Topic Editors

School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Prof. Dr. Muhammad Salman
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbay, India
Prof. Dr. Lidija Siller
School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

Final Sinks of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS)

Abstract submission deadline
closed (20 May 2024)
Manuscript submission deadline
closed (30 July 2024)
Viewed by
3046

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is the most recent term (which began with CCS) used to refer to global efforts to curb the increasing concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere. In less than five years, as of July 2019, the 5-year moving average recorded at the Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, has risen from just under 400 ppm to over 411 ppm.

CCUS aims to reduce anthropogenic emissions of CO2, typically by removing it from point sources, and in some cases even directly removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Capture on its own does not suffice, so utilization or storage of CO2 is necessary. Over the last two decades, many processes that convert CO2 back into fuels, or into plastics, char, etc. have been developed and reported in scientific literature, with some of these recently reaching large-scale implementation. Likewise, many approaches to storing CO2, in geological formations, such as carbonated minerals, in building materials, etc., are presently known and used.

The principles of sustainability, among its definitions, require that environmentally-friendly processes deliver long-term performance and security. This can be related to CCUS in terms of the idea of Final Sinks. We shall define a Final Sink as a sustainable Carbon Sink. This Topic seeks contributions from CCUS researchers and policy makers that can help to define and assess the Final Sinks of CCUS technologies. The following are suggested questions that we invite authors to address:

(a) What is/are the Final Sink(s) of CO2, at relevant decade-to-century timescales, for your CCUS technology?

(b) Does your CCUS approach lead to an intermediate/temporary Sink, rather than a Final Sink? How can we ensure that CO2 eventually ends up in a Final Sink, or for how long and what amount can it remain in an intermediate/temporary Sink?

(c) What can we learn about natural Carbon Sinks to design our CCUS technologies?

(d) Is the concept of a Final Sink compatible with the concept of a Circular Economy?

(e) What are the challenges of managing, monitoring and validating Final Sinks?

The editors encourage submissions of varied styles: original research articles, review papers, concept papers, short communications, technical notes, commentaries, and opinions.

Prof. Dr. Rafael Santos
Prof. Dr. Muhammad Salman
Prof. Dr. Lidija Siller
Topic Editors

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
C
carbon
3.9 1.6 2015 23.7 Days CHF 1600
Energies
energies
3.0 6.2 2008 16.8 Days CHF 2600
Processes
processes
2.8 5.1 2013 14.9 Days CHF 2400
Sustainable Chemistry
suschem
- - 2020 32.3 Days CHF 1000

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 1515 KiB  
Article
Energy and Economic Assessment of Oxy-Fuel Combustion CO2 Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants
by Yuyang Yuan, Lei Wang, Yaming Zhuang, Ying Wu and Xiaotao Bi
Energies 2024, 17(18), 4626; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184626 - 15 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1397
Abstract
Oxy-fuel combustion technology replaces air with a mixture of pure O2 and recycled flue gas for coal combustion, which leads to difficulties in the waste heat recovery of flue gas in the boiler tail of coal-fired power plants. This paper proposes a [...] Read more.
Oxy-fuel combustion technology replaces air with a mixture of pure O2 and recycled flue gas for coal combustion, which leads to difficulties in the waste heat recovery of flue gas in the boiler tail of coal-fired power plants. This paper proposes a new integration scheme for waste heat recovery of flue gas in coal-fired power plants with oxy-fuel combustion CO2 capture. By introducing an oxygen preheater, a recycled flue gas preheater, and a low-pressure economizer, the waste heat of flue gas is fully recovered to preheat oxygen, recycled flue gas, and feed water, respectively. The proposed scheme simultaneously ensures the safe operation of the recycled fan and improves the thermal performance of the coal-fired power plants. Compared to the air combustion configuration, the boiler’s efficiency and gross power efficiency in the oxy-fuel combustion configuration are increased by 0.42% and 1.29%, respectively. Due to power consumption for the added equipment, the net power efficiency is reduced by 10.41%. A techno-economic analysis shows that the cost of electricity for oxy-fuel combustion in coal-fired power plants has increased from USD 46.45/MWh to USD 80.18/MWh, and the cost of the CO2 avoided reaches USD 43.24/t CO2. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop