The Challenges of Maintaining Academic Integrity in the Era of Machine-Generated Learning

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2023) | Viewed by 1223

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Interdisciplinary Studies, Zefat Academic College, 11 Jerusalem St., 1320611 Zefat, Israel
Interests: academic integrity; academic dishonesty

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Effective learning and teaching are key research topics in higher education. Quality education is unattainable without respect for academic integrity. Whereas academic integrity refers to respectful and fair behaviours, academic dishonesty refers to offences that include cheating, plagiarism, fabrication, and facilitation. Higher education institutions play a twofold role. First, they grant technical knowledge and professional skills to the new generations and focus on their students’ best possible academic outcomes (i.e., excellent grades). Second, they strengthen students’ values, principles, and moral development. Differently stated, higher education institutions aim to create responsible, honest, and ethically acting citizens, for which the promotion of academic integrity is key. Yet, studies have shown the omnipresence of academic dishonesty as a normalized student behaviour that goes back decades, and that most students engage in academic dishonesty at some point in their studies.

The phenomenon of academic dishonesty represents a severe and extensively researched problem in education and psychology. Previous research in the field of academic integrity and dishonesty have linked it to individual and situational characteristics. Others have found differences in academic integrity between learning environments, which is especially relevant during and post the COVID-19 pandemic. The academic misconduct rate increased with the transition to emergency remote teaching during the pandemic due to both the increased psychological stress and the unique learning characteristics of unplanned online teaching. Emergency remote teaching is most likely to be used again when large-scale emergencies occur, and planned online and hybrid teaching are here to stay. Thus, continuous research on academic integrity in these environments is highly important.

Recent research has also allowed the development of detection tools for academic dishonesty, which have been improved but also challenged with technology’s rapid development. As automated detection tools improve, and decrease academic misconduct rates, students and third-party companies find new ways to bypass detection, raising the need for the continuous exploration of new and improved ways for maintaining academic integrity.

In an era when machine learning and artificial intelligence are becoming more present in everyday life in general and in academic writing specifically, while hybrid and remote teaching are also on the rise, we are to face new challenges yet to be fully uncovered. This Special Issue of Societies aims to explore the dynamic relationship between learning environments, technology, machine learning and academic integrity. We invite researchers to submit empirical and theoretical contributions concerning the maintenance of academic integrity in today’s complex times.

I look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Yovav Eshet
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • academic integrity
  • academic dishonesty
  • academic honesty
  • contract cheating
  • ghostwriter
  • plagiarism
  • plagiarism detection software
  • machine-generated writing
  • artificial intelligence writing

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 2340 KiB  
Article
Building Academic Integrity: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a New Framework to Address and Prevent Contract Cheating
by Deepani B. Guruge, Rajan Kadel, Samar Shailendra and Aakanksha Sharma
Societies 2025, 15(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010011 - 14 Jan 2025
Viewed by 620
Abstract
Academic integrity is a cornerstone of education systems, yet the rise of contract cheating poses significant challenges for higher education institutions. Current approaches to managing contract cheating often lack the comprehensive structure needed to address the complexities of modern cheating methods. The primary [...] Read more.
Academic integrity is a cornerstone of education systems, yet the rise of contract cheating poses significant challenges for higher education institutions. Current approaches to managing contract cheating often lack the comprehensive structure needed to address the complexities of modern cheating methods. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the proposed Three-Tier Framework (TTF), designed in our previous study to combat contract cheating. The proposed framework comprises three tiers: awareness, monitoring, and evaluation. It engages stakeholders within the system and encourages a proactive and collaborative stance against contract cheating while reinforcing a culture of academic honesty. The evaluation focuses on three key aspects: the clarity of the framework’s functions and objectives, the potential challenges in implementing the proposed monitoring process, and the perceived limitations in detecting and mitigating contract cheating through this framework. Supervised and unsupervised assignments are considered, excluding the option of e-proctoring, as some students encountered difficulties setting up necessary tools and software for online exams. Survey results reveal a broad consensus among respondents, who expressed strong confidence in the clarity and effectiveness of the framework and its monitoring procedures. These positive perceptions were consistent across respondents, regardless of their prior experience or familiarity with contract cheating. Although the overall feedback was positive, concerns were raised regarding implementing the framework in current educational settings. Specific challenges cited include tight timelines and the increased workload associated with the new procedures, emphasising a need for additional guidance, training, and institutional support to ensure effective adoption. The proposed framework incorporates an instructor dashboard designed to streamline academic workflow and simplify the monitoring process introduced in this framework. The survey results confirm that the framework can be adopted to address the unique needs of academics and diverse educational environments; however further research is needed to explore its applicability across the broader higher education community. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop