (DE) for use in solving the flexible job shop scheduling problem (FJSP). The development of algorithms were evaluated to find the solution and the best answer, and this was subsequently compared to the meta-heuristics from the literature review. For FJSP, by comparing the problem group with the makespan and the mean relative errors (MREs), it was found that for small-sized Kacem problems, value adjusting with “DE/rand/1” and exponential crossover at position 2. Moreover, value adjusting with “DE/best/2” and exponential crossover at position 2 gave an MRE of 3.25. For medium-sized Brandimarte problems, value adjusting with “DE/best/2” and exponential crossover at position 2 gave a mean relative error of 7.11. For large-sized Dauzere-Peres and Paulli problems, value adjusting with “DE/best/2” and exponential crossover at position 2 gave an MRE of 4.20. From the comparison of the DE results with other methods, it was found that the MRE was lower than that found by Girish and Jawahar with the particle swarm optimization (PSO) method (7.75), which the improved DE was 7.11. For large-sized problems, it was found that the MRE was lower than that found by Warisa (1ST-DE) method (5.08), for which the improved DE was 4.20. The results further showed that basic DE and improved DE with jump search are effective methods compared to the other meta-heuristic methods. Hence, they can be used to solve the FJSP. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1061 KiB

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Pool-Based Genetic Programming Using Evospace, Local Search and Bloat Control

by Perla Juárez-Smith, Leonardo Trujillo, Mario García-Valdez, Francisco Fernández de Vega and Francisco Chávez

Math. Comput. Appl. 2019, 24(3), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca24030078 - 29 Aug 2019

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3329

Abstract

This work presents a unique genetic programming (GP) approach that integrates a numerical local search method and a bloat-control mechanism within a distributed model for evolutionary algorithms known as EvoSpace. The first two elements provide a directed search operator and a way to control the growth of evolved models, while the latter is meant to exploit distributed and cloud-based computing architectures. EvoSpace is a Pool-based Evolutionary Algorithm, and this work is the first time that such a computing model has been used to perform a GP-based search. The proposal was extensively evaluated using real-world problems from diverse domains, and the behavior of the search was analyzed from several different perspectives. The results show that the proposed approach compares favorably with a standard approach, identifying promising aspects and limitations of this initial hybrid system. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2701 KiB

Open AccessArticle

U-Shaped Assembly Line Balancing by Using Differential Evolution Algorithm

by Poontana Sresracoo, Nuchsara Kriengkorakot, Preecha Kriengkorakot and Krit Chantarasamai

Math. Comput. Appl. 2018, 23(4), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23040079 - 12 Dec 2018

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4937

Abstract

The objective of this research is to develop metaheuristic methods by using the differential evolution (DE) algorithm for solving the U-shaped assembly line balancing problem Type 1 (UALBP-1). The proposed DE algorithm is applied for balancing the lines (manufacturing a single product within a fixed given cycle time), where the aim is to minimize the number of workstations. After establishing the method, the results from previous research studies were compared with the results from this study. For the UALBP, two groups of benchmark problems were used for the experiments: (1) For the medium-sized UALBP (21–45 tasks), it was found that the DE algorithm DE/best/2 to Exponential Crossover 1 produced better solutions when compared to the other metaheuristic methods: it could generate 25 optimal solutions from a total of 25 instances, and the average time used for the calculation was 0.10 seconds/instance; (2) for the large-scale UALBP (75–297 tasks), it was found that the basic DE algorithm and improved differential evolution algorithm generated better solutions, and DE/best/2 to Exponential Crossover 1 generated the optimal solutions and achieved the minimum solution search time when compared to the other metaheuristic methods: it could generate 36 optimal solutions from a total of 62 instances, and the average time used for the calculation was 4.88 seconds/instance. From the comparison of the DE algorithms, it was found that the improved differential evolution algorithm generated optimal solutions with a better solution search time than the search time of the basic differential evolution algorithm. The basic and improved DE algorithm are the effective methods for balancing UALBP-1 when compared to the other metaheuristic methods. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 2091 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Surrogate-Based Optimization Using an Open-Source Framework: The Bulbous Bow Shape Optimization Case

by Joel Guerrero, Alberto Cominetti, Jan Pralits and Diego Villa

Math. Comput. Appl. 2018, 23(4), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23040060 - 13 Oct 2018

Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5219

Abstract

Shape optimization is a very time-consuming and expensive task, especially if experimental tests need to be performed. To overcome the challenges of geometry optimization, the industry is increasingly relying on numerical simulations. These kinds of problems typically involve the interaction of three main applications: a solid modeler, a multi-physics solver, and an optimizer. In this manuscript, we present a shape optimization work-flow entirely based on open-source tools; it is fault tolerant and software agnostic, allows for asynchronous simulations, and has a high degree of automation. To demonstrate the usability and flexibility of the proposed methodology, we tested it in a practical case related to the naval industry, where we aimed at optimizing the shape of a bulbous bow in order to minimize the hydrodynamic resistance. As design variables, we considered the protrusion and immersion of the bulbous bow, and we used surrogate-based optimization. From the results presented, a non-negligible resistance reduction is obtainable using the proposed work-flow and optimization strategy. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3329 KiB

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

A (p,q)-Averaged Hausdorff Distance for Arbitrary Measurable Sets

by Johan M. Bogoya, Andrés Vargas, Oliver Cuate and Oliver Schütze

Math. Comput. Appl. 2018, 23(3), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23030051 - 18 Sep 2018

Cited by 19 | Viewed by 4814

Abstract

The Hausdorff distance is a widely used tool to measure the distance between different sets. For the approximation of certain objects via stochastic search algorithms this distance is, however, of limited use as it punishes single outliers. As a remedy in the context [...] Read more.

Δ_{p}

has been proposed that is better suited as an indicator for the performance assessment of EMO algorithms since such methods tend to generate outliers. Later on, the two-parameter indicator

Δ_{p, q}

has been proposed for finite sets as an extension to

Δ_{p}

which also averages distances, but which yields some desired metric properties. In this paper, we extend

Δ_{p, q}

to a continuous function between general bounded subsets of finite measure inside a metric measure space. In particular, this extension applies to bounded subsets of

R^{k}

endowed with the Euclidean metric, which is the natural context for EMO applications. We show that our extension preserves the nice metric properties of the finite case, and finally provide some useful numerical examples that arise in EMO. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1902 KiB

Open AccessArticle

An Improved Differential Evolution Algorithm for Crop Planning in the Northeastern Region of Thailand

by Udompong Ketsripongsa, Rapeepan Pitakaso, Kanchana Sethanan and Tassin Srivarapongse

Math. Comput. Appl. 2018, 23(3), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23030040 - 10 Aug 2018

Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5149

Abstract

This research aimed to solve the economic crop planning problem, considering transportation logistics to maximize the profit from cultivated activities. Income is derived from the selling price and production rate of the plants; costs are due to operating and transportation expenses. Two solving methods are presented: (1) developing a mathematical model and solving it using Lingo v.11, and (2) using three improved Differential Evolution (DE) Algorithms—I-DE-SW, I-DE-CY, and I-DE-KV—which are DE with swap, cyclic moves (CY), and K-variables moves (KV) respectively. The algorithms were tested by 16 test instances, including this case study. The computational results showed that Lingo v.11 and all DE algorithms can find the optimal solution eight out of 16 times. Regarding the remaining test instances, Lingo v.11 was unable to find the optimal solution within 400 h. The results for the DE algorithms were compared with the best solution generated within that time. The DE solutions were 1.196–1.488% better than the best solution generated by Lingo v.11 and used 200 times less computational time. Comparing the three DE algorithms, MDE-KV was the DE that was the most flexible, with the biggest neighborhood structure, and outperformed the other DE algorithms. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1047 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Modified Differential Evolution Algorithm Solving the Special Case of Location Routing Problem

by Raknoi Akararungruangkul and Sasitorn Kaewman

Math. Comput. Appl. 2018, 23(3), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23030034 - 3 Jul 2018

Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4963

Abstract

This research article aims to solve the special case of the location routing problem (SLRP) when the objective function is the fuel consumption. The fuel consumption depends on the distance of travel and the condition of the road. The condition of the road causes the vehicle to use a different speed, which affects fuel usage. This turns the original LRP into a more difficult problem. Moreover, the volume of the goods that are produced in each node could be more or less than the capacity of the vehicle, and as the case study requires the transportation of latex, which is a sensitive good and needs to be carried within a reasonable time so that it does not form solid before being used in the latex process, the maximum time that the latex can be in the truck is limited. All of these attributes are added into the LRP and make it a special case of LRP: a so-called SLRP (a special case of location routing problem). The differential evolution algorithms (DE) are proposed to solve the SLRP. We modified two points in the original DE, which are that (1) the mutation formula is introduced and (2) the new rule of a local search is presented. We call this the modified differential evolution algorithm (MDE). From the computational result, we can see that MDE generates a 13.82% better solution than that of the original version of DE in solving the test instances. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 860 KiB

Open AccessArticle

The Construction of a Model-Robust IV-Optimal Mixture Designs Using a Genetic Algorithm

by Wanida Limmun, Boonorm Chomtee and John J. Borkowski

Math. Comput. Appl. 2018, 23(2), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23020025 - 17 May 2018

Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3908

Abstract

Among the numerous alphabetical optimality criteria is the IV-criterion that is focused on prediction variance. We propose a new criterion, called the weighted IV-optimality. It is similar to IV-optimality, because the researcher must first specify a model. However, unlike IV-optimality, a suite of “reduced” models is also proposed if the original model is misspecified via over-parameterization. In this research, weighted IV-optimality is applied to mixture experiments with a set of prior weights assigned to the potential mixture models of interest. To address the issue of implementation, a genetic algorithm was developed to generate weighted IV-optimal mixture designs that are robust across multiple models. In our examples, we assign models with p parameters to have equal weights, but weights will vary based on varying p. Fraction-of-design-space (FDS) plots are used to compare the performance of an experimental design in terms of the prediction variance properties. An illustrating example is presented. The result shows that the GA-generated designs studied are robust across a set of potential mixture models. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 775 KiB

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

How Am I Driving? Using Genetic Programming to Generate Scoring Functions for Urban Driving Behavior

by Roberto López, Luis Carlos González Gurrola, Leonardo Trujillo, Olanda Prieto, Graciela Ramírez, Antonio Posada, Perla Juárez-Smith and Leticia Méndez

Math. Comput. Appl. 2018, 23(2), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23020019 - 3 Apr 2018

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4791

Abstract

Road traffic injuries are a serious concern in emerging economies. Their death toll and economic impact are shocking, with 9 out of 10 deaths occurring in low or middle-income countries; and road traffic crashes representing 3% of their gross domestic product. One way to mitigate these issues is to develop technology to effectively assist the driver, perhaps making him more aware about how her (his) decisions influence safety. Following this idea, in this paper we evaluate computational models that can score the behavior of a driver based on a risky-safety scale. Potential applications of these models include car rental agencies, insurance companies or transportation service providers. In a previous work, we showed that Genetic Programming (GP) was a successful methodology to evolve mathematical functions with the ability to learn how people subjectively score a road trip. The input to this model was a vector of frequencies of risky maneuvers, which were supposed to be detected in a sensor layer. Moreover, GP was shown, even with statistical significance, to be better than six other Machine Learning strategies, including Neural Networks, Support Vector Regression and a Fuzzy Inference system, among others. A pending task, since then, was to evaluate if a more detailed comparison of different strategies based on GP could improve upon the best GP model. In this work, we evaluate, side by side, scoring functions evolved by three different variants of GP. In the end, the results suggest that two of these strategies are very competitive in terms of accuracy and simplicity, both generating models that could be implemented in current technology that seeks to assist the driver in real-world scenarios. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization)

► Show Figures

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Published Papers (10 papers)

Research

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI