Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile

A special issue of Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 September 2021) | Viewed by 7567

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
Interests: Clostridium difficile; tuberculosis; molecular epidemiology; molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance; bacteriophage therapy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Clostridioides difficile was identified as the cause of pseudomembranous colitis, and much of antibiotic-associated diarrhea 40 years ago, and has become recognized as the leading single hospital-acquired infection in the United States, and probably worldwide.  In the last 15-20 years, there has been a surge in case-rates, complications and scientific inquiry of C. difficile.  These have translated into important changes in diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms which are discussed in this special issue.

The preferred diagnosis of C. difficile has evolved over time –from assays detecting the pathogenic C. difficile toxin proteins (e.g. cytotoxicity assays, immunoassays), to assays detecting the DNA of toxigenic strains by nucleic acid amplification (e.g. PCR), and now back to toxin detection.  While DNA assays are most sensitive, there is increasing recognition that toxin assays correlate best with severe disease and the need for treatment.  At the same time, newer more sensitive toxin assays approach the sensitivity of PCR; the clinical impact of these newer assays remains to be determined.  Finally, C.difficile culture has been considered impractical for clinical use, but remains invaluable for strain typing and epidemiologic studies.

The approach to treatment of C. difficile has also evolved in the past decade, with a new emphasis on 1. the goal of a sustained clinical response –i.e. clinical improvement without recurrence of diarrhea; and 2. the role of the “normal” intestinal microbiota (“good flora”) in preventing infection and relapse by C. difficile.  These considerations highlight the challenges of treating C difficile, whereby  relapse occurs typically in 20% of patients, with repeated recurrences in 5-10% of patients.  Thus, the most selective antimicrobials –active against C. difficile but sparing the normal flora, have demonstrated the greatest sustained clinical response.  Further, antibodies against C. difficile toxins facilitate clearance of the organism and decrease relapse.  Finally, restoring the “good microflora” by fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has demonstrated unprecedented outcomes in the difficult population of frequent relapsers. While originally requiring colonoscopy to introduce “good” fecal microbiota, newer modalities such as fecal capsules are making this FMT methodology more acceptable, more available and increasingly considered in scenarios such as severe disease or even 1st relapse.  Caveats to this methodology include the inconsistency and uncertainty of active components, potential for transmission of infectious agents and costs.

Two special scenarios present special therapeutic challenges. First, colonization by C. difficile without diarrheal disease may be protective against subsequent disease, or may be a precursor for clinical disease. The potential role of prophylactic treatment in this population is debated, while infection control measures seem to be effective.  At the other extreme, severe C. difficile disease is lacking in clear evidence-based interventions, though some antibiotic, FMT and surgical approaches seem to be effective.

Dr. Paul F. Riska
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Pathogens is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Clostridioides difficile
  • Diagnosis
  • Treatment
  • Antibiotic-associated diarrhea
  • Fecal microbiota transplant

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

8 pages, 640 KiB  
Communication
Occurrence of Blastocystis in Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection
by Laura Vega, Giovanny Herrera, Marina Muñoz, Manuel Alfonso Patarroyo and Juan David Ramírez
Pathogens 2020, 9(4), 283; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040283 - 14 Apr 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2570
Abstract
Clostridiodes difficile comprises a public-health threat that has been understudied in Colombia. Hypervirulent strains of C. difficile harbor multiple toxins, can be easily spread, and can have their onset of disease within healthcare facilities (HCFO) and the community (CO). Studies have shown that [...] Read more.
Clostridiodes difficile comprises a public-health threat that has been understudied in Colombia. Hypervirulent strains of C. difficile harbor multiple toxins, can be easily spread, and can have their onset of disease within healthcare facilities (HCFO) and the community (CO). Studies have shown that a disrupted microbiota (e.g., dysbiosis) may allow C. difficile infection (CDI). It has been suggested that dysbiosis prevents colonization by the anaerobic eukaryote Blastocystis, possibly due to an increase in luminal oxygen tension. No study has found co-occurrence of CDI and Blastocystis. Therefore, we aimed to determine the frequencies of C. difficile and Blastocystis infection/colonization in 220 diarrheal fecal samples. Molecular detection by PCR for both microorganisms was performed, with descriptive analyses of four variables (CDI detection, determination of C. difficile toxigenic profiles, Blastocystis detection, and patient site of onset). We demonstrate a significant association between the presence of Blastocystis and CDI, with coinfection found in 61 patients, and show a high frequency of CDI among both HCFO and CO groups. Our results of coinfection frequencies could support hypotheses that suggest Blastocystis can adapt to dysbiosis and oxidative stress. Further, the presence of toxigenic C. difficile occurring outside healthcare facilities shown here raises the alarm for community wide spread. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 248 KiB  
Review
Updated Management Guidelines for Clostridioides difficile in Paediatrics
by Margherita Gnocchi, Martina Gagliardi, Pierpacifico Gismondi, Federica Gaiani, Gian Luigi de’ Angelis and Susanna Esposito
Pathogens 2020, 9(4), 291; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040291 - 16 Apr 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 4399
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile, formerly known as Clostridium difficile, causes infections (CDI) varying from self-limited diarrhoea to severe conditions, including toxic megacolon and bowel perforation. For this reason, a prompt diagnosis is fundamental to early treatment and the prevention of transmission. The aim of [...] Read more.
Clostridioides difficile, formerly known as Clostridium difficile, causes infections (CDI) varying from self-limited diarrhoea to severe conditions, including toxic megacolon and bowel perforation. For this reason, a prompt diagnosis is fundamental to early treatment and the prevention of transmission. The aim of this article is to review diagnostic laboratory methods that are now available to detect C. difficile and to discuss the most recent recommendations on CDI treatment in children. Currently, there is no consensus on the best method for detecting C. difficile. Indeed, none of the available diagnostics possess at the same time high sensitivity and specificity, low cost and rapid turnaround times. Appropriate therapy is targeted according to age, severity and recurrence of the episode of infection, and the recent availability of new antibiotics opens new opportunities. De-escalation of antibiotics that are directly associated with CDI remains a priority and the cautious use of probiotics is recommended. Vancomycin represents the first-line therapy for CDI, although in children metronidazole can still be used as a first-line drug. Fidaxomicin is a new treatment option with equivalent initial response rates as vancomycin but lower relapse rates of CDI. Faecal microbiota transplantation should be considered for patients with multiple recurrences of CDI. Monoclonal antibodies and vaccines seem to represent a future perspective against CDI. However, only further studies will permit us to understand whether these new approaches could be effective in therapy and prevention of CDI in paediatric populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile)
Back to TopTop