sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Climate Adaptation, Sustainability, Ethics, and Well-Being

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability in Geographic Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 April 2025 | Viewed by 5996

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Geography and Sustainable Planning, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI, USA
Interests: climate change; land use and land cover change; human vulnerability and adaptations to climate change and natural disasters; food security; happiness and sustainability
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Global climate change is already negatively affecting and expected to have more dramatic effects on the livelihoods and well-being of communities around the world. There is a growing urgency in the need for robust adaptation strategies to alleviate human vulnerability to climate change impacts, which should be carefully balanced and coordinated with climate change mitigation and sustainable development priorities.

Adaptation policies and strategies face numerous ethical dilemmas through their inevitable trade-offs with other sustainable development and human well-being goals. A significant body of transdisciplinary scholarly and traditional knowledge indicates that deep, transformative, long-term, and system-wide adaptations are urgently needed to overcome the global climate crisis, which is exacerbated by growing social inequalities. Building a sustainable future for all requires transformative adaptation approaches driven by the prioritization of community happiness, solidarity, reciprocity, environmental ethics, and the recognition of the intrinsic value of nature. Ethics of human–environmental interactions are an essential but frequently missing foundation in existing sustainability and climate adaptation policy frameworks.

This Special Issue questions the adequacy of prevailing discourses on sustainable development and climate adaptation policies that are driven by economic growth goals, environmental utilitarianism, and a globalized culture that equates well-being with consumerism. We argue that fundamentally new models of human–environmental relationships are urgently needed, driven by priorities of sustainable community well-being, solidarity, equity, and the recognition of the intrinsic value of nature.

There is an emerging body of scholarship, empirical data, and indigenous and community knowledge on diverse aspects of human well-being, climate adaptations, land ethics, and human development. However, there is a significant gap in understanding the deep cause–effect relationships between adaptation strategies, sustainability, well-being, and ethical considerations in different cultures and at an individual, community, and global scale. The goal of this Special Issue is to provide a platform for this important scholarly discourse.

This Special Issue of Sustainability is therefore dedicated to the nexus between climate adaptations, sustainability, environmental ethics, and well-being. We invite original research articles and bibliographic reviews from all disciplinary fields, including reanalysis of local case studies worldwide, innovative theoretical and methodological frameworks, quantitative and qualitative assessments, applied and analytical studies, and reflective papers on existing and planned initiatives at various spatial and temporal scales.

Potential topics include but are not limited to:

  • The reconceptualization of human vulnerability and justice in climate adaptation policies.
  • Climate change mitigation and adaptation synergies and trade-offs, including the risks and challenges of maladaptation.
  • Climate action, adaptation, and resilience planning and mainstreaming at various scales.
  • The integration of indigenous and traditional knowledge in sustainability and adaptation planning.
  • The relationships between human well-being, sustainability, and societal views of nature.
  • Ethical frameworks for a just sustainable transition and climate adaptation.
  • Diversity, equity, and inclusion in climate adaptation and sustainability agendas.
  • The role of sustainability education in building community resilience and transformative adaptations to climate change.

I look forward to receiving your contributions.

Yours faithfully,

Prof. Dr. Elena Lioubimtseva
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • human–environmental interactions
  • vulnerability
  • resilience
  • transformation
  • environmental ethics
  • happiness
  • well-being
  • community
  • transdisciplinary
  • justice

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

31 pages, 2452 KiB  
Article
A Decision Framework for Equitable Use of Federal Funds for Voluntary Buyout Programs
by Farinaz Motlagh and Sara Hamideh
Sustainability 2025, 17(3), 966; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030966 - 24 Jan 2025
Viewed by 405
Abstract
Disaster losses and expenses are increasing rapidly in coastal regions, highlighting the pressing need for effective mitigation strategies. The voluntary buyout program is an effective approach to reducing risks of future flooding, often funded by federal grants after disasters. However, following a disaster, [...] Read more.
Disaster losses and expenses are increasing rapidly in coastal regions, highlighting the pressing need for effective mitigation strategies. The voluntary buyout program is an effective approach to reducing risks of future flooding, often funded by federal grants after disasters. However, following a disaster, decision-making tends to be reactive, potentially leading to a haphazard selection of properties and households for program participation. It is crucial for local governments in charge of these programs to be informed about who may or may not benefit from program participation when deciding which properties to select and prioritize. Therefore, incorporating social equity in those decisions prevents unintended consequences for program participants. The present research addresses this complexity by raising the critical question of how local practitioners can evaluate equity considerations of using federal grants for buyout projects. With a mixed-methods research design, we offer systematic guidelines for supporting local practitioners in evaluating the equity considerations of using funding for buyouts, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for households. By acknowledging the potential of buyouts in mitigating flood exposure and recognizing its equity implications, this study uses advanced hazard models, buyout practitioners and experts’ insights, data on buyout funding, and findings from past research to support local practitioners in making equitable prioritization and selection of households by developing a decision framework. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Adaptation, Sustainability, Ethics, and Well-Being)
17 pages, 1438 KiB  
Article
Equity and Inclusion in Climate Action and Adaptation Plans of Michigan Cities
by Elena Lioubimtseva, Hannah Zylman, Katherine Carron, Kaytlin Poynter and Bushra Mohamed-Elmabruk Rashrash
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7745; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177745 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1653
Abstract
Community engagement in climate action and adaptation planning is an essential prerequisite for overcoming existing and projected environmental injustices associated with the negative impacts of climate change. The diversity and inclusion of stakeholders are crucial for addressing equity in both the development and [...] Read more.
Community engagement in climate action and adaptation planning is an essential prerequisite for overcoming existing and projected environmental injustices associated with the negative impacts of climate change. The diversity and inclusion of stakeholders are crucial for addressing equity in both the development and implementation of local climate plans. Our study attempts to evaluate and compare consideration of equity in climate action and climate adaptation plans of Michigan cities and its association with the diversity of stakeholders involved in the planning process. Data analysis is based on the content of eight municipal climate action and/or climate adaptation plans, related documents, and interviews with city planners along with community activists. Data derived from the climate action and adaptation plans were also compared to the strategies outlined in the Tribal Climate Adaptation Menu, which integrates climate science and indigenous knowledge. The study concludes that municipalities that engage more diverse groups of stakeholders appear to be more attentive to social equity and more likely to offer specific climate action and adaptation measures focusing on vulnerable groups. The integration of indigenous knowledge could provide valuable insights for municipalities through collaboration with tribal communities and climate adaptation experts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Adaptation, Sustainability, Ethics, and Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1212 KiB  
Article
Sustainability: An Ethical Challenge: The Overexploitation of the Planet as an Exemplary Case
by Lars Carlsen
Sustainability 2024, 16(8), 3390; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083390 - 18 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1298
Abstract
Earth Overshoot Day is used as an exemplary case to suggest actions to obtain better compliance between the ecological footprints and biocapacities of the world’s regions. This study was based on the Global Footprint Network’s free public data on Earth Overshoot Day. The [...] Read more.
Earth Overshoot Day is used as an exemplary case to suggest actions to obtain better compliance between the ecological footprints and biocapacities of the world’s regions. This study was based on the Global Footprint Network’s free public data on Earth Overshoot Day. The analyses of the data applied a partial ordering methodology in combination with the so-called Philosophy Model, leading to a joint ranking of the regions based on the simultaneous inclusion of ecological footprint data and data on biocapacities. The ranking was topped by South America, whereas North America and the Middle East/Central Asia were at the bottom of the list. Biocapacity was found to be the most important ranking indicator. Thus, doubling the biocapacity for each region would, on a global scale, lead to a population reserve of approx. 1.5 billion, whereas a halving of the individual ecological footprint would still lead to a population deficit of approximately 1 billion. The footprints and the biocapacities are composed of six and five sub-indicators, respectively, and the carbon footprint together with the built-up land footprint is the most important sub-indicator. To comply with the corresponding available biocapacity, significant reductions in the carbon footprint are needed, close to 50% for high-income countries. The ethical issues, as well as their interconnection with the Sustainable Development Goals, were discussed, with a focus on carbon footprints and well-being, as well as educating women, as illustrative cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Adaptation, Sustainability, Ethics, and Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

18 pages, 292 KiB  
Perspective
International Climate Migrant Policy and Estimates of Climate Migration
by Paul Clements
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10287; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310287 - 24 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1720
Abstract
The architecture of international aid and climate finance should be reformed to address the needs of climate migrants. While humanitarian aid agencies that support some climate migrants are increasingly overburdened, climate migration has been underestimated and largely neglected by the United Nations Framework [...] Read more.
The architecture of international aid and climate finance should be reformed to address the needs of climate migrants. While humanitarian aid agencies that support some climate migrants are increasingly overburdened, climate migration has been underestimated and largely neglected by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The policy community has based a high-end estimate of 216 million potential climate migrants by 2050 on Groundswell (2021), but Groundswell does not address all drivers. It uses statistical methods to estimate internal migration from slow-onset drivers including crop yields, water supplies, and sea level rise, but the state of knowledge only permits rough, “back-of-the-envelope” estimates for other forms and drivers. Working out such estimates for sudden-onset drivers and for the remaining slow-onset drivers, if mitigation and adaptation are weak, I find that there could be about 500 million climate migrants by 2050. While the UNFCCC classifies climate migration under adaptation, few adaptation resources are devoted to migrants’ needs. Based on humanitarian aid expenses for other kinds of migrants, I estimate it could cost around $7000 per person to help climate migrants to rebuild their lives. At this rate, support for climate migrants would be a significant part of the total climate finance, and with organizational needs for supporting climate migrants being quite different from those for adaptation proper, it would make sense for the UNFCCC to address climate migration as a separate category on par with mitigation and adaptation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Adaptation, Sustainability, Ethics, and Well-Being)

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

Title: The Power of Place
Author: Eric Weiner
Highlights: Place Matters Old Places Soulplaces Third Places Thin Places

Back to TopTop