sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Agricultural Development Economics and Policy 2nd Edition

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Agriculture".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2024) | Viewed by 3916

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Natural Sciences, Forestry and Agriculture, The University of Maine, Orono, MN 04469, USA
Interests: agro-forestry economics; agricultural systems modeling; carbon sequestration; greenhouse gas emissions; sustainability
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

 Dear Colleagues,

Agriculture, in developing and developed nations, faces huge challenges over the next century in meeting human food needs and shifting preferences. Agricultural economic development, from the personal and local level to the global and industrial level, needs to be balanced with community needs (e.g. food sovereignty, self-sufficiency, etc.) and adaptable with the amplifying environmental challenges (e.g., climate change, ecosystem degradation, etc.). Local, national, and global policies need to support sustainable agricultural economic development, while also addressing future environmental and community impacts on agriculture.

Manuscripts submitted for this Special Issue can focus on any agricultural system in developing or developed nations. Submissions can analyze agricultural food systems from the personal and local level, all the way up to global commodities. Analysis can focus on economics (e.g., statistical models, non-parametric analyses, farm budgets and models, financial statements, etc.), however, the mathematics should be presented in such a way for a multi-disciplinary audience, and part of the discussion section needs to be devoted to policy recommendations. Alternatively, writing can be heavily focused on policy proposals, but economic data needs to be presented (e.g., summary statistical data from prior literature in the introduction).

This Special Issue seeks manuscripts addressing the myriad of sustainable future pathways for agricultural economic development across the world from both an economic and a policy perspective. This can involve agricultural producers, the private sector, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), as well as national governments. Past successful strategies can be applied to new locations, current applied research showcased, and future proposals highlighted. Analyses should address some combination of economics and policy which can be integrated with other academic focuses (e.g., bio-physical modeling, rural sociology, agronomy, etc.).

Sustainable agricultural development can be economically viable while reducing the environmental impact of agricultural activities, and improving local communities. From an economic perspective, sustainability can be achieved through “economies of scale”, by increasing economic efficiency and agricultural productivity, and this can spare land, in the short run reducing the need to convert natural habitats into areas for agriculture. While export commodity agriculture can employ local workers, the diversified food needs of local communities may not be addressed. Agricultural development of both intensive and extensive systems may be more challenging in the future given changes in climate, agro-ecosystem degradation, and diminishing resource availability. Articles published in this Special Issue could address how agricultural systems involving commodities may be less sustainable in the future, how these systems can be designed to be more durable to future shocks, and how sustainability shortcomings of the “economies of scale” approach can be addressed.

Alternatively, sustainable agricultural development can use “economies of scope” where agricultural producers diversify production and input use, using systems-based approaches. While such diversification can be profitable, minimizes environmental impacts, and meets local community food needs, these systems may be challenging, due to the complexity of managing the farmscape like an ecosystem adjusted to reduce input use, selling more directly to consumers, or the lack of available capital. Articles accepted to this Special Issue could address how government policies can be re-structured to support more diversified agriculture, how to improve stability of community supported agriculture (CSAs), or how micro-finance can be used to encourage greater “economies of scope.”

Dr. Aaron K. Hoshide
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainability agriculture
  • development
  • economics
  • policy
  • environment
  • community

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 674 KiB  
Article
Effects of Smart Farming on the Productivity of Korean Dairy Farms: A Case Study of Robotic Milking Systems
by Yong-Geon Lee, Kwideok Han, Chanjin Chung and Inbae Ji
Sustainability 2024, 16(22), 9991; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229991 - 15 Nov 2024
Viewed by 480
Abstract
The Korean agricultural sector faces increasing challenges such as an aging population, labor shortages, and the liberalization of agricultural markets. To overcome these challenges, the Korean government has striven to enhance the competitiveness of agriculture by introducing AI-based technologies to the agricultural sector, [...] Read more.
The Korean agricultural sector faces increasing challenges such as an aging population, labor shortages, and the liberalization of agricultural markets. To overcome these challenges, the Korean government has striven to enhance the competitiveness of agriculture by introducing AI-based technologies to the agricultural sector, labeling this as smart farming. This study estimates farm-level benefits of adopting smart farming technologies, robotic milking systems, in Korean dairy farms. The benefits are estimated by comparing the productivity (i.e., the savings of labor input, increased calf production, and increased milk production) of adopting and non-adopting farms. Our study uses the propensity score matching method to address potential problems from confounding factors, sample selection bias, and the small number of adopters. Our results show that farms that adopted robotic milking systems produced 0.10 to 0.11 more calves per year than farms that did not adopt the system. The adopters also increased milk production by 2.44 kg to 2.88 kg per head/day, while reducing labor input by 0.15 to 0.30 per head/week. However, the reduced labor input was not statistically significant. When the analysis was extended to regard the farm characteristics, the labor input became significant from small and family-run farms. We also found that the increase in the number of calves produced per head was statically significant from small farms, family-run farms, and farms with successors. The increased milk production per head was statistically significant from large farms, farms employing hired workers, and farms with successors. Our findings suggest that the Korean government continue promoting smart farming technologies such as the robotic milking system to increase the adoption rate. The findings can also provide useful information about target markets of this technology, which can be used to increase the adoption rate and ultimately enhance the sustainability and competitiveness of the Korean dairy industry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Agricultural Development Economics and Policy 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 270 KiB  
Article
Balancing Protection of Plant Varieties and Other Public Interests
by Chenwen Wu
Sustainability 2024, 16(13), 5445; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135445 - 26 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1527
Abstract
The interplay between intellectual property rights for new plant varieties and public interests, particularly farmers’ rights, is critically examined within the context of global agricultural practices and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). According to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), [...] Read more.
The interplay between intellectual property rights for new plant varieties and public interests, particularly farmers’ rights, is critically examined within the context of global agricultural practices and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). According to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), World Trade Organization (WTO) members shall establish a mechanism to grant effective protection to new plant varieties. There are two typical compliance mechanisms with TRIPS: the model developed by the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV Convention) and India’s sui generis system. A comparison from the sustainable development perspective is conducted through the textual analysis of the regulations of each model. The results show that the UPOV Convention cannot advance the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals and might have adverse effects. Conversely, India’s sui generis system represents a more balanced approach, addressing the needs of the farmers, the community, and environmental protection alongside those of breeders and benefitting sustainable development. The conclusion advocates for revising the UPOV Convention to incorporate broader concerns, including farmers’ rights and environmental sustainability, to ensure a more equitable approach to the protection of plant varieties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Agricultural Development Economics and Policy 2nd Edition)
19 pages, 296 KiB  
Article
The Impacts and Spatial Characteristics of High-Standard Farmland Construction on Agricultural Carbon Productivity
by Xiayire Xiaokaiti, Hongli Zhang and Nan Jia
Sustainability 2024, 16(4), 1481; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041481 - 9 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1255
Abstract
Agricultural carbon productivity combines the dual attributes of reducing carbon emissions and stabilizing economic growth, and is a core aspect of the new era of low-carbon agricultural development. The construction of high-standard farmland is an important initiative to promote high-yield and high-efficiency agriculture, [...] Read more.
Agricultural carbon productivity combines the dual attributes of reducing carbon emissions and stabilizing economic growth, and is a core aspect of the new era of low-carbon agricultural development. The construction of high-standard farmland is an important initiative to promote high-yield and high-efficiency agriculture, as well as environmentally sustainable development through land improvement in China. However, the impact of high-standard farmland construction on agricultural carbon productivity and its mechanisms is still in the process of being determined. In order to fill this gap, this study aims to construct a theoretical, analytical framework for the impact of high-standard farmland construction on agricultural carbon productivity. Based on the current situation of high-standard farmland construction and the characteristics of agricultural carbon productivity in China, this study used the panel data of 31 provinces, from 2003 to 2017 in China, to empirically examine the effects, mediating paths, and spatial characteristics of the construction of high-standard farmland on agricultural carbon productivity using a double fixed-effects regression model, a mediating-effects model, and a spatial econometric model. The results show that: (1) High-standard farmland construction has a positive effect on agricultural carbon productivity, with a direct effect coefficient of 0.139 after adding a series of control variables. (2) Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of high-standard farmland construction on agricultural carbon productivity will vary greatly depending on the topographic characteristics of the studied area, the level of economic development, and whether it is a main grain-producing area. (3) Mechanism analysis shows that agricultural scale operation, agricultural planting structure, and agricultural technology progress all have partial mediating roles in the impact of high-standard farmland construction on agricultural carbon productivity, with mediating effect coefficients of 0.025, 0.024, and 0.013, respectively. (4) Agricultural carbon productivity has a spatial correlation, and for every 1% increase in the level of high-standard farmland construction, agricultural carbon productivity increases by 0.117%, with a direct effect of 0.074% and a spatial spillover effect of 0.043%. Our study explains the impact effects, mechanisms, and spatial spillover effects of high-standard farmland construction on agricultural carbon productivity from theoretical and empirical perspectives, thus deepening the literature on the relationship between high-standard farmland construction and agricultural carbon productivity, and providing a theoretical basis and practical references for improving agricultural carbon productivity from the perspective of high-standard farmland construction policy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Agricultural Development Economics and Policy 2nd Edition)
Back to TopTop