3D Printing Strategies for Limb Prostheses

A special issue of Prosthesis (ISSN 2673-1592).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 November 2022) | Viewed by 41143

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UC Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Interests: biomedical engineering; cognitive neuroscience; prosthetics and orthotics; biomechanics; device development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2E1, Canada
Interests: robotics; prosthetics; 3D printing; reinforcement learning; sensory feedback

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The aim of this Special Issue is to explore and bring to light all of the ways that 3D printing has been used in the development of limb prostheses. Three-dimensional printing (also known as additive manufacturing or rapid prototyping) is a method of fabricating plastic or metal parts that became widely available in the last 10 years with the release of 3D printing services and inexpensive consumer grade 3D printers. The use of 3D printing for prosthetic applications has the potential for improving the personalization and accessibility of limb prostheses while lowering the cost and prosthesis weight. There is a trend in the literature for researchers to use 3D printing, but it is not often the main focus of a study, so it can be challenging to find emerging techniques and best practices. In this Special Issue, we are inviting researchers and clinicians to contribute journal articles or technical notes specifically on the 3D printing aspect of their research according to the scope below:

  • 3D printing of prostheses or related components (upper and lower limb), including powered (e.g., myoelectric or robotic) and unpowered (e.g., body powered or cosmetic). Components could be a particular part of a prosthesis or a related system (e.g., sensory feedback system or decorative covering);
  • 3D-printed prosthetic sockets (upper and lower limb, temporary or definitive);
  • Evaluation of 3D printed prostheses or related devices including material, part, biocompatibility, performance, and safety testing as well as outcomes measured from the use of the prosthesis by a person with limb difference;
  • Development of new 3D-printed materials and manufacturing methods for limb prostheses (e.g., using 3D prints as an intermediate step for creating molds for casting, exploration of flexible or soft materials, embedding electronics or sensors into 3D-printed parts, etc.).

Dr. Jonathon S. Schofield
Michael R. Dawson
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Prosthesis is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • upper limb prosthesis
  • lower limb prosthesis
  • prosthetic limbs
  • limb prostheses
  • 3D printing
  • rapid prototyping
  • additive manufacturing
  • prosthetic sockets
  • myoelectric
  • body-powered
  • cosmetic

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 14776 KiB  
Article
Evolving 3D-Printing Strategies for Structural and Cosmetic Components in Upper Limb Prosthesis
by Albert Manero, John Sparkman, Matt Dombrowski, Peter Smith, Pavan Senthil, Spencer Smith, Viviana Rivera and Albert Chi
Prosthesis 2023, 5(1), 167-181; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5010013 - 3 Feb 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 10742
Abstract
The evolution of prosthetic limbs continues to develop, with novel manufacturing techniques being evaluated, including additive manufacturing. Additive manufacturing (AM), or 3D-printing, holds promise for enabling personalized and tailored medical device options. The requirements for personalized medicine, coupled with the limitations of small-batch [...] Read more.
The evolution of prosthetic limbs continues to develop, with novel manufacturing techniques being evaluated, including additive manufacturing. Additive manufacturing (AM), or 3D-printing, holds promise for enabling personalized and tailored medical device options. The requirements for personalized medicine, coupled with the limitations of small-batch manufacturing, have made the technique viable for exploration. In this manuscript, an approach is presented for incorporating additive manufacturing for prostheses, both as a final part and in applications as an intermediate manufacturing step. As a result, through the use of these methods a multi-gesture capable electromyographic prosthesis was designed and manufactured, currently being evaluated in clinical trials for pediatric patients. This paper explored the results of this unique method of applying additive manufacturing techniques, and assessed how the blend of different manufacturing techniques improved performance and reduced device weight. Creating unique and aesthetic cosmetic coverings for the device was achieved through using additive manufacturing as an intermediate manufacturing component and, then, applying thermoforming. Cosmesis components saw a 33% reduction in weight from this change in manufacturing. The approach is explored to blend multiple manufacturing techniques to create cosmesis components and structural components for the prosthesis. The techniques serve the design intent to reduce reported challenges with upper limb prosthesis devices and to encourage device retention. Recommendations for manufacturing strategies are discussed, including the limitations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Strategies for Limb Prostheses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1593 KiB  
Article
3D Printing in LMICs: Functional Design for Upper Limb Prosthetics in Uganda
by Ali Hussaini, Peter Kyberd, Benedict Mulindwa, Robert Ssekitoleko, William Keeble, Laurence Kenney and David Howard
Prosthesis 2023, 5(1), 130-147; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5010011 - 1 Feb 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4123
Abstract
Meeting the needs of persons with upper limb loss in Uganda requires an understanding of the needs and desires of the local population. The limitations of resources and accessibility for the individual gave rise to a focused design methodology for delivering a culturally [...] Read more.
Meeting the needs of persons with upper limb loss in Uganda requires an understanding of the needs and desires of the local population. The limitations of resources and accessibility for the individual gave rise to a focused design methodology for delivering a culturally acceptable solution using 3D Printing technology. A series of co-design activities were held in Uganda and provided direct feedback to drive the design of two prototypes based on acceptable aesthetics and priority Activities of Daily Living. Two terminal device prototypes were 3D printed in the UK. These can be directly attached to a standard proximal socket thread. The passive hand was printed in a flexible filament and the prehensor was printed in a durable impact resistant material. Local researchers in Uganda have similar 3D printers, filaments, and assembly hardware, which allowed for concurrent development and refinement of the prototypes. Local participation provides a rich user feedback environment to understand which elements of prosthetic device design are integral to delivering acceptable prosthetics solutions for fabrication in Uganda. 3D printing can provide a viable route to addressing the needs of the user. The proposed terminal devices are now in the process of being printed locally for field testing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Strategies for Limb Prostheses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 48586 KiB  
Article
3D Printed Energy Return Elements for Upper Limb Sports Prosthetics
by Jung Wook Park, Ben Greenspan, Taylor Tabb, Eric Gallo and Andreea Danielescu
Prosthesis 2023, 5(1), 13-34; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5010002 - 4 Jan 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4721
Abstract
Prosthetics are an extension of the human body and must provide functionality similar to that of a non-disabled individual to be effective. Sports prosthetics such as the Flex-Foot Cheetah from Össur have demonstrated the value of creating devices that both provide mechanical support [...] Read more.
Prosthetics are an extension of the human body and must provide functionality similar to that of a non-disabled individual to be effective. Sports prosthetics such as the Flex-Foot Cheetah from Össur have demonstrated the value of creating devices that both provide mechanical support and introduce passive energy return to mimic forces otherwise produced at joints. These energy return mechanisms have not yet been demonstrated for upper limb prosthetics but could improve their effectiveness and provide a greater range of motion and control. Using multi-material 3D printing technology, we extend energy return components to upper limb prosthetics by developing novel force-sensing springs and applying them to a basketball prosthetic. The 3D-printed springs compensate for the forces otherwise generated by wrist and finger flexion while measuring the mechanical deflection. We discuss design guidelines, methods for integrated 3D printed energy return within prosthetics, and broader applications in assistive technologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Strategies for Limb Prostheses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4877 KiB  
Article
An Instrumented Printed Insert for Continuous Monitoring of Distal Limb Motion in Suction and Elevated Vacuum Sockets
by Kendrick A. Coburn, Nicholas S. DeGrasse, Joseph C. Mertens, Katheryn J. Allyn, Nicholas K. McCarthy, Daniel Ballesteros, Joseph L. Garbini and Joan E. Sanders
Prosthesis 2022, 4(4), 710-729; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis4040056 - 2 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2056
Abstract
A suction or elevated vacuum prosthetic socket that loses vacuum pressure may cause excessive limb motion, putting the user at risk of skin irritation, gait instability and injury. The purpose of this research was to develop a method to monitor distal limb motion [...] Read more.
A suction or elevated vacuum prosthetic socket that loses vacuum pressure may cause excessive limb motion, putting the user at risk of skin irritation, gait instability and injury. The purpose of this research was to develop a method to monitor distal limb motion and then test a small group of participants wearing suction sockets to identify variables that strongly influenced motion. A thin plastic insert holding two inductive sensor antennae was designed and printed. Inserts were placed in suction sockets made for four participants who regularly used suction or elevated vacuum suspension. Participants wore a liner with a trace amount of iron powder in the elastomer that served as a distance target for the sensors. In-lab testing demonstrated that the sensed distance increased when participants added socks and decreased when they removed socks, demonstrating proper sensor performance. Results from take-home testing (3–5 days) suggest that research investigation into cyclic limb motion for sock presence v. absence should be pursued, as should the influence of bodily position between bouts of walking. These variables may have an important influence on suspension. Long-term monitoring may provide clinical insight to improve fit and to enhance suction and elevated vacuum technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Strategies for Limb Prostheses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 6035 KiB  
Article
Conceptualization of an Anthropomorphic Replacement Hand with a Sensory Feedback System
by Lea Allmendinger, Simon Hazubski and Andreas Otte
Prosthesis 2022, 4(4), 695-709; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis4040055 - 30 Nov 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1996
Abstract
In this paper, a concept for an anthropomorphic replacement hand cast with silicone with an integrated sensory feedback system is presented. In order to construct the personalized replacement hand, a 3D scan of a healthy hand was used to create a 3D-printed mold [...] Read more.
In this paper, a concept for an anthropomorphic replacement hand cast with silicone with an integrated sensory feedback system is presented. In order to construct the personalized replacement hand, a 3D scan of a healthy hand was used to create a 3D-printed mold using computer-aided design (CAD). To allow for movement of the index and middle fingers, a motorized orthosis was used. Information about the applied force for grasping and the degree of flexion of the fingers is registered using two pressure sensors and one bending sensor in each movable finger. To integrate the sensors and additional cavities for increased flexibility, the fingers were cast in three parts, separately from the rest of the hand. A silicone adhesive (Silpuran 4200) was examined to combine the individual parts afterwards. For this, tests with different geometries were carried out. Furthermore, different test series for the secure integration of the sensors were performed, including measurements of the registered information of the sensors. Based on these findings, skin-toned individual fingers and a replacement hand with integrated sensors were created. Using Silpuran 4200, it was possible to integrate the needed cavities and to place the sensors securely into the hand while retaining full flexion using a motorized orthosis. The measurements during different loadings and while grasping various objects proved that it is possible to realize such a sensory feedback system in a replacement hand. As a result, it can be stated that the cost-effective realization of a personalized, anthropomorphic replacement hand with an integrated sensory feedback system is possible using 3D scanning and 3D printing. By integrating smaller sensors, the risk of damaging the sensors through movement could be decreased. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Strategies for Limb Prostheses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 15771 KiB  
Article
Design Evaluation of FFF-Printed Transtibial Prosthetic Sockets Using Follow-Up and Finite Element Analysis
by Merel van der Stelt, Fianna Stenveld, Thom Bitter, Thomas J. J. Maal and Dennis Janssen
Prosthesis 2022, 4(4), 589-599; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis4040048 - 14 Oct 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4636
Abstract
Background: Participants in Sierra Leone received a Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)-printed transtibial prosthetic socket. Follow-up was conducted on this group over a period of 21 months. To investigate the failure of some of the FFF-printed transtibial sockets, further strength investigation is desired. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: Participants in Sierra Leone received a Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)-printed transtibial prosthetic socket. Follow-up was conducted on this group over a period of 21 months. To investigate the failure of some of the FFF-printed transtibial sockets, further strength investigation is desired. Methods: A finite element (FE) analysis provided an extensive overview of the strength of the socket. Using follow-up data and FE analyses, weak spots were identified, and the required optimization/reinforcement of the socket wall was determined. Results: Five sockets with a 4 mm wall thickness were tested by five participants. The strength of the 4 mm prosthetic socket seemed to be sufficient for people with limited activity. The 4 mm sockets used by active participants failed at the patella tendon or popliteal area. One socket with a wall thickness of 6 mm was used by an active user and remained intact after one year of use. An FE analysis of the socket showed high stresses in the patella tendon area. An increased wall thickness of 7 mm leads to a decrease of 26% in the stress corresponding to the observed failure in the patella tendon area, compared to the 4 mm socket. Conclusions: Follow-up in combination with an FE analysis can provide insight into the strength of the transtibial socket. In future designs, both the patella tendon and popliteal area will be reinforced by a thickened trim line of 7 mm. A design with a thickened trimline of 7 mm is expected to be sufficiently strong for active users. Another follow-up study will be performed to confirm this. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Strategies for Limb Prostheses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 37396 KiB  
Article
Prosthetic Sockets: Tensile Behavior of Vacuum Infiltrated Fused Deposition Modeling Sandwich Structure Composites
by Isaac A. Cabrera, Parker J. Hill, Win-Ying Zhao, Trinity C. Pike, Marc A. Meyers, Ramesh R. Rao and Albert Y. M. Lin
Prosthesis 2022, 4(3), 317-337; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis4030027 - 22 Jun 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3838
Abstract
The development of novel materials will enable a new generation of prosthetic devices to be built with additive manufacturing (AM). Vacuum infiltrated sandwich structure composites are a promising approach for building prosthetic sockets via AM. In this paper, we test the tensile properties [...] Read more.
The development of novel materials will enable a new generation of prosthetic devices to be built with additive manufacturing (AM). Vacuum infiltrated sandwich structure composites are a promising approach for building prosthetic sockets via AM. In this paper, we test the tensile properties of 18 different composite material configurations using ASTM D638. These composites were manufactured using a custom vacuum infiltration method and had varying filament materials, infiltrated matrix materials, and print directions. Several material-matrix-print composites showed higher ultimate tensile strengths and reduced anisotropy compared to full-infill control samples. However, the mechanical properties of these composites were limited by a large degree of porosity due to the manufacturing method. Still, the results were sufficiently promising to create a proof of concept prosthetic socket via the vacuum infiltration method. Future research should focus on reducing porosity defects and investigating additional material-matrix-print combinations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Strategies for Limb Prostheses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1314 KiB  
Article
Real-World Testing of the Self Grasping Hand, a Novel Adjustable Passive Prosthesis: A Single Group Pilot Study
by Lisa O’Brien, Elena Montesano, Alix Chadwell, Laurence Kenney and Gerwin Smit
Prosthesis 2022, 4(1), 48-59; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis4010006 - 8 Feb 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4357
Abstract
(1) Background: This study investigated the feasibility of conducting a two-week “real-world” trial of the Self Grasping Hand (SGH), a novel 3D printed passive adjustable prosthesis for hand absence; (2) Methods: Single-group pilot study of nine adults with trans-radial limb absence; five used [...] Read more.
(1) Background: This study investigated the feasibility of conducting a two-week “real-world” trial of the Self Grasping Hand (SGH), a novel 3D printed passive adjustable prosthesis for hand absence; (2) Methods: Single-group pilot study of nine adults with trans-radial limb absence; five used body-powered split-hooks, and four had passive cosmetic hands as their usual prosthesis. Data from activity monitors were used to measure wear time and bilateral activity. At the end of the two-week trial, function and satisfaction were measured using the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey Function Scale (OPUS) and the prosthesis satisfaction sub-scales of the Trinity Amputations and Prosthesis Experience Scale (TAPES). Semi-structured interviews captured consumer feedback and suggestions for improvement; (3) Results: Average SGH wear time over 2 weeks was 17.5 h (10% of total prosthesis wear time) for split-hook users and 83.5 h (63% of total prosthesis wear time) for cosmetic hand users. Mean satisfaction was 5.2/10, and mean function score was 47.9/100; (4) Two-week real-world consumer testing of the SGH is feasible using the methods described. Future SGH designs need to be more robust with easier grasp lock/unlock. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Strategies for Limb Prostheses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop