Standards and Assessment of Construction Products
A special issue of Standards (ISSN 2305-6703). This special issue belongs to the section "Building Standards".
Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2022) | Viewed by 7009
Special Issue Editor
Interests: assessment and verification of the constancy of performance (AVCP) of construction products; sustainable development in construction; construction products
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Special Issue Information
Dear Colleagues,
Standards set out specifications and other technical information concerning various kinds of products. Products placed on the market or put into service must meet certain requirements. We immediately realize their obviousness and indisputability by reading the sentences mentioned earlier. Products and standards are related, but many complex processes performed by various market stakeholders are going on between them. When we talk about construction products the situation becomes even more complicated, considering that:
- An enormous variety of construction products is used in civil engineering;
- There is a huge construction products market, and all its stakeholders should be prepared for continuous technological evolution;
- Construction products are specific, and very often non-end-use products, e.g., water, added to the product, mixed, and used appropriately, are subject to assessment;
- Construction products are assessed at different levels of micro- and macrostructure;
- Various tests are performed to evaluate construction products, including not only mechanical and physical measurements but also functional and application tests;
- The testing of construction products requires non-destructive and destructive measurement methods;
- The testing of construction products is inextricably linked with variability resulting from the uncertainty of measurements;
- Due to this uncertainty there is always a risk of incorrect assessment, i.e., the product assessed as compliant may be non-compliant, and the product rejected as non-compliant may, in fact, be compliant;
- When assessing many construction products, one should remember probability, and, in this aspect, consider the values resulting from laboratory tests;
- Construction products are subject to assessment by market surveillance authorities;
- For each manufacturer, placing a construction product on the market is associated with risk, including a negative assessment of their product in tests ordered by market surveillance authorities;
- There are possible situations in which the manufacturer has correctly assessed and verified the constancy of performance (AVCP) of their construction product, and the re-assessment by the market surveillance authorities, based on laboratory tests, is negative.
Considering the conditions and thinking mentioned above, as well as those not mentioned, that standards provide a common technical language that manufacturers should use to express the technical performance of their construction products, the weight of standards is fundamental. The exact importance of standards is for regulators expressing their requirements and designers, contractors, public authorities, and other construction product market actors willing to exchange information efficiently.
Construction product assessment is a complex, challenging, and not always fully defined issue. It is perceived differently by different stakeholders of the construction product market, especially by industry, academia, and regulators. A Special Issue of Standards dedicated to evaluating construction products is important, and I invite everyone interested in assessing construction products to publish in this Special Issue of Standards.
Dr. Jacek Michalak
Guest Editor
Manuscript Submission Information
Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.
Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Standards is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.
Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
- Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
- Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
- Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
- External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
- e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.
Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.