Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
6.8
3.3
Journals
Sustainability
Special Issues
Organic Pollutants in the Environment: Analysis and Treatment
sustainability-logo
Submit to Sustainability Review for Sustainability Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Organic Pollutants in the Environment: Analysis and Treatment

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Pollution Prevention, Mitigation and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 August 2023) | Viewed by 7274

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Haiming Zhao

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Life Sciences, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Interests: emerging organic pollutants; instrumental analysis; microbial degradation; bioremediation; plant uptake and transformation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Dr. Shaohua Chen

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Integrative Microbiology Research Centre, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Interests: organic pollutants; pesticides; biocontrol; biodegradation; bioremediation; microbial quorum sensing
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Prof. Dr. Lei Xiang

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Life Sciences, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Interests: soil pollution ecology; soil pollution remediation; organic pollutant pollution characteristics; risk assessment; agricultural product safety
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the last several decades, environmental pollution has become a matter of increasing concern due to the high number of both regulated and unregulated organic pollutants that can be present in environments such as soil, water, and air. Residues of these pollutants persist in the environment for a long time and enter the food chain through biomagnification. Despite the evident advances in analytical chemistry, the comprehensive determination and investigation of the thousands of organic pollutants in various environments is still a challenge. In order to efficiently and effectively analyze these organic pollutants, it is very important to develop robust analytical methods with high accuracy and sensitivity, by optimizing pre-treatment and/or instrument parameters. Furthermore, no universal treatment strategy is feasible for the various organic pollutants, because of their extremely diverse physicochemical properties. In addition, the available conventional treatment technologies have inherent shortcomings with respect to applications, design, effectiveness, and economics. In order to overcome the global organic pollution crisis, especially in developing countries, while simultaneously achieving better economic gain, sustainable technologies for pollutant analysis and subsequent treatment are hence of paramount importance. Researchers throughout the world studying this and related issues are invited to contribute their papers in this Special Issue. The aim of the Special Issue is to invite high-quality research and review articles to provide solutions for a sustainable environment using innovative methods or technologies for analysis, and we also invite submissions exploring the latest experimental techniques and up-to-date methods used for treatment in the fields of organic pollution research. Review articles or opinions on methodologies or applications are welcome. 

Dr. Haiming Zhao
Dr. Shaohua Chen
Dr. Lei Xiang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • organic pollutants
  • analytical methods
  • pretreatment conditions
  • environment
  • remediation
  • degradation
  • mechanism
  • metabolites
  • food safety

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 1854 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Biomonitoring Strategies to Assess Performance of a Bioremediation Bioprocess
by Ahlem Mansouri, Mickael Cregut, Sulivan Jouanneau, Chiraz Abbes, Ahmed Landoulsi, Gerald Thouand and Marie-Jose Durand
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10932; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710932 - 1 Sep 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2429 | Correction
Abstract
This study was conducted to propose a suitable set of methods to evaluate the efficiency of two biotreatments. For this purpose, two sets of four 7.5 L bioreactors were followed over 90 days, containing natural sediments from the Bizerte Lagoon (Tunisia) contaminated with [...] Read more.
This study was conducted to propose a suitable set of methods to evaluate the efficiency of two biotreatments. For this purpose, two sets of four 7.5 L bioreactors were followed over 90 days, containing natural sediments from the Bizerte Lagoon (Tunisia) contaminated with 35 mg·kg−1 benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) and 28 mg·kg−1 dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT). One set was biostimulated with N/P and bioaugmented with the indigenous Pseudomonas stutzeri, Cupriavidus metallidurans and Rhodococcus equi, and the other set was only biostimulated. In the effluent, organic carbon decreased from 42 gC·L−1 to 0.2 gC·L−1 for the bioaugmented treatment compared to 15 gC·L−1 for biostimulation. Statistical analyses confirmed a significant difference in BaP concentration after bioaugmention from 35 mg·kg−1 to 21 mg·kg−1 sediment, whereas no difference was found with biostimulation. Considering DDT, biostimulation was more efficient (8.5 mg·kg−1 sediment final concentration) than bioaugmentation (15 mg·kg−1 final concentration). Native organotin and metals were also monitored using bioluminescent bioreporter strains. The bioaugmented treatment brought about a significant decrease in TBT content, to below 0.01 µM, whereas its concentration remained significant after biostimulation. The biostimulation did not alter As3+, Cu2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+ concentrations, whereas bioaugmentation induced a decrease of 1 to 2 log for each metal. At the end of the experimental period, toxicity decreased to 90% in the effluent of the bioaugmented reactors compared with a drop of only 48% for biostimulation, and a significant decrease in mutagenicity appeared for bioaugmention only. Interestingly, not all the strains used in the treatments were maintained, as P. stutzeri and R. equi increased up to densities of 8.3 × 1013 and 5.2 × 1012 DNA·g−1 sediment, respectively, while in both treatments, C. metallidurans decreased down to the detection threshold. Among the different methods used, a restricted monitoring panel of analyses appears essential to follow the change occurring over the bioremediation process: (i) organic carbon measurement reporting all biodegradation events, as well as a specific method to monitor the main compounds; (ii) dissolved N, P, O2 and pH measurements, (iii) a qPCR method to track the degraders; and (iv) measurements of the acute toxicity and the mutagenicity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Pollutants in the Environment: Analysis and Treatment)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 595 KiB  
Article
Environmental Life Cycle Assessments of Chicken Manure Compost Using Tobacco Residue, Mushroom Bran, and Biochar as Additives
by Bangxi Zhang, Tianhong Fu, Chung-Yu Guan, Shihao Cui, Beibei Fan, Yi Tan, Wenhai Luo, Quanquan Wei, Guoxue Li and Yutao Peng
Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 4976; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094976 - 21 Apr 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3942
Abstract
As an environmental management method, the (life cycle assessment) LCA method can be used to compare the differences between various waste treatment processes in order to provide an environmentally friendly and economically feasible method for waste management. This study focused on the reutilization [...] Read more.
As an environmental management method, the (life cycle assessment) LCA method can be used to compare the differences between various waste treatment processes in order to provide an environmentally friendly and economically feasible method for waste management. This study focused on the reutilization of typical organic waste to produce organic fertilizer in southwest China and used the life cycle assessment method to evaluate three aerobic chicken manure composting scenarios modified with three additives (biochar, mushroom bran, and tobacco residue) from an environmental and economic perspective. The results show that the total environmental loads of the optimized treatments using mushroom bran and biochar mixed with mushroom bran as additives were reduced by 30.0% and 35.1%, respectively, compared to the control treatment (viz. chicken manure composted with tobacco residue). Compared to the control treatment, the optimized composting treatment modified by mushroom bran with and without biochar improved the profit by 23.9% and 35.4%, respectively. This work reflected that the combined composting mode of chicken manure, tobacco residue, mushroom bran, and biochar is an environmentally friendly and economically feasible composting process, which is more suitable for the resource utilization of the typical organic waste in southwest China. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Pollutants in the Environment: Analysis and Treatment)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop